| === daniel0007 is now known as CensoredBiscuit | ||
| AndrewMC | Should bug 711030 be marked wishlist or opinion? I Think opinion but I would like Bug squad memebers opinions before I mark it. | 02:04 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 711030 in software-center "Red stars used for rating may be confusing because of their symbolicism in real world" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711030 | 02:04 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: wishlist, IMHO | 02:05 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: it's techincally true | 02:05 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: just really really low priority | 02:05 |
| AndrewMC | paultag: okay, a bug squad member will have to set that as i am not a member myself. | 02:06 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: that and I'm not sure marking something as serious as govermental oppression should be something marked opinion, but that's a small aside | 02:06 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: I'll take care of it. Cheers | 02:06 |
| AndrewMC | paultag: thanks :) | 02:07 |
| paultag | AndrewMC: cheers | 02:07 |
| === Gero is now known as CensoredBiscuit | ||
| === DrKenobi_ is now known as DrKenobi | ||
| evfool | hi evryone | 10:09 |
| evfool | the wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO | 10:11 |
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| evfool | hi everyone again | 13:13 |
| evfool | the wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO | 13:13 |
| pedro_ | evfool, yup, looks like a good idea | 13:14 |
| evfool | I have added it to the planning list, should I proceed then? | 13:14 |
| pedro_ | evfool, did you decided a date for it? | 13:16 |
| pedro_ | evfool, i was thinking in cleaning rhythmbox this week to follow up with the multimedia area | 13:16 |
| evfool | I have checked, and 10th of february still seems free | 13:16 |
| pedro_ | since we organized one for totem on the previous | 13:16 |
| pedro_ | yeap it's free | 13:16 |
| evfool | ok, so Iáll try to take care of the details, and if Iáll have the bugs list and everything set up, I'll notify you | 13:17 |
| evfool | so far it was just an idea | 13:17 |
| pedro_ | evfool, i'll add the date to the planning page and your name next to the bug day | 13:17 |
| evfool | ok | 13:18 |
| pedro_ | evfool, btw have a look to the organizing page and if you have any question let me know | 13:18 |
| evfool | I have checked it | 13:18 |
| pedro_ | ok cool :-) | 13:19 |
| evfool | so far the only one is that it'll be kindof a special hugday (LO/OO), so at least in a comment should it be mentioned that we're checking OO bugs, but LO should be marked as affected as part of 'hugging a bug' | 13:19 |
| evfool | pedro_^ | 13:20 |
| pedro_ | evfool, sounds good :-) | 13:27 |
| evfool | iok, thanks for the feedback, I'll contact you if I'll have more questions | 13:28 |
| bcurtiswx_ | is there a webkit package to link bugs to for webkit issues? i searched with the LP search upon trying to change package in a bug and i don't see anything | 14:25 |
| === evilvish is now known as vish | ||
| jibel | bcurtiswx_, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit ? | 14:31 |
| * charlie-tca too slow again. | 14:32 | |
| charlie-tca | I had the same one | 14:32 |
| bcurtiswx_ | jibel, yes i c. lemme try something else | 14:32 |
| charlie-tca | KernelBugDay today! Looking at the bugs in "New" status | 14:48 |
| evfool | for LibreOffice bug tracking on launchpad the libreoffice or the df-libreoffice should be used? | 15:09 |
| evfool | which of these two projects? | 15:10 |
| charlie-tca | evfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice | 15:18 |
| evfool | and what should be set in the Also affects field to see that, because only these two appear in the Project search | 15:19 |
| evfool | libreoffice? | 15:20 |
| charlie-tca | it should be libreoffice | 15:26 |
| vish | evfool: hey.. have you contacted xapanto? | 15:32 |
| AbhijiT | heyyyyyyyyyy | 15:32 |
| AbhijiT | vish, hows yaaa????????? | 15:32 |
| evfool | vish: no, why should I? | 15:32 |
| vish | evfool: he seems to be doing LibO triage work and might be active upstream as well.. | 15:32 |
| vish | AbhijiT: hey.. doing good, and you? :) | 15:33 |
| vish | evfool: let me find his lp id.. | 15:33 |
| AbhijiT | vish, fine!! :) | 15:33 |
| evfool | I didn't know about that, I've just started organizing a bugday for libo to mark as affecting all the bugs from oo which apply to libo too | 15:34 |
| vish | evfool: oops it is "xapantu" | 15:34 |
| vish | evfool: nah.. LibO triage sounds good.. but just mentioning that we could sync with him as well.. | 15:34 |
| evfool | vish: thanks, I'll contact him | 15:35 |
| vish | thanks.. | 15:35 |
| evfool | of course, that's what communication is for | 15:35 |
| evfool | charlie-tcaÉ libreoffice is not the libreoffice(Ubuntu) project, when a project is assigned to it | 15:57 |
