/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/02/21/#ubuntu-community-team.txt

nigelbmorning02:35
dholbachgood morning07:11
duanedesignmorning all07:15
dholbachhi duanedesign07:15
duanedesignhello dholbach07:15
dholbachhey dpm07:19
dholbachdpm, hope you had a great birthday and weekend! :)07:19
* dholbach hugs dpm07:19
kim0dpm: Happy Bday :)07:19
kim0Morning everyone07:19
dpmhey dholbach, I did, thanks! :)07:19
dholbachyoohoo07:20
* dpm hugs dholbach07:20
dpmthanks kim0!07:20
kim0:)07:20
dpmgoooood morning everyone!07:20
duanedesign'lo kim0 dpm07:24
dpmhey duanedesign, hey ara07:24
arahey dpm07:25
kim0duanedesign: ara Morning o/07:39
aramorning kim007:40
kim0everyone is so enegetic about the new week eh07:40
dholbachkim0, you're hallucinating07:42
dholbach:-P07:42
kim0hehhe :)07:42
* kim0 trapped in a heated discussion in #ubuntu-cloud07:42
dpmbrb, rebooting...07:52
vish.. how do we ban someone from editing the wiki pages? do we file a question in lp and it gets done or..?13:20
vish like what is the procedure for this? has anyone done this before?13:20
popeywe can get IS to make pages immutable13:22
popeyvish: any particular page?13:23
vishpopey: its not a particular page, its for the Artwork/* , (the john issue)13:24
popeyi dont think making pages immutable is useful in this instance13:24
vishhe just starts pages on the team namespace and it 'seems' official once it is on the wiki..13:24
vishyea, hence i was thinking about banning the user from wiki edits..13:26
popeywhilst it is possible to ban someone from the wiki by deleting their lp account, i think that's overkill13:26
popeyi think perhaps having a meeting with john to thrash out the issue and work out a way forward13:26
popeybanning should be a last resort13:26
popeyespecially for someone who is contributing (even if they're contibuting in a broken way)13:27
vishpopey: we've tried it, he is not collaborating..13:27
vishpopey: you can see that he has not responded to even one question raised by the team..13:27
popeyyes, i saw13:28
popeyI would recommend not all wading in and attacking him as a pack13:28
popeyI suspect he's less likely to respond to multiple emails raising the same point13:28
vishpopey: well, it was first tried asking in private before bringing the issue to the mailing list..13:29
popeywhats his lauchpad account name?13:29
* vish looks13:29
vishpopey: https://launchpad.net/~j.baer13:30
vishpopey: thanks for looking into this, its come to a point where people have little patience trying to be on guard for what wiki edits he makes13:31
vishthorwil was the one who used to keep the wiki clean13:31
vishand sorted..13:31
popeyi understand13:38
popeyit must be frustrating13:38
vishpopey: just for a little background, the main issue is that he contacts people saying he is representing the artwork team and misleads them to believe he is speaking for the whole team.. when none of his activities have ever been mentioned to the team, so whatever he is saying is purely his own words and ideas..13:39
vishso his activities is not limited with this wallpaper confusion alone..13:40
vishs/is/are13:41
popeyIt's tricky. I'm sure there are lots of people who contact people "on behalf of" teams. I know I contact people "on behalf of" the CC, but I don't get permission from the entire CC before I do it13:48
popeyand i know dholbach, pleia2 and Technoviking do the same13:48
popeyI am not condining his actions, but I don't believe there has to be complete agreement from everyone in a team before one person makes contact 'on behalf of' the team13:49
vishpopey: yea, but you have worked long enough with others in the team to speak for the team, and know what is within acceptable limits.13:50
popeyOk, so what specifically has he done that is outside acceptable limits?13:51
popeyI see he's contacted people trying to get new artwork for the next release.13:51
vishlike for this contest, he directed folks to the wrong pool13:51
vishhis private group instead of the one the judges will look..13:51
popeyyes, I saw that. when you say "private group" you mean, just his personal flickr group?13:52
vishyup..13:52
popeyso, what if he forwarded those "upstream" to the official group.13:52
popeythey would then be considered?13:52
vishyup, and thats what Iain reiterated now in his last mail13:53
popeyok, so whats the big problem then?13:53
vishpopey: but he doesnt13:53
popeySomeone has gone out and got contributions, which could be forwarded upstream?13:53
popeyhe has until the competition finishes to do it, surely?13:54
vishpopey: right, but that would the course correction we can do now.. he just has them in his own groups and did not mention anything about forwarding it to the main group13:54
popeyok, so thats a potential way forward?13:55
popeyrequest that John forwards them to the 'right' group?13:55
vishpopey: yup.. (for this issue)13:55
popeyOk, good. What other issues are there?13:55
vishpopey: and he has been contacting team like edubuntu, LibO and other , offering services of the whole artwork team, promising delivery of services(whatever artwork/wallpaper)13:56
