/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/19/#ubuntu-motu.txt

grunthusThanks lifeless, found out its like this:00:08
grunthushttps://code.launchpad.net/~chris-ascentsoftware/ubuntuone-control-panel/fixes_71582000:08
arandDo most(all) packages use xpm files for icons?01:01
c2tarunI am grabbing a package by grab.merge.sh script and its automatically applying the patch. I updated the .quiltrc file but still nothing happned. I tried to pop the patch but No patches found. When I am pushing I am getting Hunk** failed. What should I do?03:28
c2tarunI am grabbing a package by grab.merge.sh script and its automatically applying the patch. I updated the .quiltrc file but still nothing happned. I tried to pop the patch but No patches found. When I am pushing I am getting Hunk** failed. What should I do?05:08
artfwoc2tarun, are you trying to undo the patch, which is applied after unpacking source package?05:12
c2tarunartfwo: yup05:17
artfwoc2tarun, but why do you want to undo the patch?05:17
c2tarunartfwo: unless I wont pop the patch I wont be able to create proper source package. I will always get error that hunk failed.05:18
artfwoI thought, if a package uses quilt, it should automatically unapply the patch when creating source package05:19
artfwowhich package are you trying to merge?05:20
c2tarunartfwo: freevo05:20
artfwoc2tarun, did you fix the conflict in debian/rules?05:22
c2tarunartfwo: I think so, the line in ubuntu is just a comment, so all I need to see is how the package responds with debian line.05:22
artfwoso, you want to build the base debian version?05:23
c2tarunartfwo: I'll do that as well, its the only way to check that I should call for a sync or merge>05:24
artfwo(I'm still downloading the source package, so I have trouble figuring your problem)05:24
c2tarunartfwo: I can wait :)05:25
c2tarunartfwo: in rules file there are two lines including two mk files. They are grabbing them from my system, but they are not present there.05:27
c2tarunartfwo: one is debhelper.mk and other is python-distutils.mk05:27
artfwoc2tarun, these are files from cdbs05:28
artfwothey're supposed to be present in /usr/share/cdbs05:28
artfwoand cdbs is a build-dependency for freevo05:29
c2tarunyup they were missing, I installed build deps and done. :)05:29
c2tarunartfwo: hey pacakge is build succesfully. :/05:32
artfwoc2tarun, I've managed to build it too just a moment ago05:33
c2tarunartfwo: sorry but I was not aware that packages get automatically unapplied. I ran into a package trouble 2 days ago and I thought I should be careful :(05:33
artfwoI only had experience with 3.0 format (quilt) and cdbs, so I can't say that's true for all packaging schemes05:34
c2tarunartfwo: BTW you build the package with debian line in rules file or without it?>05:37
c2tarunwhat about this error: dpkg-source: error: File ./freevo_1.9.0.orig.tar.gz has size 34309907 instead of expected 2718286705:46
c2tarunping^^05:53
c2taruncan anyone please help me with this error: dpkg-source: error: File ./freevo_1.9.0.orig.tar.gz has size 34309907 instead of expected 2718286706:14
c2taruncan anyone please help me with this error: dpkg-source: error: File ./freevo_1.9.0.orig.tar.gz has size 34309907 instead of expected 2718286706:37
artfwoc2tarun, sorry I was away07:09
c2tarunartfwo: no prob :)07:11
c2tarunartfwo: can you help me with that error?07:11
artfwoi don't know the reason, why this error occurs07:12
artfwobut I'd just redownload freevo_1.9.0.orig.tar.gz and overwrite the file in the merge directory07:12
artfwoand to answer your question, I've built the package with the Ubuntu fix07:12
c2tarunartfwo: you tested your build on pbuilder?07:13
artfwono, by simply running debuild on my working system07:14
c2tarunartfwo: try testing it on pbuilder as well.07:14
artfwoI cannot do this right now, because I have a slow internet connection here07:15
artfwodoes it build in pbuilder for you?07:15
