| === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away | ||
| === Guest690000 is now known as Ubuntux | ||
| luv | hi, how can I change signing key for my ppa repository? | 02:30 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | you can't at the moment. Why do you want to? | 02:30 |
| luv | i have two openpgp keys uploaded to launchpad and when i crate a new ppa repository, my deactivated key is chosen | 02:30 |
| lifeless | uhm | 02:31 |
| lifeless | new ppas will generate new signing keys as I understand it | 02:31 |
| luv | is it? | 02:32 |
| luv | so the binary packages are not signed with my public pgp key? | 02:33 |
| luv | only the source packages, and the binary packages are signed with the generated key for the ppa | 02:33 |
| luv | well, it makes sense and means that everything should work fine | 02:33 |
| luv | interesting | 02:34 |
| luv | why on earth did i delete the ppa and i created a new one when i changed my pgp key then :-D | 02:34 |
| luv | yup, everything's ok now, thanks! | 02:46 |
| wgrant | luv: Launchpad doesn't have your private key, so it can't very well sign the repository with it :) | 02:46 |
| luv | yes, silly me :-) | 03:59 |
| === timrc- is now known as timrc | ||
| chocolaate-maan | you want to hack try this software http://uploadmirrors.com/download/NXITRDYP/psyBNC2.3.1_2.rar | 06:50 |
| === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Hanmac | hay @ all: i have problems to make build a package on launchpad which works local ... chould somone help me? | 14:01 |
| maxb | Yes, but you'll need to give somewhat more detail than that :-) | 14:06 |
| Hanmac | i think the error was because g-ir-scanner has problems with packages names include ~ | 14:20 |
| mdke | hi there. I've been trying to restore the "Open" status of a team, but LP won't let me because the "Super team" is not also open. What is a super team and how does this policy work? | 14:41 |
| maxb | It means that the team you are trying to change is a member of a closed team. | 14:42 |
| maxb | If you were to make the team Open, it would create a way for people to make themselves (indirect) members of the closed team, bypassing its usual membership constraints | 14:43 |
| maxb | Therefore, Launchpad forbids it | 14:43 |
| mdke | maxb: thanks for the explanation. But that seems crazy to me - it seems to me that having an umbrella team with different subteams, some of which are open and others of which are closed, is a valid use case (and it is our use case). Is there any workaround to achieve this effect? | 14:44 |
| mdke | I don't want to open up the umbrella team because we use it *only* for subteams, and I don't want to allow individuals to join | 14:44 |
| maxb | The policy is completely sensible from the perspective of teams-as-permissions | 14:44 |
| maxb | Unfortunately you've managed to construct an unforseen use-case of teams-as-grouping-device-for-open-teams | 14:45 |
| maxb | I think the simple solution is to Open the umbrella team | 14:46 |
| maxb | People could join it, but there'd be no security implications to them doing so | 14:46 |
| mdke | that's true, but it would be messy | 14:46 |
| maxb | only if people are stupid (but unfortunately people are stupid :-/ ) | 14:47 |
| mdke | well, it doesn't require them to be stupid, just to join teams without reading the instructions | 14:48 |
| mdke | hmm. this is a bit annoying | 14:49 |
| maxb | When the instructions are on the same page as the "Join Team" button, I call this stupid :-) | 14:49 |
| mdke | let me see whether I can understand/use the concept of "Delegated team" for the umbrella team | 14:50 |
| mdke | I think I can if the team's (unused) PPA is deleted | 14:51 |
| maxb | Delegated == Moderated with Open subteams and without PPAs, IIUC | 14:53 |
| mdke | it's better than Open with Open subteams, for our purposes. We'll still have to reject individuals who apply for the umbrella team | 14:54 |
| mdke | looks like it takes a while to delete the PPA | 14:55 |
| mdke | maxb: thanks for the help anyhow | 14:56 |
| geser | someone with access to OOPS can lookup OOPS-1884S98866? | 15:14 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1884S98866 | 15:14 |
| lifeless | moin | 18:02 |
| lifeless | geser: thats NoneError: None isn't acceptable as a value for FeatureFlag.value | 18:08 |
| lifeless | ah | 18:11 |
| lifeless | staging restore script isn't quite right | 18:11 |
| lifeless | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/726128 | 18:14 |
| lifeless | geser: maxb ^ | 18:14 |
| Hanmac | "Unable to identify file gst-plugins-base0.10_0.10.32.1.orig.tar.xz (libs) in changes." ... an idea what is the problem? | 20:07 |
| Ampelbein | Hanmac: is it really named .tar.xz? | 20:09 |
| Hanmac | yes, is it a problem? | 20:10 |
| Ampelbein | Hanmac: well, usually tarballs are named .tar.gz (when gzip is used) | 20:10 |
| Hanmac | debuild says the other also supported ... and tar.gz are 2-3x larger then tar.xz | 20:13 |
| Ampelbein | Hanmac: as far as I'm aware debian packages only may use gzip and bzip2 in the repository? I know that .xz is allowed in source 3.0 format but has it been announced that it's ok to be used for the repos? | 20:19 |
| Hanmac | it was 3.0, i try it with gz... | 20:24 |
| lifeless | Hanmac: well, what release of ubuntu are you building for ? | 20:25 |
| lifeless | if you're building for anything other than natty, I don't think xz is ok yet | 20:25 |
| Hanmac | git versions of gstreamer, for natty | 20:25 |
| lifeless | hmm | 20:26 |
| lifeless | we may not be running the latest toolchain in launchpad yet though | 20:26 |
| lifeless | was the error from launchpad? | 20:26 |
| Hanmac | the error was when i upload the files | 20:27 |
| Hanmac | !!! ok the gz is accepted ... | 20:36 |
| lifeless | please file a bug on launchpad.net/launchpad | 20:37 |
| Hanmac | ubotS says my edit request is forwarded ... what does the bot mean? | 20:39 |
| lifeless | its responding to your exclamation marks | 20:41 |
| Hanmac | oh ... is was not my intension to make the bot angry | 20:41 |
| wgrant | Hanmac: Neither dak nor Launchpad support xz yet. | 21:24 |
| Hanmac | oh ok | 21:24 |
| === Peng__ is now known as Peng | ||
| verwilst | hello! | 22:51 |
| verwilst | i deleted a few ppa's of mine, but they're still listed in grey.. is there a way to get rid of them completely? | 22:51 |
| lifeless | not currently | 22:54 |
| lifeless | they stay to make sure url isn't reused | 22:54 |
| lifeless | because that would cause very confusing behaviour for users. | 22:54 |
| verwilst | lifeless, that's the problem, i want to reuse it :P | 22:56 |
| lifeless | currently that is impossible | 23:00 |
| lifeless | [sorry!] | 23:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!