popeythat seems sub-optimal :)13:56
vishwhen none of the team even knows they have been volunteered13:56
popeyis this communication documented somewhere?13:56
vishpopey: you mean his letters to the other teams?13:57
popeyhe seems to be keen/enthusiastic13:57
popeyyeah13:57
popeyemails13:57
czajkowskivish: from reading he seems to want to be helping, granted he may not be doing it the way ye like atm13:57
vishpopey: the LibO one is on their mailing list, let me find you the link13:57
popeythanks vish13:57
popeyI'm just trying to understand how much of this is the one specific issue13:57
popeyand how much is a succession of little issues that have built up13:57
popeyand how we can correct the course13:58
vishczajkowski: exactly, and we tried talking to him to not do such things but he repeatedly does this..13:58
* vish finds links..13:58
czajkowskivish: ok so maybe both parites need to rethink the process, maybe he finds the way ye do things too drawn out13:58
vishpopey: http://www.mail-archive.com/marketing@libreoffice.org/msg01099.html14:01
vish"we are willing to assist as time and resources permit." and no one knew this.. :(14:02
popeyok14:02
vishand other like highvoltage(edubuntu) have told that they received similar mails, and that thought that he was talking for the whole team14:03
popeyhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs/0006_Edubuntu_Natty_Wallpaper14:06
popeythat spec?14:06
popeyvish: does the artwork team hold regular meetings?14:06
vishnope.. it used to, but that was nearly 2-3 yrs ago.. :(14:07
vishpopey: yea, that spec and now edubuntu has withdrawn that spec and doctormo is assigned the task.14:08
popeyOk, so perhaps holding regular meetings will help the team coalesce?14:08
popeyimprove communications within the team14:08
vishwe need to re-think the way things can get done in FOSS artwork, atleast wrt to Ubuntu14:08
* vish nods14:08
popeybecause right now from an outsiders point of view it basically looks like (to me)..14:09
popeyone person is actively trying to stuff14:09
popeylots of people are standing around doing nothing and rapping the first person for doing stuff14:09
popeyforgive me if that's not how it is, but that's how it looks14:09
czajkowski:s rather unfortunate tbh14:10
vishpopey: hmm, nope, thats not right, but he just is too talkative.. :)14:10
vishhence the illusion14:10
czajkowskipopey: how I've read it also from following chats in here14:10
popeyok14:10
popeyso how do you turn that around vish ?14:10
czajkowskitoo talkative?/14:10
vishpopey: right now, there is a bit of mismatch between team/member expectation and what is required for Ubuntu14:11
visheveryone wants to do the final wallapaper or theme :)14:12
popeyright14:12
popeysurely the design team (canonical) have final say on that?14:12
vishyup14:12
popeyIsn't this the long term issue that the art team has always had?14:12
popeyCanonical take little notice of community art?14:12
vishyea..14:12
vishsince only a few artwork tasks exist for 'Ubuntu' distro, and in effort to increase the tasks for others we included the photos14:13
vishand now this cycle we included the illustrations too14:13
vishpopey: but john is not fully aware for this14:13
czajkowskivish: thats hardly his fault if the team has poor communuication tbh14:14
vishand he fails to understand or grasp it when people explain that this exists14:14
vishczajkowski: we have tried to explain to him, that there is this new task..14:14
popeythe artwork team doesn't seem to act like a "team" in the way other ubuntu teams do14:14
vishyea, its messy right now14:14
czajkowskipopey: +114:15
vishpopey: earlier kwwii was there, now he has quit canonical and things just got out of hand14:15
czajkowskivish: perhaps the communication medium isn't right, or how the message is being conveyed.14:15
vishnot that we were most productive before kwwii left14:15
popeyI was about to say exactly that vish14:16
czajkowskivish: but this guy is trying to be...14:16
popeynothing seems to have changed14:16
popeythe team seems dysfunctional14:16
vishczajkowski: i blame myself for this new spurt of activity or igniting john's flame..14:17
* vish finds mail..14:17
vishwe just got dormant and i wrote this > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2010-September/012256.html14:18
IdleOnemaybe what the art team needs is a curator, someone to take charge of submitting art to canonical and the Artists can focus on the art part.14:19
IdleOneI know very little of what is going on in all this mind you.14:19
vishright now, only about 10-max20 members even communicate on the mailing list14:21
czajkowskiI dont get why the art team cannot just fall under the canonical team like in testing/desktop/kernel all other teams. canonical leads them and has community members actively helping in them14:21
vish+114:21
popeythe art team pre-dates the canonical design team14:21
popeythats why14:21
czajkowskipopey: so merge.14:21
popeyby some significant margin14:21
