[04:05] i'm hoping after the alpha2 image is tested we can make progress on updating the menu for new applications, are there any takers out there? [04:05] ScottL: hey [04:05] i was going to try and take that on [04:05] it's pretty simple to fix and i can walk someone through an example [04:05] right? [04:05] oh, yeah...i forgot about that holstein [04:05] :) [04:05] i'll give it a go [04:06] i'll ping you when im sitting around bored [04:06] should be some of that this weekend i hope [04:06] holstein, i'm not in a huge rush currently, just wanted to make sure someone was lined up for it [04:07] ideally it would be nice to have it completed before alpha3 through [04:07] ScottL: i feel like i can do that [04:07] i remember it not looking too crazy [04:08] yeah, it's really not, once you understand what needs to be done and how it just becomes tedious [04:08] :P [04:08] i start my rpm challenge this week [04:09] i'm lining up the songs now, playing around with them and thinking of more lyrics [04:09] i should start recording by this weekend for it but only have the month of february [04:09] i thought i had missed that [04:09] i've had significant improvement each of the last two years, both quantitatively and qualitatively [04:10] i think this year will not be an exception to that :) [04:10] awesome [04:11] this is kinda why i like doing it...first, because if i don't i'll probably put off recording *anything* all year and secondly, because if i keep doing it i'll get better as well [04:23] i need to also look at the release planning page and see what else is in the queue [04:23] i suppose i also need to file out the team report for january since it will be due february 10th as well [04:24] meeting is on the radar too [04:25] ah yeah, we defintely need that [13:41] good morning [13:42] ScottL, testing Iso now. anything you want me to look at especially? [15:08] ScottL, well, generic tested... quite impressed [15:08] problem is taht pd doesnt like much the 3 + periods of buffer [15:08] installing abogani kernel now [15:47] well quite strange the testing. [16:07] scott-work, having some weird stuff happening on testing [16:07] rlameiro: yeah? [16:08] well, lot of xruns [16:08] even on low latency [16:08] but at first generic run very nice.... [16:09] but as i oushed with a pd patch, a pretty simple one it gives a lot of xruns and cracks on pd [16:09] rlameiro: are you running kernel version 2.6.37? if so it has known problems [16:09] well, i should say i am using 8 channels output... [16:09] there is a whole email about cgroups and not being able to get -rt privileges [16:09] no. 2.6.38-1 [16:09] oh, hmmm that should work then for .38 [16:10] i wonder if the -lowlatency is .38 yet [16:10] there is one ther3 [16:10] there [16:10] i think abogani was going to work on that, don't know if he's got it yet [16:10] there is one on the ppa [16:11] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RealTime#Natty%20Benchmarks [16:11] over here the kernel is .38 low latency [16:11] i've had signficiant instability with my natty installs lately and haven't been testing much, just trying to fix some bugs and leaving my computer on when i manage to get it booted [16:11] scott-work, well, it could be that too [16:12] rlameiro: if you could add your test results to that wiki page that would be awesome [16:12] rlameiro: especially if you are realling loading the comptuer too [16:12] well i need to understand them first :D [16:12] rlameiro: well yeah, that is true :) [16:12] i am documenting some with screenshots for memory purposes [16:13] rlameiro: i say that because so far we have experience comparable performance between -generic and -lowlatency [16:13] rebooting now [16:13] lets see how it goes [16:13] persia mentioned heavily loading the computer during testing [16:13] i made a little project to record all the 8 channels on ardour... [16:14] lets see how it goes [16:14] perhaps his thought was that we would discover a performance differential between -generic and -lowlatency when the computer is loaded heavily [16:15] yeap [16:15] i think so far the tests have been relatively light, i know my original one was [16:15] so i'm really curious to see how your results compare :) [16:16] there is a problem tough [16:16] noone mentioned on the wiki wich architecture are using [16:16] i am testing x64..... [16:17] the xruns are really hard on low latency [16:20] rlameiro: Could you test 2.6.37-lowlatency also, please? [16:21] 12 xruns in 1 minute at 8 ms.... unacceptable... [16:21] abogani, sure :D [16:22] rlameiro: Thanks :-) [16:22] https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1428989/+listing-archive-extra [16:22] i have your ppa already [16:24] ah ok [16:25] abogani, there is no headers for it... [16:27] rlameiro: grab those from previous link [16:34] abogani, it depends on linux-headers-2.6.37.12 not linux-headers-2.6.37.12-lowlatency [16:34] :/ [16:46] well abogani, i will try it later [19:38] persia, did you see the 'Search for possible duplicate bugs when a new bug is filed' checkbox now available under https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source//+edit for any value of ? [19:39] wasn't reported anywhere that I have seen, but I think it was one we discussed before. [19:39] JFo, I didn't, but I'm all sorts of excited that it exists. [19:39] :) [19:39] I thought you would be