=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === Guest690000 is now known as Ubuntux [02:30] hi, how can I change signing key for my ppa repository? [02:30] you can't at the moment. Why do you want to? [02:30] i have two openpgp keys uploaded to launchpad and when i crate a new ppa repository, my deactivated key is chosen [02:31] uhm [02:31] new ppas will generate new signing keys as I understand it [02:32] is it? [02:33] so the binary packages are not signed with my public pgp key? [02:33] only the source packages, and the binary packages are signed with the generated key for the ppa [02:33] well, it makes sense and means that everything should work fine [02:34] interesting [02:34] why on earth did i delete the ppa and i created a new one when i changed my pgp key then :-D [02:46] yup, everything's ok now, thanks! [02:46] luv: Launchpad doesn't have your private key, so it can't very well sign the repository with it :) [03:59] yes, silly me :-) === timrc- is now known as timrc [06:50] you want to hack try this software http://uploadmirrors.com/download/NXITRDYP/psyBNC2.3.1_2.rar === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:01] hay @ all: i have problems to make build a package on launchpad which works local ... chould somone help me? [14:06] Yes, but you'll need to give somewhat more detail than that :-) [14:20] i think the error was because g-ir-scanner has problems with packages names include ~ [14:41] hi there. I've been trying to restore the "Open" status of a team, but LP won't let me because the "Super team" is not also open. What is a super team and how does this policy work? [14:42] It means that the team you are trying to change is a member of a closed team. [14:43] If you were to make the team Open, it would create a way for people to make themselves (indirect) members of the closed team, bypassing its usual membership constraints [14:43] Therefore, Launchpad forbids it [14:44] maxb: thanks for the explanation. But that seems crazy to me - it seems to me that having an umbrella team with different subteams, some of which are open and others of which are closed, is a valid use case (and it is our use case). Is there any workaround to achieve this effect? [14:44] I don't want to open up the umbrella team because we use it *only* for subteams, and I don't want to allow individuals to join [14:44] The policy is completely sensible from the perspective of teams-as-permissions [14:45] Unfortunately you've managed to construct an unforseen use-case of teams-as-grouping-device-for-open-teams [14:46] I think the simple solution is to Open the umbrella team [14:46] People could join it, but there'd be no security implications to them doing so [14:46] that's true, but it would be messy [14:47] only if people are stupid (but unfortunately people are stupid :-/ ) [14:48] well, it doesn't require them to be stupid, just to join teams without reading the instructions [14:49] hmm. this is a bit annoying [14:49] When the instructions are on the same page as the "Join Team" button, I call this stupid :-) [14:50] let me see whether I can understand/use the concept of "Delegated team" for the umbrella team [14:51] I think I can if the team's (unused) PPA is deleted [14:53] Delegated == Moderated with Open subteams and without PPAs, IIUC [14:54] it's better than Open with Open subteams, for our purposes. We'll still have to reject individuals who apply for the umbrella team [14:55] looks like it takes a while to delete the PPA [14:56] maxb: thanks for the help anyhow [15:14] someone with access to OOPS can lookup OOPS-1884S98866? [15:14] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1884S98866 [18:02] moin [18:08] geser: thats NoneError: None isn't acceptable as a value for FeatureFlag.value [18:11] ah [18:11] staging restore script isn't quite right [18:14] https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/726128 [18:14] geser: maxb ^ [20:07] "Unable to identify file gst-plugins-base0.10_0.10.32.1.orig.tar.xz (libs) in changes." ... an idea what is the problem? [20:09] Hanmac: is it really named .tar.xz? [20:10] yes, is it a problem? [20:10] Hanmac: well, usually tarballs are named .tar.gz (when gzip is used) [20:13] debuild says the other also supported ... and tar.gz are 2-3x larger then tar.xz [20:19] Hanmac: as far as I'm aware debian packages only may use gzip and bzip2 in the repository? I know that .xz is allowed in source 3.0 format but has it been announced that it's ok to be used for the repos? [20:24] it was 3.0, i try it with gz... [20:25] Hanmac: well, what release of ubuntu are you building for ? [20:25] if you're building for anything other than natty, I don't think xz is ok yet [20:25] git versions of gstreamer, for natty [20:26] hmm [20:26] we may not be running the latest toolchain in launchpad yet though [20:26] was the error from launchpad? [20:27] the error was when i upload the files [20:36] !!! ok the gz is accepted ... [20:37] please file a bug on launchpad.net/launchpad [20:39] ubotS says my edit request is forwarded ... what does the bot mean? [20:41] its responding to your exclamation marks [20:41] oh ... is was not my intension to make the bot angry [21:24] Hanmac: Neither dak nor Launchpad support xz yet. [21:24] oh ok === Peng__ is now known as Peng [22:51] hello! [22:51] i deleted a few ppa's of mine, but they're still listed in grey.. is there a way to get rid of them completely? [22:54] not currently [22:54] they stay to make sure url isn't reused [22:54] because that would cause very confusing behaviour for users. [22:56] lifeless, that's the problem, i want to reuse it :P [23:00] currently that is impossible [23:01] [sorry!]