[00:03] <weboide> Hey there, could I have someone's attention about bug 708504 ? php5-fpm got dropped along the way and php5 5.3.5-1 in debian seems to be the only package to have php5-fpm included again.
[00:29] <ari-tczew> siretart: libva for natty: bug 721978
[00:38] <paultag> I'm having an issue, hackers. I've got a d/rules file that generates the upstream tarball (with some --exclude calls), and I can't get it to match upstream's tarball
[00:38] <paultag> I've tried extracting upstream, repacking (and they don't match)
[00:38] <paultag> my generated tarballs don't match, and when I manually remove what I'm excluding and create it, it does not match any of it
[00:39] <paultag> I have 4 tarballs, and 4 different md5sums. I'm wicked confused
[00:43] <broder> i don't think tar or gzip are designed to give you the same thing repeatably
[00:43] <broder> that's why we have things like pristine-tar
[00:44] <broder> (gzip in particular includes the time it was generated in the header)
[00:44] <paultag> hummm
[00:44] <paultag> well when I md5sum `find .` inside the archive, and write that stdout to a file, they all match
[00:44] <broder> yes
[00:44] <paultag> so I guess that makes sense
[05:42] <c2tarun> I was trying to merge a package, the error posted in REPORT is the conflict b/w these lines in a file http://paste.ubuntu.com/569478/ I think both lines will do fine. but debian's new line is more explanatroy than ubuntu's Which line should I add. (I suggest debian's)
[05:43] <micahg> c2tarun: if we didn't make any changes to that line, we take Debian's, if the reason we changed it no longer applies, we take Debian's
[05:44] <c2tarun> micahg: so I should take debian's and request for a merge?
[05:45] <micahg> c2tarun: I would have to look at the package to say for sure
[05:49] <c2tarun> micahg: actually what should I look in order to check this line.
[05:50] <micahg> c2tarun: see if it's in the UBuntu patch
[05:54] <c2tarun> micahg: this line is in the patch that is what creating the conflict. Isn't it?
[05:55] <c2tarun> :q
[05:58] <micahg> c2tarun: yeah, so now you have to see why we changed that
[06:02] <c2tarun> micahg: sorry mate, i got to go now, i'll come back and work on this merge, thank you
[12:09] <c2tarun> micahg: ping
[12:24] <c2tarun> there are some packages on this link https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html which dont have any problem in merging, still they are there. Why are they not merged automatically?
[12:50] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: MoM has been crashed and doesn't update anymore. it needs to be fixed by core devs. I pinged cjwatson yesterday for it.
[13:35] <hakermania> bdrung: In 4 days, the advocation process for Ubuntu Natty 11.04 is over. How is the advocation of  http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch ?
[13:35] <hakermania> How is it going?
[13:38] <ari-tczew> hakermania: maybe tumbleweed could give you adocate
[13:39] <hakermania> tumbleweed: Can you advocate my package?
[13:39] <hakermania> ai-tczew: Thx, buddy.
[13:43] <hakermania> tsou re
[13:43] <hakermania> e
[14:19] <Adri2000> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/63056953/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.homebank_4.2.1-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <- any idea? it seems to be due to some change in natty, as the same package builds perfectly well in maverick...
[14:39] <ari-tczew> Adri2000: FTBFS due to gcc 4.5.
[14:39] <ari-tczew> Adri2000: Maverick bases on older gcc, that's works.
[14:39] <ari-tczew> Adri2000: I encourage to get in touch with upstream.
[14:41] <Adri2000> ari-tczew: probably won't have enough time to get in touch with upstream, as I'd like to upload a new version before feature freeze. do you know what the problem is exactly? and even how to fix it? :)
[14:42] <ari-tczew> Adri2000: I guess try to add -Wl, --no-add-needed to LDFLAGS/LIBS. If it won't help, upstream has to fix it in source.
[14:43] <Leon-Wallch> please make a review to Wallch before 24th of February --> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/wallch
[14:54] <ari-tczew> hyperair: 4th suggestion: when you're building source, please use debuild with option -vLAST_UBUNTU_REVISION
[15:04] <hyperair> ari-tczew: okay.
[15:05] <hyperair> ari-tczew: i think i might have missed it for one of the packages, but i usually do that when i remember to.
[15:06] <ari-tczew> hyperair: Sure, mistakes sometimes could occur.
[15:19] <mr_pouit> ari-tczew: playing with LDFLAGS won't solve an include issue…
[15:20] <ari-tczew> mr_pouit: so it's place to work for upstream.
[15:21] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: does changing name in launchpad will also change it while signature?
[15:21] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: I mean while editing changelog?
[15:21] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: nope
[15:21] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: how can i fix that?
