| porthose | a little OT but worth mentioning http://ourfriendsinjapan.com/index.php | 04:26 |
|---|---|---|
| wejaeger | Hey, anyone up for reviewing http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/l2tp-ipsec-vpn and http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon | 04:51 |
| ScottK | wejaeger: You know it's after feature freeze and we aren't, except with very limited exceptions accepting new packages right now? | 05:06 |
| wejaeger | ScottK: I did not know that, so I better try to get the package into the next ubuntu version ? | 05:18 |
| ScottK | wejaeger: Yes. Even better to try and get it into Debian and it will automatically be in the next Ubuntu version. | 05:18 |
| ScottK | mentors.debian.net is much like REVU for Ubuntu. | 05:19 |
| micahg | ScottK, does phatch need a release ACK? | 06:12 |
| === Amaranth__ is now known as Amaranth | ||
| nivan | !seen jelmer | 11:06 |
| ubottu | I have no seen command | 11:06 |
| directhex | who are you, mortal, who seeks the mighty jelmer? | 11:08 |
| nivan | hi directhex, I'm looking for some guidance on submitting a change to lp:gnome-session. I understand it's just a mirror of the upstream git repository. Where should I submit my changes? | 11:19 |
| directhex | nivan, gnome-session seems heavily ubuntu'd in ubuntu, so launchpad is probably the right place. | 11:20 |
| nivan | jelmer told me to send it to the 'packaging branch'. I don't know what the packaging branch is. | 11:22 |
| tumbleweed | nivan: lp:ubuntu/gnome-session. wiki.ubuntu.com/UDD | 11:22 |
| directhex | lp:ubuntu/gnome-session | 11:24 |
| nivan | thanks guys | 11:30 |
| geser | nivan: ask the guys in #ubuntu-desktop how they prefer it as they also have their own branches | 11:41 |
| geser | lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-session/ubuntu | 11:41 |
| geser | and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Bzr on how to use those branches | 11:42 |
| nivan | geser: thanks, will give that a try | 11:46 |
| matttbe | Hello, | 11:59 |
| matttbe | I want to update Cairo-Dock version in Ubuntu Natty. I've proposed a branch for merging and I've opened a new bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo-dock/+bug/723994 before the FF but this version is still not available on Ubuntu Natty... | 11:59 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 723994 in cairo-dock (Ubuntu) "FFe: Please update Cairo-Dock to 2.3.0~0rc1 version" [Wishlist,New] | 11:59 |
| matttbe | What can I do? | 11:59 |
| matttbe | A member of Ubuntu-Sponsoring team said to me: "the merges proposed still have the issue of missing the pristine tarball, which you could get anyone in #ubuntu-motu to help you get fixed." but I don't understand why there is an issue because when I launch "uscan --verbose" command, I see the new tarball! | 12:00 |
| matttbe | I've also tagged the upstream branch (lp:cairo-dock-core and lp:cairo-dock-plug-ins) and added two new series: lp:cairo-dock-core/2.3 and lp:cairo-dock-plug-ins/2.3 | 12:01 |
| matttbe | I've tried this command: bzr merge-upstream --version 2.3.0~0rc1 lp:cairo-dock-core -r tag:2.3.0~0rc1 --distribution=natty | 12:02 |
| matttbe | but it didn't work :-/ | 12:02 |
| tumbleweed | matttbe: you need to provide the tarball | 12:10 |
| tumbleweed | uscan --download-current-version --rename --destdir .. <- that normally does the trick | 12:10 |
| ScottK | micahg: It's just a bug fix, AFAIK. | 12:22 |
| matttbe | tumbleweed: thank you and sorry for the delay, I had an annoying paper jam with an old printer... | 12:38 |
| matttbe | tumbleweed: when I launch this command, this is what I have: uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version 2.3.0~0rc1 in watch line | 12:40 |
| matttbe | but this is what I have with uscan --verbose: -- Found the following matching hrefs: | 12:42 |
| matttbe | http://launchpad.net/cairo-dock-core/2.3/2.3.0-0rc1/+download/cairo-dock-2.3.0~0rc1.tar.gz | 12:42 |
