[00:00] Daviey: what's the PPA url? i can take a look now [00:03] hudson's deprecated anyway. [00:03] deb http://pkg.jenkins-ci.org/debian binary/ [00:03] is what I use. [00:03] jiboumans, https://launchpad.net/~hudson-ubuntu/+archive/testing [00:04] actually, ~ubuntu-hudson is based on Natty... so soren's suggestion is probably better for LTS. [00:04] Daviey: you know me well :) of course i'm on LTS (smoser++) [00:05] jiboumans, What?! You aren't putting production loads on the development release?! [00:05] Daviey: indeed, I'm not hitting the crack pipe :) [00:05] :) [00:06] Daviey: ok, i'll try ffe process [00:06] Daviey: I do seem to recall that debuild was failing until i refreshed patch 01-kvers.patch [00:06] Daviey: but, hopefully you're off for the night and will read this in the morning :) [00:07] hallyn, Make sure you note that you spent significant time trying to cherry pick a fix etc. And new upstream snapshot seemed both more reliable, and less time - and more supportable rather than a massive patchset [00:07] Lay it on thick :) [00:08] hallyn, Ah, debuild will crap out if the patch contains fuzz... when quilt push doesn't... really annoying variation of defaults! [00:09] Daviey: 3.0 quilt or --with quilt ? [00:10] I think the 3.0 (quilt) thing is a bit broken. We really need 3.0 (bzr) [00:11] SpamapS, "quilt pop -a ; quilt push -a" works.. with default setup, mentions fuzz and offset... but the build process will only accept offset but not fuzz. [00:12] SpamapS, I recently pondered the idea of 3.0 (bzr), but can you imagine converting all of debian? :).... Really, i think bzr needs to have native knowledge of .pc [00:13] Daviey: there is an experimental 3.0 (bzr) somewhere, 3.0 (git) got bumped from experimental to approved recently, I though. [00:13] err, I thought. [00:14] sbeattie, Yeah - but how useful is that for /everything/... Other than a few DM that use bzr and Ubuntu native packages? [00:15] Daviey: useful? when has that ever been a criteria? :-) [00:15] lol [00:15] Has everyone else had puppet adverts following them across the internet today? [00:17] Do nightmares about clowns count? [00:18] Depends if you have the nightmare whilst awake :) [00:33] kirkland: dude could you also please publish the tarball for poewrnap at launchpad/net/powernap? === tsimpson_ is now known as tsimpson === tohuw is now known as Tohuw [01:38] Is there any compelling reason to leave usergroups=yes in adduser.conf if I'm configuring an Ubuntu LAMP server? Granted, I need to watch my perms (e.g. 644 not 664), but that's just paying attention, not a real argument against it. [01:40] There are two cases where the group permission is relevant: /home/fred (private personal files) and /srv/share (shared files that need group write access). [01:41] IME you cannot handle both correctly with plain POSIX permissions, so it is better to err towards privacy and leave usergroups=yes. [01:41] This allows users to opt-in to a shared group on specific files (i.e. /srv/share) rather than having to opt-out of same for /home/fred. [01:42] twb: good point. thank you [01:42] Obviously if you value security over convenience, you should study one or more LSM MACs, like grsecurity, selinux or apparmor. [01:44] twb: I'm going to learn apparmor last, but I do plan to incorporate it to some extent. I figure, get it working, then harden it. :) [01:44] Sure. [01:44] You're running PHP so you're pretty much screwed anyway [01:44] twb: why are the default directory perms in adduser.conf 0755 if you're not supposed to execute stuff in /home? [01:45] Tohuw: the default behaviour is to give world read access to files in $HOME [01:45] On the basis that sharing is useful, e.g. so you can read alice's .bashrc for handy things to put in your own [01:45] twb: "You're running PHP so you're pretty much screwed anyway" <-- it depends, I would say. You can harden php decently through proper php.ini and phpSuExec configuration. [01:46] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP#Security [01:46] One quarter to one third of ALL vulnerabilities announce each year are PHP related. [01:46] twb: I was more asking about the "7" part. Doesn't that allow the user to execute from their home? [01:46] Tohuw: no, it's a umask. [01:47] Actually, not it isn't. [01:47] That's the actual permission that /home/fred will be set to, so 7 means rwx [01:48] So, why allow execution? I though executables were supposed to be in */bin dirs? [01:49] Tohuw: execute permission on a directory means that you're allowed to cd into it, IIRC [01:49] Something like that. Anyway, you need it [01:49] oh. Hm! [01:50] I'll be darned; you're right [01:50] Run info coreutils 'File permissions' [01:50] Revoking the executable bit prevents cd to the dir. [01:50] Unfortunately there's only info page, not manpage [01:51] `x' the permission the USERS have to execute the file, or search it if it is a directory. [01:54] the whole "oh let's only make info pages because info lolrulez" attitude is frankly annoying. [01:54] info foo | less [01:55] Now you have a big manpage [02:26] New bug: #735239 in postfix (main) "package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 installed post-installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 75" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735239 [02:29] twb: haha. It's more about telling users "just use man to find out about stuff", only some things don't have a man, or even worse, an outdated/very sparse one. [02:29] Though I suppose telling users, "just info it" is valid as all man pages are read by info, AFAIK [02:30] anyone here using a SAS Expander, and willing to recommend it for use in a new system ? i'm shopping for a SAS Expander for a ubuntu based system, and would love to hear from anyone running one now. [02:34] By "expander" do you mean a chassis that houses the disks, or a card that has SATA ports, or what? [02:37] a SAS expander is a circuit board, often housed on a PCI(E) shaped card or in a 5.25" bay that goes inside one of the chassis that houses the drives (or a main system) that allows multiple drives to be connected to one controller. Most of the expanders I've seen take one SFF-8088 or 8087 cable from a controller card, and "expand" it to connect 16 or 24 drives plus 2 additional expanders. [02:39] I've also seen SAS expanders built directly into a backplane, but those are too expensive for me. [02:43] Okay, I've RTFM, but I still don't understand what format the quota for quotauser should be in... [02:43] (quotauser as set in adduser.conf) [02:45] * twb looks for a picture [02:46] Hm, OK [02:47] I can't help; I mainly deal with SATA === raul is now known as bigbang [03:22] Is there a strict 1:1 relationship between inodes and files? I.e., every file has an inode. === bigbang is now known as krux [03:47] everything on a disk has an inode [03:48] even directories, symlinks, ... [03:48] not all inodes are files [03:49] Tohuw: no, two files can have the same inode (i.e. a hard link) [03:49] Patrickdk: well, multiple hard links often fit inside one inode, too... touch foo; ln foo bar ; ls -i foo bar # both have same inode number :) [03:49] ya, I wasn't thinking about that [03:49] Similarly, if you open a file, delete it, then create a new file, both files will be /tmp/x, but they will have different inodes [03:49] and wasn't even thinking about it that way [03:50] I was thinking stuff (files,dir,...) -> inodes -> blocks [03:50] inodes is a collection of blocks, basically [03:50] or, an inode [03:50] twb: thanks, I received the answer in another channel. I'm clear on it now. Is dumpe2fs the "standard" tool for viewing free inodes? [03:50] By contrast, FAT has no inodes, so you cannot delete an open ifle [03:51] tune2fs? [03:51] really df -i [03:51] oh [03:51] good ol df [03:51] Tohuw: I don't know why you would ever need to do that [03:51] df -i lists the percentage of inodes used/free [03:51] twb: setting rational quotas for my partitions [03:52] Tohuw: number of files is a rough guide to current inode usage within a specific directory tree [03:52] Given that I could theoretically run out of inodes before running out of blocks [03:52] then for quota purposes, it's pretty much dir+files=inodes [03:52] Tohuw: try find /home/ -user fred -xdev | wc -l [03:52] hopefully user fred is a standard user, and doesn't have only maildir files :) [03:52] twb: right, but I was more interested in total free inodes, to