[02:04] <AndrewMC> Should bug 711030 be marked wishlist or opinion? I Think opinion but I would like Bug squad memebers opinions before I mark it.
[02:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 711030 in software-center "Red stars used for rating may be confusing because of their symbolicism in real world" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711030
[02:05] <paultag> AndrewMC: wishlist, IMHO
[02:05] <paultag> AndrewMC: it's techincally true
[02:05] <paultag> AndrewMC: just really really low priority
[02:06] <AndrewMC> paultag: okay, a bug squad member will have to set that as i am not a member myself.
[02:06] <paultag> AndrewMC: that and I'm not sure marking something as serious as govermental oppression should be something marked opinion, but that's a small aside
[02:06] <paultag> AndrewMC: I'll take care of it. Cheers
[02:07] <AndrewMC> paultag: thanks :)
[02:07] <paultag> AndrewMC: cheers
[10:09] <evfool> hi evryone
[10:11] <evfool> the wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO
[13:13] <evfool> hi everyone again
[13:13] <evfool> the wiki page for organizing a HugDay suggested that I should ask if I'm not sure on this: would it be ok to organize a hugday for OpenOffice/LibreOffice to check hug the OO bugs to see which of them still apply to LO
[13:14] <pedro_> evfool, yup, looks like a good idea
[13:14] <evfool> I have added it to the planning list, should I proceed then?
[13:16] <pedro_> evfool, did you decided a date for it?
[13:16] <pedro_> evfool, i was thinking in cleaning rhythmbox this week to follow up with the multimedia area
[13:16] <evfool> I have checked, and 10th of february still seems free
[13:16] <pedro_> since we organized one for totem on the previous
[13:16] <pedro_> yeap it's free
[13:17] <evfool> ok, so Iáll try to take care of the details, and if Iáll have the bugs list and everything set up, I'll notify you
[13:17] <evfool> so far it was just an idea
[13:17] <pedro_> evfool, i'll add the date to the planning page and your name next to the bug day
[13:18] <evfool> ok
[13:18] <pedro_> evfool, btw have a look to the organizing page and if you have any question let me know
[13:18] <evfool> I have checked it
[13:19] <pedro_> ok cool :-)
[13:19] <evfool> so far the only one is that it'll be kindof a special hugday (LO/OO), so at least in a comment should it be mentioned that we're checking OO bugs, but LO should be marked as affected as part of 'hugging a bug'
[13:20] <evfool> pedro_^
[13:27] <pedro_> evfool, sounds good :-)
[13:28] <evfool> iok, thanks for the feedback, I'll contact you if I'll have more questions
[14:25] <bcurtiswx_> is there a webkit package to link bugs to for webkit issues? i searched with the LP search upon trying to change package in a bug and i don't see anything
[14:31] <jibel> bcurtiswx_, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit ?
[14:32]  * charlie-tca too slow again. 
[14:32] <charlie-tca> I had the same one
[14:32] <bcurtiswx_> jibel, yes i c.  lemme try something else
[14:48] <charlie-tca> KernelBugDay today! Looking at the bugs in "New" status
[15:09] <evfool> for LibreOffice bug tracking on launchpad the libreoffice or the df-libreoffice should be used?
[15:10] <evfool> which of these two projects?
[15:18] <charlie-tca> evfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice
[15:19] <evfool> and what should be set in the Also affects field to see that, because only these two appear in the Project search
[15:20] <evfool> libreoffice?
[15:26] <charlie-tca> it should be libreoffice
[15:32] <vish> evfool: hey.. have you contacted xapanto?
[15:32] <AbhijiT> heyyyyyyyyyy
[15:32] <AbhijiT> vish, hows yaaa?????????
[15:32] <evfool> vish: no, why should I?
[15:32] <vish> evfool: he seems to be doing LibO triage work and might be active upstream as well..
[15:33] <vish> AbhijiT: hey.. doing good, and you? :)
[15:33] <vish> evfool: let me find his lp id..
[15:33] <AbhijiT> vish, fine!! :)
[15:34] <evfool> I didn't know about that, I've just started organizing a bugday for libo to mark as affecting all the bugs from oo which apply to libo too
[15:34] <vish> evfool: oops it is "xapantu"
[15:34] <vish> evfool: nah.. LibO triage sounds good.. but just mentioning that we could sync with him as well..
[15:35] <evfool> vish: thanks, I'll contact him
[15:35] <vish> thanks..
[15:35] <evfool> of course, that's what communication is for
[15:57] <evfool> charlie-tcaÉ libreoffice is not the libreoffice(Ubuntu) project, when a project is assigned to it
[15:57] <evfool> charlie-tca^
[15:59] <charlie-tca> huh?
