[15:39] <bdmurray> natty alpha 3 is still listed as a valid milestone in Launchpad
[15:50] <cjwatson> bdmurray: fixed, thanks
[15:50] <cjwatson> (I think the term you want is "active" rather than "valid")
[15:51] <bdmurray> cjwatson: ah true.  If I were just part of the team I wouldn't need to use any term and could just fix it. ;-)
[15:53] <skaet_> bdmurray,  I tried last week, but there still seem to be permission issues.  :P
[15:56] <bdmurray> skaet_: oh, right the not allowed to +edit issue
[15:57] <skaet_> yuppers... :P
[16:04] <doko> skaet_: didn't hear back from the kubuntu guys about kde buildability
[16:16] <skaet_> doko, ack
[16:41] <ScottK> doko: Could you upload qt4-x11 building aganist gcc 4.5 to your toolchain PPA?  It would make testing a lot easier.
[16:43] <doko> ScottK: gcc-4.5 is building in natty, ogra will take care of it
[16:44] <ScottK> doko: OK.  That'll work.
[16:49] <charlie-tca> Could I have all powerpc builds stopped completely?
[16:49] <charlie-tca> oops, "I" being Xubuntu
[16:53] <skaet_> cjwatson, ^^ ?
[16:59] <ScottK> charlie-tca: I bit of "why" would be useful.
[17:03] <cjwatson> I thought I already did.
[17:04] <cjwatson> the current ones are just carried over - I've removed them
[17:06]  * cjwatson fixes the alternate/server builds too
[17:08] <charlie-tca> Thanks
[17:09] <charlie-tca> ScottK: because Xubuntu has no developers and testers for ppc. We have not had any for 9 months, and advertising for help has failed for 6 months
[17:10] <ScottK> charlie-tca: OK.  I didn't realize you meant ISO builds.  I thought you were talking about package builds and was concerned something had gone wrong.
[17:11] <charlie-tca> I already have both maverick and lucid 10.04.2 out without testing, and they don't really well for the very few that try to install them
[18:10] <ScottK> Right.  Once I realized you were discussing ISOs, I think it makes total sense.
[20:27] <micahg> I heard this is the place for archive admin requests?
[20:31] <micahg> slangasek: are you available to apply some archive overrides?
[20:31] <slangasek> can be
[20:31] <micahg> slangasek: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/577159/
[20:31] <micahg> slangasek: and is this the best place to ask for these?
[20:31] <slangasek> this is fine :)
[20:31] <micahg> slangasek: thank you :)
[20:32] <slangasek> do I need to apply these overrides to updates or proposed too?
[20:33] <micahg> I guess it depends if they were copied to -updates yet
[20:33] <micahg> not -proposed though
[20:33] <micahg> looks like they're just in -security at the moment
[20:34] <slangasek> ok
[20:40] <slangasek> micahg: overrides done
[20:41] <micahg> slangasek: thanks
[20:41] <slangasek> micahg: incidentally, a '-y' in there would've made it easier to cut'n'paste the commands :)
[20:41] <micahg> slangasek: I'll ask jdstrand about that when he gets back tomorrow, thanks