| raevol | there's been a lot of work done on it since it was pulled into maverick before release, and i'd like to take advantage of some of the new code :/ | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | There's always xorg-edgers. | 00:02 |
| raevol | yea i'm not that harcore :[ | 00:02 |
| raevol | hardcore* god my typing is terrible today | 00:02 |
| cnd | RAOF, I have good news :) | 00:14 |
| cnd | I'm right now packaging all the stuff up to test and push to my ppa tonight | 00:15 |
| RAOF | cnd: Excellent. | 00:15 |
| RAOF | I'll try to have 1.10RC2 merged by the time you're ready, then :) | 00:16 |
| RAOF | cnd: You've been a-workin' on the weekend? :( | 00:20 |
| cnd | RAOF, umm, and last weekend too... | 00:21 |
| cnd | I haven't had a day off for two weeks now :( | 00:21 |
| cnd | RAOF, when will you be uploading xorg-server to ubuntu (or to git)? | 00:22 |
| cnd | when I'll be able to get the source, basically | 00:22 |
| RAOF | I'll probably be able to get it done today, so that would be in <6hrs time. | 00:23 |
| cnd | ok, so after I | 00:24 |
| cnd | I'm asleep :) | 00:24 |
| RAOF | I was thinking that we'd use this opportunity to also fold in the Xi 2.1 stuff; that'll just be a couple of patches, right? | 00:24 |
| cnd | yeah | 00:24 |
| cnd | so if you want, you can push to git | 00:24 |
| cnd | and then I can push my updates to git | 00:24 |
| cnd | and then you can upload | 00:24 |
| cnd | sound good? | 00:24 |
| RAOF | That'd work. | 00:25 |
| cnd | RAOF: when do you want to push by? | 00:25 |
| RAOF | If you've got stuff ready now you could just push to git and I'd just fold that in with the rest of the merge.\ | 00:26 |
| cnd | it's not ready quite yet | 00:26 |
| RAOF | Or you can push after me, which would be tomorrow morning for you I guess ;) | 00:26 |
| cnd | I'm making packages right now | 00:26 |
| cnd | and then I need to test locally | 00:26 |
| RAOF | Soft! | 00:26 |
| cnd | and I was hoping to have one day tomorrow to have people bang on it | 00:26 |
| RAOF | Real men test in the archive :) | 00:27 |
| cnd | heh | 00:27 |
| RAOF | Ok. | 00:27 |
| RAOF | There's no OMGHUGE rush for the merge; a day's testing wouldn't hurt it, either. | 00:27 |
| cnd | k | 00:27 |
| cnd | I'm so excited :) | 00:29 |
| RAOF | Obviously FF is our deadline :) | 00:29 |
| RAOF | And you just can't hide it? | 00:29 |
| cnd | especially since it actually works :) | 00:29 |
| RAOF | :D | 00:29 |
| cnd | the one thing holding me back is that I'm still glossing over a few things | 00:29 |
| cnd | like what do you do for pointer emulation of a new touch when there's an active grab on the pointer? | 00:30 |
| cnd | corner cases like that | 00:30 |
| RAOF | Fiendish protocol-level corner cases. Yay. | 00:30 |
| cnd | I think it won't fall over, but I'm not 100% sure it'll behave as one might assume | 00:30 |
| RAOF | And you'll also get to take a couple of days off once the FF deadline hits, right? | 00:30 |
| cnd | heh, I hope so :) | 00:31 |
| cnd | oubiwann is awesome, he'll probably make me take the time off :) | 00:31 |
| RAOF | :) | 00:31 |
| cnd | testing looks good, time to push to git repos and make source packages :) | 01:03 |
| cnd | tjaalton, it looks like you've uploaded a new libxi, but the git tree hasn't been updated | 01:13 |
| cnd | can you update it for me? | 01:13 |
| RAOF | Ooh, funky. Damage bugs! | 01:31 |
| cnd | it takes waaaay too long to upload a qt package... | 01:56 |
| cnd | 207 MB source tarball... | 01:56 |
| RAOF | Xi2.1 Qt? | 01:58 |
| tjaalton | cnd: it's been synced from debian, there were no ubuntu changes | 06:40 |
| RAOF | Oh, no. intel/nouveau switcheroo problems :( | 06:58 |
