[01:14] <bdmurray> I just noticed jaunty-updates is stil active as a milestone
[01:18] <cjwatson> deactivated, thanks
[16:57] <skaet_> cjwatson,  can you look into why http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/5001 doesn't have an image?
[16:58] <cjwatson> the path is wrong, insert lucid/ before daily
[16:58] <cjwatson> AFAIK iso.qa just doesn't know about stable builds
[16:58] <cjwatson> I've never worked on the iso.qa code though
[16:59] <skaet_> thanks cjwatson,  jibel,  ScottK ^^
[17:00] <jibel> skaet_, its a known issue, on the todo list of fixes for this app.
[17:00] <skaet_> jibel,  thanks.
[17:42] <cjwatson> elmo: how tight is releases.ubuntu.com?  do we need to move 10.04.1 off before publishing 10.04.2?
[17:44] <elmo> do you know how much extra space we're talking?
[17:45] <elmo> looks like 6 Gb?
[17:45] <cjwatson> on the order of 8GB
[17:45] <cjwatson> cdimage@antimony:~/cdimage/www/simple$ find -path \*.pool/\*10.04.1\*.iso | xargs du -cs
[17:45] <cjwatson> ...
[17:45] <cjwatson> 7857564 total
[17:45] <cjwatson> actually a bit less because Kubuntu netbook is staying at .1
[17:46] <elmo> oh man that's so much cleaner than my method
[17:46] <cjwatson> do I want to know?
[17:46] <elmo> find . -name \*10.04\* | xargs ls -l | awk ' { x += $5 } END { print x / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 }'
[17:46] <cjwatson> heh
[17:46] <elmo> so, hum
[17:46] <elmo> 40+6.  no, I think we'll be OK
[17:47] <skaet_> elmo,  cool.  thanks!
[17:47] <cjwatson> ok, planning to start publishing soon
[17:47] <cjwatson> notwithstanding my utter lack of brain today
[21:50] <jibel> Here is the status of 10.04.2 ISO Testing
[21:50] <jibel> Mandatory Test Cases for:
[21:50] <jibel>  * Ubuntu Alternate: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Ubuntu Desktop: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Ubuntu DVD: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Ubuntu Server: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Kubuntu Alternate: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Kubuntu Desktop: All Done - excepted Netbook (no image available)
[21:51] <jibel>  * Kubuntu DVD: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Xubuntu Alternate: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Xubuntu Desktop: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Upgrade from 8.04.4, all flavors/arch: All Done
[21:51] <jibel>  * Upgrade from 9.10, all flavors/arch: All Done
[21:52] <jibel> Image Coverage:	26	26	100.00%
[21:52] <jibel> Mandatory TestCases: 131	132	99.24%
[21:52] <jibel> Run Once TestCases:	28	38	73.68%
[21:52] <jibel> Overall:	159	170	93.53%
[21:52] <jibel> the 2 main issues found:
[21:52] <jibel> * bug 645818
[21:52] <jibel> * bug 650703
[21:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 61) (dups: 4) (heat: 188)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818
[21:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 650703 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "oem-config-prepare works, but oem-config fails to start after reboot (affects: 11) (dups: 1) (heat: 66)" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650703
[21:53] <jibel> Other serious issues found are not reproducible or invalid
[21:53] <jibel> any question/comment ?
[21:53] <marjo> jibel: thx; nice summary
[21:53] <jibel> skaet_, ^
[21:53] <jibel> skaet_, not marjo's comment, the summary
[22:02] <marjo> jibel: which 1 mandatory test case are you counting not done?
[22:02] <jibel_> marjo, kubuntu netbook
[22:03] <ScottK> It's not needed to be done, why mention it?
[22:03] <marjo> jibel: but isn't that the one that's not needed?, therefore, mandatory is 100% ,right?
[22:03] <jibel_> ScottK, because I'm binary
[22:03] <jibel_> marjo, right
[22:03] <marjo> ScottK: I agree, but jibel_ is "binary" :)
[22:06] <ScottK> Think of it as notrequiredandtheisotrackeriswrongforlucid
[22:09] <jibel_> ScottK, correct, but my query doesn't do fixthedatareturnedbyawrongisotrackerforlucidthatdisplaysnotrequiredmandatorytestcases, that's why it won't be appear in the final report.
[22:10] <skaet_> thanks jibel.  :)
[22:11] <skaet_> cjwatson,  go ahead and pushing the images.
[22:13] <marjo> skaet_, jibel: thx!