[02:48] <mhall119> daker: could be, I'm not sure it's been tested with anything but Ubuntu SSO
[03:29] <mhall119> Ronnie: are you around?
[05:35] <salvadhor> hi, does anybody know how to change CNAME in our ubuntu-CC.org domain, with the use of magic key?
[05:55] <paultag> salvadhor: shucks, I can't recall. I do have it in my email archives. One moment, please
[06:10] <paultag> salvadhor: shoot, can't find it. try emailing rt@ubuntu.com
[06:14] <salvadhor> ok, thanks ;)
[08:42] <YoBoY> good morning
[09:59] <Ronnie> mhall119: pong
[10:00] <YoBoY> new bug 734232 
[10:00] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 734232 in loco-directory "false URLs in event description. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/734232
[10:00] <YoBoY> I'm sorry this one seems complicated ^^"
[10:12] <Ronnie> YoBoY: i think we call a standard django function for that, so it will be even more complicated
[10:14] <YoBoY> yes, I look in the diff when daker added this feature and it's just a "urlize" option https://code.launchpad.net/~daker/loco-directory/fix.656191/+merge/37907
[15:23] <mhall119> commented on that bug
[15:23] <nigelb> o/
[15:23] <mhall119> I'm pretty sure there are 3rd party alternatives to the urlize filter that might be more capable
[15:23] <mhall119> morning nigelb 
[15:23] <nigelb> hello mhall119 :)
[15:40] <Ronnie> mhall119: ping
[15:40] <Ronnie> cjohnston: ping
[15:40] <YoBoY> mhall119: can't we use a textile markup solution for the description fields ?
[15:40] <YoBoY> hi mhall119 :)
[15:41] <Ronnie> cjohnston: some new styling code for forms (both for ubuntu-website and loco-directory - need to test both at the same time)
[15:41] <Ronnie> https://code.launchpad.net/~ronnie.vd.c/ubuntu-website/django-forms/+merge/53173
[15:41] <Ronnie> https://code.launchpad.net/~ronnie.vd.c/loco-directory/form-base-styling/+merge/53174
[15:43] <Ronnie> mhall119: the new twidenash script is pushed to twidenash, how would you suggest to branch it in LD (https://code.launchpad.net/~ronnie.vd.c/loco-directory/twidentica/+merge/51626)
[15:52] <YoBoY> how do you search for the right venue in the long list of the US venues ?
[15:53] <mhall119> Ronnie: textile?
[15:53] <mhall119> Ronnie: I'm going to incorporate the bzr_apps stuff into LD, so we can use it to manage both twidenash and light-django-theme
[15:54] <YoBoY> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textile_%28markup_language%29
[15:56] <mhall119> YoBoY: that would be an option, I have also considered supporting creole wiki markup
[15:56] <Ronnie> mhall119: great, than this merge could wait for that, or we could temporary merge it, and later on remove the static twidenash file. what do you suggest?
[15:57] <Ronnie> mhall119: textile what?
[15:57] <mhall119> Ronnie: sorry, that was YoBoY who brought up textime
[15:57] <mhall119> textile
[15:58] <YoBoY> mhall119: why not, I wa thinking on textile because it's in http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/markup/ and I already know this one from Redmine :p
[15:59] <mhall119> YoBoY: unfortunately that was introduced in django 1.2, but our production server has django 1.1
[16:00] <YoBoY> ha yes sorry ^^
[16:00] <mhall119> we'd have to look into back-porting it
[16:00] <mhall119> but that would make most sense, since we'd be able to take advantage of it in the future
[16:01] <Ronnie> mhall119: installing it trough easy_install on the server?
[16:01] <mhall119> Ronnie: installing what?
[16:01] <Ronnie> django
[16:01] <Ronnie> 1.2.5
[16:01] <mhall119> we want to stick with the stock lucid packages
[16:02] <Ronnie> is there a good reason for it?
[16:02] <YoBoY> the server are not only for LD perhaps ^^"
[16:03] <YoBoY> is
[16:03] <mhall119> 1) It's easier for us and IS to maintain if we use the repositories
[16:03] <mhall119> 2) What YoBoY said 
[16:03] <mhall119> 3) It lets us show that the LTS server is capable of hosting webapps
[16:04] <mhall119> if we get to where we *need* django 1.2, we should try and get it into the backports repo (if it's not there already) rather than using virtualenv or easy_install
[16:07] <YoBoY> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/ref/contrib/ << it's here also (the textile) this mean it's available on 1.1 also ?
[16:09] <mhall119> oh, I'll take a look at it then
[16:09] <YoBoY> :) 
[16:09] <YoBoY> not an urgent feature, just to keep in mind for the future ^^"
[16:14] <mhall119> seems to work
[16:15] <Ronnie> for which parts do you want to use textile (some sort of wiki function?)
