[06:06] <Hoggs> Yo, G
[06:07] <Hoggs> Nginx beneficial to a fully dynamic website?
[06:21] <G> Hoggs: hey
[06:21] <G> Hoggs: in what way?
[06:21] <G> ajmitch: btw, Inspire & WorldExchange are already doing IPv6 trials
[08:12] <hads> Inspire I would consider.
[08:14] <hads> Hoggs: No real point if it's completely dynamic. I've never seen a completely dynamic site though.
[08:22] <G> hads: I'd consider Inspire too, although Orcon seem decent enough for me atm
[08:22] <G> and well, their caps a tad low by comparison, but yeah
[08:24] <G> Hoggs: personally, I just use nginx for everything, i.e. no Apache.  But I'm not doing anything really demanding.
[08:37] <Hoggs> G: I read Nginx/FastCGI/PHP is actually a lot slower than apache2+PHP
[08:37] <Hoggs> not that my site gets a lot of hits or anything
[08:38] <G> interesting, makes some sense though
[08:38] <G> especially if you are comparing it to apache+mod_php
[08:38] <Hoggs> Yeah, FastCGI has too much overhead
[08:39] <G> now, on the other hand....
[08:39] <G> with fastcgi you can be smart
[08:39] <Hoggs> memcached?
[08:39] <G> Hoggs: wasn't thinking that, was thinking towards the proxy/app server model
[08:40] <Hoggs> hmm?
[08:40] <G> just run fastcgi listeners on the app servers, sans HTTP server, and loadbalance via nginx the fastcgi requests
[08:41] <G> too crazy?
[08:41] <Hoggs> Uhr
[08:41] <Hoggs> I guess there's nothing wrong with Apache
[08:41] <Hoggs> :P
[08:41] <G> i.e. in a way, run it similar to how some people run django/turbogears/rails etc,
[08:42] <G> Hoggs: oh yeah, but I was just thinking in large deployments
[08:42] <Hoggs> In large deployments it's much easier to shape software around your hosting model as you're usually the developer
[08:42] <G> I know some people that have their setup in that sorta model, and just realised, sans HTTP server would be possible w/ fastcgi
[08:43] <Hoggs> But more of a pain hosting out of the box stuff
[08:43] <G> Hoggs: btw, watching the Cricket?
[08:43]  * Hoggs doesn't reslly follow cricket
[08:43] <Hoggs> really*
[08:44] <G> ahhh getting close according to cricinfo, Pakistan need 27 from 23
[08:58] <ol> hmm, how do you add an applet to the panel when there's no unused panel to click on?
[08:58] <zapzupnz> You know, I'd really like an answer to that too.
[08:58] <G> ol: gaps between icons?
[08:58] <zapzupnz> I always have to move things around, and that's a pain in the patootie.
[08:58] <ol> so it's not just me...
[08:59] <G> very small gaps
[08:59] <ol> there don't seem to be any
[08:59] <ol> at best it's a usability disaster
[08:59] <zapzupnz> The need to artificially ensure that there are gaps is a workaround, really.
[09:01] <ol> hmm, i finally got the menu I think i wanted, but add to panel was greyed out
[09:07] <G> Hoggs: talking about websites, I just saw this gem on a page not found error page: "This page is intentionally left ugly ;-)"
[17:51] <ajmitch> morning
[18:36] <ibeardslee> morning
[19:21] <chilts> morning
[19:21] <chilts> another fine Wellington morning
[19:28] <ajmitch> delightful morning in dunedin
[19:28] <ajmitch> nice & damp
[20:09] <ojwb> morning
[20:10] <snail> morning
[20:23] <Atamira> morning
[20:23] <Atamira> nice day up here in auckland too