[10:16] <jibel> marjo, hi, you reported bug 720430 against the kubuntu netbook image. Did you really used the kubuntu netbook image or was it kubuntu desktop ?
[10:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 720430 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu 10.04.2 Live Persistent ConsoleKit session error (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/720430
[10:28] <jibel> marjo, I cant reproduce your problem. Its working perfectly there. Which tool did you use to create the persistent media and on which release ?
[14:05] <marjo> jibel: i used Disk Utility 2.30.1 on 10.04.2 LTS
[14:07] <jibel> marjo, hello
[14:07] <jibel> marjo, oh, you created a partition on a hard drive ?
[14:07] <jibel> marjo, I've tried with the persistent partition on the usb.
[14:10] <marjo> jibel: no i created a partition on a usb stick
[14:11] <marjo> jibel: casper-rw, 1.0 GB Linux ext3
[14:14] <jibel> marjo, well, I need to try creating the usb in Lucid, I don't remember how it worked in this release and I don't have any lucid running here with access to a USB port.
[14:14]  * jibel trashing this poor netbook once again.
[14:15] <marjo> jibel: ack
[14:23] <marjo> jibel: according to ev, "migration assistant is supposed to work Ubuntu to Ubuntu for very old versions of Pidgin and Firefox (2.x)"
[14:24] <marjo> jibel: and it only copies files from Windows
[14:27] <jibel> marjo, pidgin to empathy and firefox 2 to 4 ?
[14:28] <marjo> ev: ^^^
[14:28] <ev> it most certainly does not understand the empathy or firefox 4 configuration formats
[14:29] <ev> it was written back when pidgin was the default
[14:29] <jibel> ev, should we drop those test cases from natty testing then ?
[14:29] <ev> probably
[14:29] <ev> it's very much bit rotten
[14:29] <jibel> marjo, ^ what do you think ? it looks obsolete.
[14:30] <marjo> jibel: that's what i'm thinking
[14:30] <jibel> ev, marjo , thanks, we'll drop them from a3 testing then.
[14:31] <marjo> jibel: i've had quite a few problems in the past with http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/DesktopMigrationAssistant
[14:31] <jibel> ev, any untested feature of ubiquity you'd like to add instead ?
[14:31] <marjo> ev: can you please consider rewriting that test case ?
[14:31] <marjo> ev: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/DesktopMigrationAssistant
[14:32] <ev> sure
[14:51] <marjo> ev: thx
[15:21] <skaet_> jibel, how close are we to finishing off the iso testing?
[15:21] <jibel> marjo, no problem with the persistent device created from 10.04.2.
[15:21] <jibel> marjo, and booting 10.04.2 kubuntu desktop i386
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[15:24] <jibel> skaet_, I think we are good. Server UEC AMD64 (i386 is done) and no iSCSI tests were run. So we need feedback from the server team if they are ok with that.
[15:24] <jibel> skaet_, no last minute deal breaker.
[15:25] <jibel> the 2 main issues remain bug 645818 and bug 650703
[15:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 60) (dups: 4) (heat: 188)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818
[15:25] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 650703 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "oem-config-prepare works, but oem-config fails to start after reboot (affects: 11) (dups: 1) (heat: 66)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650703
[15:29] <jibel> skaet_, few figures:
[15:29] <jibel> Image Coverage:	26	26	100.00%
[15:29] <jibel> Mandatory TestCases: 115	132	87.12%
[15:29] <jibel> Run Once TestCases:	23	38	60.53%
[15:29] <jibel> Overall:	138	170	81.18%
[15:29] <marjo> jibel: ack
[15:30] <skaet_> jibel,  ok we need to get the mandatory handled before the announce goes out.
[15:31] <skaet_> are the only mandatory not run yet in the server images?
[15:32] <skaet_> or are there some in the Ubuntu desktop & Alternate as well?
