| c2tarun | bug 710347 this package is not in archives I uploaded it on revu http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/schedio can anyone please take a look. | 00:34 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 710347 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] schedio" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/710347 | 00:34 |
| micahg | c2tarun: I'll try to take a look later this week | 00:44 |
| c2tarun | micahg: thanks :) I have to go now, looking forward to your comments, thanks :) | 00:46 |
| AnAnt | Hello | 05:51 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:06 |
| AnAnt | hello | 07:06 |
| dholbach | hi AnAnt | 07:06 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| jmarsden | It looks as though freedesktop.org moved the standards DTD files from www.freedsktop.org/standards/ to standards.freedesktop.org/ and does not redirect. This breaks validation of menu files (eg /etc/xdg/menus/lxde-applications.menu from package lxmenu-data). Should new .menu files reflect the new DTD location? Should existing ones be updated? | 08:00 |
| dholbach | apachelogger, Rhonda: seid ihr auch bei den Linuxwochen in Wien im Mai? | 08:01 |
| dholbach | hallo toabctl | 08:01 |
| toabctl | hey dholbach | 08:02 |
| Rhonda | dholbach: Like all the years before, it's done on my birthday, and I repeatedly told them that it's quite unlikely that I am in Vienna during that time. I'm not sure if my SO planed something for this year, so it might actually be possible, but I just don't know. | 08:09 |
| dholbach | Rhonda, no worries | 08:09 |
| Rhonda | They always wanted me to do LPI exams, that's why they were so bitter about me not being able to be around. But it's not like I haven't (repeatedly) told them about that timing issue, and yet they do it each year again at exactly the same weekend, and ask me again wether I could do the exams. %-/ | 08:10 |
| dholbach | Rhonda, I hope it'll work out next time then | 08:10 |
| Rhonda | In the case there is nothing planed (though, we are moving in march/april and might be busy with unpacking and stuff), I might be around for a nice chat at least. | 08:12 |
| Rhonda | Are you going to give a talk or such? | 08:13 |
| dholbach | yes, I'm planning to | 08:13 |
| dholbach | it's in the week before UDS | 08:13 |
| dholbach | so it makes a lot of sense to stop by on the way from Berlin and also visit a few friends in Austria | 08:13 |
| Rhonda | Where is UDS this time? | 08:15 |
| dholbach | Budapest | 08:15 |
| dholbach | just around the corner :) | 08:15 |
| Rhonda | Ouch. | 08:15 |
| dholbach | ? | 08:16 |
| Rhonda | I so much would like to attend at some point, and actually this might be potential the closest one to go. I fear it won't be possible with my private situation currently. :( | 08:16 |
| dholbach | let's see how things pan out | 08:17 |
| dholbach | there's still quite a bit of time until May 9-13 | 08:17 |
| === bilalakhtar_ is now known as cdbs | ||
| mok0 | I need some detailed information on where app icons should be placed, in what sizes, etc | 10:08 |
| mok0 | ... and how to deal with Tango! theme icons | 10:09 |
| mok0 | Hm, what's wrong with this build-dep: | 10:28 |
| mok0 | swig (>= 1.36), | 10:28 |
| mok0 | it fails even though swig has had that version since karmic | 10:28 |
| Rhonda | What's the complete error output? | 10:29 |
| Rhonda | And the complete Build-Depends line? | 10:29 |
| mok0 | Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), autotools-dev, automake, libtool, | 10:29 |
| mok0 | quilt, libmmdb-dev (>=1.23), libclipper-dev, libgpp4-dev, libssm-dev | 10:29 |
| mok0 | (>=1.1), libgsl0-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, | 10:29 |
| Rhonda | Please use a paste site. | 10:29 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: yep. sorry | 10:30 |
| mok0 | http://pastebin.com/PtvGJ0bH | 10:30 |
| mok0 | rhonda, err message is http://pastebin.com/bR49DXi0 | 10:32 |
| Rhonda | Doesn't look like the complete build log to me, unfortunately? | 10:34 |
| mok0 | Rhonda, you want that? I cut out the relevant line | 10:34 |
