skaet | cjwatson - Bug #717699 showed up on the iso tracker for 10.04.2, can you have a look? | 06:31 |
---|---|---|
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 717699 in casper (Ubuntu) "Lucid 20110211.1-desktop and 20110211.3-alternate amd64, gfxboot bug (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/717699 | 06:31 |
apw | cjwatson, is that not the bug triggered when the usb device is built on a system which is too far away from the system on the image ? the gfxboot option thingy | 08:17 |
ev | might I kindly ask that someone NEW oem-config-slideshow-ubuntu | 09:31 |
cjwatson | skaet: what apw said. I've duped it | 09:40 |
cjwatson | not a bug in 10.04.2 as such, more a bug in later releases | 09:40 |
apw | cjwatson, is this somewhere that the dreaded hybrid thingy might hep | 09:44 |
apw | help | 09:45 |
cjwatson | yes, but it's not quite that simple either - ev has been wrestling with it | 09:45 |
cjwatson | we still (potentially) have to make some modifications to the image | 09:46 |
cjwatson | ev: done | 10:07 |
ev | cjwatson: thanks bunches | 10:07 |
cjwatson | skaet: lucid DVDs are in place now | 10:55 |
cjwatson | jibel: ^- | 10:55 |
cjwatson | (for i386 too, I mean) | 10:55 |
jibel | cjwatson, thanks, syncing. | 11:01 |
jibel | skaet, there's no upgrade test cases on the tracker ? | 11:02 |
jibel | cjwatson, skaet , xubuntu i386 images failed to boot, with no bootable medium found. | 13:53 |
cjwatson | odd error. can anyone else reproduce that? | 13:54 |
jibel | charlie-tca reproduce that | 13:54 |
cjwatson | it'll be three hours absolute minimum before I can look, as I'd already started rsyncing another image | 13:55 |
cjwatson | perhaps somebody else can track down what's wrwong? | 13:55 |
cjwatson | *wrong | 13:55 |
charlie-tca | bug 718749 | 14:00 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 718749 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu i386 Lucid 10.04.2 images will not boot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/718749 | 14:00 |
cjwatson | not a ubiquity bug | 14:02 |
cjwatson | it's only a ubiquity bug if it actually gets as far as the installer | 14:02 |
cjwatson | (for the record) | 14:02 |
charlie-tca | sorry, I didn't know which package it was for sure | 14:02 |
cjwatson | install dumpet, see what it says for that image | 14:04 |
cjwatson | (dumpet -i foo.iso) | 14:05 |
charlie-tca | desktop image - does not contain an El Torito bootable image. BootRecordIndicator: 2 | 14:11 |
ev | that would do it | 14:12 |
charlie-tca | alternate 386 is the same | 14:12 |
cjwatson | the only obvious thing that might have gone wrong is that it *really* doesn't like -joliet-long | 14:25 |
* cjwatson digs up the build logs | 14:25 | |
cjwatson | oh shit | 14:25 |
cjwatson | + echo -n "-joliet-long " > $N.mkisofs_opts | 14:25 |
cjwatson | > is NOT the same as >> | 14:26 |
cjwatson | sorry folks, mea culpa | 14:26 |
cjwatson | i386 DVD will be affected too | 14:26 |
charlie-tca | Thanks for looking | 14:27 |
cjwatson | thanks for spotting it. will fix ASAP | 14:28 |
cjwatson | rebuilds in progress | 14:29 |
ogra | hmpf, someone edited the cdimage branch directly on antimony | 14:32 |
cjwatson | the branch, or the working tree? | 14:33 |
ogra | /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com shows me a diff | 14:33 |
ogra | in buildlive and publish-release | 14:34 |
cjwatson | yes, those are long-standing, please leave them in place until I figure out what to do about them | 14:34 |
ogra | hmm, and the buildlive change is from last year (!) | 14:34 |
ogra | ah, k | 14:34 |
ogra | if its on purpose i'm fine | 14:35 |
cjwatson | I know about it, at least | 14:35 |
ogra | k | 14:35 |
skaet | cjwatson, which images are slated for rebuild at this time? (looks like some need to be marked rebuilding on the tracker, ubuntu DVD, Xubuntu, ???) | 14:48 |
cjwatson | I'll mark them now | 14:48 |
cjwatson | just Xubuntu plus Ubuntu DVD i386 | 14:48 |
cjwatson | and DVDs weren't posted anyway | 14:49 |
skaet | Xubuntu marked now for rebuild | 14:51 |
skaet | jibel, upgrade test cases added for all except xubuntu, will add those with the new images | 15:15 |
skaet | thanks for catching it. :) | 15:15 |
jibel | skaet, seen that. Thanks. | 15:19 |
