/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/12/#ubuntu-release.txt

charlie-tcaAre you going to kick the xubuntu 10.04.02 images out this weekend?00:20
cjwatsonskaet: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lucid/dvd/current/ looks like DVDs to me00:58
skaetcjwatson, no i386...00:59
cjwatsonskaet: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/lucid/daily/current/ - apologies for the somewhat confusing URLs, they make sense in a twisted way00:59
cjwatsonhuh00:59
cjwatsonfair point00:59
cjwatsonsorry, you did say that01:00
cjwatsongenisoimage: Error: CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb and CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb have the same Joliet name01:01
cjwatsonJoliet tree sort failed. The -joliet-long switch may help you.01:01
cjwatsonNOTE: multiple source directories have been specified and merged into the root01:01
cjwatsonof the filesystem. Check your program arguments. genisoimage is not tar.01:01
cjwatsonmake: *** [bin-images] Error 101:01
cjwatsondear kernel team, your package names are TOO LONG01:01
cjwatson       -joliet-long01:01
cjwatson              Allow Joliet filenames to be up to 103 Unicode characters, instead of 64.  This breaks the Joliet specification, but appears to work. Use with caution.01:01
skaet*wince*01:02
cjwatson'linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic' is precisely 64 characters01:02
* cjwatson tries to divine what the likely breakage might be01:02
cjwatsonwe don't *actually* rely on Joliet much, I hope01:02
cjwatsonJoliet is mostly for readability on Windows01:03
cjwatsonwe actually rely on Rock Ridge on the Unix side01:04
cjwatsonso I think I'm going to switch on -joliet-long just for lucid, unless anyone objects01:04
cjwatsonapw: ^- for future reference, please to be coming up with shorter package names. :-)01:05
skaetbjf[afk], ^^01:07
skaetcjwatson, will we need to rebuild the existing images?  (ie. should I mark them as rebuilding)01:08
* skaet has posted server images01:09
cjwatsonno existing images need to be rebuilt01:09
cjwatsonif they built successfully, they're good from this point of view01:10
cjwatsoncharlieS: Xubuntu lucid images building now01:10
skaetcjwatson,  thanks.  am breaking for dinner now.  will check back later.01:12
cjwatsonfix deployed; lucid DVD i386 should rebuild after the Xubuntu bits01:13
apwcjwatson, as those are 'one off' names ie linked to the abi number i guess we can change them without issue08:18
apwwill start some discussion on kteam as to appropriate alternatives08:19
persiaapw, If you trim the first bit: e.g. linux-bp-modules-... or linux-new-modules-... you'd be safe, and get to keep the fun version tracking bits.09:30
=== Guest95972 is now known as ogra
apwpersia, yep, didn't know we had a limit to worry about10:36
cjwatsonpersia,apw: though I think 'linux-backports-modules' may be in code somewhere.  the later bit would be safer to shorten, if possible11:37
cjwatsonapw: nor did I :)11:37
persiapity.  That part seems the easier to shorten.11:38
cjwatsondrop "compat-" maybe?11:38
cjwatsonor shorten t11:38
cjwatsonit11:38
cjwatsonor wireless -> wl or wifi11:38
cjwatsonthe names are right on the boundary so even a single character shorter would remove the ambiguity11:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!