psusi | when using the email interface to update bugs, how do you specify which task you are talking about? it seems like the interface was written assuming a bug only had one task | 00:39 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | psusi: See the 'affects' command. | 00:39 |
psusi | wgrant, I thought that was for adding a target? it also modifies which target subsequent commands apply to? what if you don't use affects? does it apply them to all targets then? | 00:40 |
wgrant | psusi: affects will create a new target or choose an existing one if it already exists. | 00:41 |
wgrant | If you don't use affects, it guesses. | 00:41 |
wgrant | Badly. | 00:41 |
psusi | ahh, I see | 00:41 |
psusi | what about when a bug is tracked in multiple distributions? I'm still kind of fuzzy on the difference between that and milestones | 00:42 |
wgrant | Multiple series, you mean? | 00:43 |
wgrant | eg. Lucid, Maverick, Natty? | 00:43 |
psusi | yea | 00:43 |
wgrant | 'affects ubuntu/lucid/dpkg' should work, I think. | 00:44 |
psusi | hrm... ok | 00:44 |
psusi | does the mail interface support searching for bugs? | 00:51 |
psusi | i.e. give me a list of all bugs affecting ubuntu/foo? | 00:51 |
wgrant | No. | 00:53 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== doko__ is now known as doko | ||
psusi | so I'm trying to figure out the launchpad python api... I seem to be able to find a bug by number with b = lp.bugs[1], but I can not for the life of me, figure out how to look up bugs by distribution/project | 01:58 |
maxb | psusi: You have found https://launchpad.net/+apidoc/, yes? | 02:04 |
psusi | maxb, I was reading https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib, will check that one now | 02:05 |
maxb | psusi: I think you want something like lp.projects['launchpad'].searchTasks(importance="Critical") | 02:08 |
psusi | maxb, I was just messing with searchTasks... it seems to return all bugs, even fixed ones unless you add status='New'. can you search for any open status? | 02:22 |
wgrant | psusi: The default is to search for only open bugs. | 02:22 |
psusi | wgrant, it's returning invalid and fix released bugs too | 02:23 |
psusi | ok, so I have a list of bugs ( in python )... I can print their status... now if I want to change their status, how do I do that? for b in bugs: b.status = 'Invalid'? | 02:41 |
psusi | what comment would be used? | 02:41 |
wgrant | b.status = 'Invalid'; b.lp_save() | 02:43 |
wgrant | Comments aren't associated with changes like that, so you can just add a comment before or after. | 02:43 |
psusi | ohh...so how do I add a comment? and I guess both comment and status change are written when I call lp_save()? | 02:44 |
wgrant | psusi: Call newMessage on the bug (*not* the bug_task). | 02:48 |
wgrant | Attributes are only saved when you call lp_save(), but methods are executed immediately. | 02:48 |
achiang | what are the short URLs for LP? | 02:50 |
wgrant | Short URLs? | 02:51 |
achiang | don't we have a shortening service, like bit.ly? | 02:51 |
achiang | istr something like that... | 02:51 |
wgrant | pad.lv? | 02:51 |
achiang | ah, yes, that is | 02:51 |
achiang | that's it | 02:51 |
psusi | wgrant, why does help(bugs[0]) not list newMessage()? | 02:52 |
wgrant | psusi: Did you get that bugs collection from searchTasks? | 02:52 |
psusi | wgrant, yep | 02:52 |
spiv | I emailed a review to https://code.launchpad.net/~gz/bzr/smarter_smart_error_reporting_722416_B/+merge/51666 over 20 minutes ago and it still hasn't appeared. | 02:53 |
wgrant | psusi: If you check the docs, you'll see that searchTasks returns a collection of bug_tasks, not bugs. | 02:53 |
wgrant | psusi: Try help(bugs[0].bug) | 02:53 |
psusi | well, I took what each searchTasks returned, converted it to a list(), and then concactenated them together, since it seems like you have to explicitly searchTasks on each status you want ( New, Confirmed, Incomplete ) | 02:53 |
spiv | Is it probably going to appear, or has Launchpad lost it? | 02:54 |
psusi | ohh... | 02:54 |
spiv | It's not my mail setup, another review I sent an hour ago worked just fine. | 02:54 |
psusi | wgrant, print bugs[0]: https://api.staging.launchpad.net/1.0/ubuntu/+source/powernowd/+bug/153186 | 02:57 |
psusi | wgrant, print bugs[0].bug: big traceback | 02:57 |
wgrant | Oh? | 02:58 |
poolie | spiv, that's giving me a lot of deja vu | 02:59 |
