[15:09] <nigelb> skaet: hi, got a minute? :)
[15:09] <skaet> nigelb, on the phone, in 30?
[15:09] <nigelb> skaet: yup, sure
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf
=== ogra is now known as Guest60731
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra__
=== ogra__ is now known as ogra_
[17:47] <micahg> skaet: ping
[17:47] <skaet> hi micahg
[17:48] <micahg> hi skaet, it seems that Firefox will be delayed until 2011-02-14, can we still get into 10.04.2?
[17:48] <micahg> same with Thunderbird (Xubuntu)
[17:50] <skaet> micahg,  I think it will need to go out as an update/10.04.3 at that point I'm afraid.   We'll be cutting final images for testing on the 11th.
[17:51] <micahg> skaet: we'll have the actual builds before then, they just won't be published in the archive, but the Mozilla Security PPA, is it possible to pull the packages from there for the images?
[17:51] <jdstrand> I could put them in -proposed if that would help
[17:51] <cjwatson> I can't pull from a PPA for CD images
[17:52] <cjwatson> or rather in principle I suppose I could but it would be a pile of untested code I'd rather not deploy at short notice
[17:52] <jdstrand> heh
[17:52] <micahg> would -proposed work?
[17:52] <ogra_> livecd-rootfs has such code though
[17:53] <ogra_> but i doubt it was ever widely used
[17:53] <ogra_> (StevenK implemented that)
[17:53] <cjwatson> that's interesting but insufficient
[17:53] <ogra_> (PPA based builds i meant)
[17:53] <cjwatson> I would really prefer not to pull from -proposed; it's possible if absolutely no other packages on the images have versions in -proposed
[17:53] <cjwatson> but I'm afraid that's already not true
[17:54] <cjwatson> so sorry, that isn't going to be workable either
[17:54] <cjwatson> (see http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html, there's a new kernel)
[17:54] <jdstrand> once again, thanks mozilla...
[17:54] <micahg> ok, thanks cjwatson, skaet
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
[23:07] <persia> cjwatson, for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-qa-n-testing-different-architectures you said that "Identify full list of subarchitectures from installer" is DONE.  Looking at ubuntu-devel@ and the history of debian-cd, ubuntu-cdimage, and debian-installer didn't show me where.  Could you provide a pointer?
[23:13] <cjwatson> I thought I sent mail for that
[23:15] <cjwatson> Subject: Installer subarchitecture list
[23:15] <cjwatson> Message-ID: <20101213151413.GJ21862@riva.ucam.org>
[23:15] <cjwatson> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:14:14 +0000
[23:15] <cjwatson> To list includes you.  Do you need it rebounced?
[23:39] <persia> Found it.  The me in the To list is an identity at which I rarely check mail.  Sorry for the confusion.
[23:39] <cjwatson> it was tab-completed from ldap
[23:40] <persia> Indeed.  Not entirely your issue.
[23:43] <persia> Rather, not your fault in any way: just surprising to me, and another thing to add to my list of things to fix.