[15:33] <marjo> ping hggdh
[15:34] <hggdh> marjo: pong
[15:34] <marjo> hggdh: i'm testing http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/ServerWhole#Preseeded%20Installation
[15:35] <hggdh> marjo: problems there?
[15:35] <marjo> hggdh: failing w/ "Configuring linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic
[15:35] <marjo> "
[15:35] <marjo> "Unable to install the selected kernel"
[15:35] <hggdh> heavy
[15:35] <hggdh> I will run it manually here
[15:36] <marjo> hggdh: vt4 says "E: Package linux-headers-generic has no installation candidate"
[15:36] <hggdh> this is *very* weird
[15:37] <hggdh> linux-headers-generic is a meta-package, and should point to the current linux-headers package
[15:37] <hggdh> better get one of the foundations folks involve3d
[15:37] <skaet_> jibel, from looking at the ISO tracker,  seems there are some Ubuntu desktop and Alternate tests not done yet.     What is the outlook on getting those last tests done?
[15:38] <jibel> skaet_, Mandatory testcases remaining:
[15:38] <jibel>  * Kubuntu Alternate amd64 / Install (entire disk with encryption)
[15:38] <jibel>  * Kubuntu Desktop amd64 / Live Session (Netbook)
[15:38] <marjo> hggdh: i'm using image: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/lucid/daily/20110211.1/lucid-server-i386.iso
[15:38] <jibel>  * Ubuntu Server AMD64: Install (JeOS on ESX), Install (JeOS on KVM), UEC install (minimal topology)
[15:38] <jibel>  * Ubuntu Server i386: Install (default + RAID1), Install (JeOS on ESX), Install (Preseeded)
[15:39] <marjo> jibel: i've started Ubuntu Server i386: Install (Preseeded), but see problem above
[15:39]  * skaet_ must be misreading the iso tracker...    wiil dig.
[15:39] <skaet_> thanks jibel
[15:40] <hggdh> marjo: I will install it here, and see what happens
[15:40] <marjo> hggdh: i will try again, ok?
[15:42] <hggdh> marjo: OK, but sounds bad
[15:46] <jamiedmattingly> morning jibel sorry i didnt make it in yesterday had to watch kids at home do you need me to test anything today?
[15:52] <marjo> hggdh: so far so good on this current test; only difference i made was to type in "ubuntu" as the hostname instead of "marjomercado-server"
[15:53] <marjo> jamiedmattingly: thx for joining us today, please take a look at: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/notcompleted
[15:55] <jamiedmattingly> thanks marjo
[15:58] <jamiedmattingly> ok where can i get a kubuntu alternat 386 the link on the tracker site isnt working
[15:58] <hggdh> marjo: I was also able to install with no errors. Fluke?
[15:59] <marjo> hggdh: maybe, i'm going to burn a new disk, just in case
[16:00] <marjo> hggdh: please mark that one passed
[16:00] <hggdh> marjo: just did ;-)
[16:00] <marjo> hggdh: thx much
[16:07] <charlie-tca> jamiedmattingly: http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/lucid/
[16:07] <charlie-tca> daily is alternate, daily-live is desktop
[16:09] <jamiedmattingly> got it charlie-tca thanks
[16:09] <charlie-tca> You are welcome
[16:09] <jamiedmattingly> its downloading now will test when its complete
[16:10] <charlie-tca> great! thanks for helping today
[16:10] <jamiedmattingly> we dont have many left do we stop when this list is complete or do you have another to start on?
[16:13] <jibel> jamiedmattingly, mandatory test cases are ... mandatory.
[16:13] <jibel> the target is 100% of mandatory cases done.
[16:13] <jibel> btw , thanks for helping :)
[16:13] <Daviey> marjo, Do you have the preseed you were using for 10.04.2 ie86 testing?
[16:14] <Daviey> err, i386
[16:15] <marjo> daviey: url=http://people.canonical.com/~cerdea/preseed.cfg
[16:15] <jibel> jamiedmattingly, charlie-tca any of you can help with LTDP test for Alternate
[16:15] <jibel> ?
