| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| RoAkSoAx | hi all I hope this is the right channel, but I was wondering if there's a way to obtain the list of packages that someone X uploaded, using the launchpadapi? If so, can someone point me out to what should I be reading for that? Thank you! | 00:25 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | this is the right channel | 00:25 |
| lifeless | api docs | 00:25 |
| lifeless | https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html | 00:25 |
| RoAkSoAx | lifeless: yeah I was looking there but I can't seem to find anything for what I'm lookin for :( | 00:26 |
| lifeless | it may not exist yet | 00:27 |
| lifeless | feel free to file a bug | 00:27 |
| RoAkSoAx | lifeless: will do! thanks! | 00:27 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: sinzui | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| MTecknology | Is there any way to see a list of downloadable files in a project? | 03:05 |
| lifeless | like on https://launchpad.net/bzr/+download | 03:06 |
| lifeless | ? | 03:06 |
| MTecknology | lifeless: can you use that in a debian/watch file? | 03:12 |
| lifeless | no, its paginated | 03:13 |
| lifeless | uhm | 03:13 |
| lifeless | have a look at the bzr packages watch file | 03:13 |
| lifeless | it probably has what you need | 03:14 |
| MTecknology | hm.. | 03:15 |
| MTecknology | that opts looks a bit crazy | 03:16 |
| MTecknology | lifeless: any chance you could explain that part to me? | 03:18 |
| lifeless | I'd need to go read the manual | 03:18 |
| lifeless | I just knew it was an example using lp | 03:18 |
| MTecknology | opts="uversionmangle=s/rc/~rc/;s/b/.0~beta/" \ | 03:18 |
| === Guest690000 is now known as Ubuntux | ||
| MTecknology | heh.. there's nothing even about that in http://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch/ | 03:21 |
| lifeless | thats just for handling bzrs version numbers | 03:22 |
| MTecknology | just like using sed before it's evaluated? | 03:22 |
| MTecknology | lifeless: thanks :) | 03:26 |
| === menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-zzz | ||
| mwb_suse | hi. is anyone around who is familiar with the launchpad API? | 10:49 |
| wgrant | mwb_suse: Sure. | 10:50 |
| mwb_suse | wgrant: I'm trying to figure out if it's possible to pull details (description and comments, primarily) for multiple bugs from Launchpad with a single call. Is that even possible? | 10:54 |
| mwb_suse | with bugzilla it's just a matter of either tacking on extra id= parameters, or passing an array to their XMLRPC interface, but I can't find anything in the Launchpad docs about that | 10:55 |
| wgrant | mwb_suse: There's no way to do that at the moment. It's something that we want to do, though. | 10:56 |
| wgrant | It's mostly specced out, but not yet scheduled. | 10:57 |
| mwb_suse | ah, OK. is there a vague ETA on that feature? | 10:58 |
| wgrant | I'm afraid not. | 10:58 |
| mwb_suse | Ah well. Thanks! | 10:59 |
| lifeless | mwb_suse: you can use martin pools twisted api client | 11:00 |
| lifeless | which will do overlapping concurrent requests | 11:00 |
| lifeless | (but don't set the concurrency too high - it can generate a lot of server load) | 11:00 |
| m4n1sh | mwb_suse: you using launchpadlib? | 11:01 |
| mwb_suse | no, Qt/C++ | 11:02 |
| mwb_suse | i'll just wait for server support; multiple requests wouldn't be a good use of server resources | 11:03 |
| m4n1sh | mwb_suse: you using the raw api? | 11:03 |
| m4n1sh | the restful api? | 11:03 |
| mwb_suse | yeah. for context - i'd like to add launchpad support to a caching desktop bug tracker client (http://entomologist.sf.net). so currently, i guess it would wind up being a single request for every bug a user has assigned to them | 11:05 |
| m4n1sh | yeah | 11:06 |
| m4n1sh | so you are writing the wrapper by hand? | 11:06 |
| m4n1sh | the Qt/C++ wrapper around RESTful API? | 11:07 |
| mwb_suse | yes. it's actually a pretty easy API to work directly with once | 11:07 |
| mwb_suse | s/once// | 11:07 |
| m4n1sh | writing by hand or generating it? | 11:07 |
| m4n1sh | I am also writing the mono wrappers | 11:07 |
| mwb_suse | i'm doing it by hand. it didn't even occur to me to look for a WADL -> QObject generator... | 11:09 |
| m4n1sh | Bugs part is done | 11:10 |
| m4n1sh | is there any? | 11:10 |
| m4n1sh | WADL -> QObject generator? | 11:10 |
| tsimpson | I'm doubtful one exists | 11:10 |
| tsimpson | besides, you run the risk of having to rewrite massive chunks of your code if LP changes | 11:11 |
| mwb_suse | isn't that the point of having API versions? | 11:12 |
| tsimpson | ok, _when_ LP changes then | 11:12 |
| lifeless | uhm | 11:13 |
| lifeless | you have to rewrite code no matter what | 11:13 |
| m4n1sh | I have written for mono wadl-sharp for generating C# code from WADL | 11:13 |