Ampelbein | hmm, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zoneminder/+bug/507004/comments/4 looks like spam to me? | 03:03 |
wgrant | spiv, poolie: process-mail is apparently failing to run. | 03:11 |
wgrant | Looking. | 03:11 |
wgrant | Oh no. | 03:12 |
wgrant | thumper: Is that what you were looking at? | 03:12 |
wgrant | With the emailaddress thing? | 03:12 |
thumper | wgrant: no | 03:13 |
thumper | wgrant: I was looking at something else | 03:13 |
wgrant | What. | 03:13 |
wgrant | 2011-03-02 01:39:21 ERROR No mail box is configured. Please see mailbox.txt for info on how to configure one. | 03:13 |
psusi | hrm... so I set bugs[0].status = 'Invalid' and called bugs[0].lp_save() and it returned without error... but the bug isn't being updated... | 03:27 |
StevenK | Is bugs[0] a Bug or a BugTask? | 03:30 |
wgrant | psusi: Is bugs[0] actually a list? | 03:30 |
wgrant | Or is it a result from searchTasks? | 03:31 |
wgrant | It's possible that it's fetching a fresh object each time. I forget exactly how it works. | 03:31 |
wgrant | Try only retrieving it once. | 03:31 |
psusi | bugs is a list, built from the results of multiple calls to searchTasks ( one for each active status ) | 03:31 |
spiv | wgrant: well, my reviews finally came through | 03:31 |
wgrant | spiv: Yeah, we fixed it. | 03:31 |
wgrant | Bug #727570 | 03:31 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 727570 in Launchpad itself "ZCML move breaks incoming mail" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727570 | 03:31 |
wgrant | Sorry, forgot to mention it here. | 03:31 |
wgrant | Properly fixing now. | 03:31 |
spiv | wgrant: cool, thanks! | 03:32 |
psusi | in other words, I did bugs = list( d.searchTasks( status='New' ) then bugs += list( d.searchTasks( status = 'Confirmed' ) etc | 03:33 |
lifeless | psusi: if you don't pass in status, you should get all bugs | 03:34 |
psusi | lifeless, I just want all open ones, so I had to explicitly search on each open status | 03:35 |
lifeless | or you can say status=any(New,confirmed,...) | 03:35 |
wgrant | lifeless: Uh, can you? | 03:36 |
psusi | at any rate, I have all of the bugs in a list that I want... and I have done bugs[0].status = 'Invalid' and bugs[0].lp_save() and it doesn't seem to be taking effect, but no errors | 03:36 |
lifeless | if you can't say that, file a bug, but I'm pretty sure you can | 03:36 |
lifeless | psusi: you're probably talking to staging | 03:36 |
wgrant | psusi: You're not accidentally using staging? | 03:36 |
wgrant | Heh. | 03:36 |
psusi | it looks like I am, is that a problem? | 03:36 |
wgrant | If you want to write to production, staging is possibly not the best place to be writing. | 03:37 |
lifeless | only if you want to change production | 03:37 |
wgrant | Check if your changes appear on staging.launchpad.net. | 03:37 |
psusi | wait, what's staging again? edge is unreleased version of lp, but on same db right? | 03:38 |
StevenK | edge doesn't mean that anymore | 03:39 |
lifeless | edge is not staging | 03:39 |
lifeless | and never was | 03:39 |
psusi | ohh, ok... yea, shows right on staging... | 03:39 |
psusi | no, I mean edge = live db but with latest lp code right? | 03:39 |
psusi | staging = not live db? | 03:39 |
wgrant | edge used to run newer code. | 03:39 |
wgrant | But now is identical to production. | 03:40 |
psusi | ohh... odd | 03:40 |
wgrant | staging is new code, and a copy of the DB that is overwritten weekly. | 03:40 |
wgrant | edge is deprecated. | 03:40 |
wgrant | But we can't remove it entirely, because people run API scripts against it. | 03:40 |
psusi | right... ok... got ya... why is edge depreciated? | 03:40 |
wgrant | Because we roll out to production once every day or two anyway. | 03:40 |
wgrant | We used to only roll out there once a month, so edge was useful. | 03:40 |
psusi | heh... ok | 03:40 |
wgrant | But now we can roll out much more rapidly. | 03:40 |
spm | s/rapidly/frequently/ | 03:41 |
psusi | ok, so basically, let's see... I need to start over and make the initial connection not to staging? | 03:41 |
wgrant | Heh. | 03:41 |
wgrant | psusi: Yes. | 03:41 |
psusi | what do I use instead of 'staging' as the argument to Launchpad.login_with()? | 03:41 |
wgrant | 'production' | 03:42 |
psusi | ahh | 03:42 |
spm | actually - and somewhat more widely than just the edge appservers too. | 03:42 |
lifeless | we are going to delete edge | 03:42 |
lifeless | entirely. | 03:42 |