try and devise a policy for limiting them. [03:53] fred is my mta AND sql log rotation holder! :D [03:54] I'm doing one inode per 32kb currently [03:55] Patrickdk: what brought you to that decision? [03:55] it was the ratio setup before me, and I didn't see any point in changing it [03:56] 4k is just normally overkill [03:56] 64k is too big though :( [03:56] 16k would probably be good [03:56] but some users abuse inodes, not too many [03:56] Look at what users are using, then halve [03:58] I'm probably going lower the inode limit good pretty soon [03:58] once I convert all the email [05:00] Hi, Me again, still wondering which SAS Expanders people have used in here with a Ubuntu system [05:16] how can we answer that when you don't stick around for an answer? [05:17] patdk-lap: You could try answering using memoserv, if you really want to :) :) [05:18] I could [05:18] but I seriously don't even think the os knows about sas expanders [05:18] it's just sees drives connected to a scsi card [05:18] as long as the expanders and sas card get along, all should be good === twister004_ is now known as twister004 [06:08] jamespage, awake ? === twister004_ is now known as twister004 [07:12] New bug: #735296 in samba (main) "package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installed post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 127" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735296 === twister004_ is now known as twister004 [09:50] Hi all [09:51] I installed ubuntu server 10.04 64 bit and there is no desktop on it [09:51] i want to install desktop on that machine but there is no internet [09:52] luckymurali: of cource theres no desktop enviroment - servers usually don't have xorg / gnome [09:53] luckymurali: and - then you have to set up your network connection :) [09:53] <_ruben> luckymurali: if you want a desktop, install the desktop edition .. it's obvious i'd say [09:53] yes i know that, my concern is how to install desktopn on server without internet [09:54] <_ruben> you'd use the desktop cd/dvd to install it, as it's not on the server cd/dvd [09:54] luckymurali: get an internet connection. set up your wireless connection via cli. [09:54] or whatever you need for internet [09:54] TheInfinity,I need Desktop without internet [09:55] but i dont know where is the desktop pacakge [09:55] the desktop I need to use is for a specific reason [09:55] * _ruben points to #ubuntu [09:56] * TheInfinity would also say #ubuntu because i dont see the relation to server topics [09:56] any way thanks for your suggestions [10:02] New bug: #735369 in bacula "Bacula Admin Tool (bat) does not work well with Qt 4.6.2 in Lucid" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735369 === Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo [11:06] hallyn: Hi hallyn; could you please post a link to more info about updating the apparmor profile (re mail on ubuntu-server list); i found some info on https://apparmor.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libvirt but I must say I have no experience with apparmor... [11:21] New bug: #735402 in squid (main) "package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735402 [11:37] New bug: #735409 in mysql-dfsg-5.1 (main) "package mysql-server-5.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735409 === e-jat_ is now known as e-jat === zul_ is now known as zul [13:20] morning all [13:23] morning RoAkSoAx [13:33] jdepi: jdstrand may know of an actual link about updating apparmor profiles for libvirt instances, but please send reply in email to whatever msg i sent yesterday, and we'll figure it out [13:34] hallyn, jdepi: that link and the /usr/share/doc/libvirt-bin/README.Debian.gz should have everything needed [13:35] hallyn: i did :-) [13:35] jdstrand: thanks, I should'vethought of that one [13:35] jdstrand: thanks, i'll have a look [13:44] idea for UDS: [13:44] no... make that [13:44] request for UDS: ACL by default [13:44] why are we still in the 20th century? :) [13:47] heh [13:47] acl by default on what? [13:48] filesystems [13:49] never used acl's [13:49] ivoks: Last we had that discussion, I think Adam Conrad (infinity) said something about Samba changing its behaviour if the filesystem