[01:05] i just got another pm from them. where by "just" i mean 6 minutes ago when my client started connecting and so therefore claimed i was no longer /away, though ive only just actually gotten the ability to see backscroll and type now [01:05] them? you mean hoober? [01:06] lesbooter ?= hoober? [01:06] why do i use 2 ?s? i fail. [01:06] yes. [01:07] hoober, goober, orangecard, OzoneScaredyMan, LesBooter, peronni, circlecrossdev, tartarfoofas, MorganMuffler, cromblight, IKnowWhoIAm, cromblight_, FeetAndCloth, vimber, DrummerBoy38, OzoneScaredyPant, foober, OzoneScaredyMan_ [01:07] wow [01:07] holy ban evasions batman! [01:07] Thats only over the past two weeks or so too. [01:11] I have been banned from the #ubuntu channel [01:13] Are your operators pretending to know the boy? Is this a first impression? [01:13] Could you please start making sense? [01:13] maco, you are a Ubuntu Hall of Famer [01:13] is that sense? [01:13] For example, explain what on Earth you are talking about [01:14] On this earth is Ubuntu. Ubuntu you are a part of. You are a Ubuntu Hall of Famer [01:14] I meant regarding some boy you keep going on about in my PM buffer and in here, a topic which as far as I know was never introduced [01:15] (If he is not currently located on Earth, that is fine too.) [01:15] The only explanation that would make sense is if I never entered #ubuntu-women today [01:16] If I scroll back, I see that you posted a link and were made to leave. What has this to do with me? [01:16] You are a boy in space. Down here on earth the events unfolded differently. I parted and felt no pressure to leave when I did. [01:17] Are you not going to handle the ban in #ubuntu-women? [01:17] Oh, so you did. [01:17] Just as an op gaind +o to remove you [01:17] Good timing! [01:17] Depends. You seem to ban my ips [01:18] Or will you admit I have 1 IP [01:18] If you already have one ban, re-entering the channel is cause for an immediate ban. [01:18] No other misbehaviour is required. [01:18] the laws of ubuntu women are, ban if user is banned anywhere else? [01:19] LesBooter: You've been here before, you're familair with our rules, I'm not going to let you waste the time of another one of our ops. [01:19] No, though if a person is deemed a threat, a pre-emptive ban is permitted in that channel. [01:19] then you aren't capable of seeing the deeming of a person as a threat as a means for a ban [01:19] otherwise you would of just agreed [01:19] In all Freenode channels, rejoining a channel after being banned from it (with a new IP or nick) is known as ban-evading and cause for another ban. [01:20] why did you ban me? [01:20] It can also be regarded as cause for a k-line [01:20] you are incorrect. [01:20] Nicknames and Username and Descriptions are all falsifiable and changable more than once [01:21] There are only like 4 bans in the banlist that are from me, and none of them match this person [01:22] I must be getting slow [01:26] KB1JWQ: Just a heads up for #freenode, this is the same 'Roobet' fellow that was going on about this yesterday. [01:28] I really don't know whats going on with these overflows from here ending up in #freenode, but we're certainly not telling/asking/encouraging them to go there. [01:28] But its only been this guy and Jungli/spicemaster recently... just feels like more than that. [01:38] maco, lesbooter is the person who was being all creepy and naming you as an object of affection in -ot [01:38] with pics of you [01:39] Yes. [01:49] * tonyyarusso must not be cute enough to have a creepy stalker :P [02:15] can anyone help me get flash running i have tried everything, im running an old version of ubuntu, but i got all my repos [02:17] ubuser: This is #ubuntu-ops, for discussion of channel management issues, not a support channel. [02:35] i got banned from ubuntu room [02:35] pretty ghay [02:36] what are ops again [03:56] xangua called the ops in #ubuntu (dsdjf) [05:26] gpc: not to hand, but if he appears in #ubuntu, #ubuntu-offtopic, here, #ubuntu-women, or #ubuntu-devel, he's