| RAOF | I suspect bug #718620 of being switcheroo related. | 06:58 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 718620 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "Xorg assert failure: X: ../../dix/pixmap.c:118: AllocatePixmap: Assertion `pScreen->totalPixmapSize > 0' failed. (affects: 9) (dups: 11) (heat: 92)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/718620 | 06:58 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: regarding bug 718331, there's a newer upstream release which could help | 07:45 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 718331 in xf86-input-wacom (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "Xorg crashes on wacom input moule (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 30)" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/718331 | 07:45 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Aah, quite possibly. | 07:45 |
| RAOF | Argh. Why doesn't everyone have debugging symbols installed all the time? :( | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | 0.10.11, though .12 should be arriving too at some point | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | right :) | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | all the xorg-packages should imho also have a -dbg counterpart | 07:46 |
| tjaalton | but wacom is maintained by ron | 07:46 |
| RAOF | Nah; -dbgsym is easy. | 07:46 |
| tjaalton | it's not apt-get'able? | 07:46 |
| RAOF | *Debian* should have -dbgsym, and we should drop all the trivial -dbg packages. | 07:46 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: It totally is. | 07:46 |
| tjaalton | oh | 07:46 |
| RAOF | See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash :) | 07:47 |
| tjaalton | i'm missing the source then | 07:47 |
| tjaalton | fixed | 07:48 |
| RAOF | I wonder whether we shouldn't have that in the default sources. | 07:48 |
| RAOF | At least during development. | 07:49 |
| tjaalton | right | 07:49 |
| tjaalton | huh, uses a different signing key | 07:50 |
| tjaalton | oh wacom 0.10.11 was released last week, so it's quite fresh | 07:54 |
| RAOF | cnd: xserver is in git, for your delectation. | 08:02 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: I don't suppose you have a switchable graphics system to confirm my suspicion that 718620 is switcheroo-based (and get a better backtrace at the same time ☺)? | 08:02 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: nope.. | 08:03 |
| tjaalton | does switcheroo work on a desktop with embedded and discrete graphics, or is it laptop only? (not that I have such a desktop either) | 08:03 |
| RAOF | It requires ACPI support; it's likely that only laptop manufacturers bother. | 08:04 |
| tjaalton | ok | 08:04 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: i've a patch to fix mumble, will push soon | 08:57 |
| tjaalton | to xorg-server | 08:57 |
| RAOF | tjaalton: Sweet. I'd also like to convince myself that 718620 isn't an xserver problem. | 09:25 |
| tjaalton | RAOF: yeah, nasty.. | 09:27 |
| tjaalton | lunch-> | 09:28 |
| RAOF | It's probably something in the plymouth integration patch that doesn't work when copy_from_fb fails. | 09:31 |
| tjaalton | eh, https://launchpad.net/xserver | 11:51 |
| cnd | tjaalton, true, but I still can't find it in git | 12:54 |
| cnd | I can push the changes to git though | 12:54 |
| tjaalton | cnd: the ubuntu-branch there is stale, last updated 21 months ago | 12:58 |
| tjaalton | cnd: so you can pretty much do whatever you like with it :) | 12:58 |
| cnd | yeah | 13:02 |
| apw | cnd, playing with mumble to try and work out why the PPT buttons don't work | 13:25 |
| apw | its looking like the xserver hasn't sent us the events we asked for ... is there any way to ask the Select extenstion whats goign on? | 13:26 |
| apw | or any small examples of asking for key events i can use for testing | 13:26 |
| jcristau | there's a fix for the mumble thing in git, aiui | 13:26 |
| apw | oh ... pthth ... | 13:26 |
| apw | jcristau, got a pointer to the git so i can look ? | 13:27 |
| jcristau | http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/xserver/xorg-server.git;a=commitdiff;h=74acb8b958a0e19beae993f0c1f4627ab2296ee0 | 13:27 |
| apw | jcristau, oh so its an xserver issue ... | 13:28 |
| jcristau | (also at http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/4200/) | 13:28 |
| apw | do we already have that fix coming? and i am just behind or ? | 13:29 |
