[01:34] <stgraber> Patrickdk: as in, people who work on the oem installer ?
[01:34] <stgraber> doh, wrong patrick ;)
[01:34] <stgraber> and the right one left a bit earlier
[07:33] <ara> good morning!
[11:15] <kidsodateless> hello all, anyone else has encountered this bug 728205 on testing?
[11:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 728205 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity: there is no install "alongside other operating system" (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728205
[11:17] <jibel> hi kidsodateless, I didn't tested with MS Windows.
[11:19] <jibel> kidsodateless, ms windows is the only os on the system, right ?
[11:22] <kidsodateless> jibel, yes, and i think the problem was with windows xp
[11:25] <kidsodateless> jibel, I tried to install natty with 10.10 and the alongside installation works.
[11:29] <jibel> kidsodateless, thanks, I've notified the developer.
[11:33] <kidsodateless> jibel, np. thanks also for that.
[12:20] <qwebirc95066> Hi, may i ask You, how soon might Ubuntu 11.04 alpha 3 be released?
[13:08] <jibel> Hi all, New kubuntu desktop images are on the tracker, go go go, 7 + 7 mandatory tests to go!
[13:09] <patdk-wk> I tried running the default+raid1 tests last night, but failing, figured it was cause I don't normally do softraid
[13:09] <jibel> qwebirc95066, hi, natty a3 is scheduled today. If you have some spare time feel free to pick an image on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/untested and give it a try.
[13:10] <jibel> patdk-wk, I tried and failed to boot with a disconnected drive. What was your error ?
[13:10] <patdk-wk> same
[13:11] <jibel> patdk-wk, did you filed  a bug? I didn't.
[13:11] <patdk-wk> nope
[13:12] <jibel> patdk-wk, do you still have the system available and can you file a report, I'll ping the dev.
[13:12] <patdk-wk> ya, it's still there, I can start it up (I just created a vm in esx for each test I did)
[13:13] <patdk-wk> oh, I still have it up, on the fialed screen :)
[13:13] <jibel> patdk-wk, cool, subscribe me to the bug report please.
[13:14] <patdk-wk> odd, someone just reported it passed fine
[13:15]  * pedro_ testing kubuntu desktop i386
[13:16] <jibel> Daviey, ^ patdk-wk failed the RAID1 test, system doesn't boot when a disk is disconnected.
[13:16] <patdk-wk> I was server-amd64
[13:16] <jibel> pedro_ and all, please test a basic install of kubuntu then OEM.
[13:17] <pedro_> jibel, ok will do
[13:17] <jibel> pedro_, I'll do amd64
[13:17] <Daviey> jibel, Uh
[13:20] <patdk-wk> filed and posted
[13:20] <patdk-wk> bug#728435
[13:21] <jibel> bug 728435
[13:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 728435 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "raid1 boot degraded mode fails (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728435
[13:21] <Daviey> Hmm.. I thought the test case was to test you could hot remove and add and rebuild the array... I must admit i missed the case for booting missing a disk
[13:23] <Daviey> But i have just reproduced that behaviour
[13:24] <patdk-wk> I thought it was just me, since I had very little time to work on it
[13:24] <patdk-wk> and though I screwed it up
[13:26] <jibel> patdk-wk, thanks for catching that one!
[13:39] <Riddell> jibel: how are you testing "Live Session (Netbook)" on  Kubuntu Desktop amd64?
[13:40] <jibel> Riddell, create a usb stick from the iso, and boot is on a netbook
[13:40] <jibel> Riddell, is there another way ?
[13:40] <jibel> s/is/it
[13:41] <Riddell> jibel: that's the way but i didn't know there was such a thing as 64 bit netbooks
[13:41] <patdk-wk> mine is :)
[13:41] <patdk-wk> it has a 64bit atom cpu
[13:41] <jibel> Riddell, asus eeepc 1015pe, Atom N450
[13:42] <patdk-wk> atleast I'm running maverick desktop amd64 on it
[13:42] <Riddell> amazing what they can do
[13:42] <jibel> well for a daily use I'd go for i386, it's much faster
[13:42] <patdk-wk> I haven't noticed any difference
[13:42] <patdk-wk> and everything else I do is 64bit
[13:42] <patdk-wk> so nicer binary compatability
[14:10] <jibel> kubuntu desktop amd64 done. wubi failed as usual. Starting Kubuntu DVD AMD64
[15:05] <hggdh> jibel, uec tested on amd64
[15:05] <hggdh> (and failed)
[15:06] <hggdh> there is no need to test it on i386 or the alternative tests, they will all fail the same
[15:06] <hggdh> jibel, ^
[15:06] <jibel> hggdh, excellent! we like to find bugs ;-)
[15:45] <marjo> jibel: what's the plan for Kubuntu Netbook Arm (omap)?
