/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/01/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

=== daniel0007 is now known as CensoredBiscuit
AndrewMCShould bug 711030 be marked wishlist or opinion? I Think opinion but I would like Bug squad memebers opinions before I mark it.02:04
ubot2Launchpad bug 711030 in software-center "Red stars used for rating may be confusing because of their symbolicism in real world" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71103002:04
paultagAndrewMC: wishlist, IMHO02:05
paultagAndrewMC: it's techincally true02:05
paultagAndrewMC: just really really low priority02:05
AndrewMCpaultag: okay, a bug squad member will have to set that as i am not a member myself.02:06
paultagAndrewMC: that and I'm not sure marking something as serious as govermental oppression should be something marked opinion, but that's a small aside02:06
paultagAndrewMC: I'll take care of it. Cheers02:06
AndrewMCpaultag: thanks :)02:07
paultagAndrewMC: cheers02:07
=== Gero is now known as CensoredBiscuit
=== DrKenobi_ is now known as DrKenobi
evfoolhi evryone10:09
evfoolthe wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO10:11
=== wgrant_ is now known as wgrant
evfoolhi everyone again13:13
evfoolthe wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO13:13
pedro_evfool, yup, looks like a good idea13:14
evfoolI have added it to the planning list, should I proceed then?13:14
pedro_evfool, did you decided a date for it?13:16
pedro_evfool, i was thinking in cleaning rhythmbox this week to follow up with the multimedia area13:16
evfoolI have checked, and 10th of february still seems free13:16
pedro_since we organized one for totem on the previous13:16
pedro_yeap it's free13:16
evfoolok, so Iáll try to take care of the details, and if Iáll have the bugs list and everything set up, I'll notify you13:17
evfoolso far it was just an idea13:17
pedro_evfool, i'll add the date to the planning page and your name next to the bug day13:17
evfoolok13:18
pedro_evfool, btw have a look to the organizing page and if you have any question let me know13:18
evfoolI have checked it13:18
pedro_ok cool :-)13:19
evfoolso far the only one is that it'll be kindof a special hugday (LO/OO), so at least in a comment should it be mentioned that we're checking OO bugs, but LO should be marked as affected as part of 'hugging a bug'13:19
evfoolpedro_^13:20
pedro_evfool, sounds good :-)13:27
evfooliok, thanks for the feedback, I'll contact you if I'll have more questions13:28
bcurtiswx_is there a webkit package to link bugs to for webkit issues? i searched with the LP search upon trying to change package in a bug and i don't see anything14:25
=== evilvish is now known as vish
jibelbcurtiswx_, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit ?14:31
* charlie-tca too slow again. 14:32
charlie-tcaI had the same one14:32
bcurtiswx_jibel, yes i c.  lemme try something else14:32
charlie-tcaKernelBugDay today! Looking at the bugs in "New" status14:48
evfoolfor LibreOffice bug tracking on launchpad the libreoffice or the df-libreoffice should be used?15:09
evfoolwhich of these two projects?15:10
charlie-tcaevfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice15:18
evfooland what should be set in the Also affects field to see that, because only these two appear in the Project search15:19
evfoollibreoffice?15:20
charlie-tcait should be libreoffice15:26
vishevfool: hey.. have you contacted xapanto?15:32
AbhijiTheyyyyyyyyyy15:32
AbhijiTvish, hows yaaa?????????15:32
evfoolvish: no, why should I?15:32
vishevfool: he seems to be doing LibO triage work and might be active upstream as well..15:32
vishAbhijiT: hey.. doing good, and you? :)15:33
vishevfool: let me find his lp id..15:33
AbhijiTvish, fine!! :)15:33
evfoolI didn't know about that, I've just started organizing a bugday for libo to mark as affecting all the bugs from oo which apply to libo too15:34
vishevfool: oops it is "xapantu"15:34
vishevfool: nah.. LibO triage sounds good.. but just mentioning that we could sync with him as well..15:34
evfoolvish: thanks, I'll contact him15:35
vishthanks..15:35
evfoolof course, that's what communication is for15:35
