| stefanct | hello | 01:23 |
|---|---|---|
| stefanct | can someone pls shade some light on this error message: Rejected: | 01:23 |
| stefanct | Unhandled exception processing upload: need more than 0 values to unpack | 01:23 |
| stefanct | i am receiving it when i try to upload to my private ppa at ubuntu's launchpad | 01:24 |
| stefanct | first .deb package i ever try to upload there... | 01:24 |
| micahg | stefanct: you can't upload .deb packages, only source packages | 01:25 |
| stefanct | ic... and it builds it on its own then? guess i missed some basics :P | 01:26 |
| wgrant | stefanct: How did you construct the .changes file that you uploaded? | 01:26 |
| wgrant | It has a .dsc and a .deb, which no tool I know of creates. | 01:26 |
| stefanct | with dpkg-genchanges | 01:27 |
| wgrant | Ah, it is very rare that one would use that directly. | 01:27 |
| stefanct | there are too many ways to create all that stuff :) | 01:28 |
| wgrant | See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete. | 01:28 |
| wgrant | You need to upload a source package (usually built with 'debuild -S') | 01:28 |
| stefanct | i will, thanks | 01:28 |
| EvilPhoenix | what specifically influences the build scores for source packages uploaded to a PPA? | 02:10 |
| micahg | EvilPhoenix: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/BuildScores | 02:11 |
| EvilPhoenix | so does the urgency= part of the changelog determine the priority order for the building on ppas? such as emergency > high > medium > low | 04:23 |
| mwhudson | pretty sure not | 04:23 |
| micahg | technically yes, but most people ignore them and unless there | 04:24 |
| micahg | s really a priority for it, it's just not nice :) | 04:24 |
| EvilPhoenix | so such a priority being, say, an urgent patch to update and fix a very large vulnerability or similar reasoning? | 04:25 |
| micahg | EvilPhoenix: IMHO, something like that would qualify if it's for a derivative distro w/a package that's not in the main archive | 04:26 |
| EvilPhoenix | right. that's what i thought. | 04:27 |
| === jtv is now known as jtv-eat | ||
| === jtv-eat is now known as jtv | ||
| fta2 | hi, several times a day, i get some annoying "bzr: ERROR: Invalid http response for https://xmlrpc.launchpad.net/bazaar/: Unable to handle http code 502: Bad Gateway" | 07:45 |
| spiv | lifeless: ^ | 07:53 |
| lifeless | fta2: hi, please file a bug | 08:09 |
| lifeless | fta2: though if you had that about 16-24 hours ago, it was due to a server farm failure we have since fixed | 08:10 |
| fta2 | ok, i'll file a bug next time i see it then | 08:13 |
| Laney | Does anyone know of a way to have a PPA package be preferred over the archive (i.e. have a higher version number), but not potentially screw over users at upgrade due to update-manager disabling the entry? | 09:09 |
| === henninge_ is now known as henninge | ||
| ssam | where should i report launchpad comment spam? | 11:02 |
| ssam | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/30578 comment by brad | 11:05 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 30578 in ekiga (Ubuntu) "Ekiga uses ALSA layer, but sound card is blocked by esd" [Medium,Fix released] | 11:05 |
| bigjools | ssam: file a question reporting the issue on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad and an admin will delete the spam | 11:21 |
| ssam | bigjools, thanks | 11:24 |
| === henninge is now known as henninge-lunch | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| maxb | Speaking of admins, can I get some feedback on likely times to someone looking at my pendinq questions on https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-losas/+assignedquestions?field.actions.search=Search&field.status=OPEN ? | 12:22 |
| wgrant | maxb: We're unfortunately down 2 LOSAs at the moment. | 12:26 |
| wgrant | Although we may regain one tomorrow. | 12:26 |
| maxb | For the sake of people who aren't me and don't lurk here, it would be a nicer experience if someone could send holding replies to questions like this | 12:28 |
| maxb | Also, one of my questions is a simple "please run one of your standard scripts", but is 3 weeks old | 12:29 |
| === henninge-lunch is now known as henninge | ||
| === james_w` is now known as james_w | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga-ill | ||
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === m4n1sh_ is now known as m4n1sh | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === lan3y is now known as Laney | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| antono | hello all. i need help with amd63 build of rubinius in my ppa | 21:03 |
| antono | its ok if i build package locally with debuild | 21:03 |
| antono | when i upload my package to ppa it builded ok for i386 but package is empty for amd64 | 21:04 |
| thumper | hmm... missed him | 21:46 |
| === unitylogger is now known as gnomeshellogger | ||
| EvilPhoenix | thumper: anywhere I can suggest something about launchpad? | 21:50 |
| EvilPhoenix | like a feature change or something | 21:50 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: suggest away | 21:50 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: or file a bug :-) | 21:50 |
| EvilPhoenix | thumper: the teams / subteams thing. if the team that's parent to a subteam is affiliated with a project, shouldn't that project affiliation trickle down to the subteam as well>? | 21:51 |
| EvilPhoenix | if my sentence structure is confusing, forgive me because i've been up for about 36 straight hours :P | 21:52 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: otp right now, I'll look in detail in a few minutes | 21:52 |
| === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: looking and thinking now | 22:11 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: my answer would be kinda | 22:12 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: why is this an issue? | 22:12 |
| === gnomeshellogger is now known as TheHarald | ||
| EvilPhoenix | thumper: just was curious, as a project I'm working on has a core developers team, and then a subteam for the Debian maintainers | 22:44 |
| EvilPhoenix | Debian maintainers doesnt get to be seen as affiliated with the project on their team page | 22:44 |
| thumper | EvilPhoenix: perhaps it should | 22:44 |
| thumper | feel free to file a bug :) | 22:44 |
| EvilPhoenix | location to file? | 22:45 |
| lifeless | EvilPhoenix: what do you mean 'affiliated with the project' | 22:45 |
| EvilPhoenix | sorry, kinda staring at debuild/terminal atm | 22:45 |
| lifeless | EvilPhoenix: we don't have any affiliation mechanism, so I guess you mean something like driver/maintainer roles ? | 22:45 |
| lifeless | EvilPhoenix: the lp bug tracker is https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad | 22:46 |
| EvilPhoenix | lifeless: yeah, sorta | 22:46 |
| EvilPhoenix | lifeless: here: https://launchpad.net/~bbot+core+developers | 22:46 |
| bburhans | So, I've accidentally created duplicate lp accounts, and I see no interface to nuke one in order to allow that email to be added to my primary account :( | 22:46 |
| EvilPhoenix | subteam is BBot Debian Maintainers group. | 22:46 |
| EvilPhoenix | lifeless: https://launchpad.net/~bbot-debian-maintainers <--- that related projects thing isnt pushed down to the subteam | 22:47 |
| wgrant | bburhans: You can merge the accounts at https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge | 22:47 |
| bburhans | wgrant: excellent, thanks. | 22:47 |
| lifeless | EvilPhoenix: ok, thats probably oversight | 22:47 |
| lifeless | we should do teamparticipation expansion there | 22:47 |
| EvilPhoenix | ^ indeed | 22:48 |
| EvilPhoenix | should i file it as a bug? | 22:48 |
| EvilPhoenix | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/735178 <-- submitted bug for the issue i explained | 23:16 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 735178 in Launchpad itself "Subteams do not inherit "Related Projects" from parent teams" [Undecided,New] | 23:16 |
| === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!