[01:15] jcastro, another crasher: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::StaticCairoText::UpdateTexture() [08:26] Hi folks, I'm using debs from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily, which still have the version as 4.0b13pre. This is causing a bit of confusion (see https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/Firemacs/pull/7), does anyone here know whether these builds will come with a version >= 4.0 anytime soon? Or should I switch to the ppa at http://is.gd/f6TM4? Cheers. [08:48] viraldiego, whenever the version on mozilla-central changes [08:52] Ok thanks, so I'm guessing that'd be around the time of the final 4.0 release is that correct? [08:57] chrisccoulson, didn't it already switch to an RC? [08:57] magcius, no, that was done on the mozilla-2.0 branch [08:58] chrisccoulson, ah. [08:58] chrisccoulson, I assume that's stable, whereas -central is still dev? [08:58] * magcius would have figured that -central would have version bumped after RC. [08:58] magcius, yeah. we're going to rename the firefox-4.0 packages in the PPA to firefox-trunk, and that will make it clear that they are always coming from mozilla-central [08:59] (and will avoid having to rename them every few weeks too) [09:00] chrisccoulson, why not 'mozilla-cenrtal'? [09:00] er, central [09:00] oh wait, firefox != xulrunner [09:00] * magcius is always annoyed at that [09:00] maybe, but that's a bit of a long name [09:01] firefox-mozilla-central ;) [09:01] firefox-hg ? [09:01] hmmm, that could mean any of the 4 branches in http://people.mozilla.com/~sayrer/2011/temp/process.html then [09:02] I saw that article. [09:02] chrisccoulson, noticed the 3.6 packages from that ppa still have the "pre" suffix, does that mean the 4.0 packages will also keep the "pre" suffix forever? [09:02] yeah, it's going to be a lot of fun keeping up with that [09:03] Are 'release channels' being managed in terms of hg branches? [09:03] hg branches are terrible. [09:03] viraldiego, in the daily PPA, yes. [09:03] magcius, i assume so [09:03] they would need to be, to be able to merge changes in from fx-beta [09:05] chrisccoulson, am I right to assume then that that daily ppa, will never come with a version number > 4.0 (because 4.0b | 4.0pre < 4.0)? [09:05] viraldiego, it will have whatever is in mozilla-central [09:05] so it will become 5.0~ something soon [09:13] chrisccoulson, thanks for your help I'll check mozilla-central and ask in the firefox mailing lists [09:14] viraldiego, what exactly are you trying to find out? [09:16] chrisccoulson, there's an addon that uses an appversion flag in the chrome.manifest and it's set to "appversion > 4", which doesn't work on my version (4.0b13pre) [09:16] no, it won't [09:16] but, what do you want to ask? [09:17] The maintainer of that addon was asking me why I sent him a pull request if firefox rc1 already comes with version 4.0 [09:17] So I was just wondering whether it was worth him pulling my change or not, if the nightly builds are going to stay as 4.0pre for a while then it's probably worth it [09:18] no, it's not worth it [09:18] it will change soon [09:18] anyway, i have to disappear now [09:18] Alright, that's good to know, cheers === debfx_ is now known as debfx [18:56] hey! I'm back!! :D [20:48] [reed]: ping [20:49] [reed]: I opened FF 3.6, updated a few addons, restarted the browser, and now its stuck in a state where it asks to restart FF to finish updates :\ [20:49] <[reed]> BUGabundo: pong [20:50] <[reed]> BUGabundo: in your firefox profile directory, what files do you have that start with "extensions." [20:51] ~/.mozilla/firefox/3.6SSD$ ls extensions* | pastebinit [20:51] http://paste.ubuntu.com/582642/ [20:51] [reed]: ^^^^^ [20:52] I also get a pop up on startup about lang packs updates [20:52] canceling the updates on the addons individually seems to enable them back on the next startup [20:52] <[reed]> BUGabundo: delete extensions.cache, extensions.ini and extensions.rdf [20:52] * BUGabundo is scared [20:52] <[reed]> (while firefox is shutdown) [20:52] <[reed]> and start it back up [20:53] <[reed]> (you can save them) [20:53] * BUGabundo moves [20:53] <[reed]> backups, ftw [20:53] I have a btrfs snapshot of last week [20:53] before I went to lisbon on work/vacations :P [20:53] just booted the machine [20:53] so backup is fresh :) [20:55] [reed]: no fix. addons still show it requires it to restart [20:56] <[reed]> why are you using 3.6 anyway? [20:56] <[reed]> :p [20:56] meh.... I *was* going to start a new FF4 profile this week [20:56] I was on 3.6 because some of my critical addons weren't upgraded yet [20:56] but I think most of them already are [20:56] still, don't want to be left with a non working profile [20:57] it *should* work [20:59] <[reed]> yeah [20:59] <[reed]> not sure [20:59] <[reed]> file a bug? find Mossop on IRC? [20:59] <[reed]> :) [21:01] oh well [21:02] better remove the HOLD on FF, upgrade to 4, create new profiles and install all my addons fresh [21:02] wish me luck [21:10] humm [21:10] so I now can have both FF4 from natty and FF4-trunk from daily PPA? [21:11] are those two diff profiles? [21:11] [reed]: fta: ^^^^^^ [21:11] no idea [21:11] or should daily ppa natty rename the package from firefox-4.0 to firefox ? [21:12] i'm no longer involved in those [21:12] yeah I know [21:12] but u know the daily PPAs better then anyone else [21:26] * BUGabundo starts a new FF4 profile and changes *all* mouse click options to the oposite [21:26] [reed]: do you guys really like the mouse click defaults? [21:26] why can't I double click to select a partial url? [21:27] <[reed]> gnome HID stuff or some such, iirc? [21:27] <[reed]> I dunno [21:27] <[reed]> you can change it [21:27] <[reed]> it's a config setting [21:28] I know [21:28] I just did [21:28] *all* of them [21:28] its like they are all the oposite of what I want [21:28] :\ [21:55] [reed]: how do we contact devs to upgrade their addons ? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/long-url-please/ [21:56] <[reed]> Need help with this add-on? [21:56] <[reed]> E-mail your question [21:56] <[reed]> e-mail the guy ;) [21:57] ok [21:59] sent [22:10] [reed], still a bugzilla dev?