[02:11] <micahg> \o/ new gnome-web-photo (webkit) builds, just need to clean up packaging before uploading to mentors.d.n
[07:42] <fta2> hi
[08:09] <fta2> micahg, ping
[09:41] <fta2> chrisccoulson, hi, could you please add a man page to libnss3-tools for certutil?
[09:42] <chrisccoulson> fta2 - sure. i'm gradually trying to get all the mozilla packages lintian clean, and that's already one that's on my list
[10:11] <fta2> great
[10:12] <fta2> (while i tend to hate lintian for being too pedantic, forcing packages to be overly complex for no real benefits)
[15:02] <micahg> fta: pong
[15:09] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: Unity Launcher integration!  https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/unity-launcher-integration/  :)
[15:12] <jcastro> m_conley: installing now!
[15:14] <m_conley> jcastro: all feedback welcome.  :)  (Also, since it inserts the context menu items by manually creating/editing ~/.local/share/applications/thunderbird.desktop, you'll need to logout and log back in to see those context menu items.  Or trigger Unity to reload its .desktop files.  Either or. :) )
[15:14]  * jcastro unity --reset's
[16:35] <fta> micahg, n-m, too late
[16:35] <micahg> fta: ok
[18:29] <azeem> are there german translations somewhere for the firefox-net PPAs of firefox-4.0 for lucid?
[18:41] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: ping
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> hi m_conley
[18:42] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: hey - did you get a chance to check out my messaging menu extension last Friday?
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> great work on the launcher integration btw!
[18:42] <chrisccoulson> not yet :(
[18:43] <chrisccoulson> i'm stuck trying to fix a memory leak in unity atm
[18:43] <chrisccoulson> i was hoping to have it fixed by now ;)
[18:43] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: k, no worries
[18:44] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: also, now that the FF4 coding frenzy is starting to subside a bit, maybe we should start thinking about getting your globalmenu-extension integrated...
[18:44] <chrisccoulson> yeah, that would be good
[20:44] <fta> jdstrand, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=75963
[20:46] <jdstrand> fta: yeah, I updated that Ubuntu bug today. newer versions of chromium-browser do /dev/shm/.org... instead of /dev/shm/org...
[20:46] <jdstrand> fta: it is fixed in natty, apparmor would need an SRU
[20:46] <fta> where is that apparmor profile?
[20:46] <jdstrand> apparmor-profiles
[20:47] <jdstrand> it is not installed by default, provided by the apparmor package and in universe
[20:47] <fta> gasp, why not in the ch package directly?
[20:48] <jdstrand> there are different mindsets. if it is in the package, it implies it is 'ready' and the package maintainer can maintain it
[20:48] <fta> i don't have it here; hence it didn't hit the bug
[20:48] <jdstrand> apparmor-profiles is the package that is used to gently test our profiles that aren't in production yet
[20:49] <jdstrand> oh, also, installed apparmor-profiles puts the profile in complain mode, not enforce mode
[20:49] <jdstrand> so the user had to opt in to that too
[20:49] <fta> oh, ok, so it shouldn't impact regular users
[20:49] <fta> just the paranoid ones
[20:49] <jdstrand> so, basically, the person did a lot to enable the profile (ie, not accidental) and should be filing a bug in Ubuntu
[20:49] <jdstrand> fta: oh gosh no
[20:50] <jdstrand> apparmor-profiles is not installed by default or Recommended
[20:50] <jdstrand> you install it and still everything is allowed
[20:50] <fta> ok
[20:51] <jdstrand> fta: I imagine micahg will work with you on getting it packaged in chromium-browser proper (like we do with firefox-- disabled by default), but it isn't a particular high priority atm
[20:51] <fta> the sandbox is already pretty effective
[20:51] <jdstrand> yes, it is
[20:52] <fta> but it's easy for me to add the apparmor profiles, i'm no noob ;)
[20:52] <jdstrand> :)
[20:52] <jdstrand> the sandbox is easily my favorite feature of chromium
[20:52] <jdstrand> of course, I am a bit weird that way :)
[20:53] <jdstrand> upstream were also looking at profiling chromium, so I wanted to at least have an example profile people could play with
[20:54] <jdstrand> the one in natty is quite a bit more flexible (it uses the ubuntu-browsers.d/ mechanism)
[20:54] <jdstrand> but anyhoo...
[20:56] <fta> well, just let me know if/when you want me to host the profile directly
[22:35] <fta> jcastro, is there really no way to prevent windows crossing a workspace border to appear on its neighbor? i hate that, it's a huge waste of space for me, not to mention that is confuses the unity panel
[22:36] <jcastro> what do you mean?
[22:36] <jcastro> like when you're dragging it from one workspace to the next?
[22:38] <fta> no, when i move a window slightly (or partly) out to make room to another one
[22:38] <fta> but i want to keep both on the same workspace
[22:38] <fta> but nowhere else
[22:47] <LLStarks> lolmozilla. ie9 comes out tonight and firefox is going to behind ie for the first time ever.
[22:48] <micahg> LLStarks: well, Firefox 4 is still a superior browser
[22:48] <LLStarks> yeah, but it's not out yet
[22:48] <micahg> RC1
[22:48] <LLStarks> doesn't count
[22:49] <micahg> in the time it took them to release 3 new versions, Mozilla has released 4 with a 5th almost ready
[22:49] <kbrosnan> why does MS releasing a browser concern Ubuntu
[22:49] <micahg> kbrosnan: they're not
[22:52] <fta> micahg, orga told me some maverick/arm users got crashes on startup, with SIGILL
[22:52] <fta> did you test ch10 on arm?
[22:53] <micahg> fta: I haven't run it
[22:53] <fta> does your board support neon?
[22:53] <micahg> fta: I can run it later tonight
[22:53]  * micahg isn't sure, would have to check
[22:54] <fta> neon is supposed to be disabled in the last 2 builds, so if your board doesn't support it and it doesn't crash, it's something else
[22:54] <fta> please let me know
[22:54] <micahg> fta: k, hopefully can test later tonight
[22:55] <fta> i wish asac was here ;)
[22:55] <fta> he talked about some boards
[22:55] <fta> nada since
[23:04] <fta> jcastro, pff, compiz crashed, twice in 10 minutes
[23:16] <fta> 2 more times, quitting