[16:15] <jibel> not LDTP , LTSP
[16:15] <Daviey> manjo, you were using the same preseed as hggdh ?
[16:16] <hggdh> Daviey: you probably meant 'marjo', right?
[16:16] <manjo> Daviey, you want to talk to marjo
[16:16] <Daviey> err, yes. :)
[16:16] <hggdh> LOL
[16:16] <hggdh> manjo is used to this by now ;-)
[16:16] <jamiedmattingly> sure where is ltsp test?
[16:17] <Daviey> manjo, sorry
[16:17] <marjo> daviey: yes
[16:17] <jamiedmattingly> never mind i found it starting now
[16:17] <Daviey> marjo, *boggle*
[16:17] <jibel> jamiedmattingly, great ! thanks
[16:18] <charlie-tca> jibel: I tried to do that one, but failed miserably at getting it right
[16:18] <Daviey> marjo, hggdh, jibel: roaksoax has marked it as passed for him... so we have 2:1.. want a third?
[16:19] <hggdh> Daviey: no, I think we are good. This was a weird error, though
[16:19] <Daviey> :/
[16:19] <skaet_> all,  head's up -  I experienced an IRC communication glitch in the list jibel sent earlier,  in case anyone else did, the remaining mandatory test cases can be found at http://paste.ubuntu.com/568279/
[16:21] <marjo> daviey: no we're good
[16:21] <jibel> Daviey, thanks
[16:21] <Daviey> good 'o
[16:21] <Daviey> :)
[16:21] <marjo> daviey: http://paste.ubuntu.com/568279/
[16:21] <jibel> Daviey, iSCSI any one in the server team can cover them ?
[16:23] <Daviey> jibel, i didn't think we tested them for 10.04.1... do we need to for .2?
[16:23] <jibel> skaet_, ^ ?
[16:27] <skaet_> Daviey,  jibel -  it is listed as a mandatory test case.
[16:27] <skaet_> robbiew,  should the test case be mandatory?   advice?
[16:46] <marjo> skaet_ on behalf of the QA team, iSCSI should be optional
[16:47] <marjo> skaet_ with hindsight, we should have made it optional after 10.04.1
[16:49] <skaet_> robbiew,   can you weigh in on the iSCSI test case for server.  optional or mandatory?
[16:54] <robbiew> skaet_: unless we have dedicated hardware in the lab for it, I see it as optional
[16:55] <robbiew> so I agree with marjo
[16:55] <skaet_> thanks robbiew,  marjo - ok.  please mark it as optional going forward, and we'll consider it as such for this release.
[17:03] <jibel> patrickmw, hi, can you help with ltsp ?
[17:04] <patrickmw> sure
[17:04] <patrickmw> which test
[17:05] <patrickmw> I mean iso flav arch and such
[17:06] <jibel> patrickmw, ubuntu desktop alternate amd64 / i386
[17:07] <patrickmw> jibel: ok
[17:07] <jibel> patrickmw, thx
[17:09] <jibel> patrickmw, I'm on i386 btw
[17:11] <jamiedmattingly> im on i386 also jibel
[17:19] <patrickmw> jibel: im syncing those images. i will get those done today
[17:21] <randomdude> just wanted to know if 10.04.2 is coming out today (means available for download on main ubuntu page) ? thx
[17:32] <skaet_> randomdude, depended on whether the mandatory testing gets done.   Feel free to help ;),  tests that are still outstanding on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/notcompleted
[17:57] <jamiedmattingly> building thin client system has been stuck on 50% for quite a while anyone else with this issue?
[18:00] <jamiedmattingly> ok recieved an error message 'no interface for ltsp dhcp configuration found'
[18:00] <jamiedmattingly> probably why it hung up so long
[18:09] <jamiedmattingly> can someone help me to file a bug for this?