evfoolcharlie-tcaÉ libreoffice is not the libreoffice(Ubuntu) project, when a project is assigned to it15:57
evfoolcharlie-tca^15:57
charlie-tcahuh?15:59
charlie-tca!info libreoffice natty15:59
charlie-tca!info libreoffice15:59
Picihrm16:00
Pici<ubottu> libreoffice (source: libreoffice): office productivity suite. In component main, is optional. Version 1:3.3.0-1ubuntu1 (natty), package size 3 kB, installed size16:00
Pici                  44 kB (Only available for alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 s390 s390x sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 all)16:00
Pici^^ from ubottu16:00
charlie-tcawhy didn't it come here?16:00
charlie-tcaThank you, Pici16:01
charlie-tcaevfool: what is the name then?16:01
evfooli don't really know, that's why I'm asking16:02
Picicharlie-tca: not sure, looking into it.16:02
=== AbhijiT is now known as rakhiwanat
=== rakhiwanat is now known as rakhisawant
charlie-tcaaccording to the package search in launchpad and the bug listing, it is libreoffice16:03
=== rakhisawant is now known as AbhiJiT
Pici!info bash16:04
* vish pokes ubot2 harder16:05
vishbah.. doesnt work that^ way i guess ;p16:05
charlie-tcakick it16:05
PiciI've poked its owner... but I don't see any configuration settings that would cause it to not reply, as it works in pm.16:06
Pici!test16:07
ubot2Failed!16:07
* Pici shrugs16:07
vish!ping16:08
ubot2ping-pong, a fun game for all the family16:08
charlie-tcait did not give me any response16:08
shadeslayer!info kubuntu-desktop16:08
shadeslayerhuh16:08
charlie-tcaprobably just that touch I have, huh?16:09
shadeslayerlooks like only !info aint working16:09
vishah! so it does not hate charlie-tca alone.. ;)16:09
PiciYep.16:10
charlie-tcaevfool: I see 28 bugs against that package. But, it is only for natty, too16:10
charlie-tcagot one we can try?16:10
vishthe main issue would be switching relevant OOo bugs to LibO16:11
evfoolyyep, that is what the next BugDay on 10th of Feb would target16:11
vishor just adding the task and forwarding it to FDO upstream16:11
vishcool!16:11
evfoolthat is why I'm asking what package should be set as also affected on OO bugs16:12
evfoolbecause on the libreoffice package in launchpad there are no bugs : https://bugs.launchpad.net/libreoffice16:12
vishevfool: that is upstream16:13
charlie-tcathat is not the one I gave you16:13
vishevfool: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org16:13
charlie-tcaevfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice16:13
visherr!!16:13
vishyea that one :D16:14
charlie-tcawhich is not the same package16:14
vishyea.. i pasted the wrong link  :)16:14
jpds!info kubuntu-desktop16:14
charlie-tcahm, back to my kernel bugday16:14
evfoolyep, but when typing 'libreoffice' in the package search box to set as also affected only libreoffice and the df-libreoffice are displayed16:14
evfoolso is there no way to set a bug as also affecting libreoffice(ubuntu)[natty] from the launchpad interface?16:15
vishevfool: need not choose release specific, afaik there isnt an option to do it that way.. just use  libreoffice(ubuntu)16:16
evfoolok16:16
evfoolthanks16:16
vishevfool: the release task is when someone nominates it for a specific release and the powers that be approve it ;)16:16
evfoolnow I have to go, thanks for helping16:17
vishnp..16:17
evfoolbye16:17
Pici!info bash16:18
jpds!info dash16:32
vish!bad ubot216:32
ubot2Factoid 'bad ubot2' not found16:32
MH0It seems not replying in PM either...16:32
MH0Is it even loaded?16:33
vishyup doesnt respond in query for me either..16:33
MH0:/16:33
vishwhile the other !factoids seem to work16:34
* MH0 files a #ubunt-bugs bug for ubot2 :P16:36
MH0heh heh heh16:37
jpds!info dash16:38
ubot4jpds: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB16:38
jpdsFixed.16:38
vish!info dash16:38
ubot4vish: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB16:38
vishhmm, odd now it doesnt reply in query.. o.016:39
vishnot that i checked earlier.. Pici mentioned earlier it worked in query16:39
MH0Indeed they did16:42
bdmurrayhey, could somebody running natty confirm bug 710901 for me?17:57
ubot4Launchpad bug 710901 in yelp (Ubuntu) "search not implemented (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71090117:57
charlie-tcareproduced in Xubuntu17:59
