[01:31] <alex_mayorga> Hi! Can someone here make the amd64 firefox-4.0 green again? Thanks!
[06:29] <magcius> chrisccoulson, micahg: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/64803704/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.firefox-4.0_4.0~b12~hg20110220r62890%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~karmic_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[06:30] <micahg> magcius: thanks, will take a look in a bit, trying to get the latest 3.6 builds uploaded
[06:35] <micahg> magcius: you're welcome to fix it and make a merge proposal if you like
[08:22] <fta2> chrisccoulson, hi, still on holidays?
[08:23] <chrisccoulson> fta2 - not today :)
[08:24] <chrisccoulson> i just took a single day on friday
[08:24] <fta2> oh
[08:31] <fta2> chrisccoulson, i'd appreciate some help with breakpad, I read your patch, looks you're mastering it ;)
[08:32] <chrisccoulson> fta2 - yeah, i'll take a look at that later. hopefully i can figure out what's going on with chromium too :)
[08:32] <chrisccoulson> working on breakpad is "interesting", as you have quite a lot of restrictions on what you can do in a crashed application ;)
[08:33] <fta2> chrisccoulson, i guess it's even worse with chromium and its sandbox
[08:33] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i guess so
[08:34] <chrisccoulson> you can't trust anything in the address space of a crashed application, which means you can't do things such as calling functions from external libraries (including libc)
[08:34] <chrisccoulson> which is fun ;)
[08:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: good morning
[08:37] <chrisccoulson> hi micahg, how are you?
[08:38] <micahg> fta2: for some reason, my armel box is still running the chromium build started almost 24 hours ago
[08:38] <micahg> chrisccoulson: fine, I was wondering, do you generate a new tarball for firefox on hardy/karmic since the source package is different, or do you just modify the tarball (renaming)
[08:38] <fta2> micahg, oh, really? how far is it?
[08:38] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i just rename it ;)
[08:39] <micahg> doesn't seem to be too far, just using 2.8GB so far
[08:39] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok, I wanted to check to be safe, everything except those 2 are uploaded
[08:39] <chrisccoulson> micahg - cool. you have to also make sure the top-level folder is named correctly once it's extracted, so you have to rename that too
[08:39] <fta2> micahg, the worse part is linking the binary, takes ages and lots of ram
[08:39] <chrisccoulson> but it's quicker than creating different tarballs ;)
[08:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: but sparc builds seem broke, can you check with the LOSAs when they start their day (i'm technically off today)
[08:40] <micahg> fta2: yeah, I'm already hitting swap (only 512MB RAM)
[08:40] <chrisccoulson> micahg - the sparc ones always seem to fail anyway. i wouldn't worry about those too much
[08:41] <chrisccoulson> i don't think sparc has had one of these updates for ages ;)
[08:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson: they were working at some point :-/
[08:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson: how was your extended weekend
[08:42] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, it wasn't too bad thanks. we stayed around a friends house on friday evening
[08:42] <chrisccoulson> and ate way too much food!
[08:43] <micahg> nice
[11:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok, that should do it, all the builds are queued now, now we play the waiting game to see what the release plans for the week are :)
[12:33] <gnomefreak> i need a command to test sound in gnome-terminal, also for some reason if i add minefield to the launcher(unity) it doesnt work but if i launch it any other way it works fine
[12:59] <gnomefreak> can someone please open g-t and see if the folling command plays a sound, maverick or natty(classic or default) echo -e "\a"
[13:00]  * gnomefreak needs a smoke
[15:42] <gnomefreak> anyone running natty "ubuntu desktop edition"(unity) that can test if you can add minefield to the launcher panel and have it work? for some reason in the last week or so it stopped working so i removed it and keep adding it to test. running minefield on its own from terminal or applications menu it fails to load
[15:43] <gnomefreak> also on a side note. is there a way to file a bug on one of our PPA packages using apport or do i have to file it using link than use apport-collect?
[15:51] <gnomefreak> firefox version is 4.0~b12~hg20110218r62809+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1
[20:44] <BUGabundo> evening
[22:48] <micahg> fta: arm build failute
[22:48] <micahg> *failure
[22:48] <fta> micahg, doh, where?
[22:48] <micahg> LINK(target) out/Release/chrome
[22:49] <fta> oh, out of memory?
[22:49] <micahg> probably
[22:49] <fta> do you have the logs?
[22:50] <micahg> yeah, if I can get back online :)