| matttbe | (...) Newest version on remote site is 2.3.0.~0rc1, local version is 2.3.0~0rc1 | 12:42 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Ubuntu: 2 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/2) | 12:42 |
| matttbe | is it because there is a ~ in the versionning? | 12:42 |
| Rhonda | What's the watchfile? | 12:43 |
| matttbe | version=3 | 12:43 |
| matttbe | https://launchpad.net/cairo-dock-core/+download .*/cairo-dock-([\d\.\-]+)(~.*)?.tar.gz | 12:43 |
| Rhonda | That's all, no opts with any mangle thing? | 12:44 |
| matttbe | no :-/ | 12:44 |
| Rhonda | So shall the ~0rc1 be part of the version, actually? | 12:46 |
| Rhonda | Try .*/cairo-dock-([\d\.\-]+(~.*)?).tar.gz instead | 12:46 |
| Rhonda | i.e. taking the (~.*)? into the other bracked instead of having it after it | 12:46 |
| Rhonda | Potential that also should be a (?:~.*)? so that it isn't put into a variable. | 12:47 |
| matttbe | this is what I have with .*/cairo-dock-([\d\.\-]+(~.*)?).tar.gz: Newest version on remote site is 2.3.0~0rc1.~0rc1 | 12:50 |
| Rhonda | (?:~.*)? | 12:52 |
| matttbe | Rhonda: should be better :) => Newest version on remote site is 2.3.0~0rc1, local version is 2.3.0~0rc1 | 12:54 |
| matttbe | => Package is up to date | 12:54 |
| matttbe | Rhonda: thank you :) | 12:55 |
| === apachelogger is now known as apachelogger_ | ||
| === apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger__ | ||
| === apachelogger__ is now known as apachelogger___ | ||
| === apachelogger___ is now known as apachelogger | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === ogra is now known as Guest53848 | ||
| === Guest53848 is now known as ogra_ | ||
| === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === zul_ is now known as zul | ||
| === itnet7_ is now known as itnet7 | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === ogra is now known as Guest64155 | ||
| === Guest64155 is now known as ogra_ | ||
| fabrice_sp | slangasek, Hi. After your update of the expat package, gnome-commander FTBFS (see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-commander/1.2.8.10-3build1/+buildjob/2327761/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-i386.gnome-commander_1.2.8.10-3build1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ). It seems to be linked to the multiarch change you did. What should I change to the gnome-commander package to make it buildable? | 21:16 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] | 21:16 |
| slangasek | fabrice_sp: hi, thanks for the ping - let me have a look at the log | 21:17 |
| slangasek | fabrice_sp: some package that gnome-commander build-depends on which ships a .la file includes a wrong reference to libexpat.la; that package (which I'm looking up now) needs rebuilt, but it should also do something like the clean-la.mk target from gnome-pkg-tools | 21:18 |
| fabrice_sp | slangasek, oh, I missed that | 21:18 |
| slangasek | fabrice_sp: it appears to be /usr/lib/libexiv2.la that's to blame | 21:30 |
| slangasek | so exiv2 needs at minimum a rebuild, and ideally a fix to clear out its dependency_libs field in that .la file | 21:31 |
| fabrice_sp | slangasek, thanks for looking. At it's in main, I'll open a bug report with that. Thanks! | 21:36 |
| fabrice_sp | s/at/as | 21:36 |
| slangasek | fabrice_sp: I'd be happy to review a patch that add support for the .la file cleanup, if you want to prepare one | 21:36 |
| slangasek | otherwise I can trigger a no-change rebuild now-ish | 21:36 |
| slangasek | (currently I have my hands full figuring out why gcj doesn't actually work now) | 21:37 |
| fabrice_sp | slangasek, I'll have a look at the patch for .la cleanup (no hurry for the rebuild of exiv2, now that the origin of the FTBFS is clear) | 21:38 |
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| slangasek | fabrice_sp: I'm out of the woods now with gcj and ldconfig; I don't see a bug yet regarding exiv2, should I have a look at this? | 23:16 |
| === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!