lifeless | at some point I'm going to blog and pull the plug | 03:42 |
StevenK | Now? | 03:43 |
StevenK | How about now? | 03:43 |
lifeless | not today | 03:43 |
lifeless | psusi: http://blog.launchpad.net/general/edge-is-deprecated | 03:43 |
psusi | ok... now back to searchTasks()... how can I get just active bugs? someone said that is what it returns by default? | 03:44 |
psusi | but it seems to give all bugs | 03:44 |
psusi | unless I explicitly add status="something" | 03:44 |
wgrant | What are you calling it on? | 03:47 |
wgrant | psusi: You may be able to pass in a list of statuses. | 03:49 |
wgrant | Try that. | 03:49 |
wgrant | I haven't use the Bugs API for a long time :/ | 03:49 |
poolie | psusi, wgrant, you do need to explicitly list all the active bugs | 03:50 |
poolie | (just like the web ui :-/) | 03:50 |
wgrant | :( | 03:50 |
lifeless | poolie: you do? | 03:50 |
psusi | wgrant, calling it on a distribution | 03:50 |
poolie | there is a bug against lp asking for a better way to say that | 03:51 |
lifeless | poolie: whats the bug #? | 03:51 |
poolie | hm, or does it default to active and you have to list them all to get everything? | 03:51 |
poolie | it's one or the other | 03:51 |
lifeless | poolie: how are you listing multiples | 03:52 |
poolie | i believe in python it's a list of strings | 03:54 |
poolie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/lazr.restful/+bug/590561 is part of it | 03:54 |
lifeless | psusi: ['new', 'complete'] etc | 03:54 |
lifeless | if poolie is right | 03:54 |
poolie | case sensitive :) | 03:55 |
poolie | 'New' etc i think | 03:55 |
poolie | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/672883 | 03:55 |
poolie | also https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/613713 | 03:55 |
psusi | lifeless, ohh... ['foo','bar'] as opposed to the 'foo,bar' I had been trying? ;) | 03:56 |
poolie | yeah | 03:56 |
poolie | and https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/256940 | 03:56 |
StevenK | Er, I think there is an lazr.enum branch that thumper was working on to make ['new', 'complete'] work | 04:00 |
poolie | well | 04:00 |
poolie | making clients hardcode all the values is obviously poor | 04:00 |
poolie | because the available options do change over time, eg with 'opinion' | 04:00 |
lifeless | this is a bug | 04:00 |
lifeless | the values should not change in 1.0 | 04:00 |
lifeless | and outside 1.0, meh | 04:00 |
poolie | i'll make 613713 the master | 04:01 |
psusi | crap... addMessage() seems to take effect immediately rather than after lp_save() | 04:02 |
wgrant | psusi: I did warn you about that :) | 04:03 |
psusi | ohh | 04:03 |
psusi | I thought I could change status, then addmessage, and finally lp_save to save one change that modified status with a commend | 04:04 |
psusi | comment even | 04:05 |
wgrant | They are always separate changes. | 04:05 |
wgrant | Even if you do them in the web UI. | 04:05 |
wgrant | They just happen at similar times. | 04:05 |
psusi | boy I hope I did that right | 04:08 |
psusi | looks like it worked... hooray python! | 04:11 |
wgrant | Indeed, it seems to have worked. | 04:14 |
wgrant | How many were there? | 04:14 |
psusi | wgrant, looks liek 35 | 04:15 |
wgrant | Oh, you only did powernowd? | 04:16 |
psusi | wgrant, should come in handy again soon though when the usplash package is dropped... it has 239 open bugs | 04:16 |
psusi | yea | 04:16 |
wgrant | :( | 04:16 |
wgrant | I was apparently subscribed to 1. | 04:17 |
psusi | bug 1, or one of the bugs against powernowd? | 04:17 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 | 04:17 |
wgrant | One of the bugs against powernowd. | 04:18 |
* psusi wonders why his mailbox has not yet been flooded with the changes | 04:19 | |
lifeless | wgrant: we've probably broken outbound mail too | 04:23 |
wgrant | lifeless: Not likely. | 04:23 |
wgrant | lifeless: I got one of the notifications. | 04:23 |
lifeless | ok | 04:23 |
lifeless | phew | 04:23 |
wgrant | And that's all in-tree AFAIK | 04:23 |
=== mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
lxsameer | can i install the launchpad bug tracker on my server only? | 07:35 |
lifeless | its an AGPLv3 project, so you can - but you need to rebrand it, and its pretty complex to run. | 07:36 |
lifeless | (its a very complex project) | 07:36 |
lifeless | dev.launchpad.net is where you need to read, if you want to do that. | 07:36 |