| mok0 | http://pastebin.com/DwdDmSx7 | 10:35 |
| Rhonda | It might be that there is more relevant that you consider as such. :) | 10:35 |
| mok0 | (I need to figure out how to make pastebinit use paste.ubuntu.com) | 10:35 |
| Rhonda | um, debhelper 8.0.0ubuntu2? Where is that from? In maverick I see 8.0.0ubuntu1, in natty 8.1.0ubuntu1? | 10:37 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: lucid | 10:37 |
| Rhonda | negative, lucid has 7.4.15ubuntu1 | 10:37 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: I doubt that is important. I added "(>= 1.36)" after swig and it stopped working | 10:38 |
| akheron | lucid has swig 1.3.40-2ubuntu1 | 10:38 |
| Rhonda | You seem to have a strange chroot setup there. What's the sources.list in your chroot? | 10:38 |
| akheron | 1.3.40 is way less than 1.36 | 10:38 |
| mok0 | akheron: I know, which is why I find it strange | 10:39 |
| Rhonda | Well, it might be a hint that your chroot has an issue. | 10:39 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: hang on lemme log on to it | 10:39 |
| akheron | mok0: err, you have swig 1.3.40, you require 1.36 | 10:39 |
| akheron | 1.3.40 < 1.36 | 10:39 |
| Rhonda | mok0: If you log in try to apt-get install swig and see what you get there. | 10:39 |
| mok0 | akheron: ah | 10:40 |
| mok0 | akheron: thank you | 10:40 |
| mok0 | akheron: typo | 10:40 |
| akheron | :) | 10:40 |
| akheron | you meant 1.3.6? | 10:40 |
| Rhonda | ouch, right. 1.36 is higher than what we even have in natty. I'm blind. | 10:40 |
| mok0 | akheron: I mean 1.3.36 | 10:40 |
| Rhonda | But having debhelper 8.0.0 in a lucid build environment is still strange. | 10:41 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: ok, let me check that out | 10:41 |
| akheron | Rhonda: it's in backports right? | 10:41 |
| Rhonda | Please make sure to have your lucid build environment clean. :) | 10:41 |
| akheron | I myself usually use backports at least when packaing my on stuff for older releases | 10:42 |
| Rhonda | akheron: Yes, but backports should only be used when really needed in build environments, thus pulled in by dependencies, not fixed installed there. | 10:42 |
| mok0 | I don't think I'm using that | 10:42 |
| mok0 | backports | 10:42 |
| akheron | Rhonda: debhelper is not installed ina clean build environment | 10:42 |
| akheron | not any version | 10:42 |
| Rhonda | That 8.0.0ubuntu2 has to come from somewhere :) | 10:42 |
| Rhonda | akheron: It is in mok0's. | 10:42 |
| mok0 | rhonda, debhelper is 7.4.15ubuntu1 | 10:43 |
| akheron | debhelper: missing | 10:43 |
| Rhonda | Erm, right. | 10:43 |
| dholbach | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+publishinghistory | 10:43 |
| Rhonda | But I still wonder why lucid would pull in 8.0.0ubuntu2, that looks pretty strange, | 10:43 |
| akheron | true, it's not in backports afaics | 10:44 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: it doesn't pull in 8.0 afaics | 10:44 |
| Rhonda | Then at least the output is confusing and misleading. :) | 10:46 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: Grepping for that line in my stored build logs, it seems it asks for 8.0.0 once in a while | 10:47 |
| mok0 | Rhonda: also in the maverick builds I've done | 10:47 |
| mok0 | Anyways, my swig depends now works \o/ | 10:51 |
| mok0 | Ah, .pastebinit.xml allows you to customize the pastebin site | 10:55 |
| mok0 | That information really ought to be documented in the man page | 10:56 |
| mok0 | Hm. Except it doesn | 11:00 |
| mok0 | t work | 11:00 |
| mok0 | Looks like it's been fixed, but still not in lucid : Bug: 312456 | 11:07 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| apachelogger | dholbach: maybe | 11:57 |
| * apachelogger did not really think about it yet ^^ | 11:58 | |
| dholbach | apachelogger, ok | 12:11 |
| Rhonda | In general, whoever stumbles by in Vienna feel free to bug me and I'll see wether we can meet. | 12:19 |
| === ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === hanska is now known as dapal | ||
| dholbach | who could imagine running a session about some aspect of Debian/Ubuntu packaging? we still have some open slots left for UDW | 16:45 |
