/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/14/#ubuntu-release.txt

skaetcjwatson - Bug #717699 showed up on the iso tracker for 10.04.2, can you have a look?06:31
ubot4Launchpad bug 717699 in casper (Ubuntu) "Lucid 20110211.1-desktop and 20110211.3-alternate amd64, gfxboot bug (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71769906:31
apwcjwatson, is that not the bug triggered when the usb device is built on a system which is too far away from the system on the image ?  the gfxboot option thingy08:17
evmight I kindly ask that someone NEW oem-config-slideshow-ubuntu09:31
cjwatsonskaet: what apw said.  I've duped it09:40
cjwatsonnot a bug in 10.04.2 as such, more a bug in later releases09:40
apwcjwatson, is this somewhere that the dreaded hybrid thingy might hep09:44
apwhelp09:45
cjwatsonyes, but it's not quite that simple either - ev has been wrestling with it09:45
cjwatsonwe still (potentially) have to make some modifications to the image09:46
cjwatsonev: done10:07
evcjwatson: thanks bunches10:07
cjwatsonskaet: lucid DVDs are in place now10:55
cjwatsonjibel: ^-10:55
cjwatson(for i386 too, I mean)10:55
jibelcjwatson, thanks, syncing.11:01
jibelskaet, there's no upgrade test cases on the tracker ?11:02
jibelcjwatson, skaet , xubuntu i386 images failed to boot, with no bootable medium found.13:53
cjwatsonodd error.  can anyone else reproduce that?13:54
jibelcharlie-tca reproduce that13:54
cjwatsonit'll be three hours absolute minimum before I can look, as I'd already started rsyncing another image13:55
cjwatsonperhaps somebody else can track down what's wrwong?13:55
cjwatson*wrong13:55
charlie-tcabug 71874914:00
ubot4Launchpad bug 718749 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu i386 Lucid 10.04.2 images will not boot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71874914:00
cjwatsonnot a ubiquity bug14:02
cjwatsonit's only a ubiquity bug if it actually gets as far as the installer14:02
cjwatson(for the record)14:02
charlie-tcasorry, I didn't know which package it was for sure14:02
cjwatsoninstall dumpet, see what it says for that image14:04
cjwatson(dumpet -i foo.iso)14:05
charlie-tcadesktop image - does not contain an El Torito bootable image. BootRecordIndicator: 214:11
evthat would do it14:12
charlie-tcaalternate 386 is the same14:12
cjwatsonthe only obvious thing that might have gone wrong is that it *really* doesn't like -joliet-long14:25
* cjwatson digs up the build logs14:25
cjwatsonoh shit14:25
cjwatson+    echo -n "-joliet-long " > $N.mkisofs_opts14:25
cjwatson> is NOT the same as >>14:26
cjwatsonsorry folks, mea culpa14:26
cjwatsoni386 DVD will be affected too14:26
charlie-tcaThanks for looking14:27
cjwatsonthanks for spotting it.  will fix ASAP14:28
cjwatsonrebuilds in progress14:29
ograhmpf, someone edited the cdimage branch directly on antimony14:32
cjwatsonthe branch, or the working tree?14:33
ogra /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com shows me a diff14:33
ograin buildlive and publish-release14:34
cjwatsonyes, those are long-standing, please leave them in place until I figure out what to do about them14:34
ograhmm, and the buildlive change is from last year (!)14:34
ograah, k14:34
ograif its on purpose i'm fine14:35
cjwatsonI know about it, at least14:35
ograk14:35
skaetcjwatson, which images are slated for rebuild at this time?  (looks like some need to be marked rebuilding on the tracker, ubuntu DVD, Xubuntu, ???)14:48
cjwatsonI'll mark them now14:48
cjwatsonjust Xubuntu plus Ubuntu DVD i38614:48
cjwatsonand DVDs weren't posted anyway14:49
skaetXubuntu marked now for rebuild14:51
skaetjibel, upgrade test cases added for all except xubuntu,  will add those with the new images15:15
skaetthanks for catching it.  :)15:15
jibelskaet, seen that. Thanks.15:19
jibelskaet, we have verified all the images excepted server. 2 major issues have been identified so far: bug 718749 (rebuilding in progress) and bug 645818 (not a bug in lucid)15:22
