[00:03] Hey there, could I have someone's attention about bug 708504 ? php5-fpm got dropped along the way and php5 5.3.5-1 in debian seems to be the only package to have php5-fpm included again. [00:03] Launchpad bug 708504 in php5 (Ubuntu) "[needs-packaging] PHP 5.3.5 is available." [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708504 [00:29] siretart: libva for natty: bug 721978 [00:29] Launchpad bug 721978 in libva (Ubuntu) "Sync libva 1.0.8-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721978 [00:38] I'm having an issue, hackers. I've got a d/rules file that generates the upstream tarball (with some --exclude calls), and I can't get it to match upstream's tarball [00:38] I've tried extracting upstream, repacking (and they don't match) [00:38] my generated tarballs don't match, and when I manually remove what I'm excluding and create it, it does not match any of it [00:39] I have 4 tarballs, and 4 different md5sums. I'm wicked confused [00:43] i don't think tar or gzip are designed to give you the same thing repeatably [00:43] that's why we have things like pristine-tar [00:44] (gzip in particular includes the time it was generated in the header) [00:44] hummm [00:44] well when I md5sum `find .` inside the archive, and write that stdout to a file, they all match [00:44] yes [00:44] so I guess that makes sense === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage [05:42] I was trying to merge a package, the error posted in REPORT is the conflict b/w these lines in a file http://paste.ubuntu.com/569478/ I think both lines will do fine. but debian's new line is more explanatroy than ubuntu's Which line should I add. (I suggest debian's) [05:43] c2tarun: if we didn't make any changes to that line, we take Debian's, if the reason we changed it no longer applies, we take Debian's [05:44] micahg: so I should take debian's and request for a merge? [05:45] c2tarun: I would have to look at the package to say for sure [05:49] micahg: actually what should I look in order to check this line. [05:50] c2tarun: see if it's in the UBuntu patch [05:54] micahg: this line is in the patch that is what creating the conflict. Isn't it? [05:55] :q [05:58] c2tarun: yeah, so now you have to see why we changed that [06:02] micahg: sorry mate, i got to go now, i'll come back and work on this merge, thank you [12:09] micahg: ping [12:24] there are some packages on this link https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html which dont have any problem in merging, still they are there. Why are they not merged automatically? [12:50] c2tarun: MoM has been crashed and doesn't update anymore. it needs to be fixed by core devs. I pinged cjwatson yesterday for it. [13:35] bdrung: In 4 days, the advocation process for Ubuntu Natty 11.04 is over. How is the advocation of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch ? [13:35] How is it going? === Guest67018 is now known as Leon-Wallch [13:38] hakermania: maybe tumbleweed could give you adocate [13:39] tumbleweed: Can you advocate my package? [13:39] ai-tczew: Thx, buddy. [13:43] tsou re [13:43] e [14:19] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/63056953/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.homebank_4.2.1-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <- any idea? it seems to be due to some change in natty, as the same package builds perfectly well in maverick... [14:39] Adri2000: FTBFS due to gcc 4.5. [14:39] Adri2000: Maverick bases on older gcc, that's works. [14:39] Adri2000: I encourage to get in touch with upstream. [14:41] ari-tczew: probably won't have enough time to get in touch with upstream, as I'd like to upload a new version before feature freeze. do you know what the problem is exactly? and even how to fix it? :) [14:42] Adri2000: I guess try to add -Wl, --no-add-needed to LDFLAGS/LIBS. If it won't help, upstream has to fix it in source. [14:43] please make a review to Wallch before 24th of February --> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch [14:54] hyperair: 4th suggestion: when you're building source, please use debuild with option -vLAST_UBUNTU_REVISION [15:04] ari-tczew: okay. [15:05] ari-tczew: i think i might have missed it for one of the packages, but i usually do that when i remember to. [15:06] hyperair: Sure, mistakes sometimes could occur. [15:19] ari-tczew: playing with LDFLAGS won't solve an include issue… [15:20] mr_pouit: so it's place to work for upstream. [15:21] ari-tczew: does changing name in launchpad will also change it while signature? [15:21] ari-tczew: I mean while editing changelog? [15:21] c2tarun: nope [15:21] ari-tczew: how can i fix that? [15:22] c2tarun: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Intro/PackageUpdate [15:31] ari-tczew: what is binutils-gold? [15:32] !binutils-gold [15:32] c2tarun: http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking [15:36] ari-tczew: and one more thing, what is feature freeze? [15:37] !FF [15:37] firefox is the default web-browser on Ubuntu. To install the latest version, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion Installing plugins: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxPlugins - See also !firefox-3.5 [15:37] !FFe [15:37] Feature Freeze Exception. