=== rickspencer3_ is now known as greatcthulu [03:27] hi :) [03:38] ScottK: unfortunately perhaps the one thing I don't like about my current work situation is I can't stand to spend my remaining free hours on computer tasks [03:38] ScottK: though if I did get back to open source work (outside of work) translations probably wouldn't be my first priority [03:38] yuriy: Sure. I can understand how that might be. No problem. If you know any Russian translators looking for a project in need, please pass it on. [03:41] though you certainly have a point. one of the reasons I chose to install Ubuntu on my grandpa's computer was that I was worried about the translations [03:41] though now that I've used it a bit I think it doesn't matter because computer terms just sound ridiculous in russian anyway [04:19] yofel: ping [07:55] shadeslayer: rekonq is the utter broken [07:55] constantly locks up on me [09:03] morning :) [09:04] hola bambee [09:07] * tazz yawns [09:12] * yofel hands tazz some coffee [09:13] * tazz thanks yofel, and pats him on the back. [09:19] shadeslayer: hmm, tab bar still doesn't redraw on rekonq :( [09:28] I'm registering at uds, I don't really know what to choose at: Who is your attendance requested by? [09:28] Canonical I guess? [09:29] afiestas: Kubuntu! [09:30] Riddell: Kubuntu is not in the list [09:30] I can choose "Other" [09:30] Other and then Kubuntu :o? [09:32] "I agree to the video agreement (optional):" "This field is required." who made this thing? [09:32] afiestas: where does it ask Who is your attendance requested by?# [09:32] https://forms.canonical.com/udsreg/ [09:33] oh, not the sponsorship form? http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-o/sponsorship/ [09:35] I thought I had to fill both forms [09:36] I think the other one is for canonical employees [09:39] afiestas: I wouldn't worry about that registration form, I don't know what it's for, the sponsorship is the important one (assuming you'd rather have your attendance paid for and not pay for it yourself) [09:39] interesting, lib6-dbg and eglibc-source are on the livecd [09:40] Riddell: ookz [10:30] Riddell: plasma-widget-networkmanagement still needs testing ? [10:31] bambee: yes please! [10:31] in ppa:jr [10:31] Riddell: ok ;) [10:34] Riddell: yeah we are still testing the patch out before actually commiting it [10:36] hey, got this weird error with kubuntu-default-settings during this morning update: [10:36] http://paste.ubuntu.com/583734/ [10:37] does this ring a bell to someone? [10:37] agateau: yes [10:38] kirkland probably forgot to upload newt [10:41] * shadeslayer is still confused about DBus [10:53] debfx: should I file a bug report | ping kirkland? [10:53] agateau: no, I've already pinged him [10:53] debfx: great, thanks! [11:29] Riddell: thanks, I'll update the headers [11:51] I wonder if I should be worried that bambee hasn't reappeared since testing network manager plasmoid [11:51] lol [11:51] Riddell: probably [11:54] debfx: bug 740124 [11:54] Launchpad bug 740124 in eglibc (Ubuntu Natty) "2.13-0ubuntu8 grew a lot of extra dependencies, causing CD explosion" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/740124 [13:31] Riddell: plasma-widget-networkmanager works just fine here [13:32] I tested it with different networks (wired and wireless) it works [13:33] "" is a new feature ? [13:35] I've seen that hidden network here too, not sure what it's supposed to be (form to connect to hidden SSID? wasn't that broken?) [13:37] as for the mobile part - it fetches the information from m-b-i fine here and set's up the connection settings. The connection itself fails though. From syslog I assume it's a modem-manager issue in my case. wvdial works fine though [13:39] bambee: oh phew, I was getting worried when you hadn't appeared back online :) [13:40] Riddell: no don't worry , I've homeworks to do, so I was offline ;) [14:01] bambee, yofel: uploading p-w-networkmanagement then, thanks for testing [14:01] yw :) [14:02] hi guys [14:02] i use natty and the new kubuntu-default-settings gives me the following eeror: [14:03] Setting up kubuntu-default-settings (1:11.04ubuntu8) ... [14:03] update-alternatives: error: alternative /etc/newt/palette.original for newt-palette not registered, not setting. [14:03] stefan`: known bug [14:03] i hope i'm not the [14:03] fix in progress [14:03] sorry ;) [14:03] thanks! [15:18] so are we going to use the new or old terminal color