udienzc2tarun, conratulation your merge (epdfview) has been approved07:16
c2tarunnope I got that error of size mismatch. Can you please tell me the size of your orig.tar.gz07:16
c2tarunudienz: thanks :)07:16
artfwoc2tarun, my orig.tar.gz is exactly 27182867 bytes07:16
c2tarunartfwo: hmm.... that is weird. that means something is wrong with grab.merge.sh script?07:17
artfwounlikely, because I downloaded the merge tree by running grab-merge.sh07:17
c2tarunartfwo: but you just said that you redownloaded the orig tarball and overwrote the file in merge directory.07:18
artfwono07:18
artfwoI said, I would do that, if I needed to fix the error :)07:18
artfwoor just remove the entire merge directory and start over07:19
c2tarunartfwo: hmm... that may be a better option, but still my problem is unexplained :( I am going to  try :)07:19
artfwowell, I cannot explain it, but maybe someone else here can07:20
c2taruni'll try it from start :) and wait for some to explain my prob :) thanks for helping. I'll request a merge when I'll complete it :)07:21
c2tarunartfwo: ping08:37
c2taruncan anyone please take a look at this bug for sponsorship bug 721686 Thank you08:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 721686 in freevo (Ubuntu) "Please merge freevo_1.9.0-10 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72168608:38
artfwoyes, c2tarun?08:39
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis
=== cdbs_ is now known as cdbs
c2tarunneed sponsorship bug 721686 thank you10:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 721686 in freevo (Ubuntu) "Please merge freevo_1.9.0-10 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72168610:27
shadeslayerc2tarun: +#rm debian/tmp/usr/share/freevo/icons/themes/geexbox/mimetypes/folder.png10:33
shadeslayerif we don't need that, remove it10:33
shadeslayerand the changelog is wrong10:34
shadeslayer-freevo (1.9.0-10) unstable; urgency=high << Why did you remove that?10:34
shadeslayerc2tarun: fix the changelog please :)10:35
shadeslayerkthxbai10:37
hakermaniabdrung: Hello, what's going on with wallch's review :) ?10:56
=== directhe` is now known as directhex
=== warp11 is now known as warp10
ari-tczewbdrung: dget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/gdk-pixbuf_2.23.0-1ubuntu2.dsc and try to run update-maintainer13:05
=== mrpouit is now known as mr_pouit
=== Ash-Fox is now known as Ash|Qin
=== maxb_ is now known as maxb
* RainCT wonders if anyone here is using Ubuntu with a touch screen16:23
=== debfx_ is now known as debfx
=== directhe` is now known as directhex
=== ikonia_ is now known as ikonia
hyperairis there any tool that creates a dsc out of an orig.tar.gz and debian.tar.gz  file?18:00
ScottKYou could do it by hand, but it'd take a few steps.18:02
hyperairhmm yeah18:04
geserwhy can't you "unpack" the source and call "dpkg-source -b" on it?18:05
hyperairi could18:06
hyperairbut then debian.tar.gz would change checksums18:06
hyperairthough i guess it doesn't really matter18:06
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis
ari-tczewhyperair: why are you taking to sponsor a bug assigned to someone else?18:34
hyperairari-tczew: er18:34
hyperairwhich bug?18:34
ari-tczewhyperair: bug 72170218:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 721702 in systemtap (Ubuntu) "Please merge systemtap 1.3-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72170218:35
hyperairoh sorry about that18:35
hyperairi guess i didn't refresh the page18:35
ari-tczew...18:35
hyperairari-tczew: also, i didn't realize there was a custom to assign a bug to the sponsor. i thought it was assigned to the sponsoree.18:36
ari-tczewhyperair: o_O18:37
* hyperair shrugs18:38
hyperairmaybe i'm outdated18:38
hyperairbut that was the practice before i became motu18:38
hyperairand i haven't sponsored stuff for some time as i was pretty busy18:38
ari-tczewhyperair: so advices for future: 1st refresh the page before taking a look18:40
