/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/20/#launchpad.txt

idnarhttp://blog.launchpad.net/ppa/failed-to-fetch-errors-for-ppas contains what is, as far as I can determine, a really confusing typo00:30
idnarit looks like "All of these refer to different components within the same PPA. You only need the first four PPAs" should read "for" instead of "four"00:31
wgrantidnar: Hah, indeed. Fixing.00:31
wgrantFixed.00:33
wgrantidnar: I thought it was right when I reviewed it.00:34
wgrantSomeone actually corrected it to 'four' afterwards...00:34
idnarheh00:34
lifelessI would say 'PPAs only need the first component'00:37
lifelessand avoid the ambiguity00:37
wgrantOnly need, or only have?00:38
lifelesshave would be better00:42
lifelessI was rephrasing the existing sentence00:42
wgrantRight, was just proposing further alterations.00:43
wgrantIs done.00:43
kalikianaIs there a way to mark all Committed bugs as Released?01:22
wgrantkalikiana: There's no way to do it directly in Launchpad, but you can do it easily through the API, and there are several existing launchpadlib scripts that do that.01:31
wgrantlp:~mgiuca/+junk/launchpad-tools is one I've used.01:34
wgrantBut there are many around that are slightly different. Some close all Fix Committed bugs in a milestone, others all in a project, some add comments, some don't...01:34
kalikianawgrant: that looks perfectly like what I need, thanks a lot. I have only used the UI so far01:39
lostogrewho here was working on bind 9.8.0rc1?02:00
kalikianawgrant: I can't seem to use the script, it eats all my memory + swap and I need to kill it before it does anything :-(02:20
kalikianaWould you have any idea why that happens?02:20
wgrantkalikiana: What's the traceback if you kill it while it is eating?02:22
kalikianait seems to be in File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/launchpadlib/credentials.py", line 242, in __call__02:24
kalikianawebbrowser.open(self.authorization_url)02:24
kalikianait doesn't really make sense that opening a browser would need much memory02:24
wgrantOne would think not...02:26
kalikianawgrant: would you happen to know what url I need to open?02:26
wgrantIt varies, because it contains the token URL.02:27
kalikianahmm02:27
wgrantWhat happens if you strace it?02:27
kalikianaoh, very good idea, it seems to choke on xdg-open02:28
wgrantI've never seen that before. Does xdg-open work if you invoke it manually?02:28
kalikianalooks like it loops. and changing $BROWSER to not be xdg-open fixes it. which is odd because I didn't touch that variables in months02:34
kalikianabut not an lp issue in any case then02:35
kalikianawgrant: works now, thanks again02:40
=== ferrousw1eel is now known as ferroushweel
=== ferroushweel is now known as ferrouswheel
micahguh, I just had a bugzilla.gnome status just go to unknown08:11
lifelessbug ?08:29
micahgbug 65722708:30
ubot5Launchpad bug 657227 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "gnome-shell doesn't respect user font settings" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/65722708:30
lifelessits marked resolved duplicate in the bug watch portlet08:34
lifelessand the duplication was just now08:36
micahglifeless: ok, but still, should it go to unknown08:36
micahgshould I set the new upstream or do you need this for testing?08:37
lifelessmicahg: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63686808:37
lifelessunconfirmed08:37
micahgok, but unconfirmed = New08:37
lifelessmicahg: I don't know quite what the expected behaviour is here08:37
lifelessI would file a question about this and leave it be08:37
lifelesswe should be able to do better08:37
micahgquestion as opposed to bug08:37
lifelessyes08:38
lifelessbugs are for defects08:38
lifelessquestions are for, well, questions08:38
lifeless'whats meant to happen' is not a bug :)08:38
micahghttps://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/14608808:40
slangasekis there a way someone here could kill https://launchpad.net/~vorlon/+archive/multiarch/+buildjob/2274512 for me?10:41
slangasekit wasn't meant to try to build in that ppa, it was supposed to get binaries copied from a different ppa but I was too hasty and tried to copy before the binaries were fully published10:42
wgrantslangasek: Hm, it shouldn't have let you copy if there were unpublished builds...10:44
slangasekoops ;)10:44
wgrantUnfortunately we can't sensibly kill a building build without poking the builder directly.10:46
wgrantAnd even if I was to do that, it's possible the aborted build would block you from copying the i386 binaries in later.10:46
slangasekwgrant: well, I'm already routing around the need to copy by playing towers of hanoi with another ppa, but y'all might want that builder back sooner than 9 hours from now10:48
wgrantHeh. Let me try to kill it...10:49
wgrantAh, actually, I can't.10:50
wgrantI can do it for recipe builds, but not binary builds yet.10:50
slangasekok :/10:50
lvhHello!16:21
lvhIs it possible to rename a project, or do I ask for it to be removed and create a new one?16:21
lvhRemoval might actually be better: it's a replacement of a dead project.16:21
micahglvh: file a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad16:49
=== marienz_ is now known as marienz
maxblvh: Renaming is possible, if it makes sense to do so16:58
JoshBrownHow do I remove tags from a Bazaar branch on Launchpad?17:03
maxbJoshBrown: 'bzr tag --delete -d lp:.... tagname'17:05
maxbHowever... any merging of pushing from another branch which still has the tag will re-add it17:06
maxbs/of/or/17:06
JoshBrownmaxb: Thanks, that's exactly what I'm looking for!17:08
lvhmicahg: Thanks, I just did.17:27
=== kalikiana1 is now known as kalikiana
JoshBrownWhen you create an original deb package on Launchpad, what should it be called? Am I correct in thinking it should be something along the lines of `name_1.0-0ubuntu1~ppa1_all.deb`?17:48
micahgJoshBrown: launchpad only accepts source uploads17:50
JoshBrownmicahg: Okay, but nonetheless, what should the package be designated as? Do I include ubuntu1, ~ppa1, etc?17:51
micahgJoshBrown: I usually do ~series~ppa1 where series is the release targeted, if this is the first upload of that version, you can use UPSTREAMVERSION-0ubuntu1~series~ppa117:54
JoshBrownmicahg: I was mainly wondering whether it was `0ubuntu1` or just `0`. Thanks, that answers my question!17:58
micahgJoshBrown: technically either would be fine since 0 is lower than 0ubuntu117:59
maxbJoshBrown: People exercise varying degrees of care about version numbers in PPAs, and there are several different schools of thought18:56
maxbFor example, I think micahg's example is inverted, in the sense that series is usually the least significant part of your packaging efforts, so goes at the end.18:57
micahgmaxb: the problem with that is you override official backports18:57
maxbAlso, I'll explicitly avoid including 0ubuntu1 in versions unless I'm actually deriving a PPA package from an official ubuntu package version including that18:58
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte
maxbhmm. I cynically care little about that on the basis that official backports seldom seem to actually happen :-/18:59
JoshBrownmaxb: So you'd package as `name_1.0-0~ppa1~maverick`, for example?19:00
maxbI usually go with ~maverick1, and increment that number if I need to make a series-specific build fix19:01
JoshBrownmaxb: Great, thanks!19:02
maxbAlso, I tend to call things 0ppa1 rather than 0~ppa119:02
maxbMainly because I believe in using the magical ~ operator only when relevant, rather than as an arbitrary separator19:03
maxbThough I admit that I'm relying on the happenstance that 'ppa' < 'ubuntu' in doing so19:04
micahgmaxb: actually, now with the extras repo, that isn't necessarily a good idea as it's 0series1 for the versioninig19:09
=== menesis1 is now known as menesis

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!