had ACL enabled... and then we decided not to enable it. I think it [13:49] s ripe for another discussion. [13:49] makes life easier in some situations... /me thiks about samba and nfs [13:50] soren: hm... i can't remember what it was [13:51] ivoks: Anyways, it was almost 5 years ago. :) [13:51] ivoks: Hmm... Or was it in Boston? Anyways, several years ago for sure. [13:52] http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html#id2614541 [13:52] i think it was prague [13:53] * soren tries to envision the Prague session rooms [13:53] I also forget when infinity left [13:54] i didn't know he left :) [13:55] like 2 years ago i think [13:56] ah [13:56] ivoks: its on my list to bring up [13:58] thanks :) [14:00] ok, maybe pushing it by default is over the line [14:00] but, lots of people are unaware of it and we could probably make better docs by mentioning how to utilize acl [14:03] absolutely; better docs are a minimum. simple tools to enable acl's would also help, imo [14:23] ivoks: pacemaker now also has support for acls [14:23] Daviey: do i need to create a new bug for the open-vm-tools FFE? [14:24] hallyn: is there a merge bug opened already? If so, nope [14:25] there is a bug open which the merge is needed for [14:25] (bug 727342) [14:25] Launchpad bug 727342 in open-vm-tools "package open-vm-dkms 2010.06.16-268169-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727342 [14:25] cani just mark that one 'new' and put the info in there? [14:26] RoAkSoAx: hm... i don't see how's that relevant for pacemaker :) [14:26] hallyn: yeah, add [FFe] at the beginning of the bug title. You can also modify the title, and off course add the description for the FFe [14:27] RoAkSoAx: pacemaker doesn't do anything on the filesystem... ACLs are of no use for it [14:27] RoAkSoAx: maybe you are refering to pacemaker's internal ACL [14:27] ivoks: "S.U.S.E. has implemented support for ACLs. This means that you can now delegate permission to control parts of the cluster (as defined by you) to non-root users." [14:27] right, no internal ACL [14:27] ACL = access control list [14:27] what i was refering to is acl on filesystem [14:28] ivoks: yeah yeah but I mean, your conversation of FS ACL's reminded me mof pacemaker's [14:28] s/right, no internal ACL/right, so internal ACL/ [14:28] right... that's a nice feature [14:28] indeed [14:30] kirkland: howdy!! I just uploaded python-ethtool which is required by koan, could you please take a look at it when you have the time since it's in the NEW queue? thanks [14:42] hallyn, no [14:43] RoAkSoAx, Has it had FFe [14:57] Daviey: python-ethtool? yes [14:58] hallyn: yeah just use the same bug. I usually put [FFe] before the title of the bug and enhance description, etc etc (sorry for the delay i though I replied :) ) === ogra is now known as Guest56191 === Guest56191 is now known as ogra_ [15:02] p/whois soren [15:03] soren: hey, saw your presentation at fosdem about Openstack, great one [15:03] kirkland ping [15:04] lynxman: hi [15:04] RoAkSoAx: sure, i'm on a call at the moment [15:04] kirkland: no worries, whenever you have the time is fine ;) Thanks [15:05] kirkland: hey *waves* I had some unexepected troubles with the upstart file for mcollective and I modified it on my 1.1.3 packaging to get it closer to what SpamapS suggested (for mcollective-server-provisioner, which kinda is the same category) just wanted your opinion/ideas on it [15:06] kirkland: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/580609/ === jjohansen is now known as jj-afk [15:06] kirkland: no hurries though [15:07] lynxman: np, i'm on the phone for the next ~1 hour [15:07] kirkland: can easily wait :) [15:08] how can I check mail for root user ? [15:11] orudie, 2 ways: either log in as root and type mail , or as your user (asuming you have sudo access) type sudo mail [15:12] isnt there a meeting today? [15:12] zul: daylight saving [15:12] is in effect [15:13] damn farmers [15:13] lol [15:13] zul: blame the sun [15:13] lynxman: farmers are more tangable [15:13] zul: true true [15:15] * SpamapS daylight savings time [15:15] the sun will actually be up for the meeting.. woot [15:17] how can I view sshd log ? [15:17] SpamapS: I resent daylight savings time