jibel | skaet, we have verified all the images excepted server. 2 major issues have been identified so far: bug 718749 (rebuilding in progress) and bug 645818 (not a bug in lucid) | 15:22 |
ubot4 | jibel: Bug 718749 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/718749 is private | 15:22 |
ubot4 | jibel: Bug 645818 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/645818 is private | 15:22 |
jibel | ubot4, you're wrong | 15:22 |
ubot4 | Factoid "you're wrong" not found | 15:22 |
jibel | skaet, I've run the upgrades for K/Ubuntu desktop last week without any problem. | 15:23 |
charlie-tca | argue with the 'bot? ;-) | 15:23 |
skaet | jibel, thanks for the update. Can someone with an existing lucid system confirm they can make usbs/cds and install a 10.04.2 system that way? (ie. not impacted by 645818) | 15:25 |
jibel | sure, we'll find a volunteer :-) | 15:26 |
jibel | skaet, I'll change the notice on the tracker to mention the issue with USBs created on 10.10+, do you agree ? | 16:36 |
skaet | jibel, good idea. :) | 16:38 |
apw | skaet, this lbm filename limit prob, is there a bug for that ? | 16:44 |
skaet | cjwatson, ^^? | 16:45 |
apw | skaet, and can you remind me why this puppy is even on the CD ? | 16:47 |
skaet | apw, its the image from bjf and sconklin we'll be using for 10.04.2 | 16:48 |
apw | skaet, LBM seems a strange package to end up on a CD ever ? | 16:49 |
* skaet puzzles, and goes back to check some IRC logs... LBM? | 16:50 | |
apw | linux-backport-modules-* | 16:50 |
* skaet nods | 16:52 | |
skaet | apw, bjf - [01:01] <cjwatson> genisoimage: Error: CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb and CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb have the same Joliet name | 16:56 |
skaet | [01:01] <cjwatson> Joliet tree sort failed. | 16:56 |
tgardner | skaet, why are LBM packages being seeded on the CDROM ? | 16:56 |
cjwatson | phone, minute | 16:57 |
skaet | tgardner, will let the expert comment. :) | 16:58 |
apw | skaet, the problem is that the meta packages are also too long in some cases, | 16:59 |
apw | so changing their name without a transitional package seems a problem | 16:59 |
apw | but having the transitional package will trigger the same problem | 17:00 |
tgardner | apw, those are _new_ meta packages since Lucid was released, right? | 17:00 |
apw | tgardner, the too long ones are new yes | 17:00 |
apw | in all cases the names which are too long were not in the -release pocket | 17:01 |
cjwatson | the DVD includes practically everything that's in supported | 17:02 |
cjwatson | (technically, supported-common, which includes supported-kernel-common) | 17:02 |
cjwatson | so linux-backports-modules has been there for a long time | 17:02 |
cjwatson | skaet: anyway, the new DVDs haven't finished building yet | 17:04 |
cjwatson | -joliet-long should have worked around all this | 17:04 |
* skaet will keep fingers crossed | 17:04 | |
apw | cjwatson, ok so if we rename shorter which isn't impossible, what can we do about transitional pacages | 17:04 |
apw | packages, to pull people to the new names, is there some way we can exclude those from the CD? | 17:04 |
apw | DVD | 17:05 |
cjwatson | sure, but why don't we just ignore the problem for lucid | 17:05 |
apw | cjwatson, i am all for ignoring it :) | 17:06 |
cjwatson | and then we shouldn't have to worry about it since we don't do transitionals for LBM for lucid->? anyway | 17:06 |
tgardner | cjwatson, correct | 17:06 |
apw | ok as there is no point release maverick we only have to worry about natty | 17:06 |
apw | and we can fix these names before we do lbm for there | 17:06 |
cjwatson | we can just make sure that package names are unique in the first 64 characters in the future | 17:06 |
cjwatson | I only applied the debian-cd change for lucid i386, so it'll blow up on us in the future again if we violate that | 17:07 |
cjwatson | (and TBH, it may not be a massive problem as Joliet is just for Windows compat, but we should probably be a little careful in case we happen to change something that might affect Wubi - this shouldn't, though) | 17:07 |
apw | cjwatson, cool | 17:07 |
tgardner | cjwatson, we'll take steps to correct the meta package names for Natty and announce on ubuntu-devel, etc | 17:08 |
apw | cjwatson, is there an LP bug for this puppy? | 17:08 |