charlie-tcayelp in the terminal opens "Desktop User Guide". Typing gedit in the search box hangs it with "FIXME: search_activated" in the terminal18:00
bdmurraycharlie-tca: thanks!  I don't think it hangs it - it just doesn't do anything at all.18:01
charlie-tcahey, you are right18:01
charlie-tcaI can still click things in yelp18:02
charlie-tcahigh importance with regression tags?18:04
bdmurraycharlie-tca: I'd say high and it is tagged regression already18:05
charlie-tcadone18:06
charlie-tcaI hope my comments improved some18:06
bdmurraycharlie-tca: looks good thanks!18:08
charlie-tcaYou are welcome18:09
bdmurraychrisccoulson: have you found out anything about the ff memory issue?19:09
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, not yet, i can't recreate it at all here19:09
chrisccoulsonthe best thing to do for now is report it upstream. in the meantime, i can give you a build that can run inside valgrind19:10
chrisccoulsoni pushed a fix last night which makes it easy to run it in valgrind, but you need a special build for it to work19:10
chrisccoulsonbut, running in valgrind uses even more memory ;)19:11
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, how much memory does your machine have?19:12
bdmurraychrisccoulson: its making work hard as lp ajax stuff stops working19:12
bdmurraychrisccoulson: so I'm happy to help19:12
bdmurraychrisccoulson: about 3 GB19:13
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, i will upload a valgind-enabled build to my PPA tonight19:13
chrisccoulson3GB should just about be enough ;)19:13
bdmurraychrisccoulson: great and is there some documentation about what I should do?19:14
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, there is https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Debugging_memory_leaks19:15
chrisccoulsonbut a lot of that won't be much help, as we turn off all debugging features19:16
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, do you use the proprietary nvidia driver btw?19:16
bdmurraychrisccoulson: nope19:17
chrisccoulsonoh, that's ok then. a few people have pinged me about the issues, all using the nvidia driver19:17
chrisccoulsoni was starting to think there might be a correlation there ;)19:17
chrisccoulsonbdmurray, do you have any extensions installed btw?19:39
bdmurraychrisccoulson: yes, but when I was testing earlier I disabled them and still saw the issue19:40
chrisccoulsonah, ok. thanks19:40
bdmurraychrisccoulson: I was really worried it was  my firefox-lp-improvements19:41
ignarpscan anyone offer a suggestion on how I could help get more attention to this bug ?21:32
ignarpshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/68364021:32
ubot4Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid]21:32
ignarpsit has not had an update in a while.  I have also filed bug #702159 as it effects my bacula-director21:33
ubot4Launchpad bug 702159 in lsb (Ubuntu) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code causing pacemaker to fail monitor cycle (dup-of: 683640)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70215921:33
ubot4Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68364021:33
hggdhignarps, looking21:46
ignarpsthanks21:46
ignarpshggdh, based on your comment.  Does a new bug report need to be filed against lsb-base instead of lsb-base22:00
ignarpsoh that comment was because of the other items22:00
ignarpsthat answers my question if I should add the applications effected by this.22:01
hggdhignarps, yes. The correct package is lsb (the source package). lsb-base is one of the binary packages generated22:20
iktwith the hug day, when does it start? feb 3rd at 12 midnight my time or UTC or GMT?22:22
charlie-tcaikt: your time, the entire 24 hours of Feb 322:23
iktty :)22:24
hggdhignarps, I am unsure of your (assuming you are the OP on the bug, not sure though) logic on the bug, comment 422:33
hggdhignarps, the standard requires us to use the pidfile passed, I am not sure we can fail over to the cases22:34
hggdhignarps, but I am raising the importance\22:34
ignarpsno I am not psi-jack22:46
ignarpsI opened 70215922:46
ignarpsthank you for increasing the importance22:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!