=== asac_ is now known as asac === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth === StevenK_ is now known as StevenK [16:03] hi [16:04] i am using the natty alpha 2 image on the beagleboard [16:04] but i can't get tv out working [16:04] with the original bootargs i can see it booting, led blinks etc [16:05] but when i change it to omapdss.def_disp=tv [16:05] and omapfb.mode=tv:ntsc (or pal) [16:05] it just aits there and seems to be hanging [16:10] noah1989, do you have a serial cable? where's it hanging in the boot log? [16:11] i don't have a serial cable.. [16:11] i could make one.. [16:11] but if someone knows working bootargs i could avoid the hassle [16:11] okay, with out one.. it's hard to debug... so let's ask the obvious, how did you edit the boot.scr? [16:11] i edited it with vi [16:12] i tried making non-relevant changes and it still workd [16:12] ahh.. there's the problem... it has a crc header on it.. remove the header, and then regenerate it with mkimage.. [16:12] looks like vi keeps the header intact [16:13] u-boot's probally loading the boot.scr then halts when checksum fails.. [16:13] so the header contains a checksum? [16:13] that explains everything :D [16:14] yeah, kinda a pain.. there's patches to use a different methiod with a plain text file posted to u-boot.. [16:15] damn.. there is no uboot-mkimage or similar package in gentoo.. [16:15] could be u-boot-tools.. [16:17] ah, thanks [16:50] wow, yeah! ubuntu boot screen on the head mounted display [16:52] but as soon as X starts it's black again [16:52] but i think i can fix that [16:52] thanks again! === doko_ is now known as doko [18:10] rsalveti: you around by any chance? [19:59] Hi guys. Anything really interesting going on right now? [20:00] I got a 404 when trying to update linux-libc-dev from ports.ubuntu.com from maverick-security... [20:03] sveinse: How did you upgrade? [20:04] sveinse: does it happen again if you apt-get update && apt-get upgrade? [20:04] Yes [20:04] Hold on.. Perhaps not... *checking* [20:05] sveinse: I checked the packages indices and they seem correct [20:05] Package: linux-libc-dev [20:05] Version: 2.6.35-1027.48 [20:05] Filename: pool/main/l/linux/linux-libc-dev_2.6.35-1027.48_armel.deb [20:05] and this package exists [20:06] Yes, for some reason apt-get tries to download 2.6.35-1025.44, so I guess my apt-get update is failing here for some reason. [20:06] sveinse: A log and/or your sources.list might sched some light on this [20:06] sveinse: You have any error from apt-get update? [20:11] Baah.. Permission errors on /var/lib/apt/lists were set to ro, so apt update didn't update the indices. (And a second error in my script suppressing apt-get update failure.) [20:11] Conclusion: My bad [20:34] What is the difference between armv6 and armv7? I notice Qt want armv6, but doesn't support armv7. [20:36] sveinse: newer+better processor :) === npitre_ is now known as npitre [20:38] armin76: Yeah, and when Qt doesn't support armv7, only armv6, what does it lack? (I'm using -march=armv7-a in the compile options) [20:49] sveinse: What do you mean by doesn't suppor armv7? [20:49] sveinse: We're building qt in armv7 mode in Ubuntu AFAIK [20:54] lool, if -march=armv7-a is armv7 mode, yes. But for some reason, you cannot specify armv7 when configuring Qt, only armv6. There exists some inner loop implementations specific for armv6. I know that's a Q for Nokia, but I was curious to the difference between armv6 and armv7 [20:56] or perhaps more correctly: some machine specific implementations, not just inner loops implementations [21:45] hey guys [21:46] I'm trying to install Ubuntu on my mininetbook, who aparently has a arm processor, anybody knows if can be installed on a ALLFINE mini-notbook? I haven't managed to install it so far. [22:13] sveinse: armv7 doesn't exist [22:13] sveinse: It's armv7-a you want [22:13] sveinse: actually, armv7 does exist; my bad [22:14] sveinse: I don't know what armv7 means, but you probably want armv7-a