[01:14] <micahg> are we having a problem with the subscriber portlet?
[01:17] <micahg> wgrant: I seem to get Loading results failed when trying to subscrbie someone else
[01:22] <wgrant> micahg: What did you search for?
[01:23] <micahg> ubuntu-release
[01:24] <wgrant> micahg: That works OK for me.
[01:24] <wgrant> micahg: This happens before you get the list of results, right?
[01:53] <micahg> wgrant: sorry, my connection seems to be a little erratic, any ideas?
[01:53] <wgrant> 12:24:24 < wgrant> micahg: That works OK for me.
[01:53] <wgrant> 12:24:45 < wgrant> micahg: This happens before you get the list of results, right?
[01:54] <micahg> [20:30] <micahg> wgrant: yes
[01:54] <wgrant> micahg: Which browser are you using? After how long does it give the error?
[01:54] <micahg> firefox
[01:54] <micahg> let me see if I can reproduce
[01:54] <wgrant> Which Firefox?
[01:55] <micahg> wgrant: 4 in natty
[01:56] <micahg> wgrant: fails in about 3 seconds
[01:56] <micahg> bug 739869
[01:57] <wgrant> micahg: ubuntu-release is subscribed.
[01:57] <micahg> wgrant: I know, I did it through the non-ajax page
[01:57] <wgrant> But I can reproduce the "Loading results failed" here.
[01:57] <wgrant> Investigating.
[01:57] <micahg> \o/
[01:58] <wgrant> Ahh
[01:58] <ScottK> micahg: Your FFe is approved, BTW.
[01:58] <micahg> ScottK: thanks for the quick response :), now I have to find time to finish all these :)
[01:58] <ScottK> Gnash is an easy decision to make.
[02:04] <wgrant> Well, I am very confused.
[02:04] <wgrant> Somehow that bug, and only that bug, loses the last path segment.
[02:05] <lifeless> wgrant: say what now
[02:05] <wgrant> lifeless: Check the vocab request made when clicking "Subscribe someone else" on that bug.
[02:05] <wgrant> THen subtract one from the bug number.
[02:05] <wgrant> + enter a name after you click the link
[02:08] <mwhudson> that's pretty strange
[02:08] <wgrant> It is very strange.
[02:09]  * mwhudson hopes it's because the bug number is prime or something like that
[02:09] <wgrant> Heh
[02:11] <lifeless> mwhudson: its dividable by 3
[02:12] <mwhudson> oh yeah
[02:12] <mwhudson> how boring!
[06:02] <wgrant> micahg: That bug should be working again now, FWIW.
[13:49] <micahg> wgrant: thanks
[14:01] <NuB> G'day from New Zealand everyone. I have been trawling the forums & Launchpad to try to find an answer to my Ubuntu 10.04 LTS install. Closest answer I get is at: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+question/142663   but does not help me , as I do not have an "~/username/.ICEauthority file at all. Can anybody help me get a working Desktop?
[14:02] <NuB> Excuse my ignorance, but what does that ubot5 message mean?
[14:02] <JFo> NuB, you want #ubuntu for support
[14:03] <NuB> very sorry! please excuse me t.a. 'bye JFo
[14:03] <JFo> no problem NuB :)
[14:16] <d1b> this is probably a stupid question but what is the launchpad.net cookie called lp for? i have one with  path /api/devel and other with path /
[14:19] <maxb> It's your logged in session ID, and it's probably a harmless bug that it gets set on two different paths
[14:19] <d1b> and the domain is set to be .launchpad.net
[14:20] <d1b> is that really desired?
[14:20] <maxb> yes
[14:20] <maxb> Otherwise bugs. / answers. / code. etc. wouldn't work
[14:20] <d1b> fair enough
[14:20] <maxb> (One can have a separate discussion about whether spreading a web application's facets over multiple subdomains is actually sane :-) )
[14:22] <d1b> maxb: ah ok
[14:22] <d1b> maxb: right because then the security lunchpad guys should also look at  https://bugs.launchpad.net/loggerhead/+bug/740142
[14:23] <maxb> private bug, I can't see :-(
[14:26] <d1b> erh
[14:26] <d1b> that cookie isn't http only is it?
[14:26] <d1b> doesn't seem to be mmm
[14:28] <maxb> You raise a good point :-)
[14:28] <maxb> probably ought to be
[14:29] <maxb> wait, does httponly allow for it to be passed in XHRs to the origin server?
[14:41] <d1b> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/HttpOnly
[14:42] <d1b> that's probably one of the best sources of information for this
[16:38] <triune> quick question: anyone know the status of LP polls? are they still in consideration for being deprecated?
[17:18] <jcsackett> triune: polls were removed and then restored in january, when certain groups expressed a need for them.
[17:22] <triune> so, what does this mean for them being around in the long run?
[17:26] <jcsackett> triune: they exist basically for those groups that said they needed them, but they are deprecated.
[17:29] <triune> thanks for making that clear
[17:46] <jcsackett> triune: you're welcome.
[17:53] <leagris> Hello
[18:00] <leagris> today I was hit by https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/434733, I wonder if I should start dancing humba lumba or givup as there is really nothing I can do besides eating the frustrating duplicate of a private bug.
[23:43] <komputes> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-beginners-wiki-sod/+bug/738023 seems like spam