[01:40] Tetsuo55: npviewer.bin is a special case. I am not sure there is anything we can do there, but I do not dwell in the mistic rooms of flash [05:20] Regarding bug 202391 this should be marked wishlist as it is an enhancement request for AVM2 implementation in gnash. [05:20] Launchpad bug 202391 in gnash (Ubuntu) "Cannot view AVM2 flash enabled pages (affects: 6) (dups: 4) (heat: 48)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/202391 [05:29] penalvch: are yo9u sure the new bugs are duplicates of the older ones? It seems that the original one (202391) was due to an old gnash version [05:31] micahg: the cnn hyperlink is AVM2, hence the reason for the AVM2 dup'ing. [05:32] * micahg wonders if it was AVM2 3 yrs ago [05:33] micahg: ah I see, little hijack'esk on my part but still holds true to the original bug title "Cannot view some flash enabled pages" :) [05:34] penalvch: that's the problem with hijacking :), but thank you for the due diligence [05:44] micahg: I did a little research on when AVM2 came out, it did come out prior to 2008 so it's most likely that AVM2 was the bug driver. [05:50] penalvch: ok, thanks === jamespage is now known as jpage === jpage is now known as jamespage [10:41] hi people [10:41] I have a doubt [10:41] Some day ago I reported this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-applet/+bug/721813 [10:41] acarpine: Error: Bug #721813 is private. [10:42] ops is private...i'm gonna change the visibility properties... [10:44] done [10:46] the Apport retracing service mark my report as invalid saying "This [10:46] might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system at the time of the report: [10:46] libgcc1: installed version 1:4.5.2-3ubuntu1, latest version: 1:4.5.2-3ubuntu2...." and so on [10:46] but I update my system (natty release) every 2 days [10:49] acarpine: The trick is that new packages are published every hour, and that the delay between filing the bug and the apport-retracer attempting the retrace may be sufficient that the packages you used are outdated by the time it runs. [10:49] Is it possible that for correctly report a bug I have to update my system continuously? [10:49] Just update again, and reproduce, and file a new bug if you can. [10:50] You don't have to update it continuously, but if you have a reproducible bug, you'd do best to update and then reproduce, and then file, just to make sure you can still reproduce with the newest versions. [10:50] ok tks a lot persia! [10:51] I will follow your hint! [10:51] Good luck. [10:54] was the sounds disabled in terminel(irssi) on purpose? === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Afwas_ is now known as Afwas [19:35] What is the difference of isc-dhclient and dhcpcd in natty? [19:37] dhclient gives no connection and no errors [19:39] isc dhclient is the reference client by the internet software consortium, dhcpcd is another implementation [20:12] hey folks - TV out stopped working after upgrading to natty - TV is detected, but no output. Any suggestions on how I can narrow this down? [20:17] toresbe: the better place to ask would be #ubuntu [20:17] toresbe: have you tried there already [20:18] Nope, am trying #ubuntu+1, though. Sorry if I went to the wrong place, I was just thinking that this was overwhelmingly likely to be a bug in ubuntu and so I came here :) [20:18] You can try old kernel to see if it's problem in kernel. [20:19] And your Xorg.0.log could have information too. [20:20] Apport should attach that file when you submit a bug about your video driver. [20:20] is there a way to un-attach an attachment to a bug report? [20:21] Upgrading removed my old kernel, and everything in xorg.0.log is hunky-dorey. [20:22] chalcedony: the attachments are listed on the right of the page, you can delete them from the edit dialog [20:22] yofel, thanks looking [20:23] yofel, as far as i can tell there is nothing on the right hand side of the page at all? [20:23] except log out [20:25] chalcedony: you should have something like this below the subscriber list http://yofel.dyndns.org/pics/ext/lp_att.png [20:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+filebug/ stuff [20:27] yofel, doesn't seem to have that [20:28] ah no, I don't think apport supports selecting what it should attach to the report yet [20:28] neither does the launchpad filebug dialog [20:28] you could file the bug as private, remove the attachment after filing the bug and then mark it public [20:29] the bug is that it won't attach the right file, and it attaches 'xchat.conf' more often than not.. and just did it when i tried to upload a screenshot [20:29] that should be the easiest way to keep an attachment from being visible [20:29] o.O? [20:30] the add attachment dialog on the filebug page? [20:30] yes [20:30] try a different browser maybe, I'm don't know what handles that [20:30] it happens with yahoo mail and anything else needing an attachment [20:30] both opera and firefox [20:31] and i think dcc from xchat [20:32] out of ideas then :S [20:33] heh [20:33] let me see if i can figure out how to do private [20:33] or maybe just cancel? [20:34] nothing to click for private [20:35] indeed o.O [20:35] if you have a gpg key you could also try to file a bug by e-mail https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface [20:36] can't i just redo it and not attach any file? [20:36] or is it already filed even if i don't click 'submit a bug report'? [20:36] no, you can cancel it [20:39] good [20:42] evening