scheme? [15:19] http://bit.ly/fvm16s vs. http://bit.ly/dRF9yi [15:22] imho we should use the new one [15:23] the new one looks nicer, but isn't that grey a bit too bright? [15:23] overall I'm for the new one though [15:24] yofel: I think that was fixed: "Design team wanted a slightly different grey; more contrast when white on grey" [15:24] ah, then great :) [15:35] debfx: if we're going to use the design team's colour choice we may as well use the up to date version surely? [15:36] Riddell: yes, sure. I just don't have an updated screenshot [15:42] debfx: the new one looks better [15:45] what is CONFIG *= option in qmake .pro files and how is it different from += ? I could not find any reference to it via google [15:50] janimo: probably ask in #qt ? [15:50] janimo: I've never used qmake so I couldn't say [15:50] as shadeslayer says [15:50] generally if you have to start adding any config options qmake isn't the best build system for the job [15:51] ^^ true .. but CMake doesn't make the job any easier [15:51] Riddell, I was reading debian/rules which has these constructs. I'll ask in qt, thanks [15:52] janimo: for Qt itself or something else? [15:52] Riddell, no, mumble. It uses Qt [15:52] janimo: I think *= doesn't add duplicates [15:52] debfx, ah, that seems sensible. Altough I wonder why would duplicates hurt. [15:53] I'll use += for the option I am adding but wanted to make sure I don't overlook something [15:54] debfx, you're right. pointed to http://doc.trolltech.com/latest/qmake-advanced-usage.html from #qt [15:54] thanks [15:55] Hello [15:55] Just wanted to know if the Alha 3 for Kubuntu was usable [15:55] Mithrandir_: works quite fine for me [15:56] Mithrandir_: same here, try a livecd and check it out :) [15:56] note that it's still aplha though [15:56] Yes just wanted to know if it booted [15:57] boots good on i386 and amd64, less sure about arm or other arches [15:58] has there been any improvements that are notable forthe dailies or the last alpha release is close enough? [15:59] for installing the alpha should probably be less likely to be broken, after that you can just update [16:00] yofel: ah thanks [16:09] what is rosetta? [16:10] c2tarun: it's an old codename for Launchpad Translations [16:13] Riddell: you looked at the errors in two packages on that ec2 machine yesterday? [16:13] c2tarun: no I'm afraid i didn't [17:00] has anyone seen a problem in natty with kontact where if it starts before network is available it is never able to check mail? and clicking the red "-" in the status bit fails to work [17:03] oh and quiting kontact, then it won't start again? [17:04] this seems to be a problem with kontact rather than kmail as if on its own kmail behaivs properly === james147_ is now known as james147 [17:35] * debfx grabs akonadi 1.5.1 [17:39] how do I call a custom dh_* command with cdbs? [17:57] calling it in binary-install/akonadi-server seems to work [18:03] except kde-apps.org what other sites are there for announcing kde applications? [18:07] c2tarun: https://projects.kde.org/ [18:14] Riddell: libmygpo-qt should be fixed :) [18:23] Riddell: there is this application http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/cb2Bib?content=14148 I packed its new version, can you please upload it? here is the debdiff http://paste.ubuntu.com/583914/ [18:37] is firefox-kde-support compatible with firefox 4? [18:38] Can I apt-get install package=version.number ? [18:43] Better question. Sorry. WHy would apt-get recommend an older version of a package as the install candidate when a newer version has higher priority [18:46] Daskreech: is the newer version in repo? [18:46] http://paste.kde.org/7919/ [18:54] apparle: yes [18:54] Daskreech: the '/var/lib/dpkg/status' means it's only available locally, you can't get it anywhere. But that's usually the case for manually installed .deb files, not sure how you got that [18:55] Daskreech: and priority 100 is lower than 500 [19:10] debfx: just to make sure, firefox-kde-support in maverick works with https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable/ or are you talking about natty [19:12] apparle: firefox-kde-support hasn't changed since maverick so it should work fine [19:14] yofel: Oh thought it was higher [19:14] hmm [19:14] Oh that's right though didn't notice that didn't come from a repo [19:15] ah, and package=version will work as long as the package is available === real_ate_ is now known as real_ate