=== tarun is now known as c2tarun
[15:24] <bdmurray> mvo: there are some comments in bug 614993 about people still running into it
[15:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 614993 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "10.04 -> 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe (affects: 63) (dups: 26) (heat: 394)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614993
[15:29] <bdmurray> and bug 721306 has some good log files about it
[15:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721306 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Can't upgrade from 10.04LTS to 10.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721306
[15:52] <mvo> thanks bdmurray, jibel pointed me to the later one, I will check the code to see if I can add a automatic workaround
[15:53] <jibel> mvo, Nice, many thanks.
[15:53] <bdmurray> mvo: bug 721306 should be the master then? I imagine there are some duplicates
[15:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721306 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Can't upgrade from 10.04LTS to 10.10 (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721306
[15:55] <mvo> bdmurray: that is fine with me
[15:55] <bdmurray> mvo: okay, thanks!
[15:56] <mvo> thank you, I need to finish some work here before I can properly look at this though
[15:57] <bdmurray> no problem - its kind of strange that people are upgrading to 10.10 now
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[16:21] <penguin42> bdmurray: Not necessarily; people have multiple machines, or wanted to stay on LTS for some reason but finally something made them flip
[16:22] <bdmurray> s/strange/strange to me since I run the dev release/ ;-)
[16:45] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: bug 716588 has apt.log which is enough to confirm it / sort out what is up
[16:45] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 716588 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "system update doesn't finish, errors encountered (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/716588
=== meetingology` is now known as meetingology
[17:44] <seb128> is anyone running natty on amd64 and want to try if the new libc is making half of the applications fail to start?
[17:45] <bdmurray> seb128: I am
[17:46] <seb128> bdmurray, great, thanks
[17:47] <seb128> bdmurray, see #ubuntu-devel for some context
[17:48] <bdmurray> seb128: got it thanks
[18:02] <greg-g> I love "hey, anyone here want to possibly break their system?" "yep!"
[18:04] <seb128> greg-g, ;-)
[18:04] <seb128> well Jason who ran into the issue managed to downgrade the libc
[18:05] <seb128> so if you know what you are doing and get the old deb you can easily dpkg -i those
[18:05] <greg-g> That's good at least :). (I'm not on natty yet, though, just to be explicit)
[18:07] <DBO> seb128, im DBO here, keep it straight :P
[18:08] <seb128> DBO, oh right, you and your double identity!
[18:08] <DBO> seb128, I cant tell you how long I thought you and sebsebseb were the same dude
[18:08] <seb128> lol
[18:13] <bdmurray> seb128: I've recreated it with evolution but have to run to an appointment now
[18:14] <seb128> bdmurray, can you let doko know on #u-d?
[18:15] <DBO> we have confirmation
[18:53] <slicer> Hi. Can someone mark bug #721239 as wont-fix?
[18:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721239 in mumble (Ubuntu) "Mumble uses 10% cpu doing nothing (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721239
[18:55] <vish> slicer: done..
[18:55] <vish> slicer: see, being in BC has its perks ;)
[18:56] <vish> slicer: actually you should have had the option available.. looks like you are back in Bug COntrol
[19:02] <slicer> vish: .. Whoa. jcastro is FAST. I sent the email asking to be readded just a minute before I posted here :)
[19:02] <slicer> jcastro: Thank you :)
[19:02] <jcastro> cheers!
[19:03] <vish> he has superspeed ;)
[19:04] <vish> or maybe he is just on speed ;p
[19:04]  * vish hides
[19:38] <gaurav_pawaskar> Hi, I am searching for 1st bug to fix i found a typo bug  #266325 . can anyone tell me if i can go ahead and assign it to myself?
[19:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 266325 in mailman "Typos in the Mailman 2.1.8a PO file" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/266325
[19:43] <micromix> gaurav_pawaskar: i belive you can but i would wait to hear from the higher ups
[19:44] <JFo> gaurav_pawaskar, I would say that should definitely be possible. What is the package the bug has been filed against?
[19:44] <micromix> it says mailman
[19:45] <JFo> my recommendation would be to get someone from that package to mentor you as you work through it.
[19:45] <JFo> just until you become familiar with the way they may address their bugs
[19:45] <gaurav_pawaskar> GNU mailman
[19:46] <gaurav_pawaskar> ok. so its fine if I solve this bug?
[19:46] <gaurav_pawaskar> i mean I am trying to learn so starting with typo
[19:47] <micromix> gaurav_pawaskar: how did you find typo bugs i would like to learn to fix bugs myself
[19:48] <vish> gaurav_pawaskar: looks like mailman is hosted in Sourceforge and the patch needs to go here » http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1453049&group_id=103&atid=100103
[19:49] <ubot4> vish: Error: <Bugtracker.plugin.Sourceforge instance at 0x2ef87e8> bug 1453049 not found
[19:49] <gaurav_pawaskar> micromix: I was just used advanced search option.
[19:49] <vish> silly ubot4
[19:52] <JFo> gaurav_pawaskar, I enthusiastically support you :) I hope this is the start of more bugs that you want to fix. Every bit helps.
[19:52] <gaurav_pawaskar> vish: so is there any different process for  working with those bugs?