ubot4jibel: Bug 718749 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/718749 is private15:22
ubot4jibel: Bug 645818 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/645818 is private15:22
jibelubot4, you're wrong15:22
ubot4Factoid "you're wrong" not found15:22
jibelskaet, I've run the upgrades for K/Ubuntu desktop last week without any problem.15:23
charlie-tcaargue with the 'bot? ;-)15:23
skaetjibel, thanks for the update.   Can someone with an existing lucid system confirm they can make usbs/cds and install a 10.04.2 system that way?  (ie. not impacted by 645818)15:25
jibelsure, we'll find a volunteer :-)15:26
jibelskaet, I'll change the notice on the tracker to mention the issue with USBs created on 10.10+, do you agree ?16:36
skaetjibel,  good idea.  :)16:38
apwskaet, this lbm filename limit prob, is there a bug for that ?16:44
skaetcjwatson, ^^?16:45
apwskaet, and can you remind me why this puppy is even on the CD ?16:47
skaetapw,  its the image from bjf and sconklin we'll be using for 10.04.216:48
apwskaet, LBM seems a strange package to end up on a CD ever ?16:49
* skaet puzzles, and goes back to check some IRC logs... LBM?16:50
apwlinux-backport-modules-*16:50
* skaet nods16:52
skaetapw, bjf - [01:01] <cjwatson> genisoimage: Error: CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb and CD1/pool/main/l/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32/linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae_2.6.32-28.27_i386.deb have the same Joliet name16:56
skaet[01:01] <cjwatson> Joliet tree sort failed.16:56
tgardnerskaet, why are LBM packages being seeded on the CDROM ?16:56
cjwatsonphone, minute16:57
skaettgardner, will let the expert comment.  :)16:58
apwskaet, the problem is that the meta packages are also too long in some cases,16:59
apwso changing their name without a transitional package seems a problem16:59
apwbut having the transitional package will trigger the same problem17:00
tgardnerapw, those are _new_ meta packages since Lucid was released, right?17:00
apwtgardner, the too long ones are new yes17:00
apwin all cases the names which are too long were not in the -release pocket17:01
cjwatsonthe DVD includes practically everything that's in supported17:02
cjwatson(technically, supported-common, which includes supported-kernel-common)17:02
cjwatsonso linux-backports-modules has been there for a long time17:02
cjwatsonskaet: anyway, the new DVDs haven't finished building yet17:04
cjwatson-joliet-long should have worked around all this17:04
* skaet will keep fingers crossed17:04
apwcjwatson, ok so if we rename shorter which isn't impossible, what can we do about transitional pacages17:04
apwpackages, to pull people to the new names, is there some way we can exclude those from the CD?17:04
apwDVD17:05
cjwatsonsure, but why don't we just ignore the problem for lucid17:05
apwcjwatson, i am all for ignoring it :)17:06
cjwatsonand then we shouldn't have to worry about it since we don't do transitionals for LBM for lucid->? anyway17:06
tgardnercjwatson, correct17:06
apwok as there is no point release maverick we only have to worry about natty17:06
apwand we can fix these names before we do lbm for there17:06
cjwatsonwe can just make sure that package names are unique in the first 64 characters in the future17:06
cjwatsonI only applied the debian-cd change for lucid i386, so it'll blow up on us in the future again if we violate that17:07
cjwatson(and TBH, it may not be a massive problem as Joliet is just for Windows compat, but we should probably be a little careful in case we happen to change something that might affect Wubi - this shouldn't, though)17:07
apwcjwatson, cool17:07
tgardnercjwatson, we'll take steps to correct the meta package names for Natty and announce on ubuntu-devel, etc17:08
apwcjwatson, is there an LP bug for this puppy?17:08
