[03:26] hi all [03:53] interesting to learn that the gnome people even get rid of theming features though! [03:53] whoops [03:54] that was sposed to be in a PM and was gtk engine murrine dropping scrollbar colour settings [03:57] so if you switched gtk theme you can still change scrollbar colours right? [03:57] and aren't you supposed to be american? :) [04:07] highvoltage: just because i was born here doesn't mean i have to spell like a heathen [04:07] except "tire," because "tyre" just looks silly [04:08] highvoltage: i said "lorry" when talking to an english guy the other day and the americans standing next to us jumped! it amused me [04:08] i told them i codeswitch and if there's an english person, they trump on whether to use english-english or american-english [04:10] Tyre does not look silly! [04:11] maco: You fully switch? For example, 'faucet' -> 'tap'; 'diaper' -> 'nappy' ? [04:11] StevenK: those words tend not to come up so much, but i did ask about all the prams when we went to dinner during UDS [04:12] all the words where i know they say something else, i swap out [04:13] StevenK: and btw, we say tap and nappy here too sometimes. i mean "tap water" is colloquial. nappy is more used when talking to a child though [04:13] its considered baby talk [04:13] maco: Don't tempt me to feel insulted :-) [04:22] where can i find an application who needs to be packaged ? [04:23] search for needs-packaging on bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs [04:25] maco: ok! thanks ! and after create de package what i have to do ? [04:25] virusuy: upload all the pieces of the source package (listed in the .dsc file, including the .dsc) to the bug [04:25] maco: and somewone will check it , right ? [04:26] virusuy: oh actually wait no. thats for new releases of old packages. sorry, upload it to revu [04:26] !revu [04:26] REVU is a web-based tool to give people who have worked on Ubuntu packages a chance to "put their packages out there" for other people to look at and comment on in a structured manner. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU [04:26] maco: cool! thanks [04:37] virusuy: if a package needs packaging, send it up to Debian as well [04:37] virusuy: you should file an ITP up there, if you plan on doing the work anyway :) [04:38] virusuy: after it's in top-notch shape, send to debain-mentors and close out the Ubuntu ITP as well as the Debian ITP [04:38] virusuy: since we pull from Debian automatically [04:38] and ubuntu does just a "sync" from Debian, am i right ? [04:38] virusuy: you are [04:39] crabbytag: cool, actually i cannot find a app to package, can you recommend me one? a easy one :-P [04:39] virusuy: check for RFP ( Request for Packaging ) bugs in Debian, I also think pabs ( Paul Wise ) has a list of cool software [04:40] virusuy: if I had something nifty I liked, I'd just do it myself ;) [04:40] crabbytag: ok! i'll look in debian [04:40] virusuy: thanks! [04:43] crabbytag: i found one .... work time! [04:44] what happend when i found a RFP , and when i go to website, they already have .deb files to download ? [04:47] virusuy: you review what they have, and see if it's under a license you may use [04:47] virusuy: if it is, you base your work on that, and if it's unfit, please start from scratch [04:48] crabbytag: ok [04:48] virusuy: be sure to turn the RFP into an ITP :) [04:48] virusuy: remember to always maintain copyright and clean up everything === crabbytag is now known as paultag [04:49] paultag: oki doki :-D [04:49] virusuy: let me know how it goes :) [05:46] can anyone please explain me this error. http://paste.ubuntu.com/563707/ [05:50] You don't have the Build-Depends installed [05:55] StevenK: Ok, I dont want to install them in my system. but I can install them on my pbuilder-dist any way i can do that? [05:56] Then copy the source package directory inside a pbuilder chroot and run dpkg-buildpackage -S -uc -us from there [05:57] c2tarun: BTW, you shouldn't be using build1 for a version unless it's a rebuild of a Debian package that was sync'd [05:59] micahg: what should i use here then? [05:59] c2tarun: 2.0.6-0ubuntu1 [06:00] micahg: but in changelog it was in build format, why so? [06:00] c2tarun: that was just a rebuild of the Debian import, not something with Ubuntu changes [06:01] micahg: ok [06:01] c2tarun: did uscan/uupdate not set up the right changelog or did you manually set this up? [06:01] W0000T!!!! Packers are the Superbowl Champs!!!!!!! [06:03] micahg: no i downloaded the older version by apt-get and there was no watch file so i downloaded newer version from site [06:04] c2tarun: there's a newer version on mentors.debian.net, maybe you want to coordinate with Debian on this update [06:13] micahg: which file should I upload as a my public key for gpg key? [06:14] c2tarun: there should be instructions on launchpad [06:15] micahg: ya i just saw :) thanks [06:39] micahg: there is a version on mentors.debian.net upper than version in our archives. How can I coordinate with them? [06:44] c2tarun: you could try commenting on debian 609789 about the new version on mentors and the new version upstream, if that doesn't get a response by the end of the week, try e-mailing the mentors uploader and the maintainer in the same e-mail and try to coordinate [06:44] Debian bug 609789 in spyder "spyder: New upstream version" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/609789 [07:18] good morning === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs [09:55] maco, if you don't mind can i ask you some help related to packaging .. i'm stuck at some point [10:24] simar: why not just ask here for everyone to see? [10:24] inquisitive minds want to know [10:25] Bachstelze, no problem .. i mean that would be my pleasure.. [10:25] i'm a bit new to packaging and is trying to resolve this one for dapper https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lighttpd/+bug/209627 [10:25] Ubuntu bug 209627 in lighttpd (Ubuntu Dapper) "lighttpd (security) ssl fix" [Low,In progress] [10:26] i know dapper is out now but that would be good practice for me [10:27] using hardy sources (where bug is resolved) i found that 92_CVE-2008-1531.dpatch contains the code to fix the patch but the problem is that i do not understand the format of dpatch and there is no manual available on Internet [10:27] The connection_state_machine function (connections.c) in lighttpd 1.4.19 and earlier, and 1.5.x before 1.5.0, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (active SSL connection loss) by triggering an SSL error, such as disconnecting before a download has finished, which causes all active SSL connections to be lost. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1531) [10:28] http://paste.ubuntu.com/563767/ contains the patch [10:29] simar: what's the problem ? The patch doesn't apply cleanly to the sources in DApper ? [10:29] Bachstelze, i know how to do that. can i use the same patch and use in dapper sources... [10:31] if it applies cleanly, yes [10:33] Bachstelze, ok .. i will try to apply.. it [10:33] Bachstelze, if you can tell me command that would make my half work done... === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [10:34] i have downloaded the sources of both hardy and dapper and '''dpkg-source -x''' them in separate folders.. [10:36] simar: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/index.php?view=use_dpatch [10:37] simar: basically, copy the patch from the hardy package in debian/patches of the dapper package and try to apply it [10:37] (don't forget to also edit debian/patches/00list to "enable" it) [10:37] Bachstelze, I think i got it.. [10:37] i know that.. [10:38] but after i do that .. then what to do .. [10:39] after that you update debian/changelog, create a package with debuild and see if it fixes the problem === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [10:40] how can i check whether it fixes the problem .. i mean should i use pbuilder or virtualbox? [10:41] Bachstelze, [10:41] simar: you try to reproduce the bug [10:42] pbuilder is just a tool to build the package, you can use it if you want, or just usez debuild [10:42] it's unimportant [10:42] Bachstelze, but i have maverick and i think the bug is already fixed here. I must have to have dapper to reproduce the bug. [10:42] you just need to build the package, no matter how [10:43] then yes, you can use virtualbox [10:43] Bachstelze, can i build the package in maverick..?? without any of its interference.. [10:44] i mean it may get some build-depends from maverick .. may be?? [10:44] simar: yes, you can createz a Dapper pbuilder [10:44] create* [10:46] Bachstelze, ok.. i mean i must build the package in dapper pbuilder and then use VB to test whether the new one removes the bug or not... [10:46] that would be one way to do it, yes [10:46] Bachstelze, but from where can i get dapper iso now.. [10:47] http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/ [10:47] Bachstelze, thanks [10:48] actually [10:48] they are still on releases.ubuntu/com [10:48] .* [10:50] one last thing .. plz help me to install pbuilder for dapper?? or tell other easy way if you know one.. [10:50] I think you can use pbuilder-dist for that [10:51] pbuilder-dist dapper [10:51] ?? [10:51] not sure, I don't use it myself [10:51] I use this .pbuilderrc [10:51] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto#Multiple%20pbuilders [10:52] and env variables (DIST and ARCH) [10:53] Bachstelze, Thanks you very much. I hope now I can do it.. === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === yofel_ is now known as yofel === warp11 is now known as warp10 [13:31] hello! [13:32] renamed a package. I updating my old (installing before renaming) package with apt-get install but it not removed old config files from /etc. I neen properly updating of my old package. How I should write rules file for it? I need to remove old config files (from old-name package) when installing new version of package [13:51] hey guys! is there anybody here? it's so hardy question? or is my english so bad? === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === didrocks1 is now known as didrocks === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [15:55] how can i copy anthing from my home folder in pbuilder-dist environment? [16:11] c2tarun: copy it from outside the pbuilder (the chroot is in /var/cache/pbuilder/build/something) [16:12] actually pbuilder env is in /var/cache/pb.... mine is in ~/pbuilder/ [16:13] c2tarun: pbuilder-dist doesn't set the buildplace, so it presumably still happens in /var/cache/pbuilder/build [16:14] tumbleweed: thanks :) i'll try === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [16:49] if I ship a file in a deb with changed permissions (excluded from fixperms), will dpkg maintain local (statoverride) permission changes? === hanska is now known as dapal [18:58] ari-tczew, hi [18:58] ari-tczew, can i pm you [19:07] simar: hello. sure. === ximion1 is now known as ximion === fosdemlogger is now known as austrialogger === austrialogger is now known as apachelogger [21:55] hi. how i can see what command execute in the postinst and preinst sections when i install my package with apt-get install? [21:57] drizt: add "set -x" near the top of the scripts [21:58] geser: you mean what i should add "set -x" to my .postinst file? [21:59] yes [21:59] thank you. i will try. ... maybe is there is another way to do it? [22:01] what is mean "set -e" ? I have open my .postinst file and seem it on the top. [22:01] If a command exits with a status that isn't 0, the script exits [22:01] ok thank you [22:08] I want to remove obsoletes conffiles. For it i must use .preinst file. I need to see upgrade parameter and if i got it remove old conffiles. Is it true? === tumbleweed_ is now known as tumbleweed [22:16] drizt: looking for this? http://man.cx/dpkg-maintscript-helper [22:17] maybe ... [22:18] thank you. [22:19] damn. after rpm it so hardy for me! [22:20] what exactly are you trying to do? [22:22] i renamed package. [22:23] then ya, you want that page [22:23] after upgrade old package (with old name) i got couple of conffiles (from old and new packages). [22:30] MTecknology: thank you for man.cx now i can use firefox searching to find a manpage! [22:36] drizt: I gave you a link to the page you need [22:36] * MTecknology has to run off