[18:10] <marjo> Daviey, hggdh:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/720865
[18:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 720865 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[18:22] <jamiedmattingly> jibel or charlie-tca are you available for a ??
[18:22] <charlie-tca> yes
[18:23] <jamiedmattingly> i think i found a problem on the ltsp for the 386 alternate but im not sure what to do now?
[18:23] <jamiedmattingly> the last couple tests i did had a click here to file bug i dont see it on this page
[18:24] <charlie-tca> hggdh: what package does the ltsp bug get filed against?
[18:26] <hggdh> charlie-tca: good question, researching
[18:27] <hggdh> charlie-tca: which test is this?
[18:27] <charlie-tca> jamiedmattingly: ^ ^
[18:28] <jamiedmattingly> ubuntu alternate i386 ltsp
[18:29] <hggdh> charlie-tca: ltsp-server?
[18:29] <jamiedmattingly> ok im sorry install ltsp server was correct title
[18:29] <charlie-tca> yup
[18:29] <charlie-tca> It was jamiedmattingly testing it
[18:30] <jamiedmattingly> ok here is another question before i get too involved in reporting this possibly for nothing
[18:30] <charlie-tca> yes?
[18:30] <jamiedmattingly> if this is for a server would it ake a difference if i am not loading on a server
[18:30] <jamiedmattingly> running it in a vbox on my laptop
[18:31] <charlie-tca> No, installing the server stuff makes it a server, instead of a desktop
[18:33] <jamiedmattingly> ok cool
[18:33] <jamiedmattingly> did you see the error message i got when printed above?
[18:34] <charlie-tca> <jamiedmattingly> ok recieved an error message 'no interface for ltsp dhcp configuration found'
[18:35] <jamiedmattingly> yes charlie-tca that would be something to report as a bug correct?
[18:35] <marjo> ping jibel
[18:35] <ScottK> Hello marjo
[18:35] <charlie-tca> jamiedmattingly: do you have VBox set to use bridge networking, so it goes through the host interface?
[18:35] <marjo> jibel, skaet: i've asked ScottK to join the channel to discuss kubuntu iso test cases for 10.04.2
[18:35] <jamiedmattingly> let me check
[18:36] <ScottK> The netbook test doesn't apply to Kubuntu for 10.04.2 since we didn't respin that one.
[18:37] <jibel> marjo, I'm doing the latest alternate and Riddell DVD, and there's no netbook. So all the mandatory cases will be done very soon
[18:37] <jamiedmattingly> how do i set it for that charlie-tca
[18:37] <marjo> jibel: ok
[18:37] <jibel> s/lastest/last
[18:38] <charlie-tca> I don't know if the dhcp part works with out the bridge
[18:38] <marjo> jibel: ScottK says the kubuntu test cases are correct for Natty, but not for 10.04.2
[18:38] <charlie-tca> You click Network, Adapter 1, Enable Network Adapter, attached to:
[18:38] <charlie-tca> It defaults to Nat, but you can select Bridged Adapter
[18:39] <charlie-tca> Then I select Advanced:  Adapter Type PCNet-Fast III, cable connected
[18:40] <charlie-tca> since my hardware is cable connected
[18:40] <jamiedmattingly> ok let me try this again
[18:40] <charlie-tca> I don't really know if this is the issue, but I don't think it will work without the bridge. You also need two adapters added, I think
[18:42] <jibel> marjo, what do you mean ? Are you talking about this http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/AlternateEncryptedLvm
[18:43] <jibel> how can it be ok for natty, it was last updated 10 months ago.
[18:43] <marjo> ScottK ?
[18:44] <ScottK> Because Natty and Maverick are the same in this regard.
[18:44] <marjo> jibel: maybe ScottK should review all the Kubuntu test cases?
[18:44] <ScottK> I think they are fine for Natty.
[18:45] <marjo> so there's no ambiguity for ALL releases
[18:45] <marjo> ScottK: and we need testers!
