[03:45] <c2tarun> I still have some problems with my new installation :( there is no .bashrc file in home folder? I am not getting colors in command prompt. Can anyone please help :/
[03:46] <zeroseven0183> Hi c2tarun. This channel is for bug reporting and triaging. General support is in #ubuntu channel.
[03:47] <c2tarun> oh sorry
[05:50] <penalvch> Regarding bug 681080 seems this should be split into 2 bugs, one for each function (DCOUNT & DCOUNTA) or keep as is? I think split but would like 2nd opinion.
[05:50] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 681080 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) "oocalc: wrong calculation with DCOUNT and DCOUNTA function (affects: 1) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/681080
[08:58] <penalvch> Regarding bug 667453 is it pushing it to mark this affecting Abiword as well?
[08:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 667453 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "formula from .doc looks bad and visa versa (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/667453
[14:01] <papo> hello
[14:04] <AbhijiT> hi
[14:33] <hjd> Hi. Could someone please mark bug 708494 as wishlist? Thank you.
[14:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 708494 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] skytraq-datalogger (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708494
[14:35] <charlie-tca> done, hjd
[14:45] <hjd> Are package requests for packages who have been in Ubuntu earlier handled any differently from other requests? Bug 709633 was in karmic, but was removed later, but I can't find any bug reports or reference to why. Should I just add needs-packaging in the title and tag as usual?
[14:45] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 709633 in luxrender (Ubuntu) "luxrender needs packaging (affects: 1) (heat: 116)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/709633
[14:48] <charlie-tca> posibly because it was for lpia, a specialized system
[14:49] <charlie-tca> To the best of my recollection, we no longer support lpia systems
[14:53] <njin> hello, at wich package assign a wubi bug?
[14:53] <Ampelbein> charlie-tca: yeah, 9.10 was the last ubuntu with lpia support
[14:54] <charlie-tca> hjd: unless luxrender is now supporting/needed for something besides lpia, it is invalid
[14:56] <charlie-tca> njin: ubiquity
[14:56] <hjd> charlie-tca: hm, I have to admit I don't know. I just stumbled across it based on the title.
[14:57] <charlie-tca> It is needs packaging, you could check with #ubuntu-devel, where they handle such things
[14:59] <Ampelbein> hjd: FWIW, the package got removed because debian removed it http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547514
[14:59] <ubot4> Debian bug 547514 in ftp.debian.org "RM: luxrender -- RoM; RC-buggy; NPOASR" [Normal,Open]
[14:59] <Ampelbein> apparently, the maintainer didn't have time to further work on including new versions and noone stepped up
[15:04] <hjd> Ampelbein: I see. How did you find the debian bug, btw? I tried searching for the package name which had zero results.
[15:05] <Ampelbein> hjd: http://packages.qa.debian.org
[15:09] <hjd> Ampelbein: thanks :)
[15:10] <njin> charlie-tca: thanks
[16:08] <kklimonda> ah
[16:08] <kklimonda> hello
[16:09] <AbhijiT> hi
[20:16] <techningeer> Could somebody set the importance of the bug #617716 to medium?
[20:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 617716 in sun-java6 (Ubuntu) "package sun-java6-jre 6.20dlj-0ubuntu1.9.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/617716