| evfool | charlie-tca^ | 15:57 |
| charlie-tca | huh? | 15:59 |
| charlie-tca | !info libreoffice natty | 15:59 |
| charlie-tca | !info libreoffice | 15:59 |
| Pici | hrm | 16:00 |
| Pici | <ubottu> libreoffice (source: libreoffice): office productivity suite. In component main, is optional. Version 1:3.3.0-1ubuntu1 (natty), package size 3 kB, installed size | 16:00 |
| Pici | 44 kB (Only available for alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 s390 s390x sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 all) | 16:00 |
| Pici | ^^ from ubottu | 16:00 |
| charlie-tca | why didn't it come here? | 16:00 |
| charlie-tca | Thank you, Pici | 16:01 |
| charlie-tca | evfool: what is the name then? | 16:01 |
| evfool | i don't really know, that's why I'm asking | 16:02 |
| Pici | charlie-tca: not sure, looking into it. | 16:02 |
| === AbhijiT is now known as rakhiwanat | ||
| === rakhiwanat is now known as rakhisawant | ||
| charlie-tca | according to the package search in launchpad and the bug listing, it is libreoffice | 16:03 |
| === rakhisawant is now known as AbhiJiT | ||
| Pici | !info bash | 16:04 |
| * vish pokes ubot2 harder | 16:05 | |
| vish | bah.. doesnt work that^ way i guess ;p | 16:05 |
| charlie-tca | kick it | 16:05 |
| Pici | I've poked its owner... but I don't see any configuration settings that would cause it to not reply, as it works in pm. | 16:06 |
| Pici | !test | 16:07 |
| ubot2 | Failed! | 16:07 |
| * Pici shrugs | 16:07 | |
| vish | !ping | 16:08 |
| ubot2 | ping-pong, a fun game for all the family | 16:08 |
| charlie-tca | it did not give me any response | 16:08 |
| shadeslayer | !info kubuntu-desktop | 16:08 |
| shadeslayer | huh | 16:08 |
| charlie-tca | probably just that touch I have, huh? | 16:09 |
| shadeslayer | looks like only !info aint working | 16:09 |
| vish | ah! so it does not hate charlie-tca alone.. ;) | 16:09 |
| Pici | Yep. | 16:10 |
| charlie-tca | evfool: I see 28 bugs against that package. But, it is only for natty, too | 16:10 |
| charlie-tca | got one we can try? | 16:10 |
| vish | the main issue would be switching relevant OOo bugs to LibO | 16:11 |
| evfool | yyep, that is what the next BugDay on 10th of Feb would target | 16:11 |
| vish | or just adding the task and forwarding it to FDO upstream | 16:11 |
| vish | cool! | 16:11 |
| evfool | that is why I'm asking what package should be set as also affected on OO bugs | 16:12 |
| evfool | because on the libreoffice package in launchpad there are no bugs : https://bugs.launchpad.net/libreoffice | 16:12 |
| vish | evfool: that is upstream | 16:13 |
| charlie-tca | that is not the one I gave you | 16:13 |
| vish | evfool: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org | 16:13 |
| charlie-tca | evfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice | 16:13 |
| vish | err!! | 16:13 |
| vish | yea that one :D | 16:14 |
| charlie-tca | which is not the same package | 16:14 |
| vish | yea.. i pasted the wrong link :) | 16:14 |
| jpds | !info kubuntu-desktop | 16:14 |
| charlie-tca | hm, back to my kernel bugday | 16:14 |
| evfool | yep, but when typing 'libreoffice' in the package search box to set as also affected only libreoffice and the df-libreoffice are displayed | 16:14 |
| evfool | so is there no way to set a bug as also affecting libreoffice(ubuntu)[natty] from the launchpad interface? | 16:15 |
| vish | evfool: need not choose release specific, afaik there isnt an option to do it that way.. just use libreoffice(ubuntu) | 16:16 |
| evfool | ok | 16:16 |
| evfool | thanks | 16:16 |
| vish | evfool: the release task is when someone nominates it for a specific release and the powers that be approve it ;) | 16:16 |
| evfool | now I have to go, thanks for helping | 16:17 |
| vish | np.. | 16:17 |
| evfool | bye | 16:17 |
| Pici | !info bash | 16:18 |
| jpds | !info dash | 16:32 |
| vish | !bad ubot2 | 16:32 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'bad ubot2' not found | 16:32 |
| MH0 | It seems not replying in PM either... | 16:32 |
| MH0 | Is it even loaded? | 16:33 |
| vish | yup doesnt respond in query for me either.. | 16:33 |
| MH0 | :/ | 16:33 |
| vish | while the other !factoids seem to work | 16:34 |
| * MH0 files a #ubunt-bugs bug for ubot2 :P | 16:36 | |
| MH0 | heh heh heh | 16:37 |
| jpds | !info dash | 16:38 |
| ubot4 | jpds: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB | 16:38 |
| jpds | Fixed. | 16:38 |
| vish | !info dash | 16:38 |
| ubot4 | vish: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB | 16:38 |
| vish | hmm, odd now it doesnt reply in query.. o.0 | 16:39 |
| vish | not that i checked earlier.. Pici mentioned earlier it worked in query | 16:39 |
| MH0 | Indeed they did | 16:42 |
| bdmurray | hey, could somebody running natty confirm bug 710901 for me? | 17:57 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 710901 in yelp (Ubuntu) "search not implemented (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/710901 | 17:57 |