| jcristau | it's queued for whenever the next upload is, i think | 13:29 |
| apw | jcristau, heh then thank you i can go back to ignoring it for a bit :) | 13:29 |
| tjaalton | apw: you're subscribed to the bug, should've seen that it's "fix committed" :) | 13:33 |
| cnd | apw: the next upload should be tomorrow | 13:35 |
| cnd | with my multitouch stuff :) | 13:35 |
| apw | tjaalton, heh oops | 14:36 |
| apw | cnd, sounds good ... except i expect it'll be all broke :) | 14:36 |
| cnd | apw, of course it will! | 14:37 |
| cnd | I'm going to try my hardest to somehow cause a kernel panic from multitouch :) | 14:37 |
| ricotz | Sarvatt, hi, perhaps it is useful to propose the pixman update before FF while the notify-osd update seems to take longer | 15:11 |
| lilstevi | is there a way to get an onscreen keyboard to automatically launch with netbook launcher | 15:17 |
| tjaalton | ricotz: national holiday in US today ;) | 15:33 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, oh, ok ;) | 15:34 |
| === lilstevi is now known as lilstevie | ||
| Sarvatt | ricotz: yeah been 2 weeks now, sounds good to me :) | 16:03 |
| ricotz | Sarvatt, are you able to sponsor it? | 16:16 |
| Sarvatt | ricotz: nope I don't have permissions for it. tjaalton, would ya be willing to sponsor a pixman 0.20.2 update for ricotz? his update looked good to me when I reviewed it | 16:17 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, that would be great http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/pixman/ | 16:18 |
| Sarvatt | 0.21.x isn't appropriate for natty, 0.20.2 is the latest stable release, there is just an issue with notify-osd popups looking screwed up that has been waiting to have the fix uploaded since december but feature freeze and all, dont think we can wait anymore | 16:21 |
| seb128 | it's easy enough to grab the notify-osd commit and upload to natty | 16:23 |
| seb128 | don't bother about small breakages in unstable series | 16:24 |
| ricotz | seb128, yeah, macslow said he wanted to do it soon | 16:24 |
| seb128 | usually having things broken motivate to get the fix in when that has been not really moving for a while | 16:24 |
| seb128 | he was sick this weekend and has work to finish before feature freeze | 16:24 |
| seb128 | so it's likely to not land before feature freeze | 16:25 |
| ricotz | right, but we wanted to prevent a bug flood ;) | 16:25 |
| ricotz | ok | 16:25 |
| Sarvatt | seb128: well I was getting a crazy amount of emails about the problem just from edgers and was worried about when it actually went in the distro | 16:25 |
| seb128 | can't you just upload a notify-osd with the patch in natty? | 16:26 |
| Sarvatt | not sure the guy signed the contributor agreement | 16:26 |
| seb128 | Sarvatt, no need to have a c-a for a distro patch | 16:27 |
| seb128 | that's only an issue to merge in the upstream trunk | 16:28 |
| tjaalton | Sarvatt: sure, i'll upload it later when i'm back home | 16:44 |
| ari-tczew | shrugs, when we will get new nvidia driver? | 16:53 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, thanks | 16:55 |
| ricotz | ari-tczew, depends on when nvidia decides to release a working one | 16:57 |
| ari-tczew | ricotz: changing resolution and fan's speed every boot making me crazy | 16:58 |
| ricotz | ari-tczew, nouveau should work pretty fine detecting the right resolution, of course it doesnt take care of your fan speed | 17:00 |
| ari-tczew | ricotz: 1024x768 is not native resolution for my lcd | 17:01 |
| ari-tczew | so it's not prettty | 17:01 |
| ricotz | ok, if you are nouveau and nvidia blob is removed, it looks like a bug which might be reported | 17:02 |
| ricotz | probably an edid problem | 17:02 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| alex_mayorga | on bug 553789 should I provide further peeks? | 17:42 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 553789 in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "X freeze/crash with nouveau driver (affects: 22) (dups: 5) (heat: 108)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/553789 | 17:43 |
