[00:20] <charlie-tca> Are you going to kick the xubuntu 10.04.02 images out this weekend?
[00:58] <cjwatson> skaet: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lucid/dvd/current/ looks like DVDs to me
[00:59] <skaet> cjwatson, no i386...
[00:59] <cjwatson> skaet: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/lucid/daily/current/ - apologies for the somewhat confusing URLs, they make sense in a twisted way
[00:59] <cjwatson> huh
[00:59] <cjwatson> fair point
[01:00] <cjwatson> sorry, you did say that
[01:01] <cjwatson> genisoimage: Error: CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb and CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb have the same Joliet name
[01:01] <cjwatson> Joliet tree sort failed. The -joliet-long switch may help you.
[01:01] <cjwatson> NOTE: multiple source directories have been specified and merged into the root
[01:01] <cjwatson> of the filesystem. Check your program arguments. genisoimage is not tar.
[01:01] <cjwatson> make: *** [bin-images] Error 1
[01:01] <cjwatson> dear kernel team, your package names are TOO LONG
[01:01] <cjwatson>        -joliet-long
[01:01] <cjwatson>               Allow Joliet filenames to be up to 103 Unicode characters, instead of 64.  This breaks the Joliet specification, but appears to work. Use with caution.
[01:02] <skaet> *wince*
[01:02] <cjwatson> 'linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic' is precisely 64 characters
[01:02]  * cjwatson tries to divine what the likely breakage might be
[01:02] <cjwatson> we don't *actually* rely on Joliet much, I hope
[01:03] <cjwatson> Joliet is mostly for readability on Windows
[01:04] <cjwatson> we actually rely on Rock Ridge on the Unix side
[01:04] <cjwatson> so I think I'm going to switch on -joliet-long just for lucid, unless anyone objects
[01:05] <cjwatson> apw: ^- for future reference, please to be coming up with shorter package names. :-)
[01:07] <skaet> bjf[afk], ^^
[01:08] <skaet> cjwatson, will we need to rebuild the existing images?  (ie. should I mark them as rebuilding)
[01:09]  * skaet has posted server images
[01:09] <cjwatson> no existing images need to be rebuilt
[01:10] <cjwatson> if they built successfully, they're good from this point of view
[01:10] <cjwatson> charlieS: Xubuntu lucid images building now
[01:12] <skaet> cjwatson,  thanks.  am breaking for dinner now.  will check back later.
[01:13] <cjwatson> fix deployed; lucid DVD i386 should rebuild after the Xubuntu bits
[08:18] <apw> cjwatson, as those are 'one off' names ie linked to the abi number i guess we can change them without issue
[08:19] <apw> will start some discussion on kteam as to appropriate alternatives
[09:30] <persia> apw, If you trim the first bit: e.g. linux-bp-modules-... or linux-new-modules-... you'd be safe, and get to keep the fun version tracking bits.
[10:36] <apw> persia, yep, didn't know we had a limit to worry about
[11:37] <cjwatson> persia,apw: though I think 'linux-backports-modules' may be in code somewhere.  the later bit would be safer to shorten, if possible
[11:37] <cjwatson> apw: nor did I :)
[11:38] <persia> pity.  That part seems the easier to shorten.
[11:38] <cjwatson> drop "compat-" maybe?
[11:38] <cjwatson> or shorten t
[11:38] <cjwatson> it
[11:38] <cjwatson> or wireless -> wl or wifi
[11:39] <cjwatson> the names are right on the boundary so even a single character shorter would remove the ambiguity