| charlie-tca | reproduced in Xubuntu | 17:59 |
| charlie-tca | yelp in the terminal opens "Desktop User Guide". Typing gedit in the search box hangs it with "FIXME: search_activated" in the terminal | 18:00 |
| bdmurray | charlie-tca: thanks! I don't think it hangs it - it just doesn't do anything at all. | 18:01 |
| charlie-tca | hey, you are right | 18:01 |
| charlie-tca | I can still click things in yelp | 18:02 |
| charlie-tca | high importance with regression tags? | 18:04 |
| bdmurray | charlie-tca: I'd say high and it is tagged regression already | 18:05 |
| charlie-tca | done | 18:06 |
| charlie-tca | I hope my comments improved some | 18:06 |
| bdmurray | charlie-tca: looks good thanks! | 18:08 |
| charlie-tca | You are welcome | 18:09 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: have you found out anything about the ff memory issue? | 19:09 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, not yet, i can't recreate it at all here | 19:09 |
| chrisccoulson | the best thing to do for now is report it upstream. in the meantime, i can give you a build that can run inside valgrind | 19:10 |
| chrisccoulson | i pushed a fix last night which makes it easy to run it in valgrind, but you need a special build for it to work | 19:10 |
| chrisccoulson | but, running in valgrind uses even more memory ;) | 19:11 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, how much memory does your machine have? | 19:12 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: its making work hard as lp ajax stuff stops working | 19:12 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: so I'm happy to help | 19:12 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: about 3 GB | 19:13 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, i will upload a valgind-enabled build to my PPA tonight | 19:13 |
| chrisccoulson | 3GB should just about be enough ;) | 19:13 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: great and is there some documentation about what I should do? | 19:14 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, there is https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Debugging_memory_leaks | 19:15 |
| chrisccoulson | but a lot of that won't be much help, as we turn off all debugging features | 19:16 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, do you use the proprietary nvidia driver btw? | 19:16 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: nope | 19:17 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, that's ok then. a few people have pinged me about the issues, all using the nvidia driver | 19:17 |
| chrisccoulson | i was starting to think there might be a correlation there ;) | 19:17 |
| chrisccoulson | bdmurray, do you have any extensions installed btw? | 19:39 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: yes, but when I was testing earlier I disabled them and still saw the issue | 19:40 |
| chrisccoulson | ah, ok. thanks | 19:40 |
| bdmurray | chrisccoulson: I was really worried it was my firefox-lp-improvements | 19:41 |
| ignarps | can anyone offer a suggestion on how I could help get more attention to this bug ? | 21:32 |
| ignarps | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640 | 21:32 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid] | 21:32 |
| ignarps | it has not had an update in a while. I have also filed bug #702159 as it effects my bacula-director | 21:33 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 702159 in lsb (Ubuntu) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code causing pacemaker to fail monitor cycle (dup-of: 683640)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702159 | 21:33 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683640 | 21:33 |
| hggdh | ignarps, looking | 21:46 |
| ignarps | thanks | 21:46 |
| ignarps | hggdh, based on your comment. Does a new bug report need to be filed against lsb-base instead of lsb-base | 22:00 |
| ignarps | oh that comment was because of the other items | 22:00 |
| ignarps | that answers my question if I should add the applications effected by this. | 22:01 |
| hggdh | ignarps, yes. The correct package is lsb (the source package). lsb-base is one of the binary packages generated | 22:20 |
| ikt | with the hug day, when does it start? feb 3rd at 12 midnight my time or UTC or GMT? | 22:22 |
| charlie-tca | ikt: your time, the entire 24 hours of Feb 3 | 22:23 |
| ikt | ty :) | 22:24 |
| hggdh | ignarps, I am unsure of your (assuming you are the OP on the bug, not sure though) logic on the bug, comment 4 | 22:33 |
| hggdh | ignarps, the standard requires us to use the pidfile passed, I am not sure we can fail over to the cases | 22:34 |
| hggdh | ignarps, but I am raising the importance\ | 22:34 |
| ignarps | no I am not psi-jack | 22:46 |
| ignarps | I opened 702159 | 22:46 |
| ignarps | thank you for increasing the importance | 22:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!