ban-evading. I do have BT IDs for all of those, if you want them. [05:30] gpc: ps, BT comments support newlines ;) [05:31] gpc: duh, I lied. pisg has a list: OzoneScaredyMan Callico10 MorganMuffler brown_boar TurmptTarp TuskRattle bearblack_ Shoasdf silvercrab circlecrossdev DrummerBoy38 foober cromblight LesBooter Roobet prosper005 [05:35] rww: + tartarfoofas [05:36] * rww nods, is merging in Pici's list now [05:37] He managed to get banned from -devel? That takes effort. [05:38] got a comment from sabdfl, even. he's truly exceptional. [05:38] can you confirm that 10.10 still uses gnome and gdm? [05:39] not for long! [05:41] 31 nicks total is what i got for him [05:41] does that match you guys? [05:41] make that 32 [05:41] sounds right [05:41] I don't see some of these nicks Pici has in my logs at all, either because 1) my logs are spotty before the turn of the year, 2) Pici's in more channels than me. [05:41] I stopped counting at double digits [05:42] what's fubuntu? [05:43] never heard of it [05:44] fluxbox + ubuntu, maybe *shrugs* [05:44] a fedora remix [05:44] wonder if an @merge ban# would be a usefull feature [05:45] from the lovely webupd8 [05:45] where it would merge comments from all ban#'s into one [05:46] I wish stalker.pl had a command for manually merging records [06:03] ubottu: tell omarmt22 about guidelines [06:03] ubottu: tell omarmt22 about codeofconduct [06:04] tell omarmt22 about botsentience :( [06:05] ubottu: tell Hilarie_away about away [06:22] !search xkcd [06:22] Found: girl, bacon-#ubuntu-offtopic, xkcd, prayer [06:22] NOT NEARLY ENOUGH [06:23] someone integrate it into !web2.0. [06:27] bacon? [06:27] candybar of meats [06:28] in that it's disgusting /and/ bad for you! [06:28] omnomnom [06:28] it's also the formaldehyde of meats, because it smells bad. [06:29] http://whatever.scalzi.com/2006/09/13/clearly-you-people-thought-i-was-kidding/ [06:29] !bacon-#ubuntu-offtopic [06:29] I've always considered bacon to be the candybar of meats... http://xkcd.com/418/ [06:29] elky: commiserations on your successful bid to lose even more of your sanity, btw. [06:30] rww, you forget i've been on the ircc before? there's nothing left for me to lose. [06:31] yes, hence the "even more". I figure you can always delve into the realm of negative sanity. [06:31] I'm pretty sure I'm the only one to bid for it really truly knowing what i've volunteered for. [06:31] I suspect Pici had an inkling. [06:32] I think it's a logarithmic sort of thing. [06:32] an inkling is not sufficient [06:32] @random sanity insanity [06:32] insanity [06:32] yup [06:42] h00k: You're supposed to call that factoid as !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!punctuation :( [06:43] rww: :( [08:46] Just gave switch a ten minute tempquiet; recurring issue in many channels. [08:49] KB1JWQ: I had a talk with him yesterday, I'm sure he will continue to be a bit of an issue [08:49] Yeah, I figured I'd let a named op handle it after than ten minute quiet elapses. [08:50] he hasn't crossed the line well enough for plain ban I think [08:51] I would disagree. What I see in the scrollback from #ubuntu seems to be pretty clear trolling. [08:51] KB1JWQ: anyway, thanks for the help (: [08:51] Jordan_U: today? haven't checked todays behaviour [08:53] KB1JWQ: leave the quiet, I will remove it a bit laterm thanks (: [08:54] Tm_T: /lastlog switch for me in #ubuntu: http://pastebin.com/6xmhxajT [08:55] Tm_T: Unfortunately it's an automated thing. [08:58] KB1JWQ: ah, it's ok either way, I'm following his doings now [09:06] Jordan_U: as I have already talked to him, and got no useful results, I rather see him doing one more push after warnings and quiet [09:09] In #ubuntu, fisch246 said: ubottu, this is now my favorite bot after that last statement.. [09:59] Tm_T: Switch has begun again in #ubuntu [09:59] yup, gave him last warning [10:10] and there I was, hoping the remove would keep him out for some time [10:13] he is informed in PM too [11:17] In #ubuntu, erUSUL said: !xy is You're trying to do X, and