| hggdh | Tetsuo55: npviewer.bin is a special case. I am not sure there is anything we can do there, but I do not dwell in the mistic rooms of flash | 01:40 |
|---|---|---|
| penalvch | Regarding bug 202391 this should be marked wishlist as it is an enhancement request for AVM2 implementation in gnash. | 05:20 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 202391 in gnash (Ubuntu) "Cannot view AVM2 flash enabled pages (affects: 6) (dups: 4) (heat: 48)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202391 | 05:20 |
| micahg | penalvch: are yo9u sure the new bugs are duplicates of the older ones? It seems that the original one (202391) was due to an old gnash version | 05:29 |
| penalvch | micahg: the cnn hyperlink is AVM2, hence the reason for the AVM2 dup'ing. | 05:31 |
| * micahg wonders if it was AVM2 3 yrs ago | 05:32 | |
| penalvch | micahg: ah I see, little hijack'esk on my part but still holds true to the original bug title "Cannot view some flash enabled pages" :) | 05:33 |
| micahg | penalvch: that's the problem with hijacking :), but thank you for the due diligence | 05:34 |
| penalvch | micahg: I did a little research on when AVM2 came out, it did come out prior to 2008 so it's most likely that AVM2 was the bug driver. | 05:44 |
| micahg | penalvch: ok, thanks | 05:50 |
| === jamespage is now known as jpage | ||
| === jpage is now known as jamespage | ||
| acarpine | hi people | 10:41 |
| acarpine | I have a doubt | 10:41 |
| acarpine | Some day ago I reported this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-applet/+bug/721813 | 10:41 |
| ubot4 | acarpine: Error: Bug #721813 is private. | 10:41 |
| acarpine | ops is private...i'm gonna change the visibility properties... | 10:42 |
| acarpine | done | 10:44 |
| acarpine | the Apport retracing service mark my report as invalid saying "This | 10:46 |
| acarpine | might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system at the time of the report: | 10:46 |
| acarpine | libgcc1: installed version 1:4.5.2-3ubuntu1, latest version: 1:4.5.2-3ubuntu2...." and so on | 10:46 |
| acarpine | but I update my system (natty release) every 2 days | 10:46 |
| persia | acarpine: The trick is that new packages are published every hour, and that the delay between filing the bug and the apport-retracer attempting the retrace may be sufficient that the packages you used are outdated by the time it runs. | 10:49 |
| acarpine | Is it possible that for correctly report a bug I have to update my system continuously? | 10:49 |
| persia | Just update again, and reproduce, and file a new bug if you can. | 10:49 |
| persia | You don't have to update it continuously, but if you have a reproducible bug, you'd do best to update and then reproduce, and then file, just to make sure you can still reproduce with the newest versions. | 10:50 |
| acarpine | ok tks a lot persia! | 10:50 |
| acarpine | I will follow your hint! | 10:51 |
| persia | Good luck. | 10:51 |
| gnomefreak | was the sounds disabled in terminel(irssi) on purpose? | 10:54 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Afwas_ is now known as Afwas | ||
| joumetal | What is the difference of isc-dhclient and dhcpcd in natty? | 19:35 |
| joumetal | dhclient gives no connection and no errors | 19:37 |
| virtuald | isc dhclient is the reference client by the internet software consortium, dhcpcd is another implementation | 19:39 |
| toresbe | hey folks - TV out stopped working after upgrading to natty - TV is detected, but no output. Any suggestions on how I can narrow this down? | 20:12 |
| cybernet | toresbe: the better place to ask would be #ubuntu | 20:17 |
| cybernet | toresbe: have you tried there already | 20:17 |
| toresbe | Nope, am trying #ubuntu+1, though. Sorry if I went to the wrong place, I was just thinking that this was overwhelmingly likely to be a bug in ubuntu and so I came here :) | 20:18 |
| joumetal | You can try old kernel to see if it's problem in kernel. | 20:18 |
| joumetal | And your Xorg.0.log could have information too. | 20:19 |
| joumetal | Apport should attach that file when you submit a bug about your video driver. | 20:20 |
| chalcedony | is there a way to un-attach an attachment to a bug report? | 20:20 |
| toresbe | Upgrading removed my old kernel, and everything in xorg.0.log is hunky-dorey. | 20:21 |
| yofel | chalcedony: the attachments are listed on the right of the page, you can delete them from the edit dialog | 20:22 |
| chalcedony | yofel, thanks looking | 20:22 |
| chalcedony | yofel, as far as i can tell there is nothing on the right hand side of the page at all? | 20:23 |
| chalcedony | except log out | 20:23 |
| yofel | chalcedony: you should have something like this below the subscriber list http://yofel.dyndns.org/pics/ext/lp_att.png | 20:25 |
| chalcedony | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+filebug/ stuff | 20:27 |
| chalcedony | yofel, doesn't seem to have that | 20:27 |
| yofel | ah no, I don't think apport supports selecting what it should attach to the report yet | 20:28 |
| yofel | neither does the launchpad filebug dialog | 20:28 |
| yofel | you could file the bug as private, remove the attachment after filing the bug and then mark it public | 20:28 |
| chalcedony | the bug is that it won't attach the right file, and it attaches 'xchat.conf' more often than not.. and just did it when i tried to upload a screenshot | 20:29 |
| yofel | that should be the easiest way to keep an attachment from being visible | 20:29 |
| yofel | o.O? | 20:29 |
| yofel | the add attachment dialog on the filebug page? | 20:30 |
| chalcedony | yes | 20:30 |
| yofel | try a different browser maybe, I'm don't know what handles that | 20:30 |
| chalcedony | it happens with yahoo mail and anything else needing an attachment | 20:30 |
| chalcedony | both opera and firefox | 20:30 |
| chalcedony | and i think dcc from xchat | 20:31 |
| yofel | out of ideas then :S | 20:32 |
| chalcedony | heh | 20:33 |
| chalcedony | let me see if i can figure out how to do private | 20:33 |
| chalcedony | or maybe just cancel? | 20:33 |
| chalcedony | nothing to click for private | 20:34 |
| yofel | indeed o.O | 20:35 |
| yofel | if you have a gpg key you could also try to file a bug by e-mail https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface | 20:35 |
| chalcedony | can't i just redo it and not attach any file? | 20:36 |
| chalcedony | or is it already filed even if i don't click 'submit a bug report'? | 20:36 |
| yofel | no, you can cancel it | 20:36 |
| chalcedony | good | 20:39 |
| BUGabundo | evening | 20:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