[15:59] <charlie-tca> !info libreoffice natty
[15:59] <charlie-tca> !info libreoffice
[16:00] <Pici> hrm
 libreoffice (source: libreoffice): office productivity suite. In component main, is optional. Version 1:3.3.0-1ubuntu1 (natty), package size 3 kB, installed size
[16:00] <Pici>                   44 kB (Only available for alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 s390 s390x sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 all)
[16:00] <Pici> ^^ from ubottu
[16:00] <charlie-tca> why didn't it come here?
[16:01] <charlie-tca> Thank you, Pici
[16:01] <charlie-tca> evfool: what is the name then?
[16:02] <evfool> i don't really know, that's why I'm asking
[16:02] <Pici> charlie-tca: not sure, looking into it.
[16:03] <charlie-tca> according to the package search in launchpad and the bug listing, it is libreoffice
[16:04] <Pici> !info bash
[16:05]  * vish pokes ubot2 harder
[16:05] <vish> bah.. doesnt work that^ way i guess ;p
[16:05] <charlie-tca> kick it
[16:06] <Pici> I've poked its owner... but I don't see any configuration settings that would cause it to not reply, as it works in pm.
[16:07] <Pici> !test
[16:07] <ubot2> Failed!
[16:07]  * Pici shrugs
[16:08] <vish> !ping
[16:08] <ubot2> ping-pong, a fun game for all the family
[16:08] <charlie-tca> it did not give me any response
[16:08] <shadeslayer> !info kubuntu-desktop
[16:08] <shadeslayer> huh
[16:09] <charlie-tca> probably just that touch I have, huh?
[16:09] <shadeslayer> looks like only !info aint working
[16:09] <vish> ah! so it does not hate charlie-tca alone.. ;)
[16:10] <Pici> Yep.
[16:10] <charlie-tca> evfool: I see 28 bugs against that package. But, it is only for natty, too
[16:10] <charlie-tca> got one we can try?
[16:11] <vish> the main issue would be switching relevant OOo bugs to LibO
[16:11] <evfool> yyep, that is what the next BugDay on 10th of Feb would target
[16:11] <vish> or just adding the task and forwarding it to FDO upstream
[16:11] <vish> cool!
[16:12] <evfool> that is why I'm asking what package should be set as also affected on OO bugs
[16:12] <evfool> because on the libreoffice package in launchpad there are no bugs : https://bugs.launchpad.net/libreoffice
[16:13] <vish> evfool: that is upstream
[16:13] <charlie-tca> that is not the one I gave you
[16:13] <vish> evfool: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org
[16:13] <charlie-tca> evfool: LibreOffice is only in natty, but the package for bugs is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice
[16:13] <vish> err!!
[16:14] <vish> yea that one :D
[16:14] <charlie-tca> which is not the same package
[16:14] <vish> yea.. i pasted the wrong link  :)
[16:14] <jpds> !info kubuntu-desktop
[16:14] <charlie-tca> hm, back to my kernel bugday
[16:14] <evfool> yep, but when typing 'libreoffice' in the package search box to set as also affected only libreoffice and the df-libreoffice are displayed
[16:15] <evfool> so is there no way to set a bug as also affecting libreoffice(ubuntu)[natty] from the launchpad interface?
[16:16] <vish> evfool: need not choose release specific, afaik there isnt an option to do it that way.. just use  libreoffice(ubuntu)
[16:16] <evfool> ok
[16:16] <evfool> thanks
[16:16] <vish> evfool: the release task is when someone nominates it for a specific release and the powers that be approve it ;)
[16:17] <evfool> now I have to go, thanks for helping
[16:17] <vish> np..
[16:17] <evfool> bye
[16:18] <Pici> !info bash
[16:32] <jpds> !info dash
[16:32] <vish> !bad ubot2
[16:32] <ubot2> Factoid 'bad ubot2' not found
[16:32] <MH0> It seems not replying in PM either...
[16:33] <MH0> Is it even loaded?
[16:33] <vish> yup doesnt respond in query for me either..
[16:33] <MH0> :/
[16:34] <vish> while the other !factoids seem to work
[16:36]  * MH0 files a #ubunt-bugs bug for ubot2 :P
[16:37] <MH0> heh heh heh
[16:38] <jpds> !info dash
[16:38] <ubot4> jpds: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB
[16:38] <jpds> Fixed.