[19:53] <gaurav_pawaskar> JFo: sure. I am trying to get used to process here. before working on actual bugs :)
[19:54] <JFo> I can appreciate that :)
[20:13] <vish> gaurav_pawaskar: nope, just that the patch needs to be submitted in the upstream tracker( source forge)..
[20:14] <gaurav_pawaskar> vish: okey got that. thanks alot :)
[20:14] <vish> np..
[20:27] <njin> Hello, can someone set bug 721469 as triaged and hight for me. Thanks
[20:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721469 in eglibc (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "program startup fails with "Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 622: _dl_map_object_deps: Assertion `nlist > 1' failed!" (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 34)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721469
[20:29] <micahg> that should probably be critical
[20:29]  * micahg is surprised it's not set yet
[20:31] <njin> ops, surely critical
[20:32]  * JFo goes to look
[20:32] <lifeless> it is
[20:32] <lifeless> we're blocking downloads for it in a couple of minutes
[20:33] <JFo> set triaged and critical
[20:33] <JFo> njin, ^^
[20:34] <penguin42> alphas always need bugs like that, just to liven things up
[20:34] <njin> JFo: thanks
[20:34] <JFo> my pleasure
[20:48] <rr0hit> can anyone please set importance for bug 721447
[20:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721447 in unity "Unable to scroll in Applications Place using mouse wheel (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721447
[20:57] <bdmurray> rr0hit: sure
[20:58] <rr0hit> Is it OK if I mark bug 721447 as bitesize bug ?
[20:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721447 in unity "Unable to scroll in Applications Place using mouse wheel (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721447
[20:59] <bdmurray> rr0hit: you could make sure it has an Ubuntu unity task too
[21:00] <rr0hit> bdmurray: sorry, i dont follow
[21:01] <bdmurray> rr0hit: right now the bug has a task for the Unity project but not a task for the unity in Ubuntu
[21:01] <bdmurray> rr0hit: I'll add it so you can see what it looks like
[21:03] <rr0hit> bdmurray: aha,..i see :)
[21:04] <bdmurray> rr0hit: a package version would be helpful too.  I've confirmed it since I've noticed it too
[21:05] <rr0hit> bdmurray: alright, i will have to boot into my usb keyring to check the version. i will sure add the detail.
[21:06] <bdmurray> rr0hit: in the future 'ubuntu-bug unity' will gather lots of supporting information for you
[21:07] <rr0hit> bdmurray: i get an error while trying to report bug via apport. maybe due to proxy issues. Is there any way i could store the bug details collected by apport and uploadd it manually ?
[21:08] <bdmurray> rr0hit: I'm pretty sure if you use apport-cli it asks if you want to save it
[21:08] <rr0hit> bdmurray: ok, thanks
[21:09] <bdmurray> rr0hit: yep, apport-cli unity then K: Keep report file for sending later or copying to somewhere else
[21:09] <rr0hit> bdmurray: it qualifies to be a bitesize bug right?
[21:10] <bdmurray> rr0hit: I don't know enough about the code base of unity to say yes or no
[21:10] <rr0hit> bdmurray: alright. i'll leave it at that
[22:48] <rr0hit> Someone pls confirm and set importance to Bug #721555
[22:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721555 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Libre Office slide in Natty contains Open Office screenshot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721555
[22:56] <bdmurray> rr0hit: looking
[23:08] <rr0hit> bdmurray: Thanks again !! btw I added the apport report to the bug 721447 :)
[23:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721447 in unity (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Unable to scroll in Applications Place using mouse wheel (affects: 2) (heat: 10)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721447
[23:33] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: It was a duplicate of bug 614993  Marked it as such.
[23:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 614993 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "10.04 -> 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe (affects: 64) (dups: 27) (heat: 394)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614993
[23:34] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: well it doesn't seem fixed though
[23:35] <penguin42> Can someone mark up bug 719078 - the upstream bug tracker (noted in the thread) now has a fix which works.  I'd say it's medium since it causes one or two other innocent applications to seg
[23:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 719078 in gtk2-engines-oxygen (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "assertion (IA__gtk_box_reorder_child: assertion) (affects: 1) (heat: 1089)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/719078
[23:35] <penguin42> (I'm the reporter)
[23:38] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: indeed, and there are MANY dupes as you can see with that bug :(  I will do some research into that one when i get home later tonight.  Will report back here as well on results :)
[23:39] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: I thought I had duped it, the bug I mentioned, to another one
[23:39] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: mvo indicated he would look at it
[23:39] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: that was a dupe to a dupe.  I moved it to the master bug.
[23:40] <bdmurray> bug 721306
[23:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 721306 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Can't upgrade from 10.04LTS to 10.10 (affects: 9) (dups: 6) (heat: 70)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721306
[23:41] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: ah, those should be linked to the "master" as well.  Guess i will move e'm.
[23:42] <bdmurray> RedSingularity: I'd prefer to leave them separate since the developer said he'd look at that one
[23:43] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: no problem....i can move them when he is done then if necessary :)
[23:44] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: but they definitely look like the dupe of the master stated above.  Problem with the xorg package.  Removing it solves the issue.
[23:46] <RedSingularity> bdmurray: confirmed it on a few test installs so far as well.