[09:46] cjwatson: I guess MoM is hanged again ... :/ [11:40] I successfully build new version koffice but I dont have the older version's tar ball with me to create debdiff. :( is there anyway to create debdiff without downloading that tarball, downloading it is not possible now :( === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:27] Hi folks, I'm trying to commit a simple fix (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kim0/logrotate/bug-730504/revision/16) [13:27] However (for some reason) the merge proposal (https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/logrotate/bug-730504) seems to be huge (95 modified files!!) [13:27] any idea why or if I did something wrong ? Thanks [13:30] kim0: you have branched package but then requested a merge with the upstream branch. [13:31] kklimonda: how do I fix this please :) [13:32] remove the merge and request another, this time to lp:ubuntu/logrotate [13:34] kklimonda: just removed it .. but when I click "propose for merging" [13:34] by defualt LP is selecting lp:logrotate [13:34] I have to click other and write it ? [13:34] apparently [13:34] weirdo .. ok thanks :) [13:35] kim0: Isn't it a rather hacky and unpleasant solution to munge the status file with shell commands? [13:36] I think it's fairly common [13:36] cat /etc/cron.daily/appport [13:36] I mean if someone can write it in C, I wouldn't mind, but that's better than not having that [14:38] Using bzr I modified several files in a branch than I push the changes to launchpad [14:39] and I can see my changes [14:39] but why bzr diff prints nothing? [14:40] acarpine: bzr status ? [14:40] sladen, idem [14:41] I'm sure that other times they both work properly [14:44] j #ubuntu-app-devel [14:44] acarpine: what *exactly* does typing 'bzr status' in the directory you think you've been editting in, print? [14:44] acarpine: -> http://paste.ubuntu.com/ [14:47] http://paste.ubuntu.com/579289/ [14:49] sladen: I used the commands in a dir which I changed several files but I believe they should work also from other dir (of the modified branch) [14:53] acarpine: right, it's not seeing any changes; try something like "touch foobar ; bzr status" [14:54] sladen: yep! I can see the created file... [14:54] also from other dir of the same dir [14:55] acarpine: right, so (just in case), try editing one of the files again (just add a new line) and lets try bzr status again [14:55] *of the same "branch" [14:56] sladen: they worked well [14:57] they show the files that i have just modified [14:58] acarpine: I fear there was an error between the chair and keyboard about which directory was actually being edited, but I'm too polite to say that out loud ;-) [15:00] sladen: the chair and the keyboard? what do you mean? [15:02] acarpine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_error [15:04] sladen: ops you think it's my error... :) [15:07] yes probably...I'm trying to understand where is my error. [15:07] I modified 320 files, i can see the diff in the merge proposal but diff and status still say nothing [15:09] acarpine: can you paste the output of 'history' (the shell history) into http://paste.ubuntu.com/ [15:10] acarpine: bzr log --include-merges might also show you something [15:10] acarpine: but it might also be better to take this to #bzr [15:13] I believe there is nothing interesting there because I modified this branch last night anyway http://paste.ubuntu.com/579302/ [15:14] sladen: maybe http://paste.ubuntu.com/579303/ is a little more insteresting [15:15] It show my changes to the changelog file [15:16] *shows [15:18] sladen: that's the correct history http://paste.ubuntu.com/579305/ [15:23] bzr log --include-merges shows the revno 656 [15:24] with the info extracted from the changelog file [15:24] acarpine: so you've already commit it; and there's no difference between your working state and the (latest) commit [15:24] acarpine: if you do bzr diff -r 655..656 you should see the diff [15:26] sladen: bzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: 656 [15:27] but I believe you explain me why bzr diff gave no result... [15:27] because I already used debcommit Correct? [15:29] so i believe bzr is working correctly...the error was PEBKAC :D [15:31] really tks sladen (also for the new acronym) :D [17:30] tumbleweed: u-d-t 0.120 FTBFS on sid: http://paste.debian.net/110492/ [17:31] bdrung: one minute [17:59] bdrung: sorry, my local mirrors all seem to be broken. Replicated it. launchpadlib doesn't support python2.5 any more [18:01] bdrung: so, I guess we bump our x-python-version. 2.5 will hopefully be gone RSN now, anyway [18:04] k [18:05] tumbleweed: i will visit a friend today. feel free to fix the build and upload it to unstable [18:05] bdrung: ok will do. have a good evening [18:08] thanks [19:16] Hi folks, I'm trying to build a trivial "hello world" style package. Getting this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/579434/ [19:19] kim0: Did you have a question? [19:19] ScottK: yeah :) [19:20] Don't install stuff in /usr/local. [19:20] ScottK: just the line above this .. trying to build a pkg and failing [19:20] Not sure why your package is installing there, but that's the issue. [19:20] ScottK: this is packaging day1 for me [19:20] so what file should I edit [19:22] Without reviewing the entire package (which I don't have time for) I can't say for sure. I'd grep for 'local' and see if that points you to anything obvious. You may need to set a specific installation directory. [19:23] gah, I have Makefile:PREFIX ?= /usr/local [19:24] Not good. [19:24] doesn't pbuilder pass --prefix to configure [19:24] You probably want something like $(CURDIR)/debian/[binarypackagename] [19:25] Maybe $(CURDIR)/debian/[binarypackagename]/usr [19:51] The thing I'm packaging, doesn't use "./configure" and embeds PREFIX inside the Makefile. What's the best way ot change it? [19:51] to* [19:57] kim0: edit debian/rules to make it run make PREFIX=/usr instead of just make [19:57] is that [19:57] make PREFIX=/usr [19:58] or [19:58] yes [19:58] PREFIX=/usr make [19:58] both should work [19:59] Thanks trying it out === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [23:08] fta: hi, you happen to be around?