ari-tczew2nd check whether bug reported and assigned is the same person18:40
hyperairari-tczew: more like i was already taking a look, but didn't assign the bug to myself.18:40
hyperairari-tczew: but yes, i'll keep an eye out for it in the future[18:40
ari-tczewreporter*18:40
hyperairthanks18:40
* hyperair reads through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue again18:41
ari-tczewhyperair: and 3rd in future if you're taking bug to sponsor, assign to myself18:48
* hyperair nods18:48
c2tarunneed help with this control file entry http://paste.ubuntu.com/569292/18:49
c2tarunI think the Maintainer and XSBC* entry will be the one of ubuntu one, but I am not sure about the other two entries. Can anyone please help18:49
hyperairupdate the Vcs- fields18:49
hyperairkeep the *Maintainer fields18:50
hyperairlooks like ampache has moved from svn to git.18:51
ari-tczewc2tarun: I really encourage to patch d/control manually18:51
ari-tczewso get debian source, unpack by dpkg-source -x *.dsc and do merge professionally18:52
* hyperair stuff everything into git and lets it do the merge18:53
ari-tczewsometimes it will get more time but you will get to know how it works18:53
hyperairstuffs*18:53
c2tarunactually I am new and dont know what git is actually, so even If i do it manually I'll not be able to understand, Can you please give me any documentation on git?18:54
mok0c2tarun: better do it manually then18:56
ari-tczew+1 ^^18:56
c2tarunmok0 ari-tczew: ya I can take a look on control file manually :) but still it will be the same entries separately that are mentioned together in the control file by mom.18:58
atagarHi (again). A package I maintain was just added to natty (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/tor-arm/1.4.0.1-2) - can I now file a ticket to request a backport or should I wait until natty has been released?19:00
ari-tczewc2tarun: changes (delta) will be the same yes but you don't have a mess in d/control19:00
ari-tczewatagar: you can do it right now19:00
atagarfantastic - thanks19:01
mok0c2tarun: It seems the maintainer moved from svn to git for maintaining the package19:01
c2tarunmok0: what are svn and git actually?19:01
c2tarun!svn19:04
ubottusvn is Subversion: an open-source revision control system, which aims to be a compelling replacement for CVS. See http://subversion.tigris.org/19:04
c2tarun!git19:04
ubottuGit is a distributed revision control/software code management project created by Linus Torvalds. For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_(software)19:04
mok0c2tarun: there you go :-)19:06
hyperairmok0!19:06
ari-tczewc2tarun: looking on ampache example, I guess easier is unpack current natty's source and add Debian changes from -10 revision19:07
ari-tczew(*10.patch)19:08
ari-tczewbut you have to do it manually on unpacked natty's source of ampache19:08
c2tarunari-tczew: after adding the debian changes I have to run update-maintainer that will change Maintainer and XSBC* entries, and as mok0 told that maintainer moved from svn to git, I think those entries will be good in debian's control. so I think these entries will be good for control file http://paste.ubuntu.com/569294/  can you please take a look.19:10
* hyperair recommends using something like meld19:11
* ari-tczew wonders if maintainer has switched to git why these changes are not in Debian...19:11
hyperairari-tczew: the Vcs- fields were updated in the debian revision though..19:11
hyperairari-tczew: and the merge is bringing them in19:11
ari-tczewhyperair: so what's the problem19:11
hyperairari-tczew: nothing?19:11
c2tarunso should I make the changes as I suggested?19:12
ari-tczewc2tarun: let me grab-merge ampache19:14
c2tarunari-tczew: sure.19:14
mok0hi hyperair19:17
hyperairhey mok019:17
hyperairlong time no see. =D19:17
mok0hyperair: indeed19:18
hyperair=)19:18
mok0meld is good. /me loves meld19:20
* iulian nods.19:23
ari-tczewold army? :)19:25
c2tarunari-tczew: grabbed the package?19:27