| m4n1sh | but WADL being a confusing spec | 11:13 |
| tsimpson | I mean I'd rather write something like obj.call("someLPCall", args...) than individual methods for LP calls | 11:13 |
| m4n1sh | I doubt what I made is actually correct | 11:13 |
| lifeless | if we change something, you have to change. | 11:13 |
| lifeless | however | 11:13 |
| lifeless | we release versions (like 1.0) that we guarantee for years (excepting very rare circumstances) | 11:13 |
| m4n1sh | I am using 1.0 for it | 11:13 |
| lifeless | gnight | 11:13 |
| m4n1sh | tsimpson: re-writing code is LP changes | 11:14 |
| tsimpson | but if you call LP methods dynamically, only the applications need to change, not the LP binding | 11:14 |
| m4n1sh | in which case? | 11:14 |
| m4n1sh | generation by tool or writing by hand? | 11:14 |
| m4n1sh | tsimpson: the problem is with statically typed languages | 11:14 |
| m4n1sh | like C# | 11:14 |
| m4n1sh | it is painful to do things dynamically | 11:15 |
| tsimpson | which is why I use python with Launchapd, and C++ with anything else :) | 11:15 |
| m4n1sh | I asked Leonard | 11:15 |
| m4n1sh | he said the API will change in a backward compactible way | 11:15 |
| m4n1sh | but not 100% guaranteed | 11:15 |
| tsimpson | when you do foo.someMethod(...) in launchpadlib, it actually translates to another method on foo which includes "someMethod" and the arguments | 11:16 |
| tsimpson | so it only looks like a static API on the client-side, but it's dynamically generated from the WADL | 11:16 |
| tsimpson | dynamically every request too | 11:17 |
| m4n1sh | so if the no of arguments for a method changes | 11:17 |
| m4n1sh | in this case the static method will fail | 11:17 |
| tsimpson | well, every request to the root URI, not *every* request | 11:17 |
| wgrant | m4n1sh: All args are named. | 11:17 |
| wgrant | Not positional. | 11:17 |
| m4n1sh | right now I am generating C# code from WADL | 11:18 |
| m4n1sh | what all bad things can happen | 11:18 |
| m4n1sh | it is generated once | 11:18 |
| m4n1sh | and then shipped | 11:18 |
| m4n1sh | it doesnt generate dynamically | 11:18 |
| tsimpson | you'd be better off giving a map/dict to each method as the arguments | 11:18 |
| tsimpson | but then you probably need some "variant" class, like QVariant in Qt to get a map of string->any_type | 11:19 |
| mwb_suse | one other question - does launchpad have an API call, or some other way to identify that a server is running a launchpad instance? | 11:29 |
| m4n1sh | mwb_suse: you have to specify which launchpad instance you want to use (IIRC) | 11:31 |
| wgrant | mwb_suse: There has traditionally only been a single production Launchpad instance, so not really :/ | 11:32 |
| m4n1sh | but staging and edge | 11:33 |
| m4n1sh | I think edge is now no more | 11:33 |
| mwb_suse | m4n1sh: i mean if someone runs their own launchpad instance on bugs.example.com or something | 11:33 |
| m4n1sh | then it should be production | 11:34 |
| mwb_suse | wgrant: well, one more thing on the wishlist for v1.1, then :-) | 11:34 |
| mwb_suse | m4n1sh: but if there's no identifying call, eg. http://bugs.example.com/api, there's no way to distinguish whether or not a server is running a launchpad instance | 11:35 |
| m4n1sh | yeah | 11:35 |
| tsimpson | you can just use a standard GET to the service root with a header of "Accept: application/vnd.sun.wadl+xml" | 11:37 |
| tsimpson | if you get back a WADL definition, you can parse that and see if it's a launchpad instance or not | 11:38 |
| wgrant | True. THere are some reasonably definitive wadl:docs there. | 11:38 |
| mwb_suse | i don't see an identifier in there | 11:38 |
| tsimpson | there's an "About this service" wadl:doc with "Launchpad" in it | 11:39 |
| tsimpson | or you can just look at the wadl and see if it looks like an LP service | 11:40 |
| mwb_suse | yeah, that works | 11:43 |
| tsimpson | unless someone goes out of their way to customize the service definition, it should be fairly easily detectable | 11:44 |
| tsimpson | and the likelihood of you even getting a wadl definition on some random server is low anyway | 11:44 |
| mwb_suse | thanks again for the help! | 11:52 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: - | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| crom | hello anyone can help me with the fingerprint, the webpage does not accept it (BTW i'm a noob LOL) | 15:56 |
| crom | any admin arround? | 16:18 |
| m4n1sh | crom: fingerprint? | 16:37 |
| m4n1sh | crom: Hi | 16:40 |
| m4n1sh | you issue? | 16:40 |
| m4n1sh | *your | 16:40 |
| crom | the page says that there is an error with the fingerprint....or wait 10 min for the fingerprint to be uploaded | 16:41 |
| crom | sorry? | 16:42 |
| crom | any idea? | 16:44 |
| m4n1sh | your RSA/DSA fingerprint? | 16:47 |
| m4n1sh | you uploading your GPG public key? | 16:47 |
| crom | yes i did by... | 16:48 |