| dholbach | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Timetable | 16:45 |
| dholbach | any suggestions? | 16:51 |
| ari-tczew | dholbach: nope | 16:52 |
| dholbach | menesis, how's schooltool coming along? | 17:02 |
| menesis | dholbach: we have a schooltool sprint this week | 17:04 |
| dholbach | aha! excellent! | 17:05 |
| menesis | dholbach: there are some issues that are not solved yet so the main "schooltool" package is not ready. | 17:05 |
| dholbach | menesis, ah ok - there was also something with zope.html that bundled something else - is that resolved? | 17:05 |
| dholbach | I think I mailed you about it back then | 17:05 |
| menesis | but maybe I can upload the other packages in their current state just to get them uploaded, even if they are not installable | 17:05 |
| dholbach | what's missing? | 17:06 |
| menesis | dholbach: I was trying to solve more issues with zope.html (upstream) but not very successful | 17:06 |
| menesis | sorry I haven't replied | 17:06 |
| dholbach | don't worry | 17:06 |
| highvoltage | hey menesis | 17:06 |
| dholbach | if upstream can't solve it and it can be done in the packaging we can still just do it there | 17:06 |
| dholbach | hey highvoltage | 17:06 |
| highvoltage | and dholbach :) | 17:07 |
| menesis | "schooltool" is missing. schooltool.gradebook and others depend on it | 17:07 |
| menesis | I am worried already because time is running out and I have not finished my work.. | 17:07 |
| dholbach | we still made a lot of progress in terms of zope packages :) | 17:08 |
| dholbach | but if there's anything highvoltage and I can do, let us know | 17:08 |
| menesis | dholbach: but with zope.html I would like to leave it as is and solve the versioned directories later | 17:08 |
| dholbach | can you reply to that mail again, so I have it in my inbox and won't forget? | 17:08 |
| highvoltage | menesis: how bad is it? would there be something uploadable in a month from now? | 17:08 |
| dholbach | might be a few days until I get to it | 17:08 |
| highvoltage | getting a FFE just for schooltool at that stage would probably not be a big deal | 17:09 |
| menesis | I would like help with upstart, but first I need to get schooltool into archive with the old init.d scripts | 17:09 |
| dholbach | that shouldn't be a blocker | 17:09 |
| dholbach | there's loads of stuff still using old-style initscripts | 17:09 |
| menesis | yes I don't consider it a blocker | 17:10 |
| menesis | highvoltage: I hope to be able to upload schooltool in two weeks | 17:13 |
| menesis | we are in a sprint now, merging branches to upstream, then I make a release and a new package | 17:13 |
| dholbach | great | 17:14 |
| menesis | one thing is I left out 3 zope packages because they are needed only for backwards compat with existing schooltool databases. | 17:14 |
| highvoltage | menesis: ah good! that still even beats feature freeze then | 17:14 |
| menesis | but I haven't done the work and testing to make sure they are really not needed | 17:15 |
| menesis | maybe I can upload those 3 packages even though I expect them to be removed soon? | 17:15 |
| dholbach | hey blueyed | 17:16 |
| blueyed | Hi dholbach | 17:16 |
| gondoi | is there a preferred way of modifying the debian/changelog, or do I just modify it directly? | 17:31 |
| dholbach | gondoi, try 'dch' (in the devscripts package) | 17:31 |
| gondoi | cool, thanks dholbach | 17:31 |
| dholbach | 'dch -i' to add an empty changelog entry and bump the revision up one | 17:31 |
| gondoi | lol.. yeah, it's right there in the instructions I'm following.. overlooked that step | 17:32 |
| gondoi | sorry | 17:32 |
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| Riddell | could someone explain (again) the difference between ~ubuntu-dev and ~motu? I can never remember which is which. can this guy https://launchpad.net/~sylvestre confirm this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/714562 | 18:34 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 714562 in scilab (Ubuntu) "Sync scilab 5.3.0-final-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] | 18:34 |
