| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| philinux | Has the nvidia 8600gt been tested ok? | 13:42 |
|---|---|---|
| jibel | yes but a specific setting is required to make it work, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/522588 | 13:54 |
| ubot4` | Launchpad bug 522588 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu Natty) (and 1 other project) "nVidia 8600 GTS needs "NoPowerConnectorCheck" option to work (affects: 5) (heat: 22)" [High,Triaged] | 13:54 |
| xdatap | hi everybody | 16:10 |
| xdatap | Guys, I'm testing Xorg drivers (http://xorg.qa.ubuntu.com). Testcase Case ID: gpr-001 try to remove an icon from Unity bar with drag out. It doesn't works anymore, the icon stay on the bar. Is it a new feature or a new bug? :) | 16:12 |
| xdatap | jibel, Hi ^^ | 16:12 |
| jibel | hi xdatap | 16:13 |
| jibel | if your test doesn't match the test case then it is a bug | 16:14 |
| xdatap | jibel, I was wondring if it was a bug on the testacase instead on the Unity | 16:16 |
| xdatap | jibel, *wondering | 16:16 |
| jibel | xdatap, it works fine here. So it's a bug with unity. | 16:18 |
| jibel | hi patrickmw | 16:18 |
| xdatap | jibel, ok | 16:18 |
| xdatap | jibel, thanks | 16:18 |
| patrickmw | hi, jibel | 16:18 |
| jibel | mvo, hi, | 16:21 |
| jibel | mvo, patrickmw and myself were wondering if you figured out how to test buttons in webkit view like those in software-center ? | 16:22 |
| mvo | jibel_: sorry for the late reply, I was in a call. well, we dropped the webkit in s-c. | 17:02 |
| jibel | mvo, there are buttons on the right pane which are not accessible, when you investigate the interface with accerciser all the interfaces are marked as 'not implemented' | 17:08 |
| mvo | oh | 17:08 |
| jibel | mvo, what is it ? | 17:09 |
| mvo | I need to investigate that | 17:09 |
| mvo | well, it should be accessible | 17:09 |
| mvo | its all gtk now in natty | 17:09 |
| mvo | I can have a look after dinner (or tomorrow morning). what buttons in particular? | 17:11 |
| jibel | mvo, you can try this: ldtp.click("frmUbuntuSoftwareCenter", "btnDeveloperTools") | 17:12 |
| jibel | it fails with ldtp.client_exception.LdtpExecutionError: Object does not have an Action interface | 17:12 |
| jibel | mvo, no hurries, bon appétit | 17:12 |
| mvo | thanks | 17:16 |
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| chadadavis | Hi. Can someone tell me if xorg testing should be done on a fresh daily ISO, or if apt-get update is sufficient? | 18:20 |
| fader_ | chadadavis: A fresh update *should* be sufficient for xorg testing | 18:27 |
| fader_ | Though if you've monkeyed with config files or made major changes to your system it might be a good idea to do a fresh install | 18:27 |
| fader_ | (I believe -- if e.g. ara says something different I'll bow to her greater knowledge :) ) | 18:27 |
| fader_ | chadadavis: Whoops, forget I said that -- the wiki page says to do a clean install | 18:28 |
| fader_ | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/ProprietaryDrivers/Natty/WeeklyProgram | 18:28 |
| chadadavis | Thanks for the reply. Makes sense. Should one also generally report which daily ISO was used in test reports. I would imagine that would be significant, since they're updated ... well, daily. | 18:28 |
| chadadavis | Yeah, I remember that bit now, thanks. | 18:29 |
| chadadavis | Are the ATI proprietary driver still on the schedule to be tested, once their released? | 18:29 |
| fader_ | Hmm, it doesn't seem to specify if you need to report what ISO you used, so I'm not sure :/ | 18:30 |
| fader_ | chadadavis: That much I don't know, sorry :) | 18:30 |
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| xdatap | jibel, hello | 22:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!