ari-tczewc2tarun: not yet, I have to finish some things19:28
c2tarunsure :) I'll wait, just ping me.19:28
ari-tczewc2tarun: OK grabbed. I had to recreate MoM patches, as well. Why recreate? See more info on bug 71145419:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 711454 in Merge-o-Matic "Patches include .pc files and directly changes on files" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71145419:37
zookoSo is the 24th of this month -- Thursday -- the deadline for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tahoe-lafs/+bug/719092 ?19:40
ubottuUbuntu bug 719092 in tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu) "please upgrade to Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.2" [Wishlist,New]19:40
ari-tczewc2tarun: OK I see d/controls right now, could you ask me again on what do you wonder?19:40
c2tarunari-tczew: Not getting, what do you mean by wrong patch?19:40
ari-tczew.pc files in patches created by MoM19:40
c2tarunari-tczew: actually what do you mean by wrong? How can a patch be a wrong? I mean if it is wrong the package wouldn't compile.19:41
ari-tczewc2tarun: this is probably bzr issue, MoM just gives you messed patches19:43
ari-tczewif you want to get clear patches, you have to do these commants:19:43
ari-tczewdebdiff ampache_3.5.4-9.dsc ampache_3.5.4-10.dsc > ampache_3.5.4-10.patch19:43
ari-tczewdebdiff ampache_3.5.4-9.dsc ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.dsc > ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.patch19:43
c2tarunari-tczew: and I was wondering about Vcs-svn and Vcs-Browser entries, in older version maintainer was using Svn, but in newer it is git, so What the entries should be?19:44
c2tarunari-tczew: I think the entries should be as I mentioned in my pastebin.19:46
ari-tczewc2tarun: ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.patch shows current Ubuntu delta and I don't see changed Vcs-* fields, so don't touch this and keep Debian style.19:46
ari-tczewudienz: Write in bug 721722 why this sync is necessary point out to bug of sync squid3.19:55
ubottuLaunchpad bug 721722 in squid-langpack (Ubuntu) "Sync squid-langpack 20110214-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72172219:55
c2tarunari-tczew: I have a question, I builded the new native debian version of ampache on natty machine, and it builded succesfully. Is it still necessary to merge? I mean why merge when it is building without any problem?19:56
c2tarunari-tczew: exactly I mean why apply ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.patch when its not needed?19:59
ari-tczewc2tarun: builded is english wrong, built is OK20:00
c2tarunari-tczew: sorry :920:01
c2tarun:(20:01
ari-tczewc2tarun: fact that package built fine it doesn't mean that you can drop all changes.20:01
c2tarunari-tczew: it means if mom fails we have to merge?20:02
ari-tczewc2tarun: I have to know that merging process are not always can be automatically done by MoM. It usually has to be done manually.20:02
ari-tczews/I have/You have20:02
c2tarunari-tczew: actually I was thinking about a sync, if the package is built succesfully than we can also go for sync? am i right?20:03
ari-tczewc2tarun: You must understand changes done in Ubuntu and figure out whether and which changes are incorporated in Debian. Then you have to sort out which changes are still nedeed in Ubuntu.20:03
ari-tczewc2tarun: Did you check whether changes from Ubuntu were incorporated in Debian?20:05
c2tarunari-tczew: hmm... according to changelog, there are many changes for ubuntu, how can i check whether these changes are incorporated in debian or not?20:07
ari-tczewc2tarun: Open ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.patch and ampache_3.5.4-10.patch and compare.20:09
c2tarunari-tczew: I think they are incorporated, please look the debdiff of ampache_3.5.4-10.dsc ampache_3.5.4-9ubuntu4.dsc20:09
ari-tczewc2tarun: Yes, all changes have been incorporated in Debian. It's ready to sync,20:11