| micahg | Riddell: ubuntu-dev is anyone with upload rights I believe, MOTU is universe upload rights | 18:36 |
| Riddell | so how does he get upload rights? | 18:36 |
| iulian | Riddell: Maybe he has limited upload privileges. | 18:37 |
| micahg | Riddell: PPU | 18:37 |
| iulian | Riddell: Per package uploader. | 18:37 |
| micahg | Riddell: he has upload rights for that package, you can use edit-acl.py to check | 18:37 |
| micahg | er, edit_acl.py | 18:38 |
| Riddell | that works, thanks | 18:43 |
| maco | micahg: universe & multiverse | 18:44 |
| geser | yes, sylvestre has PPU rights for the packages he maintains in Debian and scilab is one of it | 18:45 |
| geser | it would be really nice to have a web view for PPU instead of only the LP API | 18:46 |
| devkorcvince | hello any one who wants to be my mentor hehehehe... where can i learn the fastest on contributing? | 18:59 |
| devkorcvince | ooops wrong channel need to go to #ubuntu-classroom | 19:01 |
| blueyed | micahg: where does edit_acl.py come from? Is is available to everyone? | 19:50 |
| micahg | blueyed: lp:ubuntu-archive-tools | 19:51 |
| blueyed | thanks, micahg. I have no use case currently, but this may become handy. | 19:59 |
| micahg | blueyed: it's good for those with packageset upload rights and don't remember if something is in a packageset or not | 20:00 |
| blueyed | There's still no distinction about sponsorship teams (motu vs core-dev) in Launchpad, is it? Like all request for sponsorship get into the same queue?! | 20:01 |
| geser | blueyed: there was in the past but got merged into ~ubuntu-sponsors lately | 20:03 |
| maco | blueyed: they used to be split, but with archive reorg that became silly | 20:03 |
| maco | because core-dev arent the only people who can upload to main. PPU, ubuntu-desktop-dev, kubuntu-dev, xubuntu-dev... they can too | 20:04 |
| blueyed | That's what I mean, yes. But now it's difficult to see for a MOTU what he can sponsor, isn't it? | 20:04 |
| maco | anything unseeded can be done by a motu | 20:04 |
| blueyed | I see. And can you see what's seeded in LP easily, preferably from the sponsor queue? | 20:04 |
| maco | im trying to locate the sponsor queue right now | 20:05 |
| maco | i dont have my bookmarks at work | 20:05 |
| micahg | maco: not true, there is some unseeded stuff in main | 20:05 |
| maco | micahg: thats not how its supposed to work :( | 20:05 |
| maco | but this silly wiki page i found from google stupidly links to lp instead of the sponsor queue when it says sponsor queue | 20:06 |
| micahg | http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ | 20:06 |
| maco | thank you! | 20:06 |
| micahg | sponsorship page still lists universe/main distinctions | 20:06 |
| maco | micahg: motu's domain was supposed to have been redefined to "the long tail of everything not seeded", according to discussions at uds...hmm....dallas, i believe | 20:06 |
| micahg | maco: yes, but that won't happen most likely until the archvie reorg is done | 20:07 |
| maco | micahg: oh that mustve been recently added back. the "origin" is all that was there before | 20:07 |
| maco | i thought archive reorg WAS done | 20:07 |
| maco | PPUs are in place, packagesets are in place...what else is needed? | 20:07 |
| micahg | maco: no, a few more cycles | 20:07 |
| micahg | at least :) | 20:07 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| micahg | maco: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveReorganisation | 20:09 |
| blueyed | I was more thinking about getting the differences from the "Bugs" page of the ubuntu-sponsors LP page. | 20:11 |
| RainCT | Any idea on why valac doesn't get installed in pbuilder? | 20:51 |
| RainCT | (pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: valac (>= 0.9.4~) but it is not going to be installed.) | 20:52 |
| gondoi | I have created a branch patch for SRU in bzr and submitted for merging... | 20:53 |
| gondoi | now what am I missing: | 20:54 |
| gondoi | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/699967 | 20:54 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 699967 in munin (Debian) "Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters" [Unknown,Confirmed] | 20:54 |