cjwatsondoesn't look like it17:08
cjwatsonI didn't mention one in the debian-cd commit message, anyway17:08
apwcjwatson, ok don't think we need one just wanted to hoover it up if it was there17:08
skaetapw, ack17:16
apwskaet, so i think we have a plan... do nothing and don't mess up natty17:16
skaetapw,  heh,  "do nothing" seems a bit ambiguous.  I read it as no change for lucid, email to u-devel about 64 char restriction so we don't mess natty.  ;)17:31
apwyeah do nothing for existing releases, email out a warning for natty, and then get natty right17:32
skaet:)17:32
cjwatsonsince this is the first time it's bitten us in 6+ years, I'm not desperately worried about it being a pervasive problem17:33
apwcjwatson, yeah, though it is always that annoying kernel team pushing the boundaries17:36
tgardnerapw, I pushed a patch to ubuntu-natty-meta that sets the format for future LBM compat-wireless package names17:43
apwtgardner, you are a star17:43
tgardnerapw, which reminds me, we need to upload an LBM soon just as a placeholder or we'll end up having to write a MIR after the fact.17:46
apwtgardner, ok ... what do we have which it would produce17:46
tgardnerapw, its always empty to begin with.17:46
apwno compat wiress, no also, i guess smb's input might exist17:46
tgardnerI guess, if it hasn't gone upstream17:47
apwif we didn't have to bump abi on all of these packages, it owuld be nice for them to be separate source17:47
tgardnerapw, don't go there :) way too much work.17:48
apwyeah i konw, well unless we could make them dkms packages17:48
apwwe have 11.10 to think about that for17:49
Riddellcjwatson: I removed a language pack from kubuntu lucid live if you want to respin it to stop oversizing17:49
skaetcjwatson, pitti,  for the release change log,   should it be since 10.04.1 or since 10.04 - what's the precedent?17:49
cjwatsonsince 10.04.117:50
skaetcjwatson,  thanks17:51
cjwatsonXubuntu reposted17:52
charlie-tcathanks17:52
cjwatsoner, oops, wrong version17:52
cjwatsonnot December yet17:53
cjwatsonok, fixed, and Ubuntu DVDs posted17:53
cjwatsonRiddell: ok, thanks - shall I just respin i386, since that's the only one affected?17:53
Riddellcjwatson: yes17:54
cjwatsonok, respinning17:55
* skaet -> lunch, biab18:10
charlie-tcaXubuntu amd64 desktop image should be okay now, did not resize the ppc images18:23
charlie-tcaCan respin that image only, please.18:25
cjwatsonto clarify: respin Xubuntu desktop amd64?18:26
charlie-tcaplease. It should no longer be oversize18:26
cjwatsonRiddell: Kubuntu still oversized18:26
* skaet back18:47
marjoskaet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/64581820:39
ubot4Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "10.04.1 image created in Maverick does not boot in my Dell Mini9 (affects: 58) (dups: 4) (heat: 178)" [Critical,Triaged]20:39
skaetmarjo,  yes?  jibel has documented workaround on isotracker.20:40
marjoskaet: ack20:40
marjoskaet: just FYI, per jibel's request,  I created a 10.04.2 bootable USB with usb-creator-gtk on Lucid. I was able to boot to a live session with this USB image.20:42
marjo System that booted is an Acer Aspire One Model ZA3.20:42
skaetmarjo,  excellent thanks - good to know.  :)20:42
ScottKskaet: But the bug was for an image created on Maverick, not an image created on Lucid?20:48
skaetScottK,  yes,  I plan on marking it invalid, after I put out the release notes.   Just wanted it to show up so it didn't get overlooked.20:49
skaetI put a comment in the bug to that effect.20:49
ScottKAh.  I see.20:50
cjwatsonskaet: please don't mark the bug invalid for natty21:01
cjwatsonwe still want to figure something out for that - it's just hard21:01
cjwatson(and maverick too)21:01
skaetcjwatson,  ack, was just planning on it for lucid21:08
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk]

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!