c2tarunari-tczew: good :) still I dont know how to sync :(20:11
c2tarun!sync20:20
ubottuHelpful information for filing a sync request can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess20:20
hggdhwhy would a quilt patch (first patch in the series) fail, but a 'patch --dry-run' on the patch succed?20:27
ScottKQuilt (IIRC) assumes -p1.  Maybe you had it different for the dry run?20:27
hggdhno, I had -p1: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/569316/20:28
hggdhoops. hum... I dry-ran on a different patch, let me check again20:29
hggdhnope dry-run still succeeds20:30
hggdh_got it21:06
c2tarunneed help in filing a sync request. Error: failed to connect mx.launchpad.net. What is mx.launchpad.net?21:10
jmarsdenc2tarun: mx.launchpad.net is the machine indium.canonical.com, at IP 91.189.90.721:25
c2tarunwhy did requestsync failed to connect?21:26
c2tarunjmarsden: ^^21:27
jmarsdenc2tarun: Sorry, I don't know the answer to that, I am not anything official at Canonical or Launchpad :)  Do you have good working connectivity to mx.launchpad.net ?  You might want to ask in #launchpad21:29
c2tarunjmarsden: thanks :) I'll try once more if it fails again, I'll ask on #launchpad21:30
zookoAnybody want to help upgrade Tahoe-LAFS in Ubuntu?21:49
zookoThere has been much talk recently about Freedom-Compatible tools, including Tahoe-LAFS.21:49
lifelesszooko: what help do you need?22:12
zookolifeless: hm...22:14
zookolifeless: take the package v1.7.1 that is already in Ubuntu, upgrade it to the latest release, build a new package. :-)22:14
jmarsdenzooko: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#Updating%20an%20Ubuntu%20Package22:15
zookoI don't have a working linux system at the moment.22:17
zookoAlthough I might soon if this dual boot project works out.22:18
lifelesszooko: what system do you have?22:19
zookolifeless: OSX22:22
hggdh_ari-tczew: hi, sorry for the delay, bug bug 663925 now has a branch for lucid-updates22:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 663925 in ncmpcpp (Ubuntu Lucid) "ncmpcpp (version < 0. 5.4) can cause unexpected deletion of files" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66392522:26
lifelesszooko: doesn't that come with a vm thingy?22:26
ari-tczewhggdh_: hi! ok thanks for spending time on it. :-)22:27
zookolifeless: I could install virtualbox and install ubuntu in vbox.22:31
hggdh_ari-tczew: also, this is my first branch, so please correct me22:31
zookoThat is approximately as much work as installing ubuntu dual-boot,...22:31
ari-tczewhggdh_: OK.22:31
lifelesszooko: I find that having any secondary platforms available as vms makes adhoc fixes on those platforms a lot easier22:38
lifelesszooko: thats the only reason I suggest it22:38
ari-tczewhggdh_: could you add DEP3 tags to patch?22:44
hggdh_ari-tczew: darn! I forgot -- again... will do22:54
ari-tczewhggdh_: I pointed out issues on branch review.22:54
hggdh_ari-tczew: going there noew22:54
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
hggdh_ari-tczew: same format as my original patch to Maverick? I remember you had some issues there, but I do not remember which -- http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/569371/22:58
ari-tczewhggdh_: Generally yes, but would be nice to have a note in description that you have adjusted this patch to 0.4.1.23:00
hggdh_ari-tczew: sure, will do23:00
hggdh_ari-tczew: no problem is it is an update to the branch?23:00
ari-tczewhggdh_: No, but I guess I can't merge branch directly, since there is no lucid-proposed branch.23:01
ari-tczewIt will be direct upload to archive via dput.23:02
hggdh_and -- IIRC -- we cannot set it to lucid-proposed, correct?23:05
hggdh_I guess this is what you said...23:06
ari-tczewhggdh_: Yes, we cannot.23:06
hggdh_ari-tczew: done23:13
hggdh_oh hell, indication applet is barfing continuously...23:13
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!