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess for the freeze exception process. [15:37] c2tarun: ^^ [15:37] ari-tczew: thanks :) [15:44] np [16:15] hi all [16:15] is it still time to sync a debian package to ubuntu? [16:17] yes. [16:17] feature freeze is on february 24th. [16:17] thanks hyperair [16:18] np [16:18] hyperair: is there any ubuntu channel with X/video/graphis people and packagers? [16:19] Turl: #ubuntu-x [16:19] thanks [16:19] np [16:44] c2tarun: merges at this point are done if the benefit of merging outweighs the risk of regressions [16:44] ari-tczew: it's not about a core-dev for MoM, but rather someone with access to the server [16:45] micahg: risk of regressions? what is it? [16:46] c2tarun: where uploading a new version breaks itself or a lot of other applications [16:48] micahg: as its too late for merges, how else can I contribute? [16:49] c2tarun: not too late, just benefit needs to outweigh risk [16:49] c2tarun: FTBFS would be great [16:49] micahg: I suggested the same. [16:50] micahg: ok, and yes ari-tczew also suggested me to go for FTBFS, I dont have very good coding background. How can I fix ftbfs? [16:50] c2tarun: you can fix FTBFS with binutils-gold/linking no-add-needed, it's easy [16:51] c2tarun: go to udienz or doko LP page and check his uploaded packages how they fixed FTBFS [16:52] c2tarun: here you can look for FTBFS: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi [17:22] debfx: finally got around to helping get fluxbox 1.3 out, thanks for taking care of my baby in Ubuntu while I was busy :) [17:31] paultag: np, want me to sync it to ubuntu? [17:40] debfx: that'd be awesome! I have a bug open, if you need it [17:40] debfx: 722232 [17:46] paultag: I take it you have tested that it works fine on natty? :) [17:47] debfx: an hour ago :) -- https://launchpad.net/~paultag/+archive/fluxbox/+packages [17:48] oh shucks, that's maverick [17:48] debfx: yeah, I tested locally. Worth testing again, but it works :) [18:06] thanks, debfx :) [18:20] Hey all, would there be anybody available to take a quick look at bug 722007 (and possibly bug 708504)? [18:20] Launchpad bug 722007 in php5 (Ubuntu) "php5-fpm is missing in natty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/722007 [18:20] Launchpad bug 708504 in php5 (Ubuntu) "[needs-packaging] PHP 5.3.5 is available." [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708504 [18:20] weboide: not happening this cycle [18:20] micahg: what do you mean? [18:21] weboide: we're going to stick with Debian WRT PHP [18:21] micahg: I see, but could just php5-fpm be reintroduced then? since this would be a regression from maverick [18:22] it's a little too late to introduce a new PHP version [18:22] micahg: wouldn't it be possible just to enable to php-fpm build? [18:22] weboide: you'd have to ask the server team [18:23] weboide: I'll mark bug 722007 as a regression though [18:23] Launchpad bug 722007 in php5 (Ubuntu) "php5-fpm is missing in natty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/722007 [18:23] micahg: thanks for your time [18:23] weboide: the server team is in #ubuntu-server or you can ask on their mailing list, but you might not get a response until Monday [18:24] micahg: okay, I will check with them, thanks for help with this! [20:13] how can I set the working directory of an application? problem: data files are under /usr/share/2ManDVD and executable is under /usr/lib/2ManDVD. now there is a symbolic link in /usr/share/2ManDVD to the executable. if I call it from there the executable does not find its resources because it says the working directory is /usr/lib/2ManDVD === menesis1 is now known as menesis [21:48] Folks: FYI POX and warner are working on packaging Tahoe-LAFS for Debian over on irc.oftc.net #debian-python. [21:48] Context: Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1 is in Ubuntu already, but I hope someone will upgrade it to v1.8.2 for Natty. [21:49] More context: Tahoe-LAFS is widely thought of as being a good candidate to be part of the new Freedom Box project that Eben Moglen recently spoke about and got written up in the New York Times. [21:49] This has spurred interest in freshening up the Tahoe-LAFS debian packaging.