[06:06] Yo, G [06:07] Nginx beneficial to a fully dynamic website? [06:21] Hoggs: hey [06:21] Hoggs: in what way? [06:21] ajmitch: btw, Inspire & WorldExchange are already doing IPv6 trials [08:12] Inspire I would consider. [08:14] Hoggs: No real point if it's completely dynamic. I've never seen a completely dynamic site though. [08:22] hads: I'd consider Inspire too, although Orcon seem decent enough for me atm [08:22] and well, their caps a tad low by comparison, but yeah [08:24] Hoggs: personally, I just use nginx for everything, i.e. no Apache. But I'm not doing anything really demanding. [08:37] G: I read Nginx/FastCGI/PHP is actually a lot slower than apache2+PHP [08:37] not that my site gets a lot of hits or anything [08:38] interesting, makes some sense though [08:38] especially if you are comparing it to apache+mod_php [08:38] Yeah, FastCGI has too much overhead [08:39] now, on the other hand.... [08:39] with fastcgi you can be smart [08:39] memcached? [08:39] Hoggs: wasn't thinking that, was thinking towards the proxy/app server model [08:40] hmm? [08:40] just run fastcgi listeners on the app servers, sans HTTP server, and loadbalance via nginx the fastcgi requests [08:41] too crazy? [08:41] Uhr [08:41] I guess there's nothing wrong with Apache [08:41] :P [08:41] i.e. in a way, run it similar to how some people run django/turbogears/rails etc, [08:42] Hoggs: oh yeah, but I was just thinking in large deployments [08:42] In large deployments it's much easier to shape software around your hosting model as you're usually the developer [08:42] I know some people that have their setup in that sorta model, and just realised, sans HTTP server would be possible w/ fastcgi [08:43] But more of a pain hosting out of the box stuff [08:43] Hoggs: btw, watching the Cricket? [08:43] * Hoggs doesn't reslly follow cricket [08:43] really* [08:44] ahhh getting close according to cricinfo, Pakistan need 27 from 23 [08:58]
    hmm, how do you add an applet to the panel when there's no unused panel to click on? [08:58] You know, I'd really like an answer to that too. [08:58] ol: gaps between icons? [08:58] I always have to move things around, and that's a pain in the patootie. [08:58]
      so it's not just me... [08:59] very small gaps [08:59]
        there don't seem to be any [08:59]
          at best it's a usability disaster [08:59] The need to artificially ensure that there are gaps is a workaround, really. [09:01]
            hmm, i finally got the menu I think i wanted, but add to panel was greyed out [09:07] Hoggs: talking about websites, I just saw this gem on a page not found error page: "This page is intentionally left ugly ;-)" === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant [17:51] morning [18:36] morning [19:21] morning [19:21] another fine Wellington morning [19:28] delightful morning in dunedin [19:28] nice & damp [20:09] morning [20:10] morning [20:23] morning [20:23] nice day up here in auckland too