[02:26] <ailo> paultag: I have to sleep. I'll have to wait another day with finishing the -controls. See you guys tomorrow.
[07:10] <abogani> ScottL: pong
[10:52]  * abogani is updating -lowlatency kernel...
[11:10] <abogani> What about http://www.ffado.org/?q=node/1316 ?
[11:32] <AutoStatic> abogani: New stack works with FFADO, except for DICE based devices
[11:32] <abogani> AutoStatic: Ok, thanks!
[11:33] <ScottL> abogani, are you available to help me work through building the -lowlatency kernel, i have your previous instructions but still not sure which directory you want me in, where the changelog is
[11:33] <AutoStatic> DICE = chipset used in FireWire soundcards like the newer Focusrite Saffire Pro's.
[11:34] <AutoStatic> And then only playback doesn't work, recording works fine
[11:37] <scott-upstairs> anyway abogani, i'm sorry to need your to hold my hand like this, but i really do want to understand and get this done :)
[11:37] <scott-upstairs> i'm at my upstairs computer and ready whenever you are
[11:52] <scott-upstairs> abogani, previously for the -meta you asked me to be in the meta-source directory and update the changelog file
[11:52] <scott-upstairs> abogani, for the -lowlatency directory there isn't a source directory (except under /debian and it only has a single file) so i do not believe that i am finding the correct changelog to update for this
[11:53] <scott-upstairs> abogani, unless i really don't need to, but your instructions said for me to repeat the previous (i.e. -meta) instructions
[11:53] <scott-upstairs> i'm going to need to leave for work soon, so please just reply and my lapttop (ScottL) will pick up the answers
[11:54] <scott-upstairs> #720476
[11:54] <scott-upstairs> bug 720476
[11:54] <scott-upstairs> ah, but i did manage to remember to attach the /var/log/installer/syslog file to this bug per cjwatson's direction :)
[11:55] <scott-upstairs> although i couldn't read it without being root, so i copied the text and posted that to the bug report
[11:55] <scott-upstairs> now i'll bug (no pun intended) people in the #ubuntu-installer channel about it :P
[11:57]  * ScottL is heading to work
[12:20] <abogani> ScottL: The meta-source/ directory don't exit in ubuntu-natty-lowlatency tree. So simply ignore it. The relevant changelog in this case is debian.lowlatency/changelog so you should use dch -c debian.lolatency/changelog -i
[12:21] <abogani> ScottL: Sorry if I missed to explain it adeguately
[13:20] <scott-work> abogani: read the irc logs...thanks for the explanation :)
[13:20] <scott-work> i'll continue to work on it tonight then
[14:07] <scott-work> eh, ctwatson looked at the tasksel bug and found something in the log
[14:07] <scott-work> Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target: The following packages have unmet dependencies: Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target:  libavcodec-extra-52 : Conflicts: libavcodec52 but 4:0.6.1-5ubuntu1 is to be installed Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target:  libavutil-extra-50 : Conflicts: libavutil50 but 4:0.6.1-5ubuntu1 is to be installed
[14:08] <scott-work> bleargh...try that again
[14:08] <scott-work> Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target: The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[14:08] <scott-work> Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target:  libavcodec-extra-52 : Conflicts: libavcodec52 but 4:0.6.1-5ubuntu1 is to be installed
[14:08] <scott-work> Feb 16 22:27:40 in-target:  libavutil-extra-50 : Conflicts: libavutil50 but 4:0.6.1-5ubuntu1 is to be installed
[14:08] <scott-work> so, i'll dig and see which package is causing this problem and see what can be done to fix it
[14:22] <scott-work> paultag: it looks like fluxbox 1.3 is out:  http://www.fluxbox.org/news/
[14:22] <scott-work> paultag: what version were you packaging for ubuntu?
[15:04] <paultag> scott-work: I packaged it before it was announced
[15:04] <paultag> scott-work: that was what I was working on :)
[15:04] <paultag> scott-work: so we had the Debian upload coincide with the fluxbox release, and then I sync'd it to natty a few hours later
[15:05] <paultag> :)
[15:05] <paultag> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fluxbox | http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fluxbox.html
[15:06] <paultag> Oh shucks, wrong link -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fluxbox/1.3.0-1
[15:06] <abogani> paultag: Do you have any news about fluxbuntu?
[15:07] <paultag> abogani: I'm not working with that project -- they want to do something totally different then what I had in mind :)
[15:07] <scott-work> paultag: that's awesome paultag !
[15:08] <paultag> scott-work: all in a days work :P
[15:08] <paultag> we're going to release 1.3.1 soonish, too
[15:08] <paultag> we're totally not doing the release-every-two-years thing anymore
[15:08] <paultag> that's just dumb
[15:09] <scott-work> paultag: i bet it took more than a days work though :P
[15:09] <paultag> scott-work: ;)
[15:09] <paultag> scott-work: anywho, that is a really good release, and showcases a new Ubuntu theme -- "Ubuntu Light"
[15:09] <paultag> It's rather nice
[15:09] <paultag> (and uses the Ubuntu font ;))
[15:10] <abogani> _really_ interesting
[15:11] <paultag> abogani: they want to rebuild packages and maintain that, I wanted to maintain a usable fluxbox DE, rather then just the WM
[15:11] <paultag> abogani: so, I don't have time to spend on fluxbuntu, sadly
[15:11] <paultag> I was working on fubuntu, but the name damned it from the start
[15:12] <paultag> it's ether "FU buntu", "FFFFUUUUUU buntu", or "FuBu  ntu"
[15:12] <paultag> all of which have a distinct issue with them :)
[15:31] <abogani> How can I install fluxbox and remove GNOME obtain a working and usable system?
[15:40] <paultag> abogani: Well fluxbox is a different thing then GNOME
[15:40] <paultag> abogani: fluxbox is a window manager
[15:40] <paultag> abogani: GNOME is a desktop env. (Applications on top of the window manager)
[15:40] <paultag> abogani: so you can actually run fluxbox + GNOME, which is what I do
[15:40] <paultag> (Fluxbox + GNOME applications / panels / settings daemons)
[15:42] <paultag> BBL, going to work out