| gondoi | just trying to cover my bases | 20:54 |
| geser | RainCT: natty? | 20:54 |
| gondoi | maverick | 20:54 |
| gondoi | sru | 20:54 |
| RainCT | geser: Debian unstable, actually | 20:54 |
| geser | then no, I know only that natty has vala 0.10 and 0.12 which causes some problems | 20:55 |
| geser | RainCT: what happens when you try to install all build-depends with apt-get in your pbuilder? (you might need to add valac and perhaps other packages to the command line to see the real problem) | 20:56 |
| RainCT | geser: It took 0.8.1-2 | 21:00 |
| geser | checking on PTS you need experimental if you want a newer valac | 21:02 |
| RainCT | geser: Oh, right. How could I miss that? :P | 21:06 |
| RainCT | geser: Thanks | 21:06 |
| sebner | geser: would you mind helping fixing flightgear ftbfs? You are tehh expert :) Evidently a linking issue but I couldn't really solve it myself. http://pastebin.com/VHvQmEDk | 21:08 |
| === rmcbride_nb is now known as rmcbride | ||
| grunthus | cyphermox: Just about to start with synaptic bug per your email | 21:47 |
| cyphermox | ah, cool | 21:48 |
| grunthus | cyphermox: Hello, I should say first! | 21:48 |
| grunthus | do I bzr branch as first step? | 21:48 |
| cyphermox | yeah, I'd say bzr branch lp:synaptic | 21:49 |
| grunthus | OK, I still have the directories lying around from when I generated the debdiff. Presumably it would be just as easy to dump all that. The edits were simple with sed. | 21:50 |
| cyphermox | right, if you did the changes directly in file from previously, you probably can just copy the files over | 21:51 |
| cyphermox | just double check after that you only have the changes you really wanted (bzr diff) | 21:51 |
| cyphermox | if I remember your diff right you could also just use that with patch -p1 <yourdiff | 21:52 |
| grunthus | OK, got a slight hitch here with ssh key. | 21:54 |
| grunthus | I need to copy it on to the VM where I'm running Natty. | 21:55 |
| cyphermox | ah | 21:55 |
| cyphermox | grunthus, well, honestly, it's really up to if you want to champion your changes all the way, because I could also apply them for you in a branch here and request a merge, if it's easier for you :) | 21:56 |
| grunthus | I would quite like to give bzr a go first. If I get stuck, then fair enough, you could apply them. | 21:57 |
| grunthus | Would I be right in saying that bazaar is "on the up"? | 21:58 |
| cyphermox | grunthus, you mean in popularity? I would have no idea | 21:58 |
| cyphermox | grunthus, also don't hesitate to ask others for help -- for instance, I'm just about done my work day and have a dinner planned, but I would be back in a few hours | 21:59 |
| grunthus | Sure. I will. Bon appetite. Perhaps see you later, although bed in this time zone is in 2 hrs! | 22:00 |
| grunthus | I'll drop you an email with my progress. | 22:01 |
| cyphermox | cool, we can certainly continue this over email | 22:02 |
| lfaraone | If overriding CFLAGS (to, say, "-O2 -wall") causes a program to break, upstream is doing it wrong, right? | 22:07 |
| geser | sebner: the solution seems to be to move "-lsgio" after "-lOpenThreads" | 22:22 |
| geser | but I didn't look how to get it into the Makefile, just tested it on the command line inside my pbuilder | 22:22 |
| grunthus | Right, perhaps someone else can advise on cyphermox's suggestion to use patch -p1<debdiff ? | 22:25 |
| grunthus | Presumably to apply my debdiff to the bzr checked out branch, | 22:26 |
| grunthus | I would cd to the bzr checked out directory, then run the above patch with full path to the debdiff... | 22:26 |
| grunthus | This relates to bug 706271 | 22:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 706271 in synaptic (Ubuntu) "synaptic network proxy preferences doesn't capitalize "internet"" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/706271 | 22:27 |
| sebner | geser: wow, great. that helps a lot, I'll look into it how to do that in the makefile! :) | 22:30 |
| * sebner hugs geser | 22:30 | |
| grunthus | Hmm. Patch failed, generated a pile of rejects. | 22:35 |