popeyi suspect there are a few blockers there14:21
czajkowskiteams merge and change.14:21
popeylike the fact that canonical like to keep design stuff internal14:22
popeyIMO14:22
czajkowskipopey: well those blockers seem to the reason why the team is less than active as well .14:22
popeyhang on..14:22
czajkowskirather frustrting and for as long as I can remmeber this team has te same issue over and over14:22
popeyand the resistance from people in the team to becoming part of the canonical machine14:22
czajkowskicanonical design team just get on with the work and do it14:22
popeythats not very community spirited14:22
popeywhy not hand over the whole of ubuntu development to canonical teams and have no community?14:23
vishpopey: "people resisting" ? no, it only john resisting :)14:23
czajkowskipopey: it may seem that way, but it's the only team that cant seem to play with canonical. look at desktop, kernel, cloud, etc14:23
IdleOnesure it is, the community needs help in this area with organization, Canonical has the Design team already set up to deal with this.14:23
vishand there is this problem of splitting design from artwork14:24
AlanBelldoes the design team understand why it needs the community?14:24
vishwe discussed these issues in the last UDS and the design team is making an effort to involve the community team,14:25
vishhttp://design.canonical.com/2010/12/surveying-contributions/14:26
vishwe are trying to first access the goal of the people and the number of people who want to participate in Ubuntu artwork/design community14:26
vishand we have the issue of Ayatana which deals with design, so there was this talk of merging artwork and design too14:27
vishright now, the easiest task was to announce contests and help the sister distros, but that is not going too well14:29
AlanBellwhat is the last project that the community artwork team did, that the design team wanted doing?14:29
vishmost serious artists dont want to spend their time taking part in contests14:29
vishAlanBell: hmm, that would be the countdown banners14:30
AlanBellok, great14:30
AlanBellso that project worked quite well (they looked great, and got into a lot of places)14:31
vishthats the only task thats been going on continuously14:32
vishand with quite some decent results..14:32
vishczajkowski: popey: so basically john's idea is like Ubuntu manual, let us try to do something and then try to get our way into the default distro, which is where we find this not a reality .14:33
vishso we have tried to tell him to not mislead people..14:34
vishand instead try to direct people to these existing tasks.14:34
vish like the illustrations one where people have a chance of actually seeing their work in the distro14:35
vishbut he does not listen..14:35
popeyI think (personally) the team needs to focus on being a team, and what they _can_ do rather than focus on the negatives and John in particular14:36
vishpopey: right, but everytime the team tries to do something, john finds a way to be distracting ;)14:36
czajkowski:s14:37
czajkowskiI actuallly kinda feel sorry for this John guy,14:37
czajkowskihe's trying to help and everyone just wants to criticise it14:37
vishoh boy! :D14:37
* vish tries to put this into community-team examples..14:38
vishlets say, that a team wants approval as an official Ubuntu LoCo team, but does not get approval.. would it be right if the LoCo starts its own Community-team and duplicating the Community team14:40
vish?14:40
popeyi dont think that analogy works :)14:40
czajkowskivish: doesnt really work that way14:40
popeyits one guy, trying to work within a team, taking leadership where there is none14:41
czajkowskiwe encourage teams to spread Ubuntu, approved or not means nothing14:41
popeyunless I am wrong, there is no leadership in the art team14:41
vishkwwii is still the leader14:41
popeyczajkowski: thats not what he's suggesting in his example14:41
popeyvish: kwwii is awol surely?14:41
vishthough he has been busy with his new job recently..14:41
popeyczajkowski: the example vish gave was that if a loco wasn't approved, they might start their own *community team* or "loco council"14:42
czajkowskipopey: teams do , netherlands there is an example i guess14:42
popeyno14:42
popeyyou're not getting the example14:42
czajkowskiok14:42
popeythe example is not that they would start their own unapproved _loco_ team14:42
vishwell, thats what john does, he does not like existing rules(available tasks), so he just tries to create his own tasks which have no way to be approved14:42
popeybut that they would start their own _loco council_ or _community team_14:43
popeybut the example/analogy is broken anyway, so meh :D14:43
popeyI see what you're saying vish14:43
vish;p14:43
popey:)14:43
vishpopey: surely you wouldnt call that taking leadership, because leading means to lead atleast _one_ .. but he is autocratic ;)14:45
vishmaybe autocratic is not the right word..14:45
popeysure, I understand14:45
popeybut if you're in a team that is dysfunctional, moribund14:46
vish:D14:46
popeysome people "JFDI"14:46