[15:45] <jibel> marjo, GrueMaster> Onlything I see there is netboot on omap which is completely unsupported and shouldn't be on iso.qa.
[15:46] <jibel> oh netbook
[15:46] <marjo> jibel, Riddell: Kubuntu Netbook Arm (omap)?
[15:50] <GrueMaster> I tested the previous armel image of kubuntu (and it should be desktop not netbook).  It fails miserably.  The respin issue was done because on the ubuntu images, we found oem-config crashed due to bad webkit, so we took out ubiquity slideshow.  While the lubuntu image was respinning, I hacked the 0301 image to see if it worked, and it crashes worse.  No X on boot, no way to configure.
[15:51] <GrueMaster> With all of the QT issues on armel, this really doesn't surprise me though.
[15:52] <GrueMaster> I am seeing kubuntu marked as rebuilding on iso.qa.  If someone wants to open it, I can mark it as failed and link a bug into it.
[15:53] <jibel> GrueMaster, done. thanks for marking it as failed.
[16:01] <GrueMaster> Ok, marked.  Someone will need to do more research, but the bugs I listed are very highly probable cause.  We know webkit has issues, and we know that there are issues with QT and QT based apps on armel when built with the current toolchain.
[18:16] <marjo> Thank you to jibel, smoser, hggdh, pedro_, charlie-tca, kidsodateless, highvoltage, marjo, brendand, ricsipontaz, PatrickDK, PaoloRotolo, nobuto, Kamusin, valix, primes2h, roadmr, pitti, jamiedmattingly, RoAkSoAx, jamespage, monkeylibre, xdatap1, Fly82, Daviey, homitsu and ogra for testing the ISOs.
[18:16] <marjo> The images would not be able to go out today without your efforts!
[18:16] <marjo> Special thanks to jibel for his leadership on the testing efforts
[18:16] <highvoltage> and thank you, marjo!
[18:16] <highvoltage> Edubuntu 11.04a3 has been announced: http://edubuntu.org/2011-03-03/edubuntu-1104-alpha-3-released
[18:16] <marjo> highvoltage: thx! nice job on the testing
[18:16] <marjo> with your super-duper fast disk array!
[18:16] <highvoltage> :D
[18:16] <marjo> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases
[18:16] <marjo> test coverage looks great for Alpha 3
[18:16] <skaet_> Thanks to all who tested Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, Server, Mythbuntu, Ubuntu Studio, Ubuntu Network edition!  The images would not have gone out without your efforts.    Thanks in particular to marjo and jibel for coordinating it and making sure the gaps were all filled in.
[18:16] <marjo> skaet_ thx for your leadership!
[18:16] <pedro_> thanks all :-)
[18:17] <skaet_> marjo, all, thank you for your patience with me.   :)
[18:17] <patdk-wk> I'm just happy I was able to get my iscsi boot test stuff working :)
[18:18] <patdk-wk> never attempted iscsi root, been on my list though
[18:18] <marjo> patdk-wk: nice! hope we'll see it used for beta 1 testing
[18:19] <kamusin> wohoo ;) , thanks to you guys
[18:20]  * charlie-tca thanks everybody, too. Help is always very welcome getting the images tested!
[18:21] <marjo> patrickmw: thx for testing ltsp server and other test cases!
[18:23] <patrickmw> marjo: my pleasure
[18:24] <marjo> patrickmw: doc perfected?!
[18:24] <marjo> test case documentation, i mean; sorry
[18:25] <patrickmw> marjo: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/LTSPServer
[18:25] <marjo> patrickmw: thx!
[18:25] <patrickmw> marjo: I think more testers will be able to follow now
[18:26] <marjo> patrickmw: me, too, so we can share the testing opportunities to more folks
[18:26] <marjo> davmor2_ alpha 3 is out!
[18:42] <davmor2> marjo: Cool busy trying to test 3 projects and guide someone else through a 4th,  oh and writing bugs from my natty box