| ari-tczew | geser: around? | 22:46 |
| blueyed | gondoi: I am not sure, but shouldn't you nominate the bug for Maverick, too? | 22:50 |
| blueyed | gondoi: apart from that, the branch/patch looks good, but I cannot ACK/sponsor it. | 22:51 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: if it's bzr branch, set status as Approved | 22:54 |
| ari-tczew | as motu member you can support patches for main | 22:55 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: but it's a SRU. | 22:55 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: not even nominated (which I could do at least, yes) | 22:56 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: it doesn't matter, if you're sure that debdiff/branch is correct with SRU policy, set as Approved commenting like "Looks good, please core-dev for upload" | 22:57 |
| ari-tczew | it works something like patch pilot | 22:57 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: I've nominated it for Maverick now, but cannot even accept the nomination. How should I set it to confirmed now? | 22:59 |
| lfaraone | ari-tczew: people shouldn't review for ~ubuntu-dev unless they are able to upload the package in question. | 22:59 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: bug 699967 | 22:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 699967 in munin (Debian) "Empty list of plugins/services with hostname containing uppercase letters" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/699967 | 22:59 |
| ari-tczew | lfaraone: I know that you're not so much involved in sponsorship last time, so I'd like to say you that we've figured out that MOTU can support sponsors-queue in cleaning up by reviewing patches | 23:01 |
| ari-tczew | I have reviewed a lot of patches in main and there were not any troubles. Just helpful to keep sponsors queue small. | 23:01 |
| micahg | lfaraone: from what I can tell, a MOTU can approve, but teh core-dev uploader should still spot-check | 23:02 |
| micahg | that should be core-dev or uploader | 23:02 |
| lfaraone | ah, okay. | 23:02 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: bzr branch linked to bug is for SRU? | 23:03 |
| ari-tczew | if so, it's wrong | 23:03 |
| ari-tczew | there is no maverick-proposed in d/changelog | 23:03 |
| geser | ari-tczew: yes | 23:03 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I'll ask pm you ;) | 23:04 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: branch says about +upstream_bug_952.patch but node/lib/Munin/Node/Server.pm has been patched directly | 23:05 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: yes, the changelog is wrong. it's meant to be maverick-proposed. @gondoi: <-- | 23:05 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: please describe all issues in comment into branch setting status as Needs-fixing | 23:05 |
| blueyed | ari-tczew: you're right. quite borked. I leave feedback as a comment, yes. | 23:05 |
| ari-tczew | ;- | 23:05 |
| ari-tczew | ;-) | 23:05 |
| grunthus | Hi, I need a little assistance following on from earlier with cyphermox. I have edited changes to my bzr branch, and updated changelog. | 23:07 |
| grunthus | According to documentation, I think I now have to either commit the changes or build source package? | 23:08 |
| grunthus | (bug 706271) | 23:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 706271 in synaptic (Ubuntu) "synaptic network proxy preferences doesn't capitalize "internet"" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/706271 | 23:09 |
| ari-tczew | blueyed: please don't forget about suggesting DEP3 tags in the patch | 23:09 |
| gondoi | blueyed: sorry man, this is my first patch to the ubuntu community :-( | 23:10 |
| blueyed | gondoi: no problem! really. | 23:10 |
| blueyed | gondoi: just do not give up learning :) | 23:10 |
| gondoi | the nomination is what I couldn't figure out earlier.. thought I just needed to say that in a comment | 23:10 |
| gondoi | I don't see a button | 23:10 |
| blueyed | gondoi: please note that you look into DEP3 tags for your patch, although that should hopefully be provided in the patch I committed for Natty already.. :) | 23:11 |
