[11:48] <micahg> ochosi: mr_pouit: finally, success with git + gmusicbrowser :)
[12:12] <ochosi> hey micahg 
[12:13] <ochosi> so you packaged gmusicbrowser from squentin's git-repo for debian/ubuntu?
[13:45] <mr_pouit> feel free to upload, then I'll s/exaile/gmusicbrowser/ in the seeds and in the panel launchers :)
[13:47] <ochosi> mr_pouit: so if gmusicbrowser from upstream gets packaged (btw, there are still a few important updates to come until thursday) we can later patch it for xubuntu?
[13:47] <ochosi> mr_pouit: just in case not everything necessary makes it upstream for the freeze
[13:48] <mr_pouit> yeah, we can still patch if needed
[13:48] <ochosi> ok, that's fine then
[13:49] <ochosi> squentin started applying patches from my repo yesterday, but he's not done yet
[13:49] <ochosi> brb
[15:06] <charlie-tca> Good morning
[15:55] <micahg> ochosi: no, I was importing 1.1.6
[16:14] <ochosi> micahg: yeah, but 1.1.6 from what repository? https://github.com/squentin/gmusicbrowser ?
[16:16] <mr_pouit> the released tarball I guess
[16:18] <ochosi> mr_pouit: right, i guess that was a misunderstanding because micahg said git + gmb
[16:30] <mr_pouit> ochosi: that's the same, he has probably imported the v1.1.6 tag from git
[17:21] <charlie-tca> mr_pouit: anything known about the alternate images failing to work for a kernel mismatch error?
[18:57] <cody-somerville> I think d-i is just borked today
[18:58] <charlie-tca> yup, there is bug filed that cjwatson is working
[18:58] <davmor2> cody-somerville: charlie-tca: yeap it's borked today
[18:59] <charlie-tca> bug 723148
[19:02] <charlie-tca> desktop images do install, though
[20:14] <surreal7z> hi guys.. when I plug in my external HDD this is what happens... It's called "The Cube" and I have a folder \media which has "The Cube" folder, but owner is root... and when I want to access it... I don't have permissions and the "The Cube_" is created which is good... 
[20:14] <surreal7z> wrong channel
[20:14] <surreal7z> sry
[22:18] <micahg> ochosi: the big issue for this week is feature freeze, since you're fixes are UI improvements, I think we're good if we get 1.1.6 upstream in by thursday
[22:37] <ochosi> micahg: ok that's fine. in fact if you don't take the tarball but the latest git-version on thursday that might save us some patches for later (at least if that's possible)
[22:37] <ochosi> micahg: i'm also checking on a mpris2 plugin to make the sound-indicator work
[22:37] <ochosi> micahg: i might be able to get that upstream till thursday
[22:38] <ochosi> micahg: please let me know whether it's worth a try
[22:39] <micahg> ochosi: well, I'm doing this through Debian, and idk how to package git snapshots yet, and we're about 24 hours out, so I'd rather run with what we have, as long as we're not adding features, we're fine uploading new bug fix/UI  versions
[23:08] <ochosi> micahg: hm, i don't know but wouldn't the way i package for ubuntu work for debian as well? (simply using debuild, the rest (rules etc) should be contained in git already)
[23:10] <micahg> ochosi: yes, but works vs proper are not necessarily the same thing, Debian requires proper packaging
[23:10] <micahg> i.e. standards compliant/lintian clean
[23:11] <ochosi> i'm afraid adding a plugin for mpris2 might be considered a "feature" not a fix...
[23:11] <ochosi> right, that's true
[23:11] <ochosi> or could we argue that the mpris plugin is a ui-change?
[23:12] <ochosi> (brb)
[23:17] <ochosi> micahg: ok, the mpris2 plugin works, i just tried it. would really be cool if we could include that
[23:18] <micahg> ochosi: ugh, that's a feature :(
[23:18] <ochosi> awwh
[23:18] <micahg> we can probably sneak it in though
[23:19] <micahg> ochosi: do you know when the new upstream version will be ready?
[23:20] <ochosi> i'll check that out, i think that we can really get most of the stuff that would be needed done by tomorrow
[23:20] <ochosi> tomorrow being wednesday
[23:22] <ochosi> micahg: until when would you need it?
[23:23] <micahg> idk, the sooner the better, if I have an estimate, I can go to skaet and say we'll have this done by this date, can we get an exception
[23:23] <ochosi> ok, i'll quickly check with upstream, give me a few mins
[23:24] <ochosi> but the thing is that this might need some testing, at least tonight