ari-tczew | cjwatson: I guess MoM is hanged again ... :/ | 09:46 |
---|---|---|
c2tarun | I successfully build new version koffice but I dont have the older version's tar ball with me to create debdiff. :( is there anyway to create debdiff without downloading that tarball, downloading it is not possible now :( | 11:40 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
kim0 | Hi folks, I'm trying to commit a simple fix (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kim0/logrotate/bug-730504/revision/16) | 13:27 |
kim0 | However (for some reason) the merge proposal (https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/logrotate/bug-730504) seems to be huge (95 modified files!!) | 13:27 |
kim0 | any idea why or if I did something wrong ? Thanks | 13:27 |
kklimonda | kim0: you have branched package but then requested a merge with the upstream branch. | 13:30 |
kim0 | kklimonda: how do I fix this please :) | 13:31 |
kklimonda | remove the merge and request another, this time to lp:ubuntu/logrotate | 13:32 |
kim0 | kklimonda: just removed it .. but when I click "propose for merging" | 13:34 |
kim0 | by defualt LP is selecting lp:logrotate | 13:34 |
kim0 | I have to click other and write it ? | 13:34 |
kklimonda | apparently | 13:34 |
kim0 | weirdo .. ok thanks :) | 13:34 |
maxb | kim0: Isn't it a rather hacky and unpleasant solution to munge the status file with shell commands? | 13:35 |
kim0 | I think it's fairly common | 13:36 |
kim0 | cat /etc/cron.daily/appport | 13:36 |
kim0 | I mean if someone can write it in C, I wouldn't mind, but that's better than not having that | 13:36 |
acarpine | Using bzr I modified several files in a branch than I push the changes to launchpad | 14:38 |
acarpine | and I can see my changes | 14:39 |
acarpine | but why bzr diff prints nothing? | 14:39 |
sladen | acarpine: bzr status ? | 14:40 |
acarpine | sladen, idem | 14:40 |
acarpine | I'm sure that other times they both work properly | 14:41 |
c2tarun | j #ubuntu-app-devel | 14:44 |
sladen | acarpine: what *exactly* does typing 'bzr status' in the directory you think you've been editting in, print? | 14:44 |
sladen | acarpine: -> http://paste.ubuntu.com/ | 14:44 |
acarpine | http://paste.ubuntu.com/579289/ | 14:47 |
acarpine | sladen: I used the commands in a dir which I changed several files but I believe they should work also from other dir (of the modified branch) | 14:49 |
sladen | acarpine: right, it's not seeing any changes; try something like "touch foobar ; bzr status" | 14:53 |
acarpine | sladen: yep! I can see the created file... | 14:54 |
acarpine | also from other dir of the same dir | 14:54 |
sladen | acarpine: right, so (just in case), try editing one of the files again (just add a new line) and lets try bzr status again | 14:55 |
acarpine | *of the same "branch" | 14:55 |
acarpine | sladen: they worked well | 14:56 |
acarpine | they show the files that i have just modified | 14:57 |
sladen | acarpine: I fear there was an error between the chair and keyboard about which directory was actually being edited, but I'm too polite to say that out loud ;-) | 14:58 |
acarpine | sladen: the chair and the keyboard? what do you mean? | 15:00 |
sladen | acarpine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_error | 15:02 |
acarpine | sladen: ops you think it's my error... :) | 15:04 |
acarpine | yes probably...I'm trying to understand where is my error. | 15:07 |
acarpine | I modified 320 files, i can see the diff in the merge proposal but diff and status still say nothing | 15:07 |
sladen | acarpine: can you paste the output of 'history' (the shell history) into http://paste.ubuntu.com/ | 15:09 |
sladen | acarpine: bzr log --include-merges might also show you something | 15:10 |
sladen | acarpine: but it might also be better to take this to #bzr | 15:10 |
acarpine | I believe there is nothing interesting there because I modified this branch last night anyway http://paste.ubuntu.com/579302/ | 15:13 |
acarpine | sladen: maybe http://paste.ubuntu.com/579303/ is a little more insteresting | 15:14 |
acarpine | It show my changes to the changelog file | 15:15 |
acarpine | *shows | 15:16 |
acarpine | sladen: that's the correct history http://paste.ubuntu.com/579305/ | 15:18 |
acarpine | bzr log --include-merges shows the revno 656 | 15:23 |
acarpine | with the info extracted from the changelog file | 15:24 |
sladen | acarpine: so you've already commit it; and there's no difference between your working state and the (latest) commit | 15:24 |
sladen | acarpine: if you do bzr diff -r 655..656 you should see the diff | 15:24 |
acarpine | sladen: bzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: 656 | 15:26 |
acarpine | but I believe you explain me why bzr diff gave no result... | 15:27 |
acarpine | because I already used debcommit Correct? | 15:27 |
acarpine | so i believe bzr is working correctly...the error was PEBKAC :D | 15:29 |
acarpine | really tks sladen (also for the new acronym) :D | 15:31 |
bdrung | tumbleweed: u-d-t 0.120 FTBFS on sid: http://paste.debian.net/110492/ | 17:30 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: one minute | 17:31 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: sorry, my local mirrors all seem to be broken. Replicated it. launchpadlib doesn't support python2.5 any more | 17:59 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: so, I guess we bump our x-python-version. 2.5 will hopefully be gone RSN now, anyway | 18:01 |
bdrung | k | 18:04 |
bdrung | tumbleweed: i will visit a friend today. feel free to fix the build and upload it to unstable | 18:05 |
tumbleweed | bdrung: ok will do. have a good evening | 18:05 |
bdrung | thanks | 18:08 |
kim0 | Hi folks, I'm trying to build a trivial "hello world" style package. Getting this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/579434/ | 19:16 |
ScottK | kim0: Did you have a question? | 19:19 |
kim0 | ScottK: yeah :) | 19:19 |
ScottK | Don't install stuff in /usr/local. | 19:20 |
kim0 | ScottK: just the line above this .. trying to build a pkg and failing | 19:20 |
ScottK | Not sure why your package is installing there, but that's the issue. | 19:20 |
kim0 | ScottK: this is packaging day1 for me | 19:20 |
kim0 | so what file should I edit | 19:20 |
ScottK | Without reviewing the entire package (which I don't have time for) I can't say for sure. I'd grep for 'local' and see if that points you to anything obvious. You may need to set a specific installation directory. | 19:22 |
kim0 | gah, I have Makefile:PREFIX ?= /usr/local | 19:23 |
ScottK | Not good. | 19:24 |
kim0 | doesn't pbuilder pass --prefix to configure | 19:24 |
ScottK | You probably want something like $(CURDIR)/debian/[binarypackagename] | 19:24 |
ScottK | Maybe $(CURDIR)/debian/[binarypackagename]/usr | 19:25 |
kim0 | The thing I'm packaging, doesn't use "./configure" and embeds PREFIX inside the Makefile. What's the best way ot change it? | 19:51 |
kim0 | to* | 19:51 |
Bachstelze | kim0: edit debian/rules to make it run make PREFIX=/usr instead of just make | 19:57 |
kim0 | is that | 19:57 |
kim0 | make PREFIX=/usr | 19:57 |
kim0 | or | 19:58 |
Bachstelze | yes | 19:58 |
kim0 | PREFIX=/usr make | 19:58 |
Bachstelze | both should work | 19:58 |
kim0 | Thanks trying it out | 19:59 |
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
achiang | fta: hi, you happen to be around? | 23:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!