[16:38] <vish> !info dash
[16:38] <ubot4> vish: dash (source: dash): POSIX-compliant shell. In component main, is required. Version 0.5.5.1-7ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 94 kB, installed size 228 kB
[16:39] <vish> hmm, odd now it doesnt reply in query.. o.0
[16:39] <vish> not that i checked earlier.. Pici mentioned earlier it worked in query
[16:42] <MH0> Indeed they did
[17:57] <bdmurray> hey, could somebody running natty confirm bug 710901 for me?
[17:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 710901 in yelp (Ubuntu) "search not implemented (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/710901
[17:59] <charlie-tca> reproduced in Xubuntu
[18:00] <charlie-tca> yelp in the terminal opens "Desktop User Guide". Typing gedit in the search box hangs it with "FIXME: search_activated" in the terminal
[18:01] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: thanks!  I don't think it hangs it - it just doesn't do anything at all.
[18:01] <charlie-tca> hey, you are right
[18:02] <charlie-tca> I can still click things in yelp
[18:04] <charlie-tca> high importance with regression tags?
[18:05] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: I'd say high and it is tagged regression already
[18:06] <charlie-tca> done
[18:06] <charlie-tca> I hope my comments improved some
[18:08] <bdmurray> charlie-tca: looks good thanks!
[18:09] <charlie-tca> You are welcome
[19:09] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: have you found out anything about the ff memory issue?
[19:09] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, not yet, i can't recreate it at all here
[19:10] <chrisccoulson> the best thing to do for now is report it upstream. in the meantime, i can give you a build that can run inside valgrind
[19:10] <chrisccoulson> i pushed a fix last night which makes it easy to run it in valgrind, but you need a special build for it to work
[19:11] <chrisccoulson> but, running in valgrind uses even more memory ;)
[19:12] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, how much memory does your machine have?
[19:12] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: its making work hard as lp ajax stuff stops working
[19:12] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: so I'm happy to help
[19:13] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: about 3 GB
[19:13] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, i will upload a valgind-enabled build to my PPA tonight
[19:13] <chrisccoulson> 3GB should just about be enough ;)
[19:14] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: great and is there some documentation about what I should do?
[19:15] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, there is https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Debugging_memory_leaks
[19:16] <chrisccoulson> but a lot of that won't be much help, as we turn off all debugging features
[19:16] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, do you use the proprietary nvidia driver btw?
[19:17] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: nope
[19:17] <chrisccoulson> oh, that's ok then. a few people have pinged me about the issues, all using the nvidia driver
[19:17] <chrisccoulson> i was starting to think there might be a correlation there ;)
[19:39] <chrisccoulson> bdmurray, do you have any extensions installed btw?
[19:40] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: yes, but when I was testing earlier I disabled them and still saw the issue
[19:40] <chrisccoulson> ah, ok. thanks
[19:41] <bdmurray> chrisccoulson: I was really worried it was  my firefox-lp-improvements
[21:32] <ignarps> can anyone offer a suggestion on how I could help get more attention to this bug ?
[21:32] <ignarps> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/683640
[21:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid]
[21:33] <ignarps> it has not had an update in a while.  I have also filed bug #702159 as it effects my bacula-director
[21:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 702159 in lsb (Ubuntu) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code causing pacemaker to fail monitor cycle (dup-of: 683640)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702159
[21:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 683640 in spamassassin (Ubuntu) (and 6 other projects) "status_of_proc is returning incorrect error code (affects: 2) (dups: 2) (heat: 81)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/683640
[21:46] <hggdh> ignarps, looking
[21:46] <ignarps> thanks
[22:00] <ignarps> hggdh, based on your comment.  Does a new bug report need to be filed against lsb-base instead of lsb-base
[22:00] <ignarps> oh that comment was because of the other items
[22:01] <ignarps> that answers my question if I should add the applications effected by this.
[22:20] <hggdh> ignarps, yes. The correct package is lsb (the source package). lsb-base is one of the binary packages generated
[22:22] <ikt> with the hug day, when does it start? feb 3rd at 12 midnight my time or UTC or GMT?
[22:23] <charlie-tca> ikt: your time, the entire 24 hours of Feb 3
[22:24] <ikt> ty :)
[22:33] <hggdh> ignarps, I am unsure of your (assuming you are the OP on the bug, not sure though) logic on the bug, comment 4
[22:34] <hggdh> ignarps, the standard requires us to use the pidfile passed, I am not sure we can fail over to the cases
[22:34] <hggdh> ignarps, but I am raising the importance\
[22:46] <ignarps> no I am not psi-jack
[22:46] <ignarps> I opened 702159
[22:48] <ignarps> thank you for increasing the importance