[18:53] <marjo> ScottK ?
[18:54] <ScottK> Does the ISO tracker have the ability to have different test cases for different releases?
[18:55] <jibel> ScottK, no it doesn't.
[18:55] <ScottK> Then it's pretty pointless to try and review their correctness for different releases.
[18:55] <marjo> ScottK: i think what's more important is the specification of test cases (mandatory, run-once, optiona) and get testers to test them
[18:56] <marjo> s/optiona/optional/
[18:56] <ScottK> marjo: The test case in question should be mandatory on Maverick/Natty and not applicable to Lucid.  You've no way to express that in the tracker.
[18:58] <marjo> ScottK: ack
[18:59] <marjo> ScottK: how about testers for each release milestone?
[18:59] <ScottK> What about them?
[19:01] <marjo> can we get more testers for kubuntu during iso testing?
[19:01] <jamiedmattingly> ok charlie-tca it worked once i changed the settings
[19:01] <charlie-tca> Great! :-)
[19:02] <ScottK> marjo: We've asked.  The amount of participation varies.
[19:02] <jamiedmattingly> sorry bout that im still new to this both on ubuntu and tewsting
[19:02] <marjo> ScottK: understood
[19:02] <marjo> and thx for asking
[19:02] <ScottK> I don't have a magic pile of ISO testers in my back pocket.
[19:02] <marjo> ScottK: ditto :)
[19:05] <ScottK> See you later.
[19:25] <robbiew> marjo: guess iscsi can remain in run-once
[19:25] <robbiew> we've found a victim...uh, I mean volunteer ;)
[19:26] <marjo> robbiew: thx for finding the volunteer
[19:33] <robbiew> marjo: nevermind...I missed the "not" in the first sentence of the email...as in "I am not volunteering to run the tests"
[19:34] <marjo> robbiew: oh too bad; thx for trying
[19:54] <marjo> hggdh, jibel: who's testing UEC install (separate networks topology) on amd64?
[19:54] <marjo> hggdh: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntuserver/notcompleted
[19:56] <marjo> hggdh: i think that's the last remaining (not doing iSCSI)
[20:13] <skaet_> marjo, jibel - can you confirm my understanding,  Ubuntu Desktop is now done,  Ubuntu Alternate has one test left - in progress.
[20:13] <skaet_> Also,  Ubuntu server has how many?
[20:15] <marjo> skaet: Ubuntu Desktop mandatory all done (exempting Migration Assistant)
[20:16] <marjo> skaet: Ubuntu Alternate (1 test in progress)
[20:17] <marjo> skaet: Ubuntu Server mandatory all done
[20:17] <jamiedmattingly> marjo,  which test is in progress the page i looked at showed complete for 386 alternate
[20:18] <marjo> jamiedmattingly: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/4991/229; patrickmw testing
[20:18] <marjo> install LTSP server
[20:19] <jamiedmattingly> ok thanks
[20:19] <patrickmw> marjo: are you asking me if I'm testing ltsp?  if so, yes :)
[20:20] <marjo> patrickmw: no, i was telling jamiedmattingly that you are testing ltsp
[20:20] <patrickmw> ack
[20:20] <charlie-tca> jamiedmattingly: thanks for doing those tests
[20:20] <charlie-tca> We do this again in two weeks for Natty alpha3, probably starting about March 1
[20:21] <marjo> skaet: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/kubuntu/notcompleted; i would consider that all done since netbook is not counted
[20:22] <jamiedmattingly> cool its actually kinda fun charlie-tca
[20:22] <jamiedmattingly> almost done with kubuntu alternate expert
[20:24] <marjo> skaet: so, for mandatory test cases, only 1 is left (pressure is on patrickmw)
[20:26] <charlie-tca> jamiedmattingly: gives you a chance to see the different distributions, too
[20:27] <charlie-tca> We will have many more tests to do for natty, though
[20:27] <jamiedmattingly> cant wait
[20:30] <hggdh> marjo: I am installing uec alternate
[20:30] <marjo> hggdh: thx much
[20:30] <skaet_> marjo, thanks!   can you please post  status in #u-release when the last test finishes off?