| crom | gpg --send-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com "pub-id" | 16:48 |
| crom | well nevermind the i have to go now ...thanks | 16:50 |
| luv | hi, how long does it take for a ppa to get completly deleted? | 17:46 |
| m4n1sh | luv: you deleted a PPA? | 17:50 |
| m4n1sh | in my case it still shows that the repo exists | 17:50 |
| m4n1sh | in my LP profile | 17:50 |
| m4n1sh | but others cannot see this | 17:50 |
| luv | hell | 17:51 |
| luv | i had a really cool for that ppa | 17:51 |
| luv | and now i was about to create one with the same name | 17:52 |
| luv | because i forgot password for my old openpgp key :-) | 17:52 |
| luv | and there is no way to change the key for a ppa | 17:52 |
| luv | anyway, at least, i can exercise my creativity again :-) | 17:53 |
| luv | thanks | 17:53 |
| maxb | luv: I'm afraid you've misunderstood - your openpgp key is not linked to a specific PPA | 18:22 |
| tsimpson | luv: you only need to sign the source package you upload to the PPA, with *any* of your registered pgp/gpg keys | 18:23 |
| luv | not really | 18:31 |
| luv | for example, add-apt-repository downloads a specific key when adding a ppa | 18:31 |
| luv | and you can see the ppa listed on your ppa launchpad website | 18:32 |
| luv | sorry | 18:32 |
| luv | and you can see the _key_ listed on your ppa launchpad website | 18:32 |
| tsimpson | luv: your key has nothing to do with the PPA key | 18:35 |
| tsimpson | you sign the package so LP knows it comes from you, then LP builds it and signs it so users know it comes from LP | 18:35 |
| tsimpson | you can change your keys all you want, as long as LP knows the key you are using to upload is associated with your account | 18:36 |
| luv | tsimpson: and then add-apt-repository comes in | 18:54 |
| tsimpson | all add-apt-repository does is get's the PPA deb source, pulls the key for the PPA, and adds it to the keyring | 18:55 |
| tsimpson | it has nothing to do with what key you used to sign the source packages with when you upload | 18:55 |
| luv | the problem is in the part where add-apt-repository pulls the key for the ppa | 19:07 |
| falktx | hey there | 20:24 |
| falktx | it seems that some users are unable to reach my PPAs | 20:25 |
| ari-tczew | We need to add ubuntu-dev as member into ~ubuntu-branches to maintain statuses. is it possible? | 21:41 |
| lifeless | the tb owns ubuntu-branches | 21:46 |
| Ampelbein | hi there, I'm running into OOPSes like OOPS-1883F2268 when trying to access a list of bugs, in that case https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.component=1&field.component=2&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.has_no_package.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.importance:list=Undecided&field.omit_dupes=on&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.owner=&field.searchtext=&field.status:list=New&orderby=-datecreated&se | 22:01 |
| Ampelbein | arch=Search&start=1575 | 22:01 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1883F2268 | 22:01 |
| tumbleweed | Hi. We have a merge proposal from a new contributor that's had a lot of back and forth (we have high standards), and eventually one of our developers decided to make the final changes necessary for acceptance, himself. | 22:16 |
| lifeless | Ampelbein: hi, just waiting for that to sync to be able to look at it for you | 22:16 |
| tumbleweed | He tried to mark the merge as superceded by his own branch, and ran into OOPS-1883A2286 | 22:16 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1883A2286 | 22:16 |
| tumbleweed | am I right in thinking that when his branch is merged, the original wone will be marked as merged? We don't really want to mark it as rejected, because it wasn't | 22:17 |
| Ampelbein | lifeless: no stress, I realise it's saturday evening for some people ;- | 22:17 |
| lifeless | Ampelbein: sunday morning in fact ;) | 22:17 |
| lifeless | tumbleweed: i think you are | 22:17 |
| tumbleweed | lifeless: ok, that's probably the best route out of here then. We don't want to alienate too much. | 22:18 |
| lifeless | Ampelbein: its a timeout | 22:39 |
| lifeless | Ampelbein: we have been working on search, still more to do. I'll make sure there is a bug dedicated to this later today. | 22:40 |
| Ampelbein | lifeless: ok, so it's nothing fancy going wrong. Will try to narrow down my search options a little in that case. thanks for checking! | 22:41 |
| lifeless | Ampelbein: its one query taking 10 seconds on its own | 22:43 |
| lifeless | ah | 22:45 |
| lifeless | you're at page 1575 of the search?! | 22:45 |
| lifeless | sorry, page 15 | 22:45 |
| lifeless | thats probably it | 22:45 |
| Ampelbein | lifeless: in that case, yeah. | 22:45 |
| Ampelbein | lifeless: I start at page 1 and click through to see if I find anything interesting. | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!