[00:29] <apachelogger> ari-tczew: yeah, though I am going on vacation soon
[00:29] <ari-tczew> apachelogger: enjoy :)
[01:16] <hyperair> ari-tczew: pong
[01:17] <hyperair> hmm segfault on start eh.
[01:17] <hyperair> that sounds bad.
[01:18]  * hyperair schroot's to natty to test
[01:19] <hyperair> hmm it works here
[01:19] <hyperair> maybe it's a plugin. let's try installing all of them
[01:20] <hyperair> nope, it starts up fine too
[01:31] <ari-tczew> hyperair: I have to reboot natty, maybe after updates regression appeared.
[01:38] <hyperair> yeah perhaps
[01:38] <hyperair> ari-tczew: so anyway, didy ou manage to trigger apport?
[01:39] <ari-tczew> hyperair: there was apport notification, but I rejected it. I'll retry it if segfault still is crashing after reboot.
[01:39] <hyperair> okay
[01:40] <hyperair> i think the .crash file should still be around
[01:40] <hyperair> so if you run apport-collect on it, it should work
[01:40] <ari-tczew> hyperair: I won't do reboot right now, no point. I'll run my PC when I'll wake up.
[01:40] <hyperair> alright.
[12:37] <rr0hit> A typo in a patch for istanbul has created a bug in natty. How do i go about settling it?
[12:37] <rr0hit> PS: i dint write the patch
[12:51] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: file a bug against this package
[12:51] <rr0hit> I have, bug 738673
[12:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: can I submit a patch? The typo is absent in source package, but is present in a patch. In that case how should I submit the patch?
[12:53] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, of course! patches always are welcome :)
[12:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: can i first apply existing patches, then create a patch to correct the mistake?
[12:54] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: is this the right way to patch a patch ?
[12:54] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: no, just fix patch where is typo. then create a debdiff
[12:54] <yofel> ari-tczew: it's one of the quilt patches of the package that adds the broken line, how should one fix that?
[12:54] <yofel> ah, just edit it?
[12:54] <ari-tczew> yes
[12:54] <yofel> k
[12:54] <ari-tczew> yofel: do you working on rr0hit's case?
[12:55] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: yes
[12:55] <ari-tczew> okok
[12:55] <ari-tczew> good luck then
[12:55] <yofel> we were debugging this in -bugs, and I wasn't sure how to do this so I advised him to ask here
[12:55] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: how do i edit the patch ? i'm noob here
[12:56] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: grab the source by command 'apt-get source PACKAGENAME' then edit in your favourite text editor :)
[12:56] <ari-tczew> */debian/patches/ this is a path where are patches
[13:02] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: I'll edit just the patch that creates the problem?
[13:02] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes
[13:02] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: after that?
[13:03] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: create a new debian/ubuntu revision in d/changelog by command 'dch -i' and build the source
[13:03] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: how do i get it pushed?
[13:04] <ari-tczew> useful wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems
[13:04] <ari-tczew> !debdiff | rr0hit
[13:44] <rr0hit> ari-tczew, yofel , I have attached a patch to bug 738673. could you just go through it. Does it look allright? First patch !!
[13:49] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: as it's first time, looks good. however, please add (LP: #738673) at the end of sentence in d/changelog.
[13:49] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: also, could you use your real full name and real e-mail?
[13:50] <ari-tczew> on Launchpad you don't need (but it;s preffered) however, in debdiffs we use real stuff
[13:50] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: in the changelog? or do i have to set it somewhere
[13:50] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: use command 'dch -e' and edit
[13:51] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: in future, you can set DEBFULLNAME, let me find something in internet
[13:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: is there a way to delete the submitted patch?
[13:53] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, on launchpad in bug
[13:53] <ari-tczew> on the right side below Subscribers field is Patches field
[13:54] <ari-tczew> click on (edit) next to attached file
[14:01] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: would you like to get to know using Bazaar for patches?
[14:02] <rr0hit> i am behind a proxy and was not able to use bzr
[14:02] <ari-tczew> aha ok
[14:06] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: uploaded the new patch
[14:07] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: now i have to find "sponsors" ?
[14:08] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to bug
[14:08] <ari-tczew> however, I'm one of sponsors :)
[14:08] <ari-tczew> sponsors are developers with upload access
[14:08] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: so u can do it for me?
