[02:11] \o/ new gnome-web-photo (webkit) builds, just need to clean up packaging before uploading to mentors.d.n === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [07:42] hi [08:09] micahg, ping [09:41] chrisccoulson, hi, could you please add a man page to libnss3-tools for certutil? [09:42] fta2 - sure. i'm gradually trying to get all the mozilla packages lintian clean, and that's already one that's on my list === silvery is now known as JesusFC [10:11] great [10:12] (while i tend to hate lintian for being too pedantic, forcing packages to be overly complex for no real benefits) === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:02] fta: pong [15:09] chrisccoulson: Unity Launcher integration! https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/unity-launcher-integration/ :) [15:12] m_conley: installing now! [15:14] jcastro: all feedback welcome. :) (Also, since it inserts the context menu items by manually creating/editing ~/.local/share/applications/thunderbird.desktop, you'll need to logout and log back in to see those context menu items. Or trigger Unity to reload its .desktop files. Either or. :) ) [15:14] * jcastro unity --reset's [16:35] micahg, n-m, too late [16:35] fta: ok [18:29] are there german translations somewhere for the firefox-net PPAs of firefox-4.0 for lucid? [18:41] chrisccoulson: ping [18:42] hi m_conley [18:42] chrisccoulson: hey - did you get a chance to check out my messaging menu extension last Friday? [18:42] great work on the launcher integration btw! [18:42] not yet :( [18:43] i'm stuck trying to fix a memory leak in unity atm [18:43] i was hoping to have it fixed by now ;) [18:43] chrisccoulson: k, no worries [18:44] chrisccoulson: also, now that the FF4 coding frenzy is starting to subside a bit, maybe we should start thinking about getting your globalmenu-extension integrated... [18:44] yeah, that would be good [20:44] jdstrand, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=75963 [20:46] fta: yeah, I updated that Ubuntu bug today. newer versions of chromium-browser do /dev/shm/.org... instead of /dev/shm/org... [20:46] fta: it is fixed in natty, apparmor would need an SRU [20:46] where is that apparmor profile? [20:46] apparmor-profiles [20:47] it is not installed by default, provided by the apparmor package and in universe [20:47] gasp, why not in the ch package directly? [20:48] there are different mindsets. if it is in the package, it implies it is 'ready' and the package maintainer can maintain it [20:48] i don't have it here; hence it didn't hit the bug [20:48] apparmor-profiles is the package that is used to gently test our profiles that aren't in production yet [20:49] oh, also, installed apparmor-profiles puts the profile in complain mode, not enforce mode [20:49] so the user had to opt in to that too [20:49] oh, ok, so it shouldn't impact regular users [20:49] just the paranoid ones [20:49] so, basically, the person did a lot to enable the profile (ie, not accidental) and should be filing a bug in Ubuntu [20:49] fta: oh gosh no [20:50] apparmor-profiles is not installed by default or Recommended [20:50] you install it and still everything is allowed [20:50] ok [20:51] fta: I imagine micahg will work with you on getting it packaged in chromium-browser proper (like we do with firefox-- disabled by default), but it isn't a particular high priority atm [20:51] the sandbox is already pretty effective [20:51] yes, it is [20:52] but it's easy for me to add the apparmor profiles, i'm no noob ;) [20:52] :) [20:52] the sandbox is easily my favorite feature of chromium [20:52] of course, I am a bit weird that way :) [20:53] upstream were also looking at profiling chromium, so I wanted to at least have an example profile people could play with [20:54] the one in natty is quite a bit more flexible (it uses the ubuntu-browsers.d/ mechanism) [20:54] but anyhoo... [20:56] well, just let me know if/when you want me to host the profile directly === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [22:35] jcastro, is there really no way to prevent windows crossing a workspace border to appear on its neighbor? i hate that, it's a huge waste of space for me, not to mention that is confuses the unity panel [22:36] what do you mean? [22:36] like when you're dragging it from one workspace to the next? [22:38] no, when i move a window slightly (or partly) out to make room to another one [22:38] but i want to keep both on the same workspace [22:38] but nowhere else [22:47] lolmozilla. ie9 comes out tonight and firefox is going to behind ie for the first time ever. [22:48] LLStarks: well, Firefox 4 is still a superior browser [22:48] yeah, but it's not out yet [22:48] RC1 [22:48] doesn't count [22:49] in the time it took them to release 3 new versions, Mozilla has released 4 with a 5th almost ready [22:49] why does MS releasing a browser concern Ubuntu [22:49] kbrosnan: they're not [22:52] micahg, orga told me some maverick/arm users got crashes on startup, with SIGILL [22:52] did you test ch10 on arm? [22:53] fta: I haven't run it [22:53] does your board support neon? [22:53] fta: I can run it later tonight [22:53] * micahg isn't sure, would have to check [22:54] neon is supposed to be disabled in the last 2 builds, so if your board doesn't support it and it doesn't crash, it's something else [22:54] please let me know [22:54] fta: k, hopefully can test later tonight [22:55] i wish asac was here ;) [22:55] he talked about some boards [22:55] nada since [23:04] jcastro, pff, compiz crashed, twice in 10 minutes [23:16] 2 more times, quitting