[01:51] <ddecator> does the BC mailing list have a spam filter?
[01:52] <micahg> ddecator: it filters non-member messages?
[01:52] <micahg> or rather holds them for moderation
[01:53] <ddecator> micahg: ah, i thought it might. RedSingularity emailed in his application but it hasn't shown up on the list yet, but he never got an email saying it needed to be approved
[04:34] <RedSingularity> jibel: around?
[04:40] <hggdh> there are no messages in the queue for moderation on the -bugcontrol ML
[04:41] <hggdh> ddecator, and yes, there are spam controls and moderation
[05:15] <RedSingularity> hggdh: Never got the confirmation after all.  Sent the Application to you.  Let me know if you got it when you get the chance.  :)
[06:42] <erkan^> when i install .deb, is that good "sudo dpkg +i" ?
[06:54] <erkan^> ActionParsnip: where can i report a bugs by launchpad for lekhonee-gnome? Software Ubuntu have lekhonee-gnome 0.7 version, but it workn't . i have downloaded: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lekhonee-gnome/lekhonee-gnome_0.11-1_i386.deb and it works good
[09:22] <jibel> RedSingularity, good morning, what's up ?
[10:28] <abhinav_> xchat bug 84397  : is it being worked on ?
[10:28] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 84397 in xchat (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "/join autocompletion shows only already joint channels (heat: 3)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/84397
[13:54] <ddecator> hggdh: thanks for checking that
[13:55] <hggdh> ddecator, welcome
[13:55] <hggdh> ah hell, compiz died again
[13:57] <ddecator> on natty?
[13:58] <hggdh> ddecator, yes
[13:59] <hggdh> ddecator, heh. I just asked RedSingularity to explain the rationale for the importances
[13:59] <hggdh> but your vote weighs in :-)
[13:59] <ddecator> hggdh: yah, i saw that. i know more because i've talked with him about the rationales on IRC. your request was valid :)
[15:57] <bdmurray> mvo: I forget did you have a plan for bug 721306?
[15:57] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 721306 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "[MASTER] Can't upgrade from 10.04LTS to 10.10 - E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks - xorg-xserver-video-nouveau (affects: 39) (dups: 28) (heat: 496)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/721306
[17:47] <abhinav-> SpamapS,  thanks for reviewing the patch. So I should make the changes as suggested by you and then push them through bazaar ?
[17:53] <SpamapS> abhinav-: yeah it will automatically update in the merge proposal
[17:53] <SpamapS> abhinav-: and of course, test it too :)
[17:53] <abhinav-> SpamapS,  yes, will do that :)
[18:54] <mvo> bdmurray: hello! sorry I don't have a plan for this one yet :(
[18:56] <bdmurray> mvo: okay, I'd mistakenly gotten impression it was "easy" to fix then
[18:57] <mvo> bdmurray: I look at it in a chroot now, hope I can reproduce
[19:15] <mvo> bdmurray: I have no luck reproducing this, I will add info in the bug
[19:19] <bdmurray> mvo: okay, thanks for trying
[19:35] <RedSingularity> hggdh: Thanks for forwarding that.  Should I resend the application with the importance reasoning?
[19:39] <ddecator> RedSingularity: yes please
[19:39] <ddecator> or reply with the reasoning added
[19:42] <RedSingularity> ddecator: ah your here :)  Ok will get on that now.
[19:42] <hggdh> just replying is enough (and we will see if now it hits the ML)
[19:42] <RedSingularity> hggdh: ok
[19:43]  * ddecator crosses fingers
[19:43] <hggdh> and -- RedSingularity -- my pleasure, and thank you for helping
[19:43] <RedSingularity> hggdh: Happy to! :)
[19:56] <hggdh> RedSingularity, nothing so far in the moderation Q. Did you send it? If so, please forward to me the email you *sent*
[19:59] <RedSingularity> hggdh: still typing up the reasoning.  Almost done.
[20:01] <hggdh> ah, OK
[20:08] <RedSingularity> hggdh: ok done.  Sent you a copy too.
[20:16] <RedSingularity> jibel: Hey.  Just wanted to ask you if the update-manager is somehow tied to gnome-power-manager.
[20:18] <RedSingularity> hggdh: again, no auto response from the mailing list it seems :(
[20:20] <hggdh> RedSingularity, but this time there _was_ a message to be moderated
[20:20] <RedSingularity> hggdh: So it worked properly?
[20:20] <hggdh> seems to have, yes
[20:20] <hggdh> I jusgt approved it
[20:21] <RedSingularity> hggdh: great!  I like it when the internet "works". ;)
[20:21] <hggdh> RedSingularity, yes... It does happen every so often ;-)
[20:21] <RedSingularity> lol indeed it does have its high points
[20:34] <jibel> RedSingularity, yes, it is bound to g-p-m via dbus to detect if the system is running on AC/battery and disable suspend during upgrade
[20:39] <RedSingularity> jibel: I suspected so.  A user didnt want to use gpm so he removed it.  It seems that update-manager still can detect if its running on battery or ac though.
[20:46] <jibel> RedSingularity, actually gpm is only used to inhibit suspend, UPower is used for battery state detection and fallback on devicekit if it is not available.
[20:47] <jibel> RedSingularity, what's the bug number ?
[20:48] <RedSingularity> jibel: bug 714356  I will probably mark it invalid though.
[20:48] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 714356 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager starts gnome-power-manager (affects: 1) (heat: 125)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/714356
[20:53] <RedSingularity> jibel: the user does not think its necessary to query g-p-m at all.  In summary.
[21:25] <trinikrono> ddecator: are you still around
[22:11] <jibel> RedSingularity, I think that the request of the user is valid and from a user point of view it's odd to restore backlight when starting u-m. That being said, this could as well be a bug in g-p-m which plays with the backlight when queried for the inhibit state.
[22:23] <RedSingularity> jibel: Sounds good.  I will move the package.  Thanks!
[22:24] <jibel> RedSingularity, you'd better add a task rather than reaffecting. The dev can choose to workaround it in update-manager if it's easier.
[22:26] <RedSingularity> jibel: pm
[22:44] <ddecator> trinikrono: just got back
[23:01] <patrickmw_> bdmurray: bug 730972
[23:01] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 730972 in linux (Ubuntu) "IdeaPad U160 Broadcom wifi not connecting (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/730972
[23:06] <trinikrono> ddecator: do you want to mentor me for 2 days while i finish my bugcontrol application?
[23:06] <ddecator> trinikrono: oh man. are you thinking right now? it's finals time for me at school so i really don't have much free time for the next two weeks :/
[23:07] <trinikrono> ddecator: i just wanted to get it before global jam so two weeks is fine
[23:07] <trinikrono> i plan to run sessions on bugsquad if i can get anyone interested
[23:09] <ddecator> trinikrono: in two weeks i should be able to help you out