for stealing 1 hour of my life [15:17] I resent it for wasting my time and everyone elses [15:17] I resent it for being a government-controlled resource [15:18] * RoAkSoAx doesn't really care [15:18] I especially resent when said government changes the start/stop times with only TWO WEEKS NOTICE because of some goddamn sporting even [15:18] * RoAkSoAx doesn't really care about daily savings [15:18] *event [15:18] orudie: mail for root should be forwarded to the user [15:18] orudie: depends on what you're looking for, mostly in /var/log/auth.log [15:18] arght daylight* [15:19] RoAkSoAx: inside a datacenter there's no daylight to save :D [15:19] Anyway, edison and friends obviated the need for a daystar [15:20] lynxman: hehe indeed. In my case is none sense since I have light till 8pm or so [15:20] lol [15:20] lynxman: it only borrows it ;) [15:21] RoAkSoAx: lucky you [15:21] lynxman: not really... because of that I don't sleep till late nite [15:21] SpamapS: yeah it's given back in October when I don't need it anymore to enjoy summertime :) [15:22] RoAkSoAx: me neither, but I just do it as an anti-farmer protest ;) [15:22] * lynxman joins together memes craftfully [15:22] lynxman: except in summer time when would you rather have more daylight.. when you've just awakened, or near sunset ... [15:23] SpamapS: hmm fair point [15:24] hm? I prefer light int he morning, thank you [15:25] night time should be dark. Lit by xmas lights. [15:25] hallyn: even if it wakes you up? [15:25] * hallyn for a moment relives college :) [15:25] lynxman: because it wakes me up [15:25] you know. at 8am. feh [15:25] You're talking to someone who doesn't get out of bed before 10AM [15:25] hallyn: that's too soon [15:25] lol [15:25] Unfortunately... my child/wife/alarm clock wake me up long before the sun threatens to do so naturally [15:25] twb: how does that feel? [15:26] all right, ubuntu desktop cd is still hanging on partman [15:26] Now, OK, it is 2:30AM and I am in the office [15:26] But that is not the point [15:26] vmbuilder to the rescue [15:26] "The datacenter!?, what is it?!" ... "Its a dank dark dungeon filled with servers and star wars fans, but thats not important right now." [15:27] it crowd? [15:27] Adaptation of Airplane! [15:27] (sounds like leslie nielsen) [15:27] ok [15:27] I liked when they gave her "the internet" in a box [15:27] i figured it crowd had an airplane moment [15:27] 'DONT DROP IT' [15:27] hello [15:27] Airplane was awesome [15:28] SpamapS: I've heard people get lost in datacenters... then they come back as deformed creatures after years of roaming through the cabling... [15:28] It's rebadged in .au, so when it was last on the telly I was watching for an hour going "this seems a lot like Airplane..." [15:28] twb: haha doh! [15:29] hm,e how does one have vmbuilder write to a lvm partition... [15:29] need help please, i can not install virtual box [15:29] Admittedly at that point I had only read the script on usenet, not actually seen the film [15:29] can you help please? [15:29] ua: that's not part of Ubuntu; it would be better to talk to your vendor (Oracle)... [15:30] virtualbox isn't part of Ubuntu? [15:30] virtualbox-ose - x86 virtualization solution - base binaries [15:30] * SpamapS has never tried to run it on Ubuntu so I'm actually curious [15:30] http://paste.debian.net/110739/ [15:31] spamaps>sorry i didn't understand what you mean [15:34] Ah, mea culpa [15:34] I forgot there was an open source "edition" [15:35] ua: you probably want virtualbox-ose, which is 4.0 in natty, but not before [15:36] twb>yes thank you, i tested now, it seems working [15:36] Daviey: ok so I was thinking we can ship two powernap-eucalyptus configs. One for when in powersave and the other for when in any other action method. The one for powersave would be default and will only have a [ProcessMonitor] for kvm, while the one for any other action method will have a [ProcessMonitor] for /sbin/init [15:36] may be i've to restart [15:37] Daviey: they can be installed in /usr/share/eucalyptus/ and the default either symlinked or copied to /etc/powernap/config.d/ [15:39] twb>can you tell me how could i inscrease the size of/boot?thank you [15:40] ua: you probably can't [15:41] Usually if /boot is its own partition, it'll be a simple primary partition, with another partition immediately after it [15:41] In theory it could be on LVM, in which case you can lvextend [15:42] If /boot is just part of your normal root filesystem, you can delete other stuff, and/or extend that partition. But if you're complaining, this is probably not the case [15:42] Note that vbox images probably don't belong in /boot -- /srv/vm would make more sense [15:47] twb>i've given 32Mb for /boot witch is own partition, but not it's full, that's why i'd like to increase it or purge somefiles ... [15:49] New bug: #734984 in debian-installer (main) "Ubuntu server Natty listening to port 953 in tcp and tcp6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/734984 [15:50] i've given 32Mb for ( /boot) witch is it own partition, for now boot patition is full, that's why i'd like to increase it or purge somefiles in... [15:51] twb>are you there friend? [15:52] where are you? === erichammond1 is now known as erichammond [16:50] I just setup a new ubuntu 10.04 server and I'm trying to move over some apache virtualhosts. I'm trying to use the default setup where you a2ensite and such. [16:51] so what is your problem? [16:51] My sites show up in etc/apache2/sites-enabled but when I try to go to their url's I only get the "default" [16:51] kpettit: paste an example of the virtualhost [16:51] to http://paste.ubuntu.com [16:52] if I remove the "default" site I can see my first virtualhost and only my first one. It doesn't seem to be paying attention to the ServerName [16:52] it's fustrating becuase same config works on identical ubuntu server. but I think that one is ubuntu 9.10. I'll paste... [16:53] http://paste.ubuntu.com/580658/ [16:53] maybe you copied something that is connected to the old machine [16:53] only this? [16:53] It's odd becuase if I remove the default it will show this domain's settings, but only this one. Like it's only going to show the first virtualhost or something [16:53] and other virtualhosts are set as? [16:54] yes, he serves the first working match [16:54] exactly same as the one I paste except the domain name and directory are different. I've got 3-4 of them on there [16:54] kpettit: and you are trying to access to http://www.setuplinux.com [16:54] ? [16:54] yes. [16:54] uhm [16:55] Right now if you go there it goes to the "default" with is a hello world. It doesn't pay attention to my virtualhost file unless I remove "default". [16:55] If I remove the "default" then it only pays attention to the next virtualhost in line for all the other virtualdomains. [16:56] http://paste.ubuntu.com/580663/ [16:57] this is a copy of the ports.conf which has the "NameVirtualHost" directive and such. I also put in the "default" virtualhost file. [16:57] everithing is correct... [16:57] uhm [16:58] yeah that's what I figured. Haven't had a issue where it only ever paid attention to one virtual host unless I hadn't set the NameVirtualHost directive or something, but it's there so I'm a confused. [16:58] let's verify something [16:58] It's a default brandnew install with updates as of this morning. [16:58] ls -la /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ [16:58] in mine, I deleted the default one [16:58] ls -la /etc/apache2/sites-available/ [16:58] so we can check [16:58] It shows 000-default and my www.setuplinux.com and other sites. === JayFo is now known as JFo [17:00] I just verified it's not a permission thing. [17:01] tail -n 50 /var/log/apache2/error.log [17:01] ? === jj-afk is now known as jjohansen [17:04] it's something to do with the namevirtualhost directive not working right. [17:04] maybe you do not need to add NameVirtualHost *:80 a second time [17:04] I did and one of the virtualhosts worked. [17:05] but another one didn't so I'm checking on that. [17:05] i've some vhosts with namevirtualhost specified, other not [17:07] it should be a generic thing that you only need to specifiy once [17:08] kpettit: why you specified on serveralias the same thing is specified on servername? [17:09] i got it wokring. [17:09] for whatever reason it didn't like everything being in different files. I copied and pasted all my virtualhosts in the one "default" config and it works [17:10] I have no idea why it works in one config rather than having them in the seperate configs like is supposed to be the default [17:10] the default is with different configs [17:10] I have mine in 12 different files [17:10] because it includes sites-enabled/* [17:10] some files have more than on vhost line, most have one [17:10] what I mean by "default" is the file /etc/apache/sites-available/default [17:11] you shouldn't use sites-available [17:11] but sites-enabled [17:11] for whatever reason on this one my different virtualhosts config files weren't looked at. But I put them all in the one file and it works fine [17:11] sites-available is ignored :) [17:12] that same line is still in there and it works fine. [17:12] so it wasn't causing it to fail. [17:12] cause default is symlinked to sites-enabled [17:12] odd [17:13] patdk-wk, yeah I had them all in sites-available and there were symlinked to sites-enabled using the a2ensite commandline [17:13] ah [17:13] it would only look at one file. If I removed default it wouldn't only look at the next virtualhost and not any others [17:13] I just ignore sites-available completely [17:14] yeah, I normally do that. I was just trying to follow more the standard on Ubuntu. [17:14] seems way too confusing for what I do, to have them doubled up in two directories [17:14] no biggie. [17:15] I like the idea behind it. It's nice when having lots of virtualhosts so you can turn on/off easy. But didn't work for me this time around [17:24] kpettit: the apache2.conf is set at default? no customizations at all? [17:25] remix_tj, yes. It was a default install as of 2 hours ago [17:25] âñåì ïðèâåò [17:25] åñòü æëàíèå ïîìî÷ íóáó? [17:26] NidHelp6092: as far as i can see you're doing a pretty UTF-8 test case. [17:26] (((( [17:27] kpettit: putting everything in a file works? [17:28] yes [17:29] kpettit: the name of that file? [17:29] /sites-available/default [17:29] I just put all my stuff in the "default" file. [17:30] my 3 domains are up and running now. All seems well. not sure why having them in the different files didn't work. [17:30] kpettit: try grep sites-enabled /etc/apache2/apache2.conf [17:30] let's take a look to the config [17:31] Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ [17:31] with * at the end? [17:31] I know it was looking in the directory becuase if I removed "default" and added my own it worked as well. But it only ever looked at the first file it found. NOt any others [17:31] no, it's just like I pasted [17:32] kpettit: try replacing with this [17:32] Shoudl it have a * at the end? [17:32] Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/[^.#]* [17:32] mine doesn't [17:33] my old server doen't either. I'll give it a try here in a bit though. [17:35] kpettit: also my lucid server does not [17:36] kpettit: this is an example of my working vhost on a single file [17:36] http://paste.ubuntu.com/580673/ [17:37] is not much different than yours.. [17:37] that hosed me up. I'm not sure what's happening with that. Have to role back. [17:41] usually apache is very straight forward for me. Oh well, it's all working now. [17:45] thanks for the help remix_tj [17:45] :-) [17:57] Hello [18:04] * RoAkSoAx is off to lunch [18:05] I'm having some problems with a static ip on an ubuntu server. I have configured the network in /etc/network/interfaces and double checked it against other servers on the same subnet (but with another IP off course). When I run "/etc/init.d/networking restart" I get an SIOCADDRT: No such process and the interface fails to come up [18:05] Any idea what could be causing this error? [18:05] dhcp works just fine [18:06] TKsw: maybe pastebin you interfaces file [18:06] TKsw: ifconfig -a and cat /etc/network/interfaces, please :-) [18:06] do *not* paste that stuff in here [18:06] no no [18:07] Just have to get a dhcp adress and then ssh :P [18:13] http://pastebin.com/CDDmHbPp [18:17] Anyone here configured a samba share to have password authentication? [18:21] per user? or per share? [18:23] Anyone has any clue what my network problem could be? :P [18:24] TKsw: remove this two lines [18:24] network xxx.xxx.102.0 [18:24] broadcast xxx.xxx.103.255 [18:25]