[20:30] <marjo> skaet_ will do
[20:31] <patrickmw> jamiedmattingly: I see you passed the ltsp test.  I am not able to connect.  What client did you use?
[20:32] <jibel> skaet_, I confirm what marjo said :-)
[20:33] <skaet_> thanks jibel.  :)   any new bugs to look into?
[20:34] <patrickmw> jibel: I am getting a failure with the ltsp test
[20:36] <jibel> skaet_, bug 720865
[20:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 720865 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/720865
[20:36] <jibel> need investigation from a server guy.
[20:37] <skaet_> Daviey,  ^^  can you help?
[20:38] <jamiedmattingly> you know patrickmw im not sure i know i had to change a bunch of settings to get it to run charlie-tca helped me with that
[20:38] <jamiedmattingly> what error are you getting?
[20:38] <marjo> skaet: i reported 720865; i don't think it's critical since two other testers passed the same test
[20:38] <charlie-tca> patrickmw: VBox?
[20:39] <marjo> skaet: could be specific to my hardware
[20:39] <patrickmw> charlie-tca: yes.  that's a problem then I take it
[20:39] <jibel> marjo, could be critical, it needs to be qualified.
[20:39] <charlie-tca> Got to use the bridge network connection
[20:39] <jamiedmattingly> should we not be using vbox to test???
[20:39] <marjo> jibel: even if it's on a netbook?!
[20:39] <patrickmw> charlie-tca. I am
[20:40] <patrickmw> charlie-tca. I've been able to pass this test before
[20:40] <jamiedmattingly> what error did you get patrickmw
[20:40] <charlie-tca> Then it might be a hard fail
[20:40] <patrickmw> I get an unable to connect
[20:41] <patrickmw> I can ssh in the ltsp server, so I know I have a connection
[20:41] <charlie-tca> I had jamiedmattingly change to the bridged networking and add a second adapter
[20:41] <patrickmw> ok, I will try adding an additional nic
[20:41] <charlie-tca> They were using NAT, which won't work
[20:41] <patrickmw> yes, that makes sense
[20:41] <charlie-tca> I am by no means an expert, I could not get the tests to work at all
[20:42] <patrickmw> charlie-tca, there was a bug with natty alpha 3 when I tested it, but this is different
[20:42]  * charlie-tca feels real bad, now. Can't get the tests to work, but knows how to fix it?
[20:53] <jibel> stgraber, around ?
[20:55] <marjo> patrickmw: can you please go ahead and file a bug and mark the test as failed?
[20:57] <patrickmw> marjo: I can
[20:57] <marjo> patrickmw: please do ASAP; thx
[21:05] <stgraber> jibel: yep, what's up ?
[21:06] <marjo> jibel: just passed kubuntu alternate i386 manual partitioning
[21:06] <patrickmw> jibel: done
[21:06] <jamiedmattingly> jibel just passed kubuntu altenate 386 expert mode
[21:07] <jibel> stgraber, patrickmw is experiencing issues with ltsp setup can you help him?
[21:08] <patrickmw> jibel, marjo, skaet_: tests are complete, if you're waiting on me. I've updated the iso tracker
[21:08] <stgraber> patrickmw: what kind of issues are you having ?