cjwatson | doesn't look like it | 17:08 |
cjwatson | I didn't mention one in the debian-cd commit message, anyway | 17:08 |
apw | cjwatson, ok don't think we need one just wanted to hoover it up if it was there | 17:08 |
skaet | apw, ack | 17:16 |
apw | skaet, so i think we have a plan... do nothing and don't mess up natty | 17:16 |
skaet | apw, heh, "do nothing" seems a bit ambiguous. I read it as no change for lucid, email to u-devel about 64 char restriction so we don't mess natty. ;) | 17:31 |
apw | yeah do nothing for existing releases, email out a warning for natty, and then get natty right | 17:32 |
skaet | :) | 17:32 |
cjwatson | since this is the first time it's bitten us in 6+ years, I'm not desperately worried about it being a pervasive problem | 17:33 |
apw | cjwatson, yeah, though it is always that annoying kernel team pushing the boundaries | 17:36 |
tgardner | apw, I pushed a patch to ubuntu-natty-meta that sets the format for future LBM compat-wireless package names | 17:43 |
apw | tgardner, you are a star | 17:43 |
tgardner | apw, which reminds me, we need to upload an LBM soon just as a placeholder or we'll end up having to write a MIR after the fact. | 17:46 |
apw | tgardner, ok ... what do we have which it would produce | 17:46 |
tgardner | apw, its always empty to begin with. | 17:46 |
apw | no compat wiress, no also, i guess smb's input might exist | 17:46 |
tgardner | I guess, if it hasn't gone upstream | 17:47 |
apw | if we didn't have to bump abi on all of these packages, it owuld be nice for them to be separate source | 17:47 |
tgardner | apw, don't go there :) way too much work. | 17:48 |
apw | yeah i konw, well unless we could make them dkms packages | 17:48 |
apw | we have 11.10 to think about that for | 17:49 |
Riddell | cjwatson: I removed a language pack from kubuntu lucid live if you want to respin it to stop oversizing | 17:49 |
skaet | cjwatson, pitti, for the release change log, should it be since 10.04.1 or since 10.04 - what's the precedent? | 17:49 |
cjwatson | since 10.04.1 | 17:50 |
skaet | cjwatson, thanks | 17:51 |
cjwatson | Xubuntu reposted | 17:52 |
charlie-tca | thanks | 17:52 |
cjwatson | er, oops, wrong version | 17:52 |
cjwatson | not December yet | 17:53 |
cjwatson | ok, fixed, and Ubuntu DVDs posted | 17:53 |
cjwatson | Riddell: ok, thanks - shall I just respin i386, since that's the only one affected? | 17:53 |
Riddell | cjwatson: yes | 17:54 |
cjwatson | ok, respinning | 17:55 |
* skaet -> lunch, biab | 18:10 | |
charlie-tca | Xubuntu amd64 desktop image should be okay now, did not resize the ppc images | 18:23 |
charlie-tca | Can respin that image only, please. | 18:25 |
cjwatson | to clarify: respin Xubuntu desktop amd64? | 18:26 |
charlie-tca | please. It should no longer be oversize | 18:26 |
cjwatson | Riddell: Kubuntu still oversized | 18:26 |
* skaet back | 18:47 | |
marjo | skaet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/645818 | 20:39 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "10.04.1 image created in Maverick does not boot in my Dell Mini9 (affects: 58) (dups: 4) (heat: 178)" [Critical,Triaged] | 20:39 |
skaet | marjo, yes? jibel has documented workaround on isotracker. | 20:40 |
marjo | skaet: ack | 20:40 |
marjo | skaet: just FYI, per jibel's request, I created a 10.04.2 bootable USB with usb-creator-gtk on Lucid. I was able to boot to a live session with this USB image. | 20:42 |
marjo | System that booted is an Acer Aspire One Model ZA3. | 20:42 |
skaet | marjo, excellent thanks - good to know. :) | 20:42 |
ScottK | skaet: But the bug was for an image created on Maverick, not an image created on Lucid? | 20:48 |
skaet | ScottK, yes, I plan on marking it invalid, after I put out the release notes. Just wanted it to show up so it didn't get overlooked. | 20:49 |
skaet | I put a comment in the bug to that effect. | 20:49 |
ScottK | Ah. I see. | 20:50 |
cjwatson | skaet: please don't mark the bug invalid for natty | 21:01 |
cjwatson | we still want to figure something out for that - it's just hard | 21:01 |
cjwatson | (and maverick too) | 21:01 |
skaet | cjwatson, ack, was just planning on it for lucid | 21:08 |
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk] |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!