| alex_mayorga | X keeps freezing every 2-4 hours or so | 17:43 |
| alex_mayorga | what else should I gather? | 17:44 |
| alex_mayorga | I have an ssh window to the frozen laptop | 17:44 |
| alex_mayorga | bryceh: ping | 17:47 |
| tjaalton | alex_mayorga: no | 17:50 |
| alex_mayorga | tjaalton: so for now is just patience and frequent reboot? | 17:52 |
| alex_mayorga | or should I try edgers or something? | 17:52 |
| alex_mayorga | or is there a way to restar X from an ssh window? | 17:52 |
| hyperair | restart gdm | 17:53 |
| hyperair | or rather, sudo restart gdm | 17:53 |
| alex_mayorga | hyperair: thanks! Let me try that | 17:53 |
| alex_mayorga | didn't do unfortunately | 17:55 |
| tjaalton | alex_mayorga: there is no known fix, nor is there one on the horizon | 17:58 |
| alex_mayorga | tjaalton: I see, this would bug me on every distro right? | 17:58 |
| tjaalton | a workaround is to disable acceleration, the upstream bug, at least, has th details | 17:59 |
| alex_mayorga | also I hear the nvidia blob is not much better anyway | 17:59 |
| tjaalton | yes | 17:59 |
| alex_mayorga | let me review, but I think accel is already off here | 17:59 |
| alex_mayorga | is there other driver that I can use other than nouveau | 18:08 |
| alex_mayorga | vesa perhaps? | 18:08 |
| tjaalton | not unless you disable kms | 18:14 |
| yofel | really? I did try vesa as a replacement for nouveau once, did work, but with rather low resolution | 18:15 |
| yofel | could be that I had nvidia installed and just nouvea blacklisted maybe | 18:16 |
| tjaalton | probably | 18:17 |
| yofel | I'll try nouveau.noaccel=1 later, I don't use it anyway | 18:19 |
| yofel | tjaalton: would my bug be a dup of that one too? I think so since I've an GT218 here | 18:21 |
| tjaalton | yofel: dunno, i'd have to check | 18:23 |
| yofel | bug 711908 | 18:24 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 711908 in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu) "[natty] frequent nouveau freeze on GT218 [NVS 3100M] (rev a2) (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/711908 | 18:24 |
| tjaalton | yofel: yeah looks like it | 18:27 |
| tjaalton | i can reproduce it when i _disable_ dri | 18:28 |
| tjaalton | though i have nv5x | 18:28 |
| tjaalton | and had to switch firefox to chromium | 18:28 |
| tjaalton | otherwise it would crash, though the bt looks different | 18:29 |
| tjaalton | ricotz: no _source.changes for pixman? | 19:05 |
| ricotz | tjaalton, sorry, should be there now | 19:09 |
| tjaalton | ricotz: thanks, uploaded | 19:15 |
| cnd | bryceh, or anyone else who's a core dev: can someone review the utouch-grail upload and push to ubuntu? | 20:08 |
| cnd | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/utouch-grail/+bug/722780 | 20:08 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 722780 in utouch-grail (Ubuntu) "Upload utouch-grail 1.0.19 to Ubuntu (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] | 20:08 |
| cnd | it's a dependency of the new xi 2.1 work | 20:08 |
| tjaalton | cnd: i can check it out a bit later | 20:09 |
| cnd | tjaalton, that would be great! | 20:09 |
| cnd | let me know if you need anything | 20:10 |
| tjaalton | sure | 20:10 |
| tjaalton | cnd: ok, what exactly should I do to upload it? | 22:12 |
| cnd | usually didrocks helps out, but he seems unavailable | 22:12 |
| cnd | we give him a link to our packaging branch | 22:13 |
| cnd | he builds the package and signs it | 22:13 |
| cnd | and uploads it | 22:13 |
| cnd | I can build it for you instead | 22:13 |
| cnd | if you'd prefer that | 22:13 |
| tjaalton | the source, yeah | 22:13 |
| tjaalton | or wait | 22:13 |
| tjaalton | I'll try something first | 22:13 |
| cnd | sure | 22:13 |
| cnd | the packaging branch is linked in the bug, if you've got that handy | 22:14 |
| tjaalton | yep | 22:14 |
| tjaalton | hmm no, I'd need the tarball anyway etc. guess it's best if you prepare the source and I'll debsign&dput it to the archive | 22:15 |