popeyget on with it14:46
vishpopey: right, but that JFDI would be right, when there was no task, but what he is doing now is essentially duplicating an existing task14:47
popeyor embracing and extending14:47
popey:)14:47
popeyI'm not making excuses for what he's done, but I can see why he's done what he has14:47
popeyto some degree14:48
popeyI do believe the art team needs a massive kick up the butt though14:48
vishhmm, wait i think i might have explained this whole thing wrong.. :)14:48
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
vishpopey: +1 for kick though ;)14:48
czajkowskivish: yes but not John14:48
vishlet me start again..14:48
vish:s14:49
czajkowskiyou seem hell bent on making this poor guy suffer for tryig to help vish14:49
czajkowski:(14:49
vishhmm?14:49
vishoh well.. nvm me then :)14:49
vishczajkowski: the problem was he was misdirecting people to the wrong groups, where peoles' submissions will never be judged » https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2011-February/013201.html14:51
vishpoeple's14:51
popey14:48:30 < vish> hmm, wait i think i might have explained this whole thing wrong.. :)14:52
vishczajkowski: and people are quitting the team because of him » https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2011-February/013142.html14:52
popeynope14:52
popeyI completely understand14:52
popeybut I do still think the team has issues that are much larger than John14:52
vishyea..14:53
czajkowskivish: that mail says ther are larger issues in then team than one person. finger pointing doesn't help anyone14:53
vishczajkowski: not sure what you mean finger pointing..14:54
vishczajkowski: but i'm not saying he is the sole problem14:54
vishi think i'm bad at irc-xplaining ;)14:54
AlanBellthere is plenty more stuff in that thread14:54
vishright, but i've been talking to thorwil, and john is the last effort which broke him14:55
czajkowskivish: but you're saying people are leaving because of him, and I',m saying like AlanBell is there is more content in that email which explains why he is leaving14:55
czajkowskifinger pointing at John saying he is the reason people are leaving is inaccurate14:56
AlanBellnot what I am saying14:56
czajkowskiAlanBell: you said more content in thread sorry not mail14:56
vishczajkowski: let me be clear on one thing, I'm not blaming the artwork team's problem are solely because of john14:56
AlanBellvish isn't the only person who perceives an issue here, looking at the other mails in that thread14:56
popeyindeed14:56
AlanBellhowever I don't understand the issue yet14:57
AlanBelltbh, if I was involved in artwork I could see myself writing the same emails John is14:57
vishczajkowski: i started the discussion here about blocking john from editing the wiki..14:57
vishand nothing else.. :)14:58
popeyvish: nobody is critisising you for bringing this up :)14:58
popeyI've been following the issue for a while.14:58
vishyea, but i think czajkowski has joined the conversation in the middle and  got my intent wrong14:58
vish:)14:58
czajkowskivish: no I've read scroll back.14:59
vishczajkowski: and that problem was since he was using the artwork team namespace for tasks that are his own and not the team's14:59
vishoh well :(14:59
popeyvish: other than banning john, what would you like to see happen?15:05
vishpopey: banning john (from wiki edits alone) , we need to restructure the team, find ways to be more productive..15:07
vishthis contests thing is not working..15:07
vishwe should rather form a pool of work/artists where people feel comfortable to choose from..15:07
vishthe contests are not attracting the right kind of artists..15:08
popeyvish: if you feel the cc needs to get involved then I'd recommend a summary email with the necessary bits of detail, and we can take a look.15:16
vishpopey: i think i better not.. :)  my intentions seem to be mistaken.. i'll let someone else take that initiative.. " <czajkowski> you seem hell bent on making this poor guy suffer for tryig to help vish "15:19
popeyvish: as I said, they have not been mistaken, if they had I would have said so about an hour ago :)15:27
vish:)15:28
* vish thinks he might need to pick up an irish accent then, this is the second time czajkowski has completely misunderstood me ;)15:29
IdleOnehehe15:29
czajkowskiheh15:30
vishpopey: i'll see how it goes(now that I've gotten Iain himself to reply there, maybe he course-corrects) and what others think, and if he still keeps doing this.. iirc, leogg was the first person who brought up involving CC, so if the team does want to take this to CC, I'll send the mail..15:34
popeyok15:34
popeygood luck!15:34
popeyI'm on the mailing list so I see the mail15:34
vishthx.. :)15:34
popeyvish: seems like progress on the list15:43
vishohh! /me checks mail..16:14
vishhmm, saleel changed his sig to inactive :(16:19
* popey hugs Technoviking 17:37
* dholbach calls it a day - have a great rest of your day - see you tomorrow!17:52
dholbachHUGS17:52
nhandlero/wnn chic18:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!