[02:45] <zeta-> Where can I find out which hardware/drivers are needed for webgl? I have Intel 945GME :-)
[02:46] <zeta-> That was meant to be :-(
[08:39] <chrisccoulson> fta / micahg - if either of you have any time for SRU verification, moonlight needs testing on all releases
[08:40] <chrisccoulson> i can't really verify that myself ;)
[15:02] <greg-g> heya all, I think I've found an odd bug with Fx4b10 (from the mozillateam ppa) and this webpage: http://2011.beercamp.com/
[15:03] <greg-g> basically, if you go there, scroll all the way in (scroll up to zoom in) and start scrolling back out, it crashes gnome
[15:03] <greg-g> being that it is just CSS, that shouldn't happen
[15:04] <micahg> greg-g: sounds like a video driver bug
[15:05] <greg-g> hmmm
[15:06]  * greg-g tests epiphany
[15:06] <greg-g> well would you look at that :)
[15:07] <greg-g> report it against xorg then, I assume?
[15:11] <micahg> greg-g: yeah, that's probably a good start
[15:24] <chrisccoulson> yeah, ffox crashing X almost certainly isn't a ffox bug ;)
[16:21] <fta> jdstrand, yt?
[16:22] <jdstrand> fta: hey
[16:23] <fta> jdstrand, fyi, new security update of chromium expected in the next few days (v9, so it's also a major update)
[16:23] <jdstrand> fta: ack
[16:26] <fta> jdstrand, pm
[21:43] <fta> jdstrand: ch9 has been released, i'm almost done with it but because the translations regressed (because of a launchpad change), i'll wait for tomorrow's lp translations export to generate the tarball with hopefully the proper translations
[21:43] <jdstrand> fta: ack
[21:45] <fta> jdstrand, i mean, i've updated my l10n script to workaround the lp translation mess. i think it's good enough now (i'm testing right now), but as the lp export happens only once a day (6~7am utc), i'll know only tomorrow
[21:46] <fta> if it takes too long, i can generate the tarball manually
[21:48] <fta> bug 712655
[21:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 712655 in chromium-browser "8.0.552.237 -> 9.0.597.84 upgrade" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/712655
[21:50] <jdstrand> fta: thanks
[21:56] <fta> grrr, it takes 30min to replay a month worth of revisions of the daily lp translation exports
[21:56] <fta> it's huge
[22:23] <fta> jdstrand, I forgot to mention, upstream also bumped: the codecs, gyp and libvpx
[22:23] <fta> gyp is not mandatory here
[22:24] <fta> libvpx, they use 0.9.5xxx (which we have in natty), but iirc, our old 0.9.2 may still work (it will break v10 though, the api changed)
[22:27] <jdstrand> fta: meh. we have 0.9.2 in lucid and maverick. did v10 work before?
[22:28] <jdstrand> the codecs are not a problem
[22:28] <fta> jdstrand, this upgrade is v8->v9. it may still work with 0.9.2 (to be confirmed), but i know for sure that v10 needs 0.9.5
[22:28] <jdstrand> oh, I see, I misunderstood
[22:29] <fta> so we'll have to deal with this issue eventually
[22:29]  * micahg cries
[22:29] <micahg> not too bad
[22:29] <jdstrand> well, not too much uses libvpx in the archive iirc
[22:29] <micahg> libavcodec52
[22:29] <jdstrand> certainly not in lucid, which we added after release
[22:30] <micahg> in maverick at least
[22:30] <jdstrand> hmm, yeah
[22:30] <fta> if we do it this time, we'll be in sync with upstream
[22:30] <fta> otherwise, in 6 weeks
[22:30] <fta> still pre-natty
[22:30] <fta> hopefully
[22:31] <jdstrand> I'm inclined to keep 0.9.2 now, if it works
[22:31] <jdstrand> if not, then we'll have to deal
[22:31] <fta> it's possible to  test right now, the -beta ppa has everything already
[22:31] <fta> i don't have any lucid left here :P
[22:32] <fta> anyone for a quick test? :)
[22:32] <fta> https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/beta
[22:47] <jdstrand> fta: I can try, I was on the phone
[22:48] <fta> i just realized the codecs in there is a bit older than the one upstream ships with v9
[22:55] <Dimmuxx> will h264 still remain in -extra for chromium after h264 is removed from chrome?
[22:56] <micahg> Dimmuxx: no, it's I believe it's being removed in both
[22:57] <Dimmuxx> okay so no browser in linux will support h264 then :/
[22:58] <micahg> Dimmuxx: right, but if Firefox ever gets gstreamer backend support, it could
[22:59] <Dimmuxx> micahg: I guess but isn't that just for fennec?
[23:00] <micahg> Dimmuxx: I didn't think so
[23:00] <Dimmuxx> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422540
[23:00] <ubot2> Dimmuxx: Error: Could not parse XML returned by Mozilla: The read operation timed out (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/xml.cgi?id=422540)
[23:00] <micahg> no, it's in core
[23:01] <micahg> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422540#c231
[23:02] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 422540 in Video/Audio "GStreamer backend for HTML5 video element" [Enhancement,Assigned]
[23:03] <Dimmuxx> yeah I saw that but it just says that they might do it and if it's added will the ubuntu builds be built with it?
[23:05] <micahg> Dimmuxx: TBD
[23:06] <micahg> not having h.264 support anywhere might be a good reason, but then again, we really don't want to push h.264
[23:16] <fta> Dimmuxx, until there's a good reason to diverge, i'll keep following the google choices for chromium.
[23:17] <fta> -extra will stay, it does mp3 and aac iirc
[23:19] <fta> jdstrand, i've updated the -beta ppa with the codecs expected by v9, and it's using vpx 0.9.2 (except on natty)
[23:36] <jdstrand> fta: sweet, thanks. had yet another phone call
[23:36] <jdstrand> not sure why I am so popular lately :P
[23:37] <fta> :)
[23:50] <LLStarks> hey chrisccoulson, will the new gnome-panel support firefox menus?
[23:57] <chrisccoulson> new gnome-panel?
[23:58] <chrisccoulson> LLStarks, do you mean unity?
[23:58] <chrisccoulson> if so, the answer is yes
[23:58] <chrisccoulson> LLStarks, https://code.launchpad.net/~extension-hackers/globalmenu-extension/trunk