[14:11] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes
[14:11] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks :)
[14:11] <ari-tczew> just let me finish one thing
[14:12] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: i am out to grab something to eat. will be back in 5 - 10 minutes. My first sponsor :)
[14:12] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: enjoy your meal
[14:22] <ari-tczew> I;ve got a ftbfs: /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:96:1: note: expected 'const char * __restrict__' but argument is of type 'struct _IO_FILE *'
[14:23] <ari-tczew> this line looks that: fprintf (FILE *__restrict __stream, __const char *__restrict __fmt, ...)
[14:23] <ari-tczew> anybody knows how to fix it?
[14:25] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: could you check whether is the same bug reported already in Debian? if no, could you forward your change to Debian?
[14:26] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: alright
[14:27] <geser> ari-tczew: can you pastebin the source code causing this message?
[14:28] <ari-tczew> geser: sure, http://paste.ubuntu.com/582944/
[14:29] <xteejx> Hi all, I know feature freeze is in effect, but would it be possible to get Fold-it into multiverse repo? How is it done?
[14:29] <xteejx> ref: bug 375530
[14:29] <ari-tczew> !FFe | xteejx
[14:30] <xteejx> I thought FF was just bug fixes?
[14:30] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: if you would like to get fixed your full name and e-mail, please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate
[14:30] <xteejx> I'm not worried if it's not until 11.10
[14:31] <ari-tczew> xteejx: bug fixes go without FFe. New upstream releases and new packages need FFe,
[14:31] <xteejx> Ok
[14:31] <ari-tczew> xteejx: if you don't want to spend time on making FFe, you can get in in natty+1.
[14:31] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks..will keep in mind :)
[14:31] <ari-tczew> xteejx: preffered way is get it to Debian first and sync to Ubuntu.
[14:32] <xteejx> Hmm, the problem with fold-it and Debian might be the licensing (there is none AFAIK)
[14:32] <geser> ari-tczew: sorry, no idea
[14:33] <ari-tczew> xteejx: did you try to get it in Debian?
[14:33] <xteejx> ari-tczew: Haven't tried
[14:34] <ari-tczew> xteejx: could you try? :)
[14:34] <xteejx> I'll keep that as a good option I think ;)
[14:34] <xteejx> My packaging skill sare limited so I will do it when I have time :)
[14:34] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: the bug is not reported in debian.
[14:34] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: could you report it and attach your patch?
[14:35] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: k
[14:35] <ari-tczew> thanks!
[14:36] <ari-tczew> geser: but problem is in libc6-dev (binary of eglibc source), not in package which I'm trying to build, right?
[14:37] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: should i submit by mail? i dont see another option
[14:38] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: we have a script 'submittodebian' but I prefer to use just mail.
[14:38] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: i can attach the patch to the mail?
[14:40] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes
[14:40] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: http://paste.ubuntu.com/582950/ please use Subject field as bug title
[14:40] <geser> ari-tczew: not sure, from your pastebin it looks like the arguments got interchanged, but the source code looks ok
[14:41] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks :)
[14:43] <ari-tczew> geser: a piece of source code where it's failling: http://paste.ubuntu.com/582952/
[14:43] <ari-tczew> I'm fixing FTBFS in package gridengine, loads and loads gcc errors
[14:44] <geser> ari-tczew: then I looked at the wrong piece, and this explains the error you get
[14:45] <ari-tczew> geser: yes? do you know resolve it?
[14:45] <ari-tczew> know how to *
[14:45] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: do i need to give a bug description or just refer to the LP bug
[14:45] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yea, just use the same infromation about typo which causes crash
[14:46] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: and in the template, you provided what is the line that starts with *
[14:47] <geser> ari-tczew: does that file get patched? because when I look at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/natty/gridengine/natty/view/head:/source/libs/cull/cull_multitype.c#L105 it looks different (or it this the wrong file to look at?)
[14:49] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: * debian/ ? this is a place where you should copy and paste your entry from d/changelog.
[14:50] <ari-tczew> geser: yes as I said, I'm fixing loads of gcc errors, this is my patch for file cull_multitype.c: http://paste.ubuntu.com/582955/
[14:51] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: http://paste.ubuntu.com/582956/ looks ok?
[14:52] <geser> ari-tczew: ah, your patch is wrong: I assume you want to fix the warning about the missing format string, right?