you thought of solution Y. So you're asking about solution Y, without even mentioning X. The problem is, there might be a better solution, but we can't know that unless you describe what X is. [11:19] Graphy. [12:30] meh, I prefer [12:30] !details [12:30] Please give us full details. For example: "I have a problem with ..., I'm running Ubuntu version .... When I try to do ..., I get the following output: ..., but I expected it to do ..." [12:32] jussi, did you say VB was a good australian beer? [12:33] knome: I like it, yes [12:34] jussi, you are wrong. :P this is almost as watery as the rest :P [12:34] knome: whatever you like :) [12:34] jussi, i would even say i'd prefer fosters, if i could choose one of these served cold. [12:34] jussi, warm, maybe this. [12:34] well, not cooled enough, that is [12:35] fosters is horrible - and you probably lie it because its made here... [12:36] :) [12:37] fosters is much like lapin kulta in terms of drinkability... it goes if it's cool. if it's warm, it's really bad. [12:55] someone from a different channel seems to have a bot logging in #ubuntu - Warrio is the bots name, not sure what our rules on that is [12:56] gord: more details please? [12:57] jussi, its a bot, its logging. thats about all i know. http://soldat.gr:5656/ its generating [12:58] honestly i just don't like the idea of unapproved bots in our channels, they can go wrong which can lead to lots of uncontrolled problems [12:58] bots that don't interfere with the channel (no messaging/noticing) are ok because we can't really enforce anything else [12:58] jrib: thats not actually the case for logbots [12:58] jussi: how so? [12:59] jrib: see the bottom of: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Bots [12:59] i'm basically a log bot in the channel [12:59] jrib: but you arent publishing said logs [13:00] jrib: also, wrt you ban/exception yesterday, did you remember to put a note in the BT? [13:00] jussi: kunwon? [13:01] yes [13:01] I don't think I did, let me do that now [13:02] Back to the bots though, I think it's a waste of time to try to enforce this rule, because you can only "catch" the honest people [13:03] and having the bots log doesn't hurt anyone [13:04] jrib: those who publish the realtime logs, if legit are more than welcome to, we just want to know about it. there are some privacy implications, as well as its against freenode policy to log without permission [13:04] surely against freenode policy to "log and publish" not just "log" [13:04] oh, I wasn't aware that was freenode policy [13:05] i suppose it would be impossible to ban logging, since many clients do that by default [13:06] knome: yes, you are correct [13:06] anyway, Im off. [13:06] have a nice day [13:09] we should have the logs somewhere in #ubuntu according to freenode guidelines [13:09] also, I dislike the goo.gl links :/ [13:10] iirc it's explained in a message when you join the channel [13:10] topyli: you are right [13:11] click-through eula :) [13:14] I'm surprised no one owns ubunt.us [13:15] ubnt.us is taken though [13:16] hmm, .us is cheap [15:58] Please remove the 'New X stack' stuff from #ubuntu+1 topic, and add : "New X.org stack uploaded, known issues: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-February/032378.html" [15:58] thanks [16:20] I guess cdbs doesn't know he has access in +1 [16:25] Ignorance is bliss. === Mamarok_ is now known as Mamarok [20:37] !ping [20:37] fyi: 15:36:07 donvito is a troll from EFnet. Please keep an eye on him. As soon as he's done getting help, he starts his antics. [20:37] ping-pong, a fun game for all the family [20:37] Pici: rumor has it that donvito is a troll from efnet. at least that's what i got in a pm. can you keep an eye on him? i am dealing with a few feet of snow right now [20:37] hahaha [20:37] :P [20:49] ubottu: tell shadaloo about guidelines [21:58] 13:59 -!- barack_osama [~barack_os@adsl-144-134-92.mia.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu [22:48] tsimpson: probationary #ubuntu ops don't have access in #ubuntu+1