[05:30] <skaet> apw, JFo - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/2011-03-11 available a bit earlier - still working through the A3 testing reports, so a few more updates may happen tomorrow.
[09:40] <smb> bjf, I just changed my mind on that CVE. I think that anon_vma_chain does not exist in Hardy and Karmic
[09:41] <bjf> smb, i've not applied it, go ahead and do what you feel is right
[09:41] <smb> bjf, Yeah, just wanted to avoid you to grab it as you were the second acker
[09:43] <smb> bjf, I would feel the right thing is to have the submitter actually test compile it. :)
[09:43] <smb> bjf, He's probably sitting somewhere close to you
[09:43] <sconklin> smb: good guess, I'll figure this out
[09:43] <bjf> smb, yes, he will be beaten
[09:45] <smb> bjf, Beating is not needed. You have to use the flakey coffee machine. Which I heard can be enough punishment 
[09:46] <sconklin> smb: good idea. I'll use the coffee machine and then look at it
[09:46] <smb> sconklin, Cool. I guess that one line just slipped in. It was not part of the original patch but part of the context.
[10:52] <sconklin> smb, bjf - Revised (and test built) patches for Hardy and Karmic CVE have been mailed
[10:56] <smb> sconklin, ack. should be ok now
[10:59] <phillips321> hi all
[10:59] <phillips321> has anyone got a guide to getting 2.6.38 on 10.10?
[11:19] <diwic> sconklin, when is next deadline for upload to maverick SRU?
[11:20] <sconklin> diwic: there is no real deadline, patches put on the -next branch will go into the next upload. I expect that the next Maverick upload will be late next week
[11:21] <diwic> sconklin, cool, thanks.
[12:03] <rishi> Hey guys, I think the natty-lts-backport that is there in the kernel-ppa breaks my Ethernet. I have nVidia MCP61 Ethernet chip.
[12:03] <rishi> Is this known?
[12:03] <rishi> I can help with debugging, bug report, etc..
[12:05] <rigved> rishi: patience. maybe someone might be able to help.
[12:06] <rishi> rigved: Yeah, no problem. :-)
[15:18] <ogra> tgardner, poke
[15:20] <tgardner> ogra, hmm?
[15:20] <ogra> tgardner, can we have .38 as default for omap4 ?
[15:20] <tgardner> ogra, yep, was just waiting for Tobin to pull the trigger.
[15:21] <amitk> ogra: it works?
[15:21]  * amitk is pleasantly surprised...
[15:22] <ogra> tgardner, i think he answered the mail thread on monday or so ;)
[15:22] <ogra> amitk, the BSp kernel from agreen
[15:22] <amitk> ogra: right..
[15:22] <tgardner> ogra, OK, I'll get it started building.
[15:23] <ogra> tgardner, thanks :)
[15:23] <amitk> tgardner: y'all going to ELC, I noticed
[15:24] <tgardner> amitk, yep
[15:24] <amitk> will see you there in a few weeks then
[15:25] <tgardner> amitk, indeed. I'm back from London this Sat, then off to SFO 3 weeks later.
[15:25] <amitk> tgardner: aah, kernel sprint?
[15:25] <tgardner> amitk, yeah, new guy sprint.
[15:26]  * amitk needs to plan a trip to london soon
[15:26] <amitk> s/london/cambridge
[16:49] <JFo> <-food
[17:10] <tseliot> mjg59: is there an equivalent for acpi_video_register() (acpi/video.h) in linux 2.6.32? I'm trying to get a backlight with poulsbo
[17:11] <tseliot> *backlight device
[20:13] <lborda> Hi guys
[20:15] <lborda> anybody comfortable with bonding with arp monitoring AND bridge? 
[20:37] <rydberg> greetings, i wonder if someone can explain this, running latest stock kernel: "cat /sys/module/*/srcversion | sort | uniq -c"
[20:52] <rhuddusa> forgive if this isn't the correct place to ask this. i upgraded from linux-image-2.6.32-29-virtual linux-image-2.6.35-25-virtual and now any ipsec ah & esp packet with wire size > 304 does not decrypt accross the wire.  i see encrypted packets transmitted and then received, but then they are lost.  if i switch back to 2.6.32, packets decrypt fine.  any ideas who to track down my missing packets? ifconfig doesn'
[20:52] <rhuddusa> t show any errors. 
[20:59] <rydberg> it seems to have occurred between 2.6.38-4 and 2.6.38-5
[21:15] <rydberg> ... and it is still present in 2.6.38-6, and still present in mainline.
[21:17] <rydberg> dkms packages will fail to install roughly 50% of the time because of this, for instance
[21:20] <rydberg> timg, have you seen anything about this?
[21:21] <JFo> rydberg, they are in London this week, so likely off getting dinner somewhere.
[21:21] <rydberg> oh, i see
[21:21] <rydberg> hey, jfo :-)
[21:21] <JFo> hey rydberg :)
[21:21] <rydberg> ill dig further on lkml to see if i find anything
[21:22] <JFo> ok, I'd be interested in what you find, from a purely informational aspect.
[21:22] <rydberg> sure thing
[21:24] <rydberg> to confirm the problem, all one needs to do is run that line above, and see that some line has a number different from 1 in the first column *nudge nudge*
[21:42] <BenC> rydberg: Is that really a problem, or just not what you expected?
[21:43] <rydberg> expect that dkms packages compare srcversions and end up not installing the new version because it looks like the old one?
[21:44] <rydberg> honestly, i dont know what the assumptions around srcversion are, but it sure seems likely that they all should be unique, and so they were, up to recently (checked in maverick too)
[21:44] <BenC> rydberg: What I'm asking is if the srcversion being the same for two things is really a bug or not
[21:44] <BenC> What two modules share the same srcversion?
[21:45] <rydberg> i understand, i can't say for sure, other than there being little reason for it otherwise
[21:45] <BenC> What modules have the same srcversion would be a good data point
[21:45] <rydberg> any modules - please try it out, the line is cat /sys/module/*/srcversion | sort | uniq -c
[21:45] <BenC> None of the ones on my system have the same
[21:45] <BenC> so I'm asking you since you can reproduce this "issue"
[21:46] <rydberg> what kernel version are you running?
[21:46] <BenC> 2.6.32-8-generic
[21:46] <rydberg> cnd confirms this problem also
[21:46] <cnd> rydberg, ugh, dragging me into another problem :)
[21:47] <rydberg> yes, this is between 2.6.38-4 and 2.6.38-5 ubuntu versions, somewhere in the 2.6.38-rc series
[21:47] <rydberg> hehe
[21:47] <BenC> Right, so check yours and tell me which modules share the same srcversion
[21:49] <rydberg> it seems random, and completely unrelated stuff, like i2c_piix4 and joydev, k10temp
[21:50] <rydberg> im going to bisect this on mainline git now, its not an ubuntu issue it seems
[21:50] <BenC> Is it random on the same boot, or different between boots?
[21:50] <rydberg> same number occuring between boots
[21:50] <rydberg> you can look it up on the internet and get hits :-)
[21:50] <rydberg> 533BB7E5866E52F63B9ACCB
[21:50] <rydberg> there is one of them