[16:15] <mhall119> most text fields probably
[16:15] <mhall119> event details, meeting detail, agenda description
[16:16] <mhall119> we'll add python-textile as a new dependency
[16:17] <mhall119> but I think that's okay
[16:18] <YoBoY> descriptions / détails / future report pages ... don't know ^^
[16:20] <YoBoY> it's a part of the bug 715581 if you want
[16:20] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 715581 in loco-directory "Agenda item description field is too small (affects: 1) (heat: 4)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/715581
[16:28] <mhall119> YoBoY: they're different issues and different fixes, so make a new bug please
[16:47] <YoBoY> mhall119: ok 
[17:07] <YoBoY> mhall119: bug 734401
[17:07] <ubot4`> YoBoY: Bug 734401 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/734401 is private
[17:08] <YoBoY> too fast ^^" the bug is not entirely registered yet :p
[21:06] <daker_> mhall119, bug #734498
[21:06] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 734498 in loco-directory "textfields should accept markup formating (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/734498
[21:07] <daker_> no is the bot kidding ツ
[21:22] <YoBoY> how to report a bug on the bot ? :D
[21:22] <czajkowski> to irc folks YoBoY 
[21:22] <czajkowski> YoBoY: do you just like to report bugs 
[21:23] <YoBoY> no I like also to organize events
[21:24] <YoBoY> and I report bugs only on the application I use
[21:31] <daker_> re-test bug #734498
[21:31] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 734498 in django-openid-auth "The SReg extension isn't working correctly (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/734498
[21:32] <daker_> god dog ubot4` 
[21:32] <daker_> s/god/good
[21:40] <cjohnston> howdy
[21:55] <daker_> hello cjohnston 
[22:04] <czajkowski> https://bugs.launchpad.net/loco-directory/+bug/734520
[22:04] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 734520 in loco-directory "profile images not displaying correctly if no image on LP (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[22:10] <cjohnston> czajkowski: iirc thats a bigger problem that will take work on our part and lp part
[22:10] <czajkowski> nods 
[22:10] <czajkowski> well the bug is ust reported 
[22:10] <czajkowski> it's not a biggie 
[22:11] <czajkowski> but just to have it logged 
[22:11] <czajkowski> and seeing as more people are singing in using open user it looks fine 
[22:11] <czajkowski> just people with no LP images are making it look messy 
[22:12] <cjohnston> i dont think we should be getting anymore openid users.. mhall119 am i wrong?
[22:12] <czajkowski> cjohnston: why not? isnt that for folks who dont want to sgn up t LP ?
[22:13] <cjohnston> you shoudlnt' be able to sign up for LD without an LP account
[22:14] <czajkowski> which is a bit annoying for folks tbh
[22:14] <czajkowski> :s
[22:14] <cjohnston> we dont have the backend in place to support it
[22:14] <cjohnston> we pull all of our info from LP
[22:14] <czajkowski> but you can log intp LP with open id right ?
[22:15] <cjohnston> Not sure
[22:15] <cjohnston> I think you only can with ubuntu sso
[22:15] <cjohnston> but you still have to create an LP account
[22:16] <czajkowski> I guess it's somethign to think about, means if we get teams to create events on the LD but invite non Ubuntu folks, they cant sign up to attend 
[22:16] <czajkowski> which means we;re back at using eventbrite or other apps for larger events 
[22:17] <czajkowski> cjohnston: not trying to ne negative here
[22:17] <czajkowski> just soudning things out 
[22:17] <cjohnston> but at the same time, you cant be a team member without an lp account.. or alteast an "online" team member
[22:17] <czajkowski> *sounding 
[22:17] <cjohnston> this has been debated prolly 2 dozen times
[22:17] <czajkowski> hmmm 
[22:17] <czajkowski> food for thought 
[22:17] <czajkowski> mm 
[22:17] <czajkowski> nn
[22:17] <cjohnston> and alot more negative
[22:18] <Ronnie> czajkowski, cjohnston: this scheme i made once, when i needed to know the link between openid/LP/LD http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7037/schemaopenidld.png
[23:08] <mhall119> cjohnston: the openiduser## bug still exisys
[23:08] <mhall119> technically you can log into LD with only an SSO account, not an LP account, but we should block that
[23:09] <mhall119> the main issue we have right now is that username isn't an SSO field, it's strictly an LP field
[23:09] <mhall119> there is some mechanism to sync the two, but it doesn't always work, and when it doesn't work, we get openiduser##
[23:09] <mhall119> also if someone has just SSO but no LP profile, we get openiduser##
[23:14] <YoBoY> there is no way to detect this "non existing username" and replace it by the openid ident ?
[23:16] <mhall119> YoBoY: possible yes, but as of right now the LP API is based solely on username
[23:17] <mhall119> we've spoken to them about this, and they plan on making the API accept the openid ident too
[23:17] <mhall119> hmmmm, maybe I'll be allowed to work on my outstanding django-openid-auth branches tomorrow
[23:42] <markjones> czajkowski, I didn't realise you had connections with @BrynS on Twitter :P