[21:09] <patrickmw> stgraber: i've followed this test case: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/LTSPServer
[21:10] <patrickmw> and I'm not sure if its incomplete or if there is some assumed knowledge I should have before running the test
[21:10] <stgraber> hmm, someone should have mentioned that you need two NICs ;)
[21:10] <patrickmw> yes
[21:10] <marjo> patrickmw: thx much
[21:10] <patrickmw> one for external connections, one for the ltsp connection
[21:10] <stgraber> yep
[21:11] <stgraber> and at install time, choose the one with internet access so it can install. A dhcp server will be setup on the other one for ltsp
[21:11] <patrickmw> ok
[21:11] <stgraber> so you should always make sure the one that's going to be used for ltsp is plugged to a switch that doesn't have any dhcp server plugged in
[21:12] <stgraber> or just use a crossover cable as suggested
[21:12] <patrickmw> let's say I'm using a VM ;)
[21:12] <stgraber> ok, so create a isolated virtual network for ltsp
[21:13] <stgraber> and put the second nic of your server in it
[21:13] <stgraber> then create a diskless VM that boots using PXE and is plugged on that same isolated network
[21:13] <patrickmw> ah
[21:14] <patrickmw> adding a nic inside the virt network makes sense
[21:14] <patrickmw> the other part I would not have figured out
[21:14] <stgraber> so usually I have "virbr0" that's the usual libvirt bridge with libvirt's DHCP and internet access and I have another "virtbr1" bridge that's not connected to anything and used only for the second nic of the ltsp server and the nic of the thin client
[21:15] <patrickmw> you seem to have a grasp on this. maybe you and I can take some time to document a reproducable test case
[21:15] <patrickmw> I don't know of many people who can follow the 7 steps outlined in the test and get it to pass.
[21:17] <kirkland> marjo: ping
[21:17] <kirkland> marjo: re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/720865
[21:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 720865 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New]
[21:17] <kirkland> marjo: i just ran that in a VM without trouble
[21:17] <kirkland> marjo: rtg thinks the issue you hit might be related to Atom and PAE
[21:18] <skaet_> jibel,  I think there's a bug in error on the isotracker - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/227869
[21:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 227869 in base-installer (Ubuntu) "Server installer should not use -server kernel for non-PAE CPU's (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Medium,Triaged]
[21:21] <jibel> skaet_, why ?
[21:22] <stgraber> patrickmw: I just updated the wiki page
[21:22] <patrickmw> stgraber: you rock
[21:23] <skaet_> its a bug from 2008, and hasn't been touched since 2009.   If its applicable against this release, it should be targetted to lucid, and iso-testing tags added?
[21:23] <skaet_> jibel, ^^
[21:24] <skaet_> bug looks like what's being seen though,  so maybe it just hasn't been updated to reflect today's results/comments?
[21:24]  * jibel context switching is too high atm.
[21:25] <jibel> skaet_, it's already tagged, but should have been updated with today's status, right.
[21:25] <skaet_> jibel,  yes please.
[21:25] <jibel> Ill nominate for lucid and confirm
[21:26]  * skaet_ understands what jibel means about context switching too high as well ;)
[21:26] <skaet_> jibel, thanks.
[21:29] <marjo> kirkland: thx; i suspect rtg is right
[21:29] <marjo> kirkland; that's why i hesitated to log the bug
[21:29] <jibel> skaet_, done
[21:43] <jibel> patrickmw, you're ltsp failure is due to your setup or the build or the documentation ?
[21:44] <jibel> you're/your
[21:44] <patrickmw> jibel: yes
[21:44] <patrickmw> jibel :)
[21:44] <jibel> yes what ?
[21:44] <patrickmw> jibel: the test case has been updated
[21:45] <jibel> nice, thanks
[21:45] <patrickmw> jibel: i did not rerun the test
[21:46] <hggdh> marjo: uec separate topo test done for amd64; I really do not think i386 is required
[21:47] <marjo> hggdh: ack
[22:11] <wormyourhonor_> whoami
[22:46] <skaet_> jibel, marjo, Riddell, ScottK, charlie-tca  - please pass on a big "Thank you" to everyone who was testing today.   Ubuntu, Kubuntu and Xubuntu  would not be able to go out today without their efforts!
[22:50] <jamiedmattingly> just out of curiosity for whoevr runs this area..... do you get feedback on your wiki for working here? ill do it anyway but just curious