[12:11] <danilos> gmb, hi, for bug 720826 I need to add some text for the matching filters in the email body as well (for the benefit of gmail users); do you have a minute to discuss this?
[12:11] <_mup_> Bug #720826: Add subscription description header for bug notifications <qa-ok> <story-better-bug-notification> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by danilo> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/720826 >
[12:16] <gmb> danilos: I'm just grabbing some lunch; I'll be happy to talk when I've grazed, though.
[12:17] <danilos> gmb, sure, thanks
[13:01] <gary_poster> hi y'all.  I'm having to flex time it a bit this morning because Karyn has a doctor's appt.  I'll be in and out until about an hour from now.  I do intend to be around for the call.
[13:02] <benji> k
[13:29] <gary_poster> bac benji danilos gmb mumble/kanban in 1-ish
[13:30] <gary_poster> gmb and danilos, yoo hoo
[13:39] <bac> whee!
[13:40] <gmb> danilos: You still there?
[13:40] <danilos> gmb, https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/720826
[13:40] <_mup_> Bug #720826: Add subscription description header for bug notifications <qa-ok> <story-better-bug-notification> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by danilo> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/720826 >
[13:42] <danilos> gmb, https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-720826-emails/+merge/51747
[14:06] <gmb> bac: My dsl has dropped out. I'll ping you when I'm back online.
[14:06] <bac> gmb: ok
[14:13] <gmb> bac: I'm back in the land of the online. Firing up mumble now.
[14:13] <bac> ok
[15:08]  * gmb -> afk for a little bit to run some errands
[15:31] <danilos> gmb, yep
[15:32] <danilos> uhm, wrong channel, wrong person
[15:32] <gmb> FAIL.
[15:54] <gmb> bac: This might be a rabbit hole we don't need to descend into, but do you have any idea why the height increases by 17px with every close/open cycle?
[15:54] <gary_poster> It's a feature.
[15:55] <bac> gmb: no idea
[15:56] <bac> even on my little example it increases by a few pixels each time, which i attribute to a border, perhaps
[15:56] <gmb> Hmm, possibly.
[15:56] <gmb> I guess we needn't worry until we've sorted the other stuff out.
[15:57] <gary_poster> though probably worth highlighting as an issue if we have the attention of a/the dev
[15:58] <gmb> Fair point.
[16:19] <bac> gmb: would you have a look at  bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bac/%2Bjunk/accordion_test and see if you think it demonstrates the problem minimally and clearly?
[16:20] <gmb> bac: Sure
[16:27] <gmb> bac: I think that demonstrates our problem, but it might help if the second item in the accordion had a note telling you how many lines should be displayed. It's hard to tell at first glance where it's going wrong.
[16:27] <gmb> (Whereas in our LP code it's far more obvious first-up).
[16:28] <bac> gmb: have you noticed how the accordion behaves nicely with the overlay when initially loaded?
[16:28] <gmb> Yes.
[16:29] <bac> it is only after the forced resize that it gets dumb
[16:29] <gmb> (That's kind of what I mean)
[16:29] <bac> yeah, ok
[16:29] <gmb> There's a danger that someone might lazily say "what? That works fine"
[16:29] <gmb> Without actually looking.
[16:30] <gary_poster> Have we tried setting display on and off, and cropping an enclosing div, and random stuff like that?  I expect so, but I can't stop from asking
[16:30] <gary_poster> Or maybe it is not even pertinent/appropriate
[16:31] <bac> display on/off works nicely
[16:31] <bac> but it is not animatable
[16:31] <bac> and, yes, we're performing the resizing on an enclosing div
[16:31] <bac> but i've tried removing the wrapper and operating on the accordion itself
[16:32] <gary_poster> cool
[16:32] <bac> well it'd be cooler if it worked!  :)
[16:32] <gary_poster> yeah
[16:33] <gary_poster> I wonder if the display on/off thing points to some acceptable hack.  Won't worry about it till later; justa passing thought.
[16:50]  * bac lunches
[17:01]  * benji lunches.
[17:17]  * danilos -> off, enjoy the rest of the day all
[19:52] <benji> so... what is the state of the art in JS testing?
[20:20] <gary_poster> I suspect that's a question for Deryck.  Maybe bac has a pointer.  I think LP does currently have some answers.
[20:21] <bac> benji, gary_poster: i just looked for a wiki page that i thought was helpful but  cannot find it
[20:21] <bac> curtis' page is an brief intro:
[20:21] <bac> https://dev.launchpad.net/JavascriptUnitTesting
[20:21] <gary_poster> That looks good to me, thanks bac
[20:21] <bac> i *thought* i'd edited that page in the past to show how to run those tests from the command line
[20:22] <benji> thanks guys; I'll see what Deryck says.  I guess this means that none of y'all have started your testing yet either. :)
[20:22] <gary_poster> I'm not writing JS right now :-)
[20:25] <gary_poster> benji, I'm going to have my call with Francis soon so I'm trying to tidy up the kanban board.  You have three cards active on the board right now.  Are all of them in fact in progress, or are some of them mistaken, possibly because of crazy card shenanigans I've pulled in the past?
[20:25] <benji> gary_poster: looking
[20:26] <benji> gary_poster: I moved "implement accordion panes" back to tasks an unassigned myself; if you'll remember, I did a little work on it but we decided the optimum would be for me to work on other things
[20:26] <gary_poster> right, cool, thanks benji
[20:27] <benji> the "wire up" card isn't done and I'm not actively working on it, but I expect I will when the accordion panes are done; perhaps marking it blocked is the right thing to do there
[20:27] <benji> gary_poster: ^
[20:28] <gary_poster> (AIUI) blocked means you can't work on it because of things outside of you--you couldn't start it regardless of your own availability.  So, on the face of it it doesn't sound blocked to me, benji.
[20:29] <benji> gary_poster: well, I can't finish wiring up the form until the accordion panes are done, and I'm not doing them, is that not blocked?
[20:29] <gary_poster> ah, yes, it is, benji :-)
[20:30] <benji> :)
[20:30] <gary_poster> thank you
[21:30] <bac> benji, gary_poster: i found the command-line invocation
[21:30] <bac> xvfb-run ./bin/test --layer=RegistryWindmillLayer -cvvt test_yuitests
[21:31] <bac> runs all lp.registry YUI tests -- not windmill
[21:31] <benji> cool
[21:31] <bac> i'll add this to the wiki now
[21:31] <gary_poster> ah-ha, bac!  that looks golden.  How do we run Bugs only--BugsWindmillLayer?
[21:31] <bac> note there is no way to specify a single test -- you can only get granularity of a subsystem
[21:31] <bac> gary_poster: i believe you've cracked the pattern!
[21:31] <gary_poster> ;-)
[21:32] <bac> thank god i've got my history file set to 'forever'
[21:32] <bac> in bash, i mean
[21:32] <gary_poster> :-)
[22:08] <bac> https://dev.launchpad.net/JavascriptUnitTesting -- now even better
[22:23] <gary_poster> sehr awesome, bac