| cnd | ok | 22:16 |
| tjaalton | I haven't used bzr for packaging, so :) | 22:16 |
| cnd | ahh | 22:16 |
| tjaalton | don't know what the workflow is | 22:16 |
| cnd | it's actually quite nice, especially if you are doing packaging of new upstream sources | 22:17 |
| cnd | there's a command that takes the upstream tarball and the current packaging branch, and does crazy commits and merges for you | 22:18 |
| cnd | and then gives you a new commit in your packaging branch that's all ready for you to upload | 22:18 |
| tjaalton | alrighty | 22:18 |
| cnd | tjaalton, it's up at people.canonical.com/~cndougla/utouch/ | 22:21 |
| tjaalton | oh it was a native package | 22:21 |
| tjaalton | but thanks, will upload | 22:22 |
| cnd | wait | 22:23 |
| cnd | no, it's should be native | 22:23 |
| cnd | tjaalton, why do you think it's native? | 22:23 |
| tjaalton | cnd: normally the upstream tarball is a separate file | 22:23 |
| cnd | oh wait | 22:23 |
| cnd | I forgot to put it there | 22:23 |
| cnd | let me upload it too | 22:23 |
| tjaalton | that explains it then :) | 22:24 |
| tjaalton | hmm EPERM too | 22:24 |
| tjaalton | +NO | 22:24 |
| tjaalton | :) | 22:24 |
| cnd | ? | 22:25 |
| cnd | I just uploaded the tarball | 22:25 |
| tjaalton | can't access them | 22:25 |
| tjaalton | forbidden | 22:25 |
| tjaalton | chmod 755? | 22:25 |
| cnd | I'll try | 22:25 |
| tjaalton | or 644 at least | 22:25 |
| cnd | tjaalton, I did chmod a+x * | 22:26 |
| cnd | sorry a+r | 22:26 |
| cnd | so hopefully you can get them now | 22:26 |
| tjaalton | yep | 22:26 |
| tjaalton | forgot to finalize the release?-) | 22:27 |
| cnd | oh yeah... | 22:27 |
| cnd | grrr | 22:27 |
| cnd | sorry | 22:27 |
| tjaalton | heh | 22:28 |
| cnd | usually didrocks does that for us :) | 22:28 |
| tjaalton | indeed, since he'd have to sign it himself | 22:28 |
| tjaalton | um | 22:28 |
| cnd | well, if you mean putting your name in the changelog | 22:28 |
| tjaalton | i mean create the source package | 22:28 |
| cnd | you can sign without doing that | 22:28 |
| tjaalton | yes | 22:28 |
| cnd | anyways, I'll create a new package as released | 22:29 |
| cnd | and upload again | 22:29 |
| tjaalton | cool | 22:29 |
| cnd | sorry for the trouble | 22:29 |
| tjaalton | np | 22:29 |
| cnd | tjaalton, ok, the new package is ready for you | 22:36 |
| tjaalton | cnd: and uploaded | 22:37 |
| cnd | tjaalton, thanks! | 22:37 |
| cnd | we need to make a packaging group for utouch so I can upload them... | 22:39 |
| cnd | I just never got around to requesting it | 22:39 |
| tjaalton | heh, right | 22:39 |
| bryceh | cnd, yep | 22:42 |
| bryceh | cnd, or just get core-dev ;-) | 22:46 |
| cnd | bryceh, how high is the bar for that? | 22:46 |
| cnd | I've so far only touched linux-firmware, utouch*, and x stuff | 22:47 |
| bryceh | cnd, generally you'd get motu first, which that's probably enough. | 22:48 |
| bryceh | it's more about "do we trust him" than "does he have enough experience" | 22:48 |
| cnd | I don't touch much in universe :) | 22:49 |
| bryceh | again, it's not so much a point of having experience in the area as much as being trusted to upload stuff in that area | 22:49 |
| cnd | and most of the stuff I do need privs for are core packages | 22:49 |
| cnd | ok | 22:49 |
| cnd | maybe I should at least attempt motu now | 22:50 |
| bryceh | once you've gotten motu, spend a bit of time doing some random package sponsorship and stuff for a month or two, to gain some sponsor statements (which should be easy for you), then put in for core dev. | 22:50 |
| cnd | ok | 22:51 |
| cnd | bryceh, RAOF: got some questions for you about versioning | 23:10 |
| cnd | we're pushing xi 2.1 stuff | 23:10 |
| bryceh | ok | 23:10 |
| RAOF | cnd: Shoot. | 23:10 |
| cnd | but there's no official upstream input proto packages yet | 23:10 |
| cnd | nothing like inputproto 2.0.99.901 | 23:10 |
| bryceh | cnd, so you need a git snapshot? | 23:11 |
| cnd | so I've been just adding them into ubuntu patches on top of what's already there | 23:11 |