lifeless | lxsameer: we can run private projects for you though (its a commercial service) if you want. | 07:37 |
lifeless | lxsameer: or if its a public project, we host those for free as long as they are open source | 07:37 |
lxsameer | lifeless: the main problem here is that i wan to know that can i just install bugtracker ? i don't need other stuff | 07:38 |
lifeless | no | 07:40 |
lifeless | the bugtracking component isn't a separate project | 07:40 |
lifeless | you can run it and only have the bugs subdomain routed, but I wouldn't expect that to play well | 07:41 |
fta2 | is the publisher dead or something? build "Finished 1 hour ago" but still "Pending publication" | 08:05 |
wgrant | fta2: Which build? | 08:06 |
fta2 | wgrant, https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1533137/+listing-archive-extra | 08:07 |
wgrant | Thanks. | 08:07 |
wgrant | fta2: Looks published to me. | 08:07 |
fta2 | oh, it just changed status, been waiting for nearly 2h in "Pending publication" mode | 08:09 |
wgrant | Hmm. | 08:10 |
wgrant | I'm waiting for logs to sync, then we'll hopefully be able to see what's going on. | 08:10 |
wgrant | fta2: It looks like the publisher was running really slow for about half an hour. | 08:30 |
fta2 | hm, ok | 08:30 |
mok0 | Why doesn't a deleted PPA disappear? It's only greyed-out | 10:26 |
bigjools | mok0: that part is not implemented (yet) | 10:51 |
bigjools | deletion was done so that people could rename their accounts | 10:51 |
mok0 | bigjools: I see | 10:52 |
shadeslayer | could someone have a look at OOPS-1887C1077 | 11:01 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1887C1077 | 11:01 |
shadeslayer | Same thing with OOPS-1887O1093 | 11:02 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1887O1093 | 11:02 |
shadeslayer | Trying to copy a package from a public PPA to a private ppa | 11:02 |
wgrant | shadeslayer: That's a timeout. Were you copying more than one source? | 11:15 |
bigjools | shadeslayer: it's timing out because you're copying too much at once. This is a know bug. | 11:15 |
shadeslayer | nope | 11:15 |
wgrant | Wow. | 11:15 |
shadeslayer | just one source | 11:15 |
wgrant | Nice timing. | 11:15 |
bigjools | does it have a lot of binaries? | 11:15 |
wgrant | shadeslayer: Has copying this source worked recently? | 11:15 |
shadeslayer | quit possibly yes ... /me checks | 11:15 |
shadeslayer | wgrant: yeah | 11:15 |
wgrant | The global timeout was reduced a few hours ago. | 11:15 |
bigjools | that page really needs a job runner | 11:15 |
wgrant | We may want to increase it by a couple of seconds for this page and see what happens. | 11:16 |
wgrant | bigjools: No, it just needs me to find time to make it not suck. | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | yeah loads of binaries | 11:16 |
wgrant | There are two really easy fixes which half the query count. | 11:16 |
bigjools | shadeslayer: that's the problem then :( | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | this is the source : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebindings | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | :( | 11:16 |
bigjools | wgrant: JFDI! | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | hahah | 11:16 |
wgrant | shadeslayer: Ah, KDE disorder. | 11:16 |
wgrant | Of course. | 11:16 |
shadeslayer | ;) | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | i thought it was only with big sources | 11:17 |
bigjools | it's the file count that matters | 11:17 |
wgrant | It mostly depends on the number of binaries. | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | didn't know large number of binaries cause timeouts as well | 11:17 |
wgrant | Sources aren't so critical. | 11:17 |
bigjools | it has to go checking each file for conflicts in the target archive | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | yeah i just copied the sources over | 11:17 |
shadeslayer | ah | 11:17 |
bigjools | the code that does that sucks a bit | 11:18 |
wgrant | It's fairly easy to fix, but difficult to write a test to ensure that it stays fixed. | 11:18 |
shadeslayer | yeah ... the test part is fairly important | 11:18 |
wgrant | I think I will give up on that for now and just fix the problem. | 11:19 |
wgrant | Eventually we'll get the whole thing into a testable state. | 11:19 |
shadeslayer | :D | 11:19 |
shadeslayer | another issue, i can't open build logs in a private PPA, like this one https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ninjas/+archive/ppa/+buildjob/2295261 | 11:38 |