| blueyed | gondoi: the button is "Nominate for series".. third one in the row starting with "Also affects project" | 23:12 |
| gondoi | blueyed: I don't have that button :-( I guess I don't have the right privs | 23:16 |
| blueyed | gondoi: maybe. you are not a member of bugcontrol then even, are you? | 23:16 |
| gondoi | well, I thought I was, but perhaps not | 23:16 |
| blueyed | does not matter then currently. Can you fix your branch? | 23:16 |
| gondoi | well, i'll have to figure out how... | 23:17 |
| gondoi | :-( | 23:17 |
| gondoi | i'll look into the dep3 thing | 23:17 |
| micahg | blueyed: yeah, that was a recent change, I think only bug supervisors can nominate now | 23:17 |
| blueyed | gondoi: ^^ | 23:17 |
| gondoi | :-D | 23:17 |
| micahg | bdmurray: am I right about this? ^^ | 23:17 |
| blueyed | gondoi: dep3 is not important.. as said, I should have either provided it in the natty patch, or if not, it would not make sense to have it in the maverick fix/branch only. | 23:18 |
| blueyed | gondoi: just use the patch instead of patching inline. Feel free to query me, if you have any more detailed questions about this. | 23:18 |
| gondoi | blueyed: sorry then, i'm not sure on what I am fixing | 23:18 |
| gondoi | oh | 23:18 |
| gondoi | so provide the debdiff? | 23:19 |
| blueyed | gondoi: you need to only fix the changelog (add "-proposed" and use the patch instead of editing it inline) | 23:19 |
| blueyed | gondoi: no, edit your branch, then add another commit. | 23:19 |
| gondoi | well, I did use the patch on the src | 23:20 |
| gondoi | i'll add the -proposed | 23:20 |
| bdmurray | micahg: yes bug supervisors can nominate for release maybe uploaders too | 23:21 |
| blueyed | gondoi: yes, that was wrong.. go to your checkout of lp:~bkbox/ubuntu/maverick/munin/fix-for-699967, add 1) the -proposed and 2) revert the change to node/lib/Munin/Node/Server.pm and add the debian/patches/upstream_bug_952.patch file from the natty source instead. | 23:21 |
| micahg | bdmurray: all uploaders are implicit members of bug control | 23:21 |
| blueyed | gondoi: then commit after each change and push it. | 23:21 |
| micahg | bdmurray: if it's only bug control now, we should probably update the SRU docs | 23:21 |
| blueyed | micahg: gondoi is not an uploader and not bug supervisor. Shouldn't anybody be allowed to nominate? | 23:22 |
| micahg | blueyed: I think that changed recently in that we had people randomly nominating creating a lot of noise | 23:23 |
| cjwatson | it was certainly a real issue | 23:29 |
| cjwatson | the nomination queue was basically entirely unusable | 23:29 |
| sebner | geser: hmm, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/63828404/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.flightgear_2.0.0-3ubuntu11_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 23:30 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: show your makefile | 23:30 |
| ari-tczew | (LIBS) | 23:30 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: http://paste.ubuntu.com/564736/ | 23:31 |
| geser | sebner: I don't fully understand the needed order, but I had only success when I only moved the mentioned "-lsgio" and left the other at there place | 23:32 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: LIBS = @LIBS@ | 23:33 |
| ari-tczew | where are links changed? | 23:33 |
| sebner | geser: did you put it at the end or right behind -lOpenThreads? | 23:33 |
| geser | perhaps it's an error in -lOpenThreads that it didn't link with all needed libraries (didn't check yet) | 23:33 |
| geser | sebner: after the -lOpenThreads | 23:33 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: configure evidently | 23:34 |
| sebner | geser: Ok, I didn't try that | 23:34 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: which line? | 23:34 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: various ones but I found the -OpenThreads part, will try that now | 23:37 |
| === blueyed is now known as heh | ||
| === heh is now known as blueyed | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!