| cnd | well, it's not even upstream git snapshot yet | 23:11 |
| cnd | not in the official repo | 23:11 |
| cnd | so I've just been incremening the ubuntu version suffix | 23:12 |
| cnd | and adding patches | 23:12 |
| RAOF | That seems reasonable to me. | 23:13 |
| cnd | one issue is that for libxi lintian complains because we're adding symbols with an ubuntu version | 23:13 |
| bryceh | that can probably be ignored in this case | 23:13 |
| cnd | it's actually a lintian error | 23:13 |
| RAOF | Lintian is wrong. Feel free to silence that with an override if you want. | 23:13 |
| cnd | will that cause an issue? | 23:13 |
| bryceh | don't think so | 23:13 |
| cnd | I didn't think so either, since I remember xorg-server having lintian errors too :) | 23:14 |
| RAOF | It'd cause an issue in Debian because dak's started to reject packages with lintian errors; I don't believe soyuz does that :) | 23:14 |
| cnd | ahh | 23:14 |
| bryceh | cnd, yeah doing incrementing ubuntu versions is probably fine. I think I'd probably do it that way myself | 23:14 |
| cnd | ok | 23:15 |
| cnd | I'm going to prepare packages right now | 23:15 |
| RAOF | There's probably no way we can stick an ubuntu string into the input ABI version, is there? | 23:20 |
| cnd | RAOF, that sounds really ugly :) | 23:22 |
| cnd | but it may be helpful | 23:23 |
| cnd | RAOF, the alternative is to leave the input abi at 12 | 23:31 |
| cnd | and to assume the input abi includes the new mt stuff in evdev and synaptics | 23:31 |
| cnd | I'm almost tempted to say that's a better route | 23:31 |
| RAOF | We could also bump the minor version of the input abi? | 23:31 |
| cnd | because in reality, input abi 13 should be backwards compatible with 12, but whot likes to bump the major version for some reason | 23:32 |
| cnd | RAOF, even that could potentially be an issue if they bump the minor version upstream | 23:32 |
| cnd | though that's highly unlikely at this point | 23:32 |
| cnd | rc2 is a little late for that :) | 23:32 |
| cnd | RAOF, ok, I'm thinking that may be a good idea | 23:32 |
| cnd | bump the minor to 12.3 | 23:33 |
| RAOF | I think aaronp has declared the ABI frozen. | 23:33 |
| cnd | and I can convince whot to bump the major to 13 when mt is added | 23:33 |
| cnd | leaving the major at 13 would also mean we don't have to rebuild all the input module packages | 23:33 |
| RAOF | Major at 12, you mean? | 23:34 |
| cnd | I'm glad someone has finally declared it frozen :) | 23:34 |
| cnd | yeah, leaving it at 12 | 23:34 |
| cnd | :) | 23:34 |
| bryceh | seriously | 23:34 |
| cnd | bryceh, was that in response to my comment about abi frozen declarations? | 23:35 |
| bryceh | cnd, yep | 23:35 |
| cnd | heh, ok | 23:35 |
| cnd | it puzzled me for a moment, I thought you had better ideas about the input abi handling :) | 23:35 |
| bryceh | not seriously | 23:35 |
| cnd | heh | 23:36 |
| cnd | everyone should play with qt's fingerpaint demo | 23:36 |
| cnd | it makes me happy :) | 23:36 |
| cnd | and they have a pinch to zoom demo where there's a giant world of cheese with mice running on it | 23:37 |
| cnd | and you can pinch to zoom in and out | 23:37 |
| RAOF | Oh, bah. | 23:38 |
| cnd | RAOF, btw, thanks for fixing that doxygen issue :) | 23:39 |
| cnd | it was really getting on my nerves :) | 23:39 |
| RAOF | Debian's X server Provides: xorg-video-abi-9, we Provides: xorg-video-abi-9.0 | 23:39 |
| RAOF | cnd: KiBi also fixed it :) | 23:39 |
| cnd | ahh | 23:39 |
| RAOF | bryceh: Do we want to go with Debian's packaging and incur another rebuild of the world, or diverge for now to include the minor version in those ABI virtual packages too? | 23:41 |
| cnd | tjaalton, I think your xi 1.x fix is causing warnings: | 23:42 |
| cnd | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/570315/ | 23:43 |
| cnd | just a guess since I think your patch touched that file | 23:43 |
| cnd | RAOF, so you think you'll be ready for uploads today? | 23:44 |
| RAOF | cnd: I think so, yes. | 23:44 |
| cnd | cool | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!