=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team (Chromium too!): | Firefox 4.0rc1 in Firefox Beta PPA 9.10-10.10 http://is.gd/f6TM4 | Seamonkey 2.0.12 in http://is.gd/dsudW needs testing | Firefox 3.6.15/Thunderbird 3.1.8 in Stable Releases  | Report Mozilla PPA bugs here: http://is.gd/hdZc1
=== silvery is now known as stupid
=== stupid is now known as silvery
[13:06] <jdstrand> fta2: thanks, it looks like something in gnome libraries changed
[13:07] <jdstrand> fta2: I say it with some other gnome apps as well
[13:45] <fta2> jdstrand, what is status "m"?
[13:45] <jdstrand> allow PROT_EXEC with mmap(2) calls
[13:45] <fta2> oh, ok
[13:45] <jdstrand> it is the multiarch stuff added to eglibc
[13:45] <jdstrand> I am working on it now (new in ubuntu6)
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
[16:15] <micahg> chrisccoulson, with multiarch landing, can we build plugin-container as a separate i386 package?
[16:15] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i think it's probably more complicated than that
[16:22] <micahg> chrisccoulson, after the comments in -devel, I don't see it happening this cycle, but maybe next time :)
[16:49] <fta> dpm, uhuh, 16144 strings from lp landed upstream
[16:49] <fta> dpm, for 26 langs: http://paste.ubuntu.com/581679/
[16:50] <dpm> 16K ??? we should blog about it!!
[16:50] <dpm> that's excellent!
[16:51] <fta> i will write something, hoping to boost the other 30 langs ;)
[16:53] <dpm> brilliant
[16:53] <dpm> I'll see if I do a quick one as well
[16:54] <fta> i will also explain how other dists could enable those
[16:54] <fta> as it's only a subset of the strings lp collected
[17:03] <micahg> chrisccoulson, bug 736847, seems like the dir path for xulrunner isn't following the 1.x.x pattern
[17:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 736847 in couchdb "/usr/bin/couchjs crashes with /usr/lib/xulrunner-2.0/ libmozjs.so dir" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/736847
[17:04] <chrisccoulson> oops
[17:04] <chrisccoulson> heh
[17:04] <chrisccoulson> there will be a few more like that
[17:11] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: ping
[17:11] <chrisccoulson> hi m_conley
[17:11] <chrisccoulson> i'm doing it now ;)
[17:12] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: took the words right out of my mouth.  :)
[17:12] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: thanks!
[17:12] <chrisccoulson> heh
[17:12] <chrisccoulson> m_conley, do you know if thunderbird is going to be adopting a release process similar to firefox? ;)
[17:13] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: hm - not sure if we're doing the short release cycle.  I know we're going to have to modify the way we do builds to work off the right mozilla-central branches though.
[17:13] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: all arcane build stuff that's probably driving our build engineers a little batty.  :)
[17:13] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i was trying to think how it would work
[17:14] <fta> chrisccoulson, what will be the default emailer in natty? evo or tb?
[17:15] <chrisccoulson> fta - oh, for natty, it's still evo. it's far too late in the cycle to change the default mail client ;)
[17:15] <fta> ok
[17:16] <fta> i don't mind either way. but i use evo, and i find its support in ubuntu is close to zero, and upstream is, well, not very receptive
[17:16] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i find that too
[17:59] <m_conley> fta: I'm working hard at making TB work nicely with Ubuntu.  Not in time for Natty, unfortunately, but soon!
[19:48] <fta> micahg, jdstrand:  linux/stable (10.0.648.134 -> 10.0.648.151)
[20:22] <fta> jdstrand, how come i need to build with -fPIC on maverick but not on natty when i use PIE?
[20:34] <jdstrand> fta: not sure. you might ask kees-- he is way more familiar with this than I
[20:36] <fta> ok, i will, next occasion. enough crashes & ftbfs for today for me
[20:37] <fta> jcastro, btw, i have the bug <soreau> talked about (empty wallpaper with just a cursor)
[20:38] <jcastro> fta: any idea where it is in launchpad?
[20:39] <fta> jcastro, i mentioned it in u-d a few hours ago, i've been ignored. i mentioned it weeks ago to didrocks, he said it's known but noone is able to reproduce it, pitti confirmed
[20:39] <fta> it happens to me very often
[20:39] <fta> each reboot, and most re-login
[20:39] <fta> but each time, the crash file is almost empty
[20:40] <micahg> fta, ACK
[20:41] <fta> micahg, seems to be just about blacklisted https certs
[20:41] <micahg> fta, yeah, I'm not sure if we want to do an upload just for that, but I'll check with jdstrand
[20:42] <fta> micahg, i need to ship the arm fix for the SIGILL on some board
[20:42] <fta> +s
[20:43] <micahg> fta, ah, hmm, ok, still don't know if that's worth pushing an upgrade to everyone
[20:43]  * micahg -> brb 15 min
[20:51] <fta> jcastro, if you find a bug # for this particular issue, please Cc me to it. it's really annoying
[20:51] <fta> i just see a sig 11, but no crash file or log of any kind :(
[20:52] <jcastro> If I see it
[20:52] <jcastro> I don't get crashers, I only get the occasional invisible box of death
[20:54] <fta> i get it on my 2 main desktops
[20:54] <fta> 32 and 64
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
[21:12] <micahg> fta, so, the chromium update doesn't look like something we'd want to push through -security, you're free to push through -proposed, -updates if you like (target {lucid,maverick}-proposed),  otherwise, you can just upload to natty, or skip it
[21:13] <fta> well, skipping is fine for me, it's just feeding the chrome is more up-to-date trolls
[21:14] <micahg> yeah, well, we can't push through every feel good release through -security, we don't do it for firefox/thunderbird either (case in point TB 3.1.9 wasn't pushed)
[21:15] <fta> the stable ppa will have it anyway, and at each release, it's getting more subscribers; those who can't wait the few days of the QA checks
[21:15] <micahg> fta, thanks for the heads up though!
[21:15]  * micahg needs to push thunderbird to thunderbird-stable....
[23:16] <loltoad> Hi!, when i dump the cookies.sqlite, i don't get all of the cookies i can see in the browser's cookie manager. I belive these are session cookies... how do i extract all of them?