[15:22] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Intro/PackageUpdate
[15:31] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: what is binutils-gold?
[15:32] <c2tarun> !binutils-gold
[15:32] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
[15:36] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: and one more thing, what is feature freeze?
[15:37] <ari-tczew> !FF
[15:37] <ari-tczew> !FFe
[15:37] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: ^^
[15:37] <c2tarun> ari-tczew: thanks :)
[15:44] <ari-tczew> np
[16:15] <Turl> hi all
[16:15] <Turl> is it still time to sync a debian package to ubuntu?
[16:17] <hyperair> yes.
[16:17] <hyperair> feature freeze is on february 24th.
[16:17] <Turl> thanks hyperair
[16:18] <hyperair> np
[16:18] <Turl> hyperair: is there any ubuntu channel with X/video/graphis people and packagers?
[16:19] <ari-tczew> Turl: #ubuntu-x
[16:19] <Turl> thanks
[16:19] <ari-tczew> np
[16:44] <micahg> c2tarun: merges at this point are done if the benefit of merging outweighs the risk of regressions
[16:44] <micahg> ari-tczew: it's not about a core-dev for MoM, but rather someone with access to the server
[16:45] <c2tarun> micahg: risk of regressions? what is it?
[16:46] <micahg> c2tarun: where uploading a new version breaks itself or a lot of other applications
[16:48] <c2tarun> micahg: as its too late for merges, how else can I contribute?
[16:49] <micahg> c2tarun: not too late, just benefit needs to outweigh risk
[16:49] <micahg> c2tarun: FTBFS would be great
[16:49] <ari-tczew> micahg: I suggested the same.
[16:50] <c2tarun> micahg: ok, and yes ari-tczew also suggested me to go for FTBFS, I dont have very good coding background. How can I fix ftbfs?
[16:50] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: you can fix FTBFS with binutils-gold/linking no-add-needed, it's easy
[16:51] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: go to udienz or doko LP page and check his uploaded packages how they fixed FTBFS
[16:52] <ari-tczew> c2tarun: here you can look for FTBFS: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi
[17:22] <paultag> debfx: finally got around to helping get fluxbox 1.3 out, thanks for taking care of my baby in Ubuntu while I was busy :)
[17:31] <debfx> paultag: np, want me to sync it to ubuntu?
[17:40] <paultag> debfx: that'd be awesome! I have a bug open, if you need it
[17:40] <paultag> debfx: 722232
[17:46] <debfx> paultag: I take it you have tested that it works fine on natty? :)
[17:47] <paultag> debfx: an hour ago :) -- https://launchpad.net/~paultag/+archive/fluxbox/+packages
[17:48] <paultag> oh shucks, that's maverick
[17:48] <paultag> debfx: yeah, I tested locally. Worth testing again, but it works :)
[18:06] <paultag> thanks, debfx :)
[18:20] <weboide> Hey all, would there be anybody available to take a quick look at bug 722007 (and possibly bug 708504)?
[18:20] <micahg> weboide: not happening this cycle
[18:20] <weboide> micahg: what do you mean?
[18:21] <micahg> weboide: we're going to stick with Debian WRT PHP
[18:21] <weboide> micahg: I see, but could just php5-fpm be reintroduced then? since this would be a regression from maverick
[18:22] <micahg> it's a little too late to introduce a new PHP version
[18:22] <weboide> micahg: wouldn't it be possible just to enable to php-fpm build?
[18:22] <micahg> weboide: you'd have to ask the server team
[18:23] <micahg> weboide: I'll mark bug 722007 as a regression though
[18:23] <weboide> micahg: thanks for your time
[18:23] <micahg> weboide: the server team is in #ubuntu-server or you can ask on their mailing list, but you might not get a response until Monday
[18:24] <weboide> micahg: okay, I will check with them, thanks for help with this!
[20:13] <c_korn> how can I set the working directory of an application? problem: data files are under /usr/share/2ManDVD and executable is under /usr/lib/2ManDVD. now there is a symbolic link in /usr/share/2ManDVD to the executable. if I call it from there the executable does not find its resources because it says the working directory is /usr/lib/2ManDVD
[21:48] <zooko> Folks: FYI POX and warner are working on packaging Tahoe-LAFS for Debian over on irc.oftc.net #debian-python.
[21:48] <zooko> Context: Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1 is in Ubuntu already, but I hope someone will upgrade it to v1.8.2 for Natty.
[21:49] <zooko> More context: Tahoe-LAFS is widely thought of as being a good candidate to be part of the new Freedom Box project that Eben Moglen recently spoke about and got written up in the New York Times.
[21:49] <zooko> This has spurred interest in freshening up the Tahoe-LAFS debian packaging.