shadeslayer | nvm ... looks like a chromium issue | 11:40 |
bigjools | yeah there's a bug in Chromium | 11:43 |
=== henninge is now known as henninge-lunch | ||
crom | hello any help arround...Error ID: OOPS-1887O1263 while trying to import finger print | 12:53 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1887O1263 | 12:53 |
crom | any admin there? | 12:57 |
crom | any admin there? | 13:02 |
wgrant | crom: Have you tried it more than once? | 13:03 |
crom | last week, but different error | 13:03 |
crom | i cant manage to import the fingerprint | 13:03 |
wgrant | crom: Could you try it again now? | 13:05 |
crom | sure.... 1 sec | 13:05 |
crom | did u change anything....i try all evening last week | 13:07 |
crom | now works | 13:07 |
wgrant | crom: What was the error you were getting last week? | 13:07 |
wgrant | I don't think it was this same one. | 13:07 |
stgraber | hello | 13:16 |
stgraber | could someone rename https://launchpad.net/vmmanager to https://launchpad.net/weblive ? | 13:17 |
stgraber | vmmanager doesn't have any blueprint or bugs at the moment, only two bzr branches | 13:17 |
stgraber | so there shouldn't be any really broken link by doing so | 13:17 |
stgraber | Just filed: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/147523 | 13:22 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
flower | gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt, but how do I specify a certain key? | 13:25 |
flower | gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt, uses the first user key which is on the system, I need a other | 13:26 |
raphink | flower, have you read the manpage? | 13:39 |
raphink | it says how to do it | 13:39 |
raphink | The key to be used for | 13:40 |
raphink | signing is chosen by default or can be set with the --local-user and --default-key options. | 13:40 |
flower | gpg --clearsign -u works | 13:40 |
raphink | -u is the short for --local-user | 13:41 |
raphink | as per manpage gpg | 13:41 |
flower | allthough launchpad gives a general error :/ | 13:41 |
flower | ah | 13:42 |
crom | so after confirming code of conduct....what next? | 14:04 |
=== zyga is now known as zyga-food | ||
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
=== zyga-food is now known as zyga | ||
\sh | moins | 16:45 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
\sh | could someone explain what the real contents of the cve collection is? is it imported from mitre or is it only a list of cves somehow reported via bug reports? | 17:16 |
\sh | when the latter is true, the cve entry bugs collection should show somehow at least one bug entry per cve entry, right? | 17:17 |
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk | ||
=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away | ||
=== zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
cody-somerville | When should I expect staging.launchpad.net to come back? | 19:48 |
lifeless | don't know why its down yet | 20:06 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-food | ||
kees | hi! how do I configure my bzr branch to email merge requests somewhere? I don't seem to get any email notifications of merges. | 20:55 |
tumbleweed | kees: it's an option when you subscribe to a branch | 20:57 |
tumbleweed | (emailing them to you) | 20:57 |
kees | tumbleweed: hm | 20:58 |
Ampelbein | kees: https://code.launchpad.net/~USER/PACKET/BRANCH/+edit-subscription ? on the middle right corner "edit my subscription" | 20:59 |
kees | Ampelbein, tumbleweed: I don't see an option for "just merge requests". won't this send all commits too? | 21:00 |
kees | or are merge-requests considered "attribute" changes? | 21:00 |
tumbleweed | kees: see "code review level" I think | 21:01 |
kees | tumbleweed: ah, so "Notification Level" is about the branch itself, and "Code review Level" is about merge requests? that makes sense. | 21:03 |
tumbleweed | kees: I think so, I'm no LP dev :) The branches I get review mail on, I also subscribe to commits for | 21:04 |
=== wallyworld___ is now known as wallyworld | ||
=== medberry is now known as Guest57670 | ||
=== Ursinha-food is now known as Ursinha | ||
wgrant | kees: That UI isn't quite optimal, since merge proposals were added later. But yes, "Notification level" is all about commit notifications. | 21:52 |
=== Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!