[14:52] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: not at all: Version: 0.2.2-8
[14:53] <geser> the it should be "fprintf(stderr, "%s", buf)" (the argument order is: where, format, variable)
[14:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: oops
[14:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: anything else?
[14:53] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: paste a link to bug on launchpad
[14:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: right
[14:53] <geser> I guess the same for CRITICAL but check to what it expends first
[14:53] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: attach your patch
[14:53] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: k
[14:54] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: and please about fill Subject field as bug title
[14:54] <ari-tczew> otherwise, looks fine
[14:54] <ari-tczew> geser: I found in google this blog: http://bobthegnome.blogspot.com/2009/07/format-not-string-literal-and-no-format.html
[14:56] <geser> ari-tczew: in that case it's correct, as g_error() doesn't expect a file object as first argument but a format string and then it's variables
[14:56] <ari-tczew> geser: I just used this blog as useful handbook
[14:57] <ari-tczew> and I fixed a lot of warnings, I'll show you patch when it's done.
[14:58] <ari-tczew> geser: current package has got a delta which is workaround for errors, it should be fixed instead making it quiet
[15:02] <ari-tczew> geser: yeah, fixed, thanks!!!
[15:06] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: done. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619028
[15:08] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: could you open a task for Debian and link this bug ^^ to launchpad?
[15:09] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: how do i do that
[15:10] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: "also affects ?"
[15:10] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: also affects distribution
[15:10] <rr0hit> alright
[15:11] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: done
[15:12] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: ok thanks. I'll test your patch.
[15:13] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: :)
[15:19] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: you should choice project Debian, not istanbul upstream
[15:20] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: how do i change
[15:21] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: there is a button to edit project name, but I guess it won't work
[15:22] <ari-tczew> I'll fix it.
[15:23] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: I did Invalid status for upstream istanbul and noticed you opened task on Debian now correctly.
[15:23] <ari-tczew> now I'm going to play with your debdiff.
[15:23] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: yes..
[15:25] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: ah, you forgot to use update-maintainer :)
[15:25] <ari-tczew> and I forgot to point out you for it.
[15:25]  * ari-tczew lunch, afk.
[15:25] <rr0hit> ah..so i ve to correct it in 2 places
[15:26] <rr0hit> :(
[15:26] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: I'll fix it.
[15:26] <ari-tczew> it's 5 sec work.
[15:27] <ari-tczew> but in future remember about it :)
[15:27] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: what about the debian bug
[15:28] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: I'll add Closes: #XXXXX to d/changelog entry.
[15:29] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: in future please attach patch with only needed thing, so entry of d/changelog should not be included since it's wrong for Debian and you included information from d/changelog in e-mail.
[15:31] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: ahh
[15:32] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: so you are correcting my mistakes right?
[15:33] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but I can't fix attached file on BTS. :)
[15:33] <rr0hit> you can add  a separate reply, right?
[15:39] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: yes, but there is no need to additional commenting on debian bug. they know how to cut necessary changes from your debdiff.
[15:40] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: ofcourse they do :)
[16:53] <ari-tczew> geser: how to resolve this line?    chown(fname, myuid, mygid, "%s");
[16:53] <ari-tczew> the same error as previous
[16:56] <ari-tczew> I moved %s everywhere in ( ) but no good result :/
[17:01] <qnix> hi
[17:02] <qnix> How can I get the ImplicitPointerConversions when building in my pbuilder env?
[17:02] <qnix> That way, I could fix them before uploading to launchpad
[17:26] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: are you there?
[17:27] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: i was just checking out istanbul on my debian squeeze installation, (same version 2.2-8), the bug is absent in that package
[17:27] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: isnt that strange?
[17:28] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: well, let's wait for comments on Debian bug.
[17:32] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: thanks for ur help. feels good. fix released. :)
[17:32] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: thank you for patch!
[17:33] <rr0hit> ari-tczew: :)
[17:33] <rr0hit> monday morning physics class now
[17:33] <rr0hit> ahh
[17:34] <ari-tczew> rr0hit: you have uploaded your first package in Ubuntu!
[19:26] <c_korn> does someone know how I can set all packages in a repository to priority standard using reprepro ?
[19:53] <cody-somerville> c_korn, You'll have to use an override file.
[19:55] <cody-somerville> c_korn, You could write a hook to do it whenever a package is added (see man page). Then you could run rerunnotifiers
[19:58] <c_korn> cody-somerville: ok, will give it a try thanks