[06:34] <perscitus> Anyone here?
[09:22] <acarpine> morning everyone!
[09:22] <acarpine> Reporting a bug with apport it doesn't show any duplicate.
[09:22] <acarpine> Anyway I queried launchpad by myself and I found a bug with the same summary of what I was reporting.
[09:23] <acarpine> This bug has been reported only 15 hours ago
[09:25] <acarpine> This behavior should be considered an error?
[09:30] <acarpine> What use apport (or lp?) to decide if a bug is 'similar' to another bug?
[15:33] <serfus> the word "launchpad" in the second line directs to a non exist page
[15:33] <serfus> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[15:40] <hggdh> serfus, corrected, thank you
[15:40] <hggdh> er, corrected-ing, still saving
[15:41] <serfus> great :-)
[15:43] <hggdh> we listen. We may just be a bit slow on responding ;-)
[15:54] <patrickmw> bdmurray: I have bug questions for you.  Let me know when have some time to talk
[15:54] <bdmurray> patrickmw: now is a fine time
[15:55] <patrickmw> bug 712101
[15:55] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 712101 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "Ubiquity slideshow is crammed with Traditional Chinese (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/712101
[15:55] <patrickmw> the status states its tracked in Natty
[15:55] <bdmurray> yep
[15:56] <patrickmw> but, which status do I change to get it looked at. The root level, or natty level?
[15:56] <patrickmw> I hope that made sense
[15:57] <bdmurray> the natty one is the task for ubuntu
[15:57] <bdmurray> the other one is for the project
[15:58] <patrickmw> I'ts still new and unassigned, what's the best way to get the "owners" to look at it?  I can't change the importance, its disabled
[16:01] <bdmurray> well dylan is subscribed to it so he should be getting emails about it
[16:01] <bdmurray> comment 5 leads on to believe that there is a different bug that might be related
[16:02] <bdmurray> I'd ask him for more information about that bug or go searching for it
[16:02] <bdmurray> does that help?
[16:02] <patrickmw> Yes. I'm just using this bug as an example.  I was just thinking in general too.
[16:02] <bdmurray> well, in general set it to triaged and assign it an importance
[16:02] <patrickmw> bug 712124
[16:03] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 712124 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "Korean translations do not match test case (affects: 1) (heat: 95)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/712124
[16:03] <patrickmw> here's another example
[16:03] <patrickmw> where it was triaged at the project level, targeted to Natty with out changing the status or assignments
[16:05] <patrickmw> I know its low in importance, but I just want to make sure it still has visibility as a Natty work item
[16:06] <bdmurray> translation bugs are sort of a special case - I'd check with David Planella he is on the Canonical community team and deals with translations
[16:09] <patrickmw> bdmurray: bug 728810
[16:09] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 728810 in software-center (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "software-center crashed with IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error (affects: 1) (heat: 304)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728810
[16:09] <patrickmw> almost done :)
[16:10] <patrickmw> another example of the being was targeted to Natty, made public, but then remained new and unassigned
[16:12] <patrickmw> do I have the authority to confirm my own bugs?  I've just noticed a lot of bugs get half-way triaged
[16:12] <bdmurray> patrickmw: in my mind that bug is incomplete.  where is the traceback?
[16:12] <bdmurray> patrickmw: no one should have somebody else set their bug to confirmed / triaged
[16:12] <patrickmw> I agree
[16:13] <patrickmw> if this bug was really incomplete, it should've been marked that way?
[16:14] <bdmurray> Well, Gary is a software center developer so he might know something I don't.
[16:15] <patrickmw> do you know that just because of experience, or is that documented some where in LP?
[16:15] <patrickmw> I don't see it
[16:15] <bdmurray> Both!
[16:15] <patrickmw> are you going by the comment?
[16:16] <bdmurray> no, you'd need to click overview
[16:16] <bdmurray> then look at the change logs
[16:16] <bdmurray> and in the maverick one you see his name
[16:16] <bdmurray> so that's a big stretch
[16:17] <patrickmw> I see Aaron and Michael as the last Natty committers, would those not be the same people to ask?
[16:17] <patrickmw> why maverick?
[16:17] <bdmurray> that's just where his name happened to appear
[16:18] <bdmurray> We were trying to find out how I know Gary is a software center dev right?
[16:19] <patrickmw> haha, I guess so.  Really I just want to know how to find the best people to contact per project.  But it seems like its on a per project basis
[16:19] <bdmurray> I'm really pretty sure it's complete and I'd just check with Gary.
[16:19] <patrickmw> I'm using bugs as examples ;)
[16:19] <bdmurray> er pretty sure its incomplete
[16:21] <patrickmw> bdmurray, thanks for answering my questions.  Just trying to find more resourceful ways to contact the right people.  You gave me some new things to check
[16:22] <bdmurray> patrickmw: looking at the changelog is a good way to find out who is familiar with a piece of software
[16:23] <bdmurray> patrickmw: oh there is this too https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperResponsibilities
[16:23] <bdmurray> patrickmw: that is a bit out of date though
[16:24] <Abhijit> hello all
[16:26] <bdmurray> Abhijit: hello
[16:26] <Abhijit> bdmurray, how are you doiing?
[16:28] <bdmurray> good
[17:22] <patrickmw> jibel: could you please provide feedback on bug 723898 ?
[17:22] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 723898 in evolution (Ubuntu Natty) (and 2 other projects) "a11y support removed for ETable objects (affects: 1) (heat: 161)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/723898
[17:26] <jibel> patrickmw, hi
[17:26] <jibel> patrickmw, done
[17:27] <patrickmw> jibel ty
[17:27] <seb128> jibel: he asked for feedback, dumping that on our team is not feedback :p
[17:28] <seb128> oh it was already assigned, ignore that ;-)
[17:28] <jibel> seb128, I even remove the assignment :-)
